A Travel Through Time, Stupidity and Power

By Andrea Monti

This panoramic photo, taken with an iPhone, shows the four corners of a square in my hometown. As such, the photo has no particular merit or quality that justifies its public release. However, it is historically and culturally significant, as it shows how architecture marks the passing of time and the persistence of stupidity.

The oldest buildings (the second and the fourth) are similar in appearance. Dating from the early 20th century, they give an idea of the town’s original character. One is still privately owned and the other houses the local chamber of commerce.

Then came the second wave: the building on the far left in the style of the 1970s replaced the original façade. This was the first step in changing the identity of this crossroads (and indeed the whole town).

The third building from the left is the final phase of this identity distortion: a glass-and-steel box built with modern cities in mind. It is not the worst piece of architecture conceivable, but it is clearly out of context.

And here’s the catch: the inability to preserve this place’s original architecture led to its complete loss of identity. However, this crossroads acquired symbolic value for the very same reason: a testament to the ignorance of those in power locally.

Unless they booked the wrong Ryanair flight thinking it was headed to Rome, I don’t think anyone would be interested in spending time here. But just in case, it’s worth visiting this open-air exhibition of the power of stupidity.

Share this post:

About The Author

By Andrea Monti
My name is Andrea Monti. I’m an Italian free-lance journalist, photographer and – in my spare time – an hi-tech lawyer. The works I am more proud of are covering live jazz, pop and rock concerts for an Italian online music magazine and Opera and prose for a 200 years-old theatre. I also do sport photography mainly in athletics and fighting disciplines. You may find out more about me on https://andrea.monti.photography
Read More Articles From Andrea Monti

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
If you think £2.99 a month is too little, then please subscribe and I can manually edit the subscription value for you – thank you very much in advance if this is what you would like to do!

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Gioacchino Artesiano Pagliuca on A Travel Through Time, Stupidity and Power

Comment posted: 17/09/2025

If we then add the roundabouts, which are seen in the foreground, intersected by a road, we reach the maximum...!!!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain on A Travel Through Time, Stupidity and Power

Comment posted: 17/09/2025

I couldn't agree more with you man
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


JA on A Travel Through Time, Stupidity and Power

Comment posted: 17/09/2025

Styles come and go. None of those buildings look particularly special. They are just the style of a time there will have been people bemoaning they modern buildings and the changes they represent when the first ones were built.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Michael Keppler on A Travel Through Time, Stupidity and Power

Comment posted: 17/09/2025

In an age increasingly marked by division and hatred, it would be nice if photography, and especially a site devoted mainly to analogue photography, could remain a refuge and a place of common ground.

Architecture always reflects the era in which it was created. The building on the left, which originated in a democratic Italy, may not be considered beautiful, but it certainly offers very practical flats that are designed to meet human needs. Perhaps even better than supposedly more beautiful older buildings from a time when only a privileged few were allowed to live in dignified conditions. Of course, the architecture of recent decades has left behind many architectural eyesores, but to accuse administrative staff, who in a democratic and capitalist society may have only limited influence, of stupidity across the board, goes too far for me and does not correspond to my experience.
Many old buildings that we consider beautiful today were highly controversial at the time of their construction. And sometimes we humans make mistakes that we have to correct later.
Other times, all it takes is openness and curiosity to discover beauty in the seemingly ugly. For a photographer, that could also be an exciting challenge
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Andrea Monti replied:

Comment posted: 17/09/2025

I am not talking about - and I am not interested in - the economics and politics of urban renovation. My point is very simple: the identity of a place is formed through consistency. In other words, what transforms an area filled with haphazardly designed objects into a 'place' is the consistency of what is built there. What makes a place you belong 'a place'? The fact that it does not change over time, or that he preserves its roots while changing. When you come back 'home' after having spent years elsewhere, what makes you feel you are at home is that you find an environment that connects you with your personal and collective past. Architectural consistency over time is what enables a place to evolve while maintaining its identity. However, of course also flattening a place and rebuilding it from scratch can give it a new soul. What I find disturbing is the middle ground: allowing unrelated pieces of architecture to be built without reason. This does not happen by chance or by divine intervention, but because of the deliberate choice of the local authorities, who repeatedly allowed development to take place without having an idea of what a city should be —or become. In other words, I would have understood if an area was entirely reshaped in worship of an idea, no matter how questionable — say, Brutalism. As bad as the results may be, they are — at the very least — the outcome of a cultural endeavour. However, that did not happen in the case of this photo.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


JA replied:

Comment posted: 17/09/2025

If its about consistency we would be stuck with everything thats has come before, stifled by our past and restricted in progressing. You can take the consistency further. Why did you use a phone? Should have used a plate camera for the oldest buildings, a medium format for the 70s one and possibly your phone for the most modern. If you don't you are forcing everyone to look through the lens of 2025 Glancing at the comments. It would appear that your opinion isn't really shared, with no personal history of the place we just see a fairly normal (and natural) progression of a generic junction which to you is, perhaps, jarring.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Hume on A Travel Through Time, Stupidity and Power

Comment posted: 18/09/2025

Yes, I think Andrea’s proclamation of this architecture as an exhibition of stupidity is unfortunate and ironic.

Unfortunate, because it lacks encouragement for us to think more deeply about the sociological and technical developments that shaped these changes.

Ironic, because there are surely more factors at play than power and stupidity. By making a sweeping pronouncement without considering those factors, Andrea risks falling into the very trap he criticises: acting on a strong opinion without room for other viewpoints.

But that’s not really what prompted me to write. What struck me was Andrea’s comment: “As such, the photo has no particular merit or quality that justifies its public release. However, it is historically and culturally significant, as it shows how architecture marks the passing of time …” (and I’d leave off the bit about stupidity).

That, to me, is interesting. It raises the possibility that a photograph could be made that presents this situation in a visually engaging way. One that shows the juxtapositions and invites the viewer to consider the changes, form an opinion, enter a discussion.

The thought I had was, "Hmm - four styles on four corners of a square; that's a neat opportunity...how would you make a photograph that actually says all that?" I agree the pano shot doesn’t really do it. But perhaps it’s a subject worth further thought?
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Andrea Monti replied:

Comment posted: 18/09/2025

I understand from your comment that I did not explain clearly my point. My bad. Please read the answer I just gave to Michael, where I hope I clarified the purpose of the post.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Tony Warren on A Travel Through Time, Stupidity and Power

Comment posted: 18/09/2025

Andrea, I am or was an architect, retired now for over 20 years. I quite agree that the earliest building exhibits a character and style that would have had some identity with its location. Design and materials tended to reflect local tastes and available materials and methods. The left hand building seems to have some affinity with the earlier ones, but tenuous at best. The most modern one is an attempt at modernity and out of character with its surroundings. My training impressed the need to respect location and surroundings but that no longer seems to matter at all. I suppose it boils down to changing fashion but I am sure it a loss nevertheless.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Michael Jardine on A Travel Through Time, Stupidity and Power

Comment posted: 18/09/2025

It's terrible, having to look at something every day that strikes one as just wrong. Architecture is a difficult business- the individuals, or councils or committees composed of individuals, that make the wrong or right decision have to keep hold of so many parameters obviously concerned with practicality and cost but there are a load of bits to do with qualities and feelings and 'rightness' that someone needs to make sure aren't lost in the heat and noise.

There was a wonderful Italian thinker and architect called Aldo Rossi who alas is remembered to an extent with mockery as associated with a stylistic direction that hasn't aged all that well- his writing on precisely these matters of urbanism and heirarchy would I think address the issues of this place, and Andrea wouldn't have to read them in English translation like I did!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Gary Smith on A Travel Through Time, Stupidity and Power

Comment posted: 19/09/2025

Or, you are there with the place over time and as you age, the place also ages and changes. Just as I look in the mirror each day, I haven't changed in the last 50 years or so (at least inside my head).
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *