One By Four – A One Shot Story told by four photographers – Part 1

By Scott Ferguson

First, I’d like to thank my fellow 35mmc contributors David Pauley, David Hume and Dean Lawrence for having the temerity to quadruple down on the idea of a dialogue-driven post on 35mmc, in this case a One Shot Story, in which four photographers will take turns discussing a single image amongst themselves.  With contributors from Australia, the UK and Brooklyn, here we go with a virtual global studio visit…

SCOTT: This photo QUINCEANERA, DUMBO 8/3/25, is part of an ongoing series of photos of people getting their photos taken within the two or three block radius of my place in Brooklyn.  Because of its NYC skyline backdrops, the neighborhood is a magnet for photography, from the ubiquitous iphone selfies to high end professional fashion or advertising shoots, with lots of wedding photos in between.

Here, perhaps a little perversely, I’m shooting directly away from the famous view of the Empire State Building framed by the stanchions of the Manhattan Bridge and from behind the main subject of both my photo and that of the photographer in the mid ground, a young woman dressed in a gown fit for a Disney princess, presumably for her Quinceanera also called a ‘Fifteen’ in some parts of the world, a tradition in the Latin community commemorating a woman’s fifteenth birthday.  I was intrigued by the juxtaposition of her glittering finery fit for a Hollywood red carpet while the other people in the shot go about their less glamorous days absorbed in their own little bubbles.  Literally no-one is looking at her — not even her photographer who is fiddling with his camera. Is this what she thought her big day and rite of passage would be like?  Is there just a touch of impatience in the posture of her head and shoulders while she waits for the photographer to take another shot?

DEAN: I’ve had a few days to think about this image now, to absorb all that is going on within the frame. Before your image I’d never heard of the ‘Fifteen’ ( my spelling is atrocious so I’ll stick to the simple words), and for this girl/young lady, is she thinking, well this is dull? Unlike so many people in the frame she can’t even kill time on her phone. Her dress is spectacular, she should be surrounded by finery and elegance. Instead as you mention, her posture seems not joyful in the slightest.

DAVID H: I think this shot is made stronger by knowing that it’s part of an intended series. The question then becomes do we need to be told this, and are we viewing it with that knowledge or as an image by itself? And how much in general should we be told about a photograph and how much should we be able to read from it? I think what I take from it in isolation is the girl is standing there in a moment that is quite perfect to her but which no one else really gives a toss about.

DAVID P: This photo is perhaps a bit more familiar to me than to others as I live within a mile or two of where it was taken. I can tell by the fade of the light that this must have been taken at  the golden hour with the sun getting ready to sink behind Manhattan at the subject’s (and viewer’s) back. So there’s an additional drama there offstage, a sense of being in the gloaming with the radiant lacy dress as the focal point as night falls.

DAVID HUME: Circling back to my point, the fact that she is being photographed with the Empire State Building as a backdrop is something that I needed to be told and it changes the image a lot. It makes more sense of it. Without that knowledge the girl is just standing in the middle of a busy street and you wonder why.  Technically? Not much to say. The shot is nice. It’s not a high impact photograph. To me it seems like it’s done with a view to treating the medium with respect and getting a lot out of it in a traditional sense of what people expect from a nice negative that captures the tones. I think this is probably less important to a viewer than it is to you, except that there are no technical faults that would be distracting.

DAVID P: I think what draws my interest in the photo — perhaps even more so than the extravagant dress, or the shapely young woman wearing it — is as others have commented about that extent to which it is a photograph about photography. The Quinceañera has either happened or is about to happen, again somewhere outside this frame in space and time, but what’s happening here is the more ordinary lull between takes with a camera, a moment I’m sure we all can relate to as photographers and photographic subjects.

DAVID H: In terms of framing/composition, I would prefer to see a lower viewpoint so that the girl’s head is elevated in the frame and does not disappear into the sea of other heads. But then there is the obvious constraint of working within the time allowed because I’m assuming that you would not be “that guy” who stood in the background behind the girl sticking a ‘Blad in the face of the other photographer and getting in his shot, so it needs to be a quick candid capture between the frames made by the other photographer and that is made trickier using manual focus medium format.

SCOTT:  First everyone, thanks for the very interesting reactions.  Re-framing the way you, David H,  suggest is a really interesting thought to consider.   I think it would certainly make it a stronger composition graphically and give the girl a bit more of a heroic stature and single her out more as the subject of the photo.  Subtextually, I’d have to think about it a minute because I think the unconscious story of the photo is that despite the trappings of a celebrity photo, she’s really one of the many people going about their day on the street, so ‘leveling’ everyone might be part of what I’m trying to say with the photo.

DAVID P: I feel ill equipped to intelligently comment on the specific meaning of the photos as I am not from a Latino/X background and don’t have the cultural vocabulary even for “sweet sixteen” parties, let alone Quinceañeras. (I am sure Scott will do his homework if this becomes a more substantial series and we will learn more about the specific meanings of such events in different Latin and South Americans cultures).
SCOTT: To clarify, the ‘series’ is not about Quinceanera’s per se.  Nor is it really a formal disciplined ‘project’ that has an intended final form or end result in mind.  What makes it a series is that this kind of thing is what tends to be going on outside my building in Brooklyn when I go outside with a camera.  So I shoot it because it is there, quite literally — not unlike an earlier post I did about a tree in my driveway at our house out of town.  A story I heard about the great cinematographer Conrad Hall comes to mind; my dear friend Steve Zaillian was lucky to do a couple of films with Conrad and he told me that he would make a bee-line for the most comfortable chair in the room as soon as he got to set, and that would inevitably end up being where he put the camera to start shooting the scene.
In Brooklyn and elsewhere, I have stumbled onto a handful of Quinceanera photo shoots and I like shooting them because there is such an interesting juxtaposition between the grand finery of the young women on their special day, which usually falls somewhere between ancien regime France and the Hollywood red carpet, and everyone else going about their day in casual clothes.  I do feel the need to be a little careful how I speak about these photos that avoids appearing or actually is judgmental or condescending toward the people who I’m photographing.  If I’m trying to level everyone, it’s not meant to be in a way to bring young women like her down or have a laugh, but to make all boats rise together so to speak.  Humanity must be doing something right to produce a singular beauty like this!
I’m probably adding layers of meaning that weren’t in my mind when I was framing up this shot that afternoon, but I think this conversation might be helping me to get at what I find interesting about shooting these kinds of moments.  So if I have a longer term goal in mind with these photos, it might be some combination of the thoughts that David H.’s note about framing brought up in my mind and some of what I tried to learn from Jamel Shabazz who manages to bring out the inner hero/celebrity in everyone.  DUMBO is a place where people come to look and feel fabulous, perhaps for their social media posts and certainly for themselves.
Cue Sly and the Family Stone’s “Everybody is a Star” for the outro music!
Featured Image: QUINCEANERA, DUMBO 8/3/25, Hasselblad 500CM, Zeiss Planar 80mm f2.8, Delta 400 with Hasselblad Yellow/Green filter.

Share this post:

About The Author

By Scott Ferguson
Scott Ferguson is an independent film and television producer known for such films as Brokeback Mountain, Only Lovers Left Alive and The People vs. Larry Flynt, and the television shows The Night Of and Succession. While working around cameras and recorded images for his entire career, shooting still photography with vintage all manual cameras is a new and very stimulating passion.
Read More Articles From Scott Ferguson

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
If you think £2.99 a month is too little, then please subscribe and I can manually edit the subscription value for you – thank you very much in advance if this is what you would like to do!

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Thorsten Wulff on One By Four – A One Shot Story told by four photographers – Part 1

Comment posted: 10/10/2025

Excellent idea very well executed, dear SDDD!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Scott Ferguson replied:

Comment posted: 10/10/2025

Thanks Thorsten! All best, s

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain on One By Four – A One Shot Story told by four photographers – Part 1

Comment posted: 10/10/2025

Another interesting and refreshing idea / series. And very thoughtful critique
I hope you don’t mind my own subjective look at it.
Please Don’t take anything I say as Criticism
I thought it was a wedding photo of a bride
As the black and white turns it into a sort of wedding dress at first glance
I am familiar with the tradition as my wife is a Mestiza from coastal Peru, but even then it is difficult to recognise until
You explained it.
I reckon a different angle - a look at her face and expression would’ve worked better. Along with something which perhaps gives the viewer an idea as to what the event/celebration is.
I also think there are some distractions such as the people sitting / legs on the left of the frame . A much closer crop would be more powerful. Wondering if you took any colour shots that day?

The tones are marvellous by the way
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Scott Ferguson replied:

Comment posted: 10/10/2025

All good, Ibraar, and thank you! Interesting -- my frame of reference was a 'celebrity' red carpet photo event, but in this case for a non-celebrity 'mortal'. The context of life going on around the 'heroine' of the shot is as important as she is to the story I was trying to tell, whether successfully or not. Again, as noted in the conversation with the others, the idea is trying to show the inner celebrity of everyone. I can see the confusion as to whether it was a wedding photo or not, and many, many people get wedding photos taken there. I did shoot some color, but it wasn't my finest moment, and I forgot to remove the yellow/green filter when I swapped backs on the Hasselblad. I also took what would have been some decent frontal shots, but I missed focus -- that body is currently in the shop, trying to diagnose and repair a back focus issue. Otherwise, I am pleased with the technical qualities of this shot -- I managed to hit focus here and I love Delta 400 and shooting people with a yellow/green filter, which boosts contrast nicely and is very nice with skin tones. I think my recent post "In The Zone" with street portraits at Washington Square Park might be better examples of what I'm trying to do here, but actually this conversation with David, David, and Dean -- which took place before I took those photos -- greatly helped to clarify in my mind what I'm hoping to achieve with my current major project of doing street portraits in NYC. And since this conversation I've done many shots with up angles, as David Hume suggested, and have generally been getting closer and closer to my subjects. This was actually kind of early in my efforts at street shooting with people.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 10/10/2025

Thanks Scott. looking at the photo again on a larger screen I totally get and see what you were after. The only distraction are the people cross legged sitting on the left, thing is they're too much in to crop or clone out. If they weren't there it would give the subject more of a sense of isolation. I do like some critique and wish pedants would nit pick my photos as I guess its part of mastery. I obviously don't normally critique myself but thought I would do this time! hehe!! A shame the camera was defective as it would've been great to see a sequence of different view points. And thanks for the tips on the filters, I've only ever used a Yellow, orange and Red.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Scott Ferguson replied:

Comment posted: 10/10/2025

Hey Ibraar, First, the whole point of this format of posting is to invite other photographers to critique our work and to learn and grow from the resulting conversation. So I am very happy to hear your thoughts. I think you raise a very interesting and valid point. I think you are right that cropping out the intruding legs and feet on the left of the frame would 'improve' the photo in terms of making it a stronger, more focused composition, just as David Hume was right that choosing an up angle would emphasize the young woman as the subject of the photo. I tend to like to shoot in a pretty loose and spontaneous style, especially when I'm doing 'street' photography. I'm not sure my brain/eye is attuned to those kinds of details when I'm framing up, nor was I bothered by it in 'post' -- it wouldn't be difficult to reframe, and the 6x6 negative is big enough that it would still be a pretty juicy image if I cropped it out. But I'm not sure I want to, possibly for perverse reasons -- like shooting away from the Empire State Building and from behind the young woman's back. I don't know that I've realized it perfectly, but I think having a sense of people on the edge of frame maybe makes the frame feel like it has more depth and dimensionality than it would if I cropped them out and made the young woman the closest person to the lens. I tried looking at it with those intruding legs framed out in Lightroom, and I don't think I liked it as much -- somehow it reduced the energy of the shot for me in ways that are hard to describe. In most art forms, I tend to favor things that are more spontaneous and expressive than perfect and polished -- punk rock vs. prog, abstract expressionist art vs. photo realism, art house film vs. Hollywood tentpole filmmaking, etc. But, as with David's comment, I will probably consciously and unconsciously noticing things like intruding legs and feet and make a more deliberate and thoughtful decision about whether they belong in the frame or not. So I thank you for your very constructive critique!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 10/10/2025

I understand fully !! I feel that I should be able to get a shot right and have it as what I had in my minds eye when I made the shot - if I do clone anything it’s always bits of outlying distractions which don’t form a part of the core of the image I agree about the people in a scene - about the depth and life they give it. I think they should add something to the scene and be an integral part of the whole, the same with trees plants and buildings and other structures. Any distractions always interrupt the viewers thoughts - and in B&W it’s a good idea to dodge out areas away from the subject as required - it’s all part of the creative process as long as the final image is what one had been after. Great stuff and discussion Has made me think hard about the elements of composition and tonal relationships in a scene

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Alexandre Kreisman replied:

Comment posted: 10/10/2025

Loving "Critique" about photography, I hope you wouldn't mind If I step in .... To add, to the different point of views raised in the comment and in the post, if I were to take this shot, an up angle would definitely help, another point would be to move a meter or so to the left (maybe more right) whilst taken the shot: 1 you would have a face clear, without anything behind it (which causes distraction). I would also try to use the rule of third to place her in a jonction point. Then in post, dodging her skin and hair, whilst burning a bit the rest. The intend would be to isolate her. I haven't shot a blad in some years, but to me you are to far away, thus the depth of field is bigger making the person on the bench to visible. Also, to me, she is not in focus enough, thsus f4 or f8 and moving to remove person at the same plane she stands. Easy to say, when you are not present at the scene but that was my 2 cents, and I hope you do not mind. Lovely picture and mood! Do not believe it needs introduction to make an effect, being part of a serie or a stand alone, the photo is good and the story is there for me!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Scott Ferguson replied:

Comment posted: 10/10/2025

Thanks Ibraar and Alexandre! I love hearing this feedback and especially your very thoughtful and specific ideas on how you would have shot it if you were both there. These are things I will definitely think about when I'm out shooting people going forward. I think those ideas would certainly make for an improved composition that had a clearer and stronger view of the young woman, and would be things to keep in mind if/when I find myself in a similar situation. I do think this shot reflects a certain stage of my development shooting people where I did not get as close to the subject as I have been moving since. I tried looking back at the other shots I took of that situation, and all of them were from a similar distance and height of the lens, but none of them had the same sense of something happening in the midst of a busy city street and to me they lacked energy. I think finding an entirely different angle may have improved things, perhaps something more raking like you suggest, Alexandre -- but one thing that I'm conscious of in this situation is that I'm not trying to get the perfect shot of the girl, but more of a comment on the idea of the celebration of the moment that mimics a celebrity photo, so the context of the photographer and the other people on the street is something I don't want to avoid entirely. Please understand that I'm not trying to defend this as the ideal version of the shot or closing myself off to very thoughtful and legit criticism, it's more to talk about something I find interesting and difficult to shoot, which is capturing a moment that has a strong graphic subject in the context of a busy environment like the streets of NYC. I find if I isolate the subject too much, the shot loses the energy of the context and if I include too much of the background and foreground, the shot becomes chaotic and doesn't guide the viewer to what I'm hoping for them to see. Thank you both so much! I'm enjoying this ongoing discussion as an expansion of the discussion with David, David and Dean! Also, Alexandre, I don't know if you had a chance to look at another recent post of mine on 35mmc called Hitting The Zone, but I felt that is a little closer to what I'm trying to do currently and reflected some of the dialogue we had in regard to your extraordinary post about shooting humans. https://www.35mmc.com/28/09/2025/hitting-the-zone-street-shooting-with-a-hasselblad-500cm-shot-by-shot/

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Hume on One By Four – A One Shot Story told by four photographers – Part 1

Comment posted: 10/10/2025

Hi Scott - nice to be reminded of this process and discussion, which was fun. And reading it all again now I think that your dialogue with Ibraar above highlights, as you say, how such a discussion process really is valuable as a way of clarify and refining intent, because while it was only five or six weeks ago there seems to now a refined and clearer intent expressed in where you might choose to take this.

Well - only three days to wait until the next one - coming to a blog near you on Oct 14!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Scott Ferguson replied:

Comment posted: 10/10/2025

Thank you David! I think this post is living proof of how dialogue and community have been to my photography. When I was a younger person, I was more reluctant to ask questions, to show how little I knew and how much I had to learn, and was a much slower learner and less effective do-er than I am now. What I learned from our conversation, and particularly your astute critical questions has been a real gift and made everything I've shot since a little better. Part of that intention and aspiration was there all along, but the conversation with you, David and Dean helped unlock and open what was inside working its way out, a process that continues! Looking forward to the next one. s

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Dean Lawrence on One By Four – A One Shot Story told by four photographers – Part 1

Comment posted: 11/10/2025

Brilliant Scott, a thoroughly enjoyable experience, and I didn't think I would ever say that. I'm so pleased that you have taken something from the experience, as in clarifying your own ideas, intent, and how you can maybe make slight changes to your approach for further adventures. I'm glad I'm not the only one to learn something. It takes me back to the conversation David H and I had on the original 5X2 post. I was reluctant to subject myself to the thoughts of others, but those thoughts, suggestions really help clear the mind and prepare us to take the next step.

Bravo young man, and thank you.

Dean.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Scott Ferguson replied:

Comment posted: 11/10/2025

Thanks Dean! It was your conversation with David Hume that inspired the idea of doing a dialogue driven post with more photographers, so that means a lot to me. And one of the real joys of taking up photography at this point is that I have so much to learn about it. The day I stop thinking I have something to learn and improve on is the day I should stop doing photography (same for my day job doing film and tv shows.). Learning from friends and peers is both fun and vital to the process, and you and the two David's have been wonderful partners in my ongoing education. All best, s

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Dean Lawrence replied:

Comment posted: 11/10/2025

Scott, do you think it possible to know everything there is to learn about photography? I really do think that the more I learn the more there is to learn. It's what makes it so engaging. All the best, Dean.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Scott Ferguson replied:

Comment posted: 11/10/2025

Hey Dean, I don't think it is possible to know everything there is to learn about anything, let alone photography. I think there are times when you feel like you've learned all you can about something, which is usually the time you stop loving doing it and start to think about other things. I've been blessed to find a way to make a living doing something I love, and finding still photography is yet another adventure of learning that I'm finding very rewarding. But I still consider myself very much an amateur/beginner and am very humble in the company of the people who also contribute to 35mmc. I feel like I can continue learning and loving photography for many years to come! Thanks Dean

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Clipping Expert Asia on One By Four – A One Shot Story told by four photographers – Part 1

Comment posted: 17/10/2025

I really enjoyed the layered conversation around this image—it captures that fascinating intersection between personal milestone and public space. The contrast between the subject’s formal elegance and the everyday bustle around her says a lot without needing to say much. At Clipping Expert Asia, we often work with photos like this, where subtle context and emotion are just as important as technical precision.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley on One By Four – A One Shot Story told by four photographers – Part 1

Comment posted: 21/10/2025

Hi David,

I'm coming late to the comments section party but want to thank you again for being so generous in sharing your work and nurturing this kind of conversation. In a hectic world being able to pause and think about one photo and hear a community taking it seriously (even amidst suggestions critiques praise etc) is a balm. You've been the leader in this process and given how geographically dispersed we are and differences in background experience styles I think it's quite remarkable. Well done! - David
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 21/10/2025

That I addressed you as David, Scott, about sums up where my head is today. Sorry! I will resist the urge to sign off as "Scott." Take care.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *