5 Frames from a cheap and simple camera – and a very rare one too

By Chris Giles

A while back I picked up a job lot of three cameras for not much money. The one I was after was a Konica C35 EF – which did prove to be exactly what I wanted, but that is another story. Of the other cameras, one was a Kodak Instamatic 155X while the third was unknown to me, an odd looking thing. It is branded a Neo Fot A and was made in Denmark. While there is not much information online, it appears it was designed by a Danish engineer Kaj Hyllestad, who opened a factory in Copenhagen in 1946 to produce the relatively low cost camera for the local market. The venture apparently met with some success selling more than 25,000 units over the years it was produced. It is not clear when production ceased, however, according to Collectiblend, it is now a very rare camera. The original owner of this particular camera was from the Netherlands, bringing it with him to New Zealand when he immigrated in the 1950s. It had been in the family since then, but not used for many years.

I think most would agree it is not a pretty camera; a bulky Bakelite body with a fixed protruding lens barrel gives it a rather odd look. It uses 120 film set up for 16 frames of 4.5 x 6 negatives and  has absolutely no frills. There is a fixed focus lens with a simple guillotine shutter operating at about 1/50, although it does have and I and T options. The viewfinder is a basic portrait format frame with glass on one face.  To load film, the back is opened by inserting a coin in a slot on the side and levering it open. Once loaded, the back is then pushed and clipped on and film advanced with the large knob on the side.

Given the apparent market success I was interested in how it actually performed. So, presented with a sunny autumn day at Castlepoint, a small community on New Zealand’s North Island east coast, I loaded a roll of Kentmere 100 and did a walk around. The camera initially felt a bit awkward, but holding the barrel with the right hand and operating the shutter with the thumb worked for me. Other than keeping the camera steady and the sun over the shoulder, it was point and shoot, an enjoyable experience just thinking about composing the image. And in the end, the rudimentary view finder proved to be accurate enough for the job.

The results were quite pleasing, sharp enough in the mid to foreground, with a decent tonal range and no obvious vignettes or light leaks. One could see how the Neo Fot could be very satisfactory for capturing the family snapshots back in the early 50s, and I imagine getting 16 frames from a roll of film was a bonus too.  So given the limited choices at the time it was not surprising it sold reasonably well in it’s own market.

Share this post:

About The Author

By Chris Giles
I started taking photographs at high school with a 126 camera and moved on to second hand SLRs when I started earning. My first new camera was a Fujica ST801 which I carried around the world for five years. Totally reliable, I still have it and it still works. Then career & family demands pushed photography into the background for a couple of decades, until recently unearthing my old cameras and firing them up – hooked again! Besides taking and developing photographs, I am also enjoying bringing old cameras back to life.
Read More Articles From Chris Giles

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
If you think £2.99 a month is too little, then please subscribe and I can manually edit the subscription value for you – thank you very much in advance if this is what you would like to do!

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Stephen Hanka on 5 Frames from a cheap and simple camera – and a very rare one too

Comment posted: 03/11/2025

Nicely done!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Gary Smith on 5 Frames from a cheap and simple camera – and a very rare one too

Comment posted: 03/11/2025

It is shown in the 12th edition of McKeown's with an image and minimal information. They suggest that it was produced between 1946 and 1951 but they don't list total production and they seem pretty loose on the certainty of their dates. They also hint at some variation although this is again hazy. It seems as if your example takes reasonable photos and it looks to be in great shape. Thanks for sharing!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Tony Warren on 5 Frames from a cheap and simple camera – and a very rare one too

Comment posted: 03/11/2025

Nice story Chris and right up my street. I am always impressed by the performance of these very simple cameras which were unashamedly aimed at producing acceptable album prints in good light. These would have appeared sharper than here I imagine at no more than half the size here. A contact print would be even smaller. As you say, this one is sharp in mid distances, just the area a family would want recorded most of the time. And quite neat, functinal design too for its time.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *