Reflections on an Impromptu Photo Shoot

By David Pauley

At this stage, it happens fairly often: a conversation with a stranger that eventually leads to a photo. Sometimes I approach them, though often it’s the other way around. Drawn to the vintage gear – true especially if I am carrying one of my Rolleiflexes – someone asks a question and eventually becomes curious about having their portrait taken.

This might be rather annoying if I were a landscape or architectural photographer. But as a generalist who ventures into street photography, I have come to view such moments as gifts. Even in the harried world of New York City, a dialogue between strangers sometimes unfolds, lasting long enough on occasion for me to make a series of photos.

These impromptu photo shoots are not only enjoyable for me but are becoming more and more common in my work. The people I’m photographing are typically not folks I might meet in my ordinary daily routines. Sometimes our conversations are perfunctory, other times quite animated; these emotions often find their way into the frame. My favorite moment is when they offer a thought about something they might do to help a picture click. To me this reflects their investment in making something meaningful.

I generally share my contact info and offer to send scans or darkroom prints. It can be interesting to see who takes me up on the offer of a print versus the many people who are satisfied with a digital capture.

Sometimes folks ask me what I do with the photos, a question that stumps me. As I am not on social media, the answer used to be “nothing,” though I suppose this can change now that I share my work here on 35mmc. Over time I have come to realize that these photo sessions help me to experience myself in a different way. The prints and the binders of negatives, like the shelves of ceramics in a potter’s studio, give weight and substance to my life as a photographer.

The following series, seven photos including the featured image, happened as I struck up conversation recently with a young man on a subway bound deep into Brooklyn. He noticed the old film camera (a screw-mount Leica) in my hands, while I noticed and liked his look, especially his long, tufted chin-beard, which seemed like it must be a point of pride (he later said that it was). He kindly agreed to my request for a photo:

As we spoke further about his day and the meeting he’d just come from, he talked about having done some modeling in the past and seemed excited at the prospect of making more photos.

This led to two sets of images. The first, on the train platform at the terminus of the Q line, was taken with the same Leica on color film (Kodak UltraMax 400):

 


Gathering momentum – this first set felt like a warmup – I asked if he would be willing to pose for a few more shots with the other camera I had kept until then in my bag, my 1960 Tele-Rolleiflex (my absolute favorite camera for portraits).

We did these shots outdoors in the noonday sun on the Coney Island Boardwalk. While the close-framing 135mm f4 Zeiss Sonnar lens removed much of the context — the photos in fact could have been taken anywhere — I think this second set captured something significant about him, or at least about how I’d come to perceive the 25 year-old as our conversation drew to a close. For me his Prince Regent’s bearing, latent in the other images, is at last revealed in the set’s final shot, hands down my favorite of the day.

A roll of Tri-X 400 and twenty minutes later, we’d finished the impromptu photo session and each moved on with the afternoon.

Technical notes: color photos were shot with a 1933 Leica III on Kodak UltraMax 400 using a Canon LTM 50mm f1.4 lens; monochrome images are from Tri-X 400 negatives shot on a 1960 Tele-Rolleiflex whose native lens is the venerable 135mm f4 Zeiss Sonnar. Negatives were processed and scanned at home with a Fujifilm XT-50 mirrorless camera and 200mm f2.8  Fujinon macro lens, converted with the FilmLab app and lightly adjusted/color corrected in Photoshop. The developer used for the black and white negatives was Kodak HC-110.

Share this post:

About The Author

By David Pauley
I'm a Brooklyn-based photographer and psychoanalyst. My journey with photography began in middle school in the late 1970s and revived in 2019 when I bought a used film camera and installed a darkroom in my basement. For 2025 I've decided to use just one camera, a Rolleiflex 2.8F, to document the year. While I am not on social media, you can reach me at [email protected].
Read More Articles From David Pauley

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
If you think £2.99 a month is too little, then please subscribe and I can manually edit the subscription value for you – thank you very much in advance if this is what you would like to do!

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Ibraar Hussain on Reflections on an Impromptu Photo Shoot

Comment posted: 24/09/2025

David, you’re brave - I’d never have the courage to even talk about the camera I had. Must be something about being in London and turning into a misanthrope! Hehe!
Excellent photography - the look of the color has a timeless look to it - and the lad is very photogenic.
The b and w in particular is exceptional - I at first thought it was 35mm but I am assuming the ‘scanning’ produced the oblong crop ? Or was that intentional?
Great stuff as usual. The developer really makes the film shine - I think I’ll
Need to stop being lazy and try some

Thanks again man
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 24/09/2025

(I’d assumed the square photos were crops and the oblong one the actual frame) but looking at them again they’re obviously 6x6

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Adrien Grelet on Reflections on an Impromptu Photo Shoot

Comment posted: 24/09/2025

Really Nice shots ! I'm like Ibraar too. The next step for me is to engage conversation with strangers and try some portraits too !
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Hamish Gill on Reflections on an Impromptu Photo Shoot

Comment posted: 24/09/2025

Bloody brilliant!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *