Leica IIIa and 50mm Elmar – The Pleasures and Challenges of a Barnack Leica

By Curtis Heikkinen

I’ve posted a number of pieces on this site, all but one featuring images from my Leica M3 with a Zeiss 50 mm F2 lens.  That set up has been my primary one for film photography.  Recently, though, I became interested in the Leicas that preceded the M mount cameras, the so-called Barnack Leicas.  The more I read about them, the more intrigued I became.  I found a Leica llla at Blue Moon Camera in Portland, Oregon, that was represented to be in excellent condition and fully functional.  I decided to purchase it.  These old Leicas are a relative bargain compared to most Leicas.  One can get a relatively inexpensive setup without too much difficulty, at least I did.  I knew I wanted a vintage lens for the llla and settled on a classic pairing, an Elmar 50mm F3.5 collapsible lens, which I obtained through a very reputable site for vintage film equipment, Victory Camera in Colorado.  I gather a lot of the old Elmar lenses are not in great condition, but this one was in excellent shape.  The llla was manufactured in 1937 and the Elmar in 1950.  Of all my film gear, this was by far my oldest setup.  I was very excited to work with this primitive gear.

What follows is not a review, per se.  I’m not qualified to provide one.  Besides, there is plenty of information about this gear online and from people far more experienced than I am.  What I am attempting in this piece is to detail my reaction to the llla and Elmar F3.5, relating my experience with this equipment and what has been challenging and what I love about this setup.  With all this in mind, I will proceed.

I knew from reading about the llla and the Elmar that using this equipment would be much different from shooting with the M3.  The llla is a quirky camera.  The first problem that I encountered was something I did not anticipate.  That was forgetting to extend the lens.  The first roll I loaded was largely useless due to failure to extend the lens.  If you don’t extend the lens, you get this.

I felt so stupid that I had neglected to do something as basic as not extending the lens.  The only thing I can say in my defense is that I had never used a collapsible lens before.  I have since concentrated on making sure the Elmar is extended before  pressing the shutter button.  I leave the lens extended as much as I can.  I have read that it is possible to burn a hole in the shutter cloth if the lens cap is not left on the Elmar lens.  I like to leave my lens cap off the lenses of my Leicas as much as possible because I have an annoying tendency to leave them on when I am taking pictures.  Leave a lens cap on when you take a picture and you end up with nothing.  I generally have the Elmar stopped down and pointed to the ground so I have not experienced any issues so far with leaving the lens cap off.

I knew that loading the camera might present some issues since you must cut a roll of film to make a longer leader.  That hasn’t been much of a problem, though loading the camera takes longer than with the M3.  One issue I’ve encountered  is that a couple of my rolls apparently did not advance properly. On the llla, all three dials of the top of the camera, the film advance, shutter speed and rewind dials, should turn when you take a shot and advance the film.  The film is properly loaded if all three dials move.  On a number of rolls this did not occur immediately.  I was not concerned because the rewind dial on my M3 usually does not move immediately but does so after several exposures.  I assumed the llla would do the same.  Unfortunately, on two rolls, the rewind dial did not move until after many attempted exposures.  When I had the film developed, one roll had hardly any usable exposures and only about half of the intended exposures on the other actually produced an image.  After watching some online videos, I learned that when loading film on the llla you should turn the rewind dial to take up slack and create tension.  That seems to have resolved the issue.

One of the great things about the M3 is the large viewfinder where you can focus and compose all on one screen.  On the llla, focusing and composing are done on two separate, and very small, screens.  I wear eyeglasses so focusing and composing is a bit of a challenge.  But one gets used to it.  On the plus side, the composing screen is quite bright.  Some people have expressed concern about scratching eyeglass lenses using the llla.  So far that has not happened to me.

As for the Elmar lens, I like it, though changing the aperture on the lens is not at all convenient.  That must be done by moving the small dial on the front of the lens with you fingernail.  It has taken some time to get used to this.  On a sunny day, using the lens is easier.  Just set the aperature once to F16 and rely on the Sunny 16 rule.  In changeable light, though, when more frequent aperture changes may be required, the lens presents more of an issue.  But, again, this is something you get used to.  One other thing to note is that the focusing dial on the lens has a long throw.  It is not ideal but once again, it is not that difficult to adjust to.

Everything about the llla and the Elmar 50 mm F3.5 is slow, even more so than my Yashica D TLR,  which also requires a deliberate, slow-paced style of photography.  So why put up with all the quirks and hassles of a primitive 1930s camera?  First and foremost, I really like the results I get from this camera and lens.  I also love the way the camera looks and feels.  It is smaller and lighter than the M3 and feels really nice in the hand.  The build quality is excellent.  It is simply fun to use such vintage gear.  I am in no rush taking pictures so the fact that using this camera and lens is a slow process makes little difference to me.  If I do my job correctly, all the hassles are worth it.  The following are some color images from the llla using mostly Kodak UltraMax 400 with a few Fugifilm 400 exposures mixed in.



Of course, where my setup really excels is with black and white film.  The following were all taken with Ilford XP2.  I loved the results.  I particularly like the sharpness and contrast of the exposures.  A few architectural shots from downtown Portland to start.





Next are a few shots from Saturday Market in downtown Portland, including a couple of musicians providing atmosphere to this weekly marketplace of locally grown fruits and vegetables, among other items.



Next are some images taken inside an historic courthouse in downtown Portland.  The Elmar lens did a nice job in these interior locations.

 

Finally,  some miscellaneous shots from various locations.

So, they are slow, quirky, fussy, fiddly and inconvenient.  Yet, the Leica llla and Elmar 50mm F3.5 collapsible lens are a fun, compelling pair capable of some really good results if you keep your wits about you, take your time, do your job properly and simply revel in a very old-fashioned photography experience.  Much as I love my M3, I think I enjoy the older Leica even more.  Sure there are challenges, but the joys of old-time photography outweigh the hassles.

Go ahead and give this equipment a try, even if you wear glasses like I do.  Thanks for reading this. If you get a chance, you might check out CurtisHeikkinen.smugmug.com or @curtisheikkinen on Instagram.

Share this post:

About The Author

By Curtis Heikkinen
Born and raised in Vermont, I have lived in Oregon for the past 44 years. Besides photography, I enjoy kayaking, hiking, bird watching and snowshoeing. Film photography is my current passion. I have also published several photo books of my work.
Read More Articles From Curtis Heikkinen

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
If you think £2.99 a month is too little, then please subscribe and I can manually edit the subscription value for you – thank you very much in advance if this is what you would like to do!

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Bill Thomas on Leica IIIa and 50mm Elmar – The Pleasures and Challenges of a Barnack Leica

Comment posted: 25/07/2025

Enjoyed your story on the Leica IIIa with the 50/3.5 Elmar. As shown in your photos the lens is a very good performer with excellent sharpness. I have had the same setup, IIIa and 50/3.5 Elmar, for well over thirty years. It works perfectly and is a joy to use!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Curtis Heikkinen replied:

Comment posted: 25/07/2025

Thank you for the comment! I was a bit surprised at how much I have enjoyed this setup. It is easy to make a mistake but the equipment is a lot of fun to use.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jeffery Luhn on Leica IIIa and 50mm Elmar – The Pleasures and Challenges of a Barnack Leica

Comment posted: 25/07/2025

A friend loaned me his Leica IIIf recently. I wanted to like it. I tried to like it. I didn't like it. Why? Firstly, loading the camera was a chore until I did the research and found out about the need to trim the leader. Secondly, and most importantly, focusing is difficult. The rangefinder window is tiny and useless in low light. Once you get it 'focused' you have to view the frame through the other equally tiny window. There's nothing to recommend that design. All of my subjects closer than 12 feet were mis focused, despite agonizing over the operation. If I can't reliably shoot people, like I can with my Zeiss Contessa, Ikonta, or Russian Fed 3. What's the upside of a LeicaIIIF?
I applaud your enthusiasm, but cannot agree with the design decisions of Leica. Different strokes for different folks.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jeffery Luhn replied:

Comment posted: 25/07/2025

Additional: I should have begun my negative comments by complimenting you on your photos. They are better than good.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Curtis Heikkinen replied:

Comment posted: 25/07/2025

Glad you liked the images, Jeffrey, and I appreciate your adding the second comment. Thanks for your thoughts. Without a doubt the Barnack Leicas are not easy to use and have some significant limitations, many of which were corrected by the M series cameras like the M3. I have a number of film cameras so I certainly don’t use this setup exclusively. I am mindful of what it can and can’t do. I have made a number of errors with the llla and Elmar as I noted in the piece. Despite all the hassles of using such a primitive system, I really enjoy the look, feel and especially the results I get from the camera. The Barnacks are certainly an acquired taste and definitely not for everyone. Thanks for providing your input. I’m sorry your Barnack did not work out for you.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Michael Flory on Leica IIIa and 50mm Elmar – The Pleasures and Challenges of a Barnack Leica

Comment posted: 25/07/2025

You've achieved such spectacular results here that I'm inspired to get my IIIf off the shelf. But I wouldn't feel bad about the roll taken with the unextended lens. I think the shot you posted is a beautiful abstract composition, an impressionist's view of a path through the woods!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Curtis Heikkinen replied:

Comment posted: 25/07/2025

Thank you so much, Michael! So glad you liked the images. I am also happy you see some value in the “botched” image. I have not deleted the images taken while the lens was not extended, thinking, like you, that there is some beauty in them. Thanks for the comment!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PASCAL on Leica IIIa and 50mm Elmar – The Pleasures and Challenges of a Barnack Leica

Comment posted: 25/07/2025

I have liked your article very much, as I too have acquired recently a Leica IIIa and have exactly the same feeling as you about it. By the way, I too have the habit of forgetting the cap on the lens sometimes, whatever camera I use!
Your images are magnificent, and I also had a look to your website : I like a lot what you do !
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Curtis Heikkinen replied:

Comment posted: 25/07/2025

Thank you so much, Pascal! I really appreciate the comments! So glad you checked out my website. It is nice to hear that I am not the only one who leaves the lens cap on. :)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scott Ferguson on Leica IIIa and 50mm Elmar – The Pleasures and Challenges of a Barnack Leica

Comment posted: 25/07/2025

Hi Curtis,
Great post and great photos. I'm glad you're enjoying the iiia. I was nosing around a Barnack midwinter and actually bought a 1950's iiif that was in beautiful condition. I had a weekend to shoot a couple of test rolls and run them through a 24 drugstore photo lab to see if it worked for me. To try it out, I also bought a 1949 Summitar 50mm f2, which was recommended to me by a somewhat legendary Leica tech, Sherry Krauter. One roll came out ok when I was shooting indoors, but when I took it outside it was unbelievably bitter cold that weekend in Canada, and I couldn't work the camera without taking my gloves off and risking frostbite within a few minutes. I think I messed up the tension on the film and ended up with a roll of unexposed frames. Between that and that I also felt like I couldn't fall in love with the viewfinder system on the Barnack, I decided that body was not for me, so I returned it. I ended up keeping the lens, and it has become my favorite 50mm on my M3. I'm glad it's working so well for you. I wanted to love it, but I think the M3 is the right body for me.
Cheers,
s
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Curtis Heikkinen replied:

Comment posted: 25/07/2025

Thank you very much, Scott! I’ve not had the llla out in adverse conditions so I don’t know how it would do. I know my M3 can handle snow and cold. I love my M3 but have found that the llla is a nice complement to it. I see that you had problems with tension on a roll. I think I have that issue solved, at least I hope so. Again, thanks for the kind words and input about your experience.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith on Leica IIIa and 50mm Elmar – The Pleasures and Challenges of a Barnack Leica

Comment posted: 25/07/2025

I have a iiic with a 50/2 Summicron. The lens cap fits so tightly that I'd be hard pressed to forget to extend the lens since taking the cap off usually does that.

Blue Moon is a true "candy store".
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Curtis Heikkinen replied:

Comment posted: 25/07/2025

Yes, Blue Moon is fantastic. They have some great equipment and do a nice job developing film as well. I have that Summicron but have it on my M3. Thanks for the comment!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Wayne Duerfeldt on Leica IIIa and 50mm Elmar – The Pleasures and Challenges of a Barnack Leica

Comment posted: 25/07/2025

Hi Curtis,
Outstanding photos! I wish I could do as well. I have a IIIf with a Summitar f/2. I’ve owned it for over 30+ years (longer than the original owner). I too like how it feels in my hands. When the pandemic hit I dent it out for a CLA. The beam splitter ( may not be the correct term) was replaced. This made a huge impact on focusing. The film loading, extending the lens, and removing the lens cap issues are all very familiar. But when you get it right, as you have, it’s a great feeling.
Good shooting and don’t give up on the little Leica.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Curtis Heikkinen replied:

Comment posted: 25/07/2025

Thank you so very much, Wayne! Really appreciate the comment!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren on Leica IIIa and 50mm Elmar – The Pleasures and Challenges of a Barnack Leica

Comment posted: 25/07/2025

Great post Curtis and the images are exactly what I associate with Leitz glass. That clean, sharp, totally corrected result that really makes them stand out. You are after all using something designed well over 100 years ago, the very firast of its type so there is never going to be the facility of a more modern camera. Jumping through the hoops is worth the effort when you can have results like these. Great work.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Curtis Heikkinen replied:

Comment posted: 25/07/2025

Thanks so much for the kind words, Tony! I really appreciate them! You make a great point about this old technology. You have to expect some hurdles to overcome. I was surprised at how capable the camera can be if used properly. Not for everyone of course. But if you accept its limitations and inconveniences and simply revel in using such venerable old equipment, it is a lot of fun to use the camera. Again, thanks so much!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Michael Jardine on Leica IIIa and 50mm Elmar – The Pleasures and Challenges of a Barnack Leica

Comment posted: 25/07/2025

These are really lovely photos- congratulations!
You put me to shame- I have a Canon IV (postwar Japanese copy of your Leica III) that's been in bits for far longer than is wise for something that I really want to try and use. I need to build up the courage to replace the shutter curtains, with glue and needle-and-thread. I WILL PREVAIL! The Canon has the advantage of one finder window and although it would as likely as not have had a collapsible lens when new, I have a sweet little Canon 50/f1.8 to go on it (and a rotten Jupiter-8 that came with the camera and which I've cleaned up as much as I can). Your confessional shot from the unextended lens looks alarmingly like the computerised eye-test machine before it's whirred and clicked to tell me how appalling my eyesight is. :)
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Curtis Heikkinen replied:

Comment posted: 25/07/2025

Hey, thanks a bunch, Michael! Glad you liked the photos! Hope you get the Canon IV up and going. Thanks so much for your comment!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Geoff Chaplin on Leica IIIa and 50mm Elmar – The Pleasures and Challenges of a Barnack Leica

Comment posted: 26/07/2025

Brilliant images! Excellent "review" of the camera - but you forgot to mention the main benefit: compactness. Slips into the pocket with the lens collapsed. Also the range finder focussing lever can be a major advantage of you use several different spectacles, or none. Yes, your lens cap and non-extension of the lens are mistakes I'm very familiar with - largely now in the past. I prefer the iiig partly because it's so much easier to find one in really good condition. Did you use a tripod for the interior images? Thanks for a great article.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Curtis Heikkinen replied:

Comment posted: 26/07/2025

Wow! Thank you so very much for the very kind words! So glad you liked what the camera produced. Yes, you are very correct in mentioning the compactness of the camera and lens. I neglected to mention that. I actually did not use a tripod for any of the images. Everything was the result of a handheld camera, including the interior shots. I opened up the lens, used the slowest shutter speed I dared to, and relied on what light I had. Again, I so appreciate the encouraging and kind words.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *