5 Frames with an APS film camera – the Fujifilm 1000ix Tiara

By Walter Reumkens

On 23 November 2025, our friend John Andrews showed us some of his fantastic photos taken with an APS film camera. Wonderful shots. We exchanged ideas, because, as befits a GAS victim, I also have three APS cameras in my collection. John recommended that I expose a roll with them again. While I was thinking about it, it started to rain outside and I began writing this article. My fourth report in 35mmc.

With the APS format, the camera and film industry wanted to save what was unstoppable: digital photography. The manufacturers’ cameras were all small, packed with technology from 1996 to 2011. In addition to this Fujifilm, I also own a Contax Tix and a simple Konica model. All of them have very good lenses.

This is the Fujifilm Fotonex 1000ix Tiara, which can be seen above in its unfolded state. To my knowledge, it was probably the smallest camera in the APS series. I had inserted a Fujifilm APS Nexia A200, the photos were taken in 2018, the film had already expired then.

Once the film canister is placed in the camera, advancing is automatic, as is the rewinding process later on. Exposed negatives remain safe in the canister too. My minilab can develop this format where scanning is done with a Noritsu scanner.

These five photos of mine were taken, like those in my second article, in the vicinity of the Museum Abteiberg in my hometown of Mönchengladbach. This allows for a comparison with the photos taken with the Nikon F2 and Kodak Ultramax 400.

The museum building is one of the most architecturally beautiful museum buildings in Europe. The architect was Prof. Hans Hollein from Vienna, Austria. What you see here is a side façade, which is actually temporary, as there is no money available for the extension that was already planned when it was built. Not then, and certainly not now. So you get used to it.

The museum is built on a slope, the so-called Abteiberg, the founding site of the city with a monastery and church over 1000 years ago. The other side of the building is easily accessible via a large platform. This plated area is the roof of part of the building. The laid slabs are made of soft material and get dirty very quickly. The architect knew this, but wanted it that way.

The floor tiles have been replaced twice since completion in 1982. But you get such nice patterns for photos, and the sun also contributes to this.

The architecture and the different shapes in combination with sunlight allow you to quickly expose a roll of film.

From the roof or platform of the museum, you can access the lower sculpture garden, which offers a view of the museum and its administration tower. But the main attraction is probably the sculpture by Claes Oldenburg, the world-famous artist born in Stockholm, Sweden, in 1929, who died in New York in 2022.

I would love to hear your thoughts on the article and photos. Many thanks to John Andrews for the suggestion. Nevertheless, I will be exposing another roll of APS film in the near future, probably with my Contax Tix, which, as I have discovered, hardly anyone knows about. Despite the fact it hasn’t been produced for a long time I still have enough expired film boxes in the fridge.

Thank you for reading.

Share this post:

About The Author

By Walter Reumkens
Born and living in Moenchengladbach (Germany), retired administrative expert and IT specialist, hobby photographer analogue + digital since 1975, no main topics.
Read More Articles From Walter Reumkens

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £5 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

John Andrews on 5 Frames with an APS film camera – the Fujifilm 1000ix Tiara

Comment posted: 19/12/2025

Hi Walter, what a lovely article with images. You have inspired me to find another APS camera, as I have one film left and thanks for the mention too.Best wishes for Christmas and the New Year.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 19/12/2025

Hi John, thank you for your feedback and praise. I wish you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year too. At the beginning of the year, I will publish an article here about the "Contax Tix", another APS film camera that I own.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Hume on 5 Frames with an APS film camera – the Fujifilm 1000ix Tiara

Comment posted: 20/12/2025

Hi Walter… Since you have asked for feedback I will offer the following. I see that the photos were taken at the same museum where you used the Nikon F2 recently. Anyway, my thoughts on the scans are that perhaps they could be adjusted so there are deeper blacks. One thing I have noticed, and I don't know if this applies to your lab, but where I get my processing and scanning done the results I get back depend to some extent on the film, the subject, and how familiar they are with that combination. For example, if it's something mainstream like a wedding on Portra 400 the scans come back pretty much good to go. Deep blacks, good saturation all that kind of stuff - nothing needed. If it's a less common film and subject often they come back in need of adjustment. I don't mean this as a bad thing, I mean that the lab wasn't quite sure where you would want the black point to be and they let you put that in yourself. You can easily adjust the curves to put the black where you want it, but if the black is already there, then you can't take it out - if that makes sense. This is a bit less true if you're getting TIFFs but my lab just does JPEGs. So what they tend to do is leave the blacks out and so the darkest areas are grey and then I need to put the black in where I want them. This of course is personal, but the colours are a bit less intense and there's a bit less contrast than the shots you took on the Nikon on so I guess it depends what you prefer. In terms of the composition, I did find the slightly converging verticals a little bit distracting. Again, this depends on what you're after. When an architectural photographer photographs a building they usually adjust it so that the verticals are parallel. (in the film days this was either by keeping the camera horizontal or using a shift tilt lens) However, if you're looking at shapes and composition and are going for a more abstract geometric composition, then even being more brutal with convergence can lead to interesting effects. I guess I find these are neither one nor the other. So I'm seeing something that is semi-architectural and semi-observational abstract without placing a foot firmly in either camp. Hope this helps!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 20/12/2025

Hi David, thank you for the detailed information and valuable tips. I am only now starting to do more post-processing of the negatives, although I tend to avoid excessive editing and only do what is absolutely necessary. I am purely an amateur photographer and concentrate more on seeing motifs and the exposure of the photo. For almost 40 years, I worked with computer software in my IT career and was then glad to have as little to do with it as possible in my free time. The images taken with this APS film camera are a poor example, as the camera is fully automatic with no control over exposure. My small lab, where you could drop off your film many years ago and pick up the paper prints an hour later, does not process the film, and there are no special presets for APS. Only JPEGS are created. The film used was produced in 2011 at the latest and was probably already expired in 2018, when the photos were taken. I am very happy with the results, as they say today, "out of camera". Nevertheless, I am happy to take your advice. My large collection of old cameras hardly includes any fully automatic models; most of them are mechanical cameras, some of which do not even have a built-in light meter. I expose the films based on the shadows, take several exposures with the spot meter and calculate the average value, or use the dome on my Sekonic L-398A. Your advice is very helpful in improving the whole process. Thank you, David!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Kodachromeguy on 5 Frames with an APS film camera – the Fujifilm 1000ix Tiara

Comment posted: 20/12/2025

When were the last APS film cartridges made? Are any B&W films left?
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 20/12/2025

APS films have not been manufactured since 2011. Most of the films offered were colour negative films, but Kodak also released a black-and-white film that had to be developed using the C41 process. There was also a slide film available for a while, but it was discontinued early on due to a lack of interest.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Sean Benham on 5 Frames with an APS film camera – the Fujifilm 1000ix Tiara

Comment posted: 21/12/2025

Just before purchasing my first digital camera in 2001, there was a period of time when i stopped shooting traditional 35mm film snd picked up an APS Kodak Advantix C700 camera and scores of film in this super convenient format. This camera was always with me and I captured some of the most memorable photos ever between 1999-2004.

I’m actually sad they stopped making this film despite the fact that many developers can still develop it! And because of its convenient format I kept all those processed canisters and about 8 years ago had all of them scanned to JPGs!

Now today all these incredibly compact APS cameras are just left sitting of shelves. I truly wish it would make a comeback.

Thanks for the walk down memory lane for me!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 21/12/2025

Hi Sean, Thank you for your comment. I'm glad I brought back some good memories! At the time, I continued to take photographs with 35 mm film and only bought my APS cameras a few years ago. The film was no longer being produced, but it hadn't expired yet. I still have quite a few in cold storage. Let's see how long they can still be used for, and whether any changes occur. At the beginning of January, I will publish another report on APS here. It's a real shame, but many photographers, like me, continued to use their 35mm cameras, perhaps because of the high cost of APS cameras. They were all high quality and packed with automatic features. The films on offer were great emulsions and, although the negative was smaller, they produced excellent results. All my films were scanned directly after being developed in my local lab, which still does this today. I would be surprised if new APS film were to be offered again. I think we just have to accept the situation. Thanks again for your contribution, Sean.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Omar Tibi on 5 Frames with an APS film camera – the Fujifilm 1000ix Tiara

Comment posted: 21/12/2025

Splendid shots Walther! Nice to see how well these photos turned out, despite the much smaller film size versus 35mm. Did you feel much difference in shooting APS versus 135? I wonder if, had APS & its camera ecosystem came out in recent times, rather than at the start of the digital era, would it have become more popular than it was back then?

Funny that you mention the Tix - that would've been my suggestion for another camera to try. I've seen them available for very cheap and I've been tempted, but the lack of film keeps me away. Therefore I'm really curious as to how your shots on that will turn out.

Happy shooting Walter and thanks again for all your posts!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 21/12/2025

Thank you for your comment, Omar! I'm glad you like the pictures. APS films were state-of-the-art emulsions, if not further developments compared to 35mm film. The few companies in the consortium put everything they could into film and camera technology. It was the last shot, but it came too late. When comparing point-and-shoot cameras, I haven't noticed any differences. The quality is at least equivalent. The cameras are smaller and more convenient to use, and handling the film is a big step forward. I would like to answer your question with a YES. The APS format would have prevailed among the many users of compact cameras, which no longer exist today, having been replaced by smartphones. The "self-developers" among us, those who make all the settings themselves, work in manual mode and focus manually, would probably have found it very difficult. My Konica + Fujifilm cameras are fully automatic, unlike the Contax Tix, which allows me to set the aperture myself. In my opinion, it was also the best and most valuable APS camera. But also by far the most expensive. I was lucky enough to get it brand new for €100. I still have plenty of film in the fridge. All of them are probably past their expiry date, so we'll see how the results turn out. The upcoming Contax photos cannot be used for comparison, as they were taken several years ago, in 2022, I believe. I hope you enjoy taking photographs too, and thank you very much!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *