Thoughts on Shooting Film

Trying Not to Get Too Attached to a Dead Film: FujiFilm Neopan 400 – by Simon King

My first exposure to Neopan 400 (Professional/Presto) was in the work of one of my favourite film photographers; Walter Rothwell. When I first discovered his work I wasn’t too interested in the medium the work was produced on; the content was powerful enough to keep my interest away from questions about film and gear. However when reading up about his process I was fascinated by the almost romantic way he described his first experiences with the film type, as well as his satisfaction when he started processing in D76.

I didn’t start on my own film journey until a roll of AGFA 400 through a Leica CL, back in October 2016, after which I decided that I would try and limit my film use for black and white photography only. I started looking into the different options for black and white film, especially interested in films that can be developed cheaply and easily by my local labs, without needing to be sent away.

Only one film that was easily accessible to me fit these requirements, and the majority of my early film work was shot on Ilford XP2. However, I was always on the look out for new ways to style my images, and most of that takes the form of learning about the techniques used by other photographers.

I’m very aware that even if I had access to Kodachrome it wouldn’t mean my images would look like Steve McCurry’s, and similarly shooting with Neopan 400, or a variation of it, would not make my images even close to the work put out by Walter Rothwell. Nevertheless there is an allure to augmenting seemingly “tried and tested” methodology into ones work, and I was once again chasing that Black and White Dragon.

Every film has its own aesthetic, and I recognise the temptation of many different colour stocks – the deep saturation of Ektar, the mood of CineStill. I do not yet speak the language of black and white film in the same way, but I still recognise accents of the aesthetic. Borrowing the accent of Neopan was very inviting, and after a lot of research I managed to find five rolls of a variant of Neopan 400 called “CN.” Although this is not identical to the “true” black and white chemistry of Neopan 400 Professional as shot by Rothwell I still wanted to give it a try and see what it offered me. I shot one of these through my XPan, and the rest on 35mm rangefinder cameras. I had an issue with one of the rolls where I had accidentally mis-loaded it leading to wasting half the roll on blank frames – I managed to salvage the rest though.

Neopan 400 (CN)

In Neopan 400 (CN) I see extreme tonality when exposing for the highlights, which leads to deep, rich shadows and detailed whites on the most extreme ends of the histogram. Lines when in focus are very sharp, but most frames maintain a consistent grain as well – depending on the developer you use this can be tempered.

Neopan 400 (CN)

My first rolls were developed as C41, but I really like the ability to develop C41 in black and white chemistry, which can lend your film different looks. I’ve actually been thinking a lot about just how much variance there can be between even the exact same film, which can be exposed and developed and handled in different eays by different photographers – but I’m sure that’s a topic for a future article.

Neopan 400 (CN)

After looking at my images I think I could definitely see Neopan 400 (CN) finding a more secure position in my standard workflow.The tones work for the way I expose, and the convenience of being able to develop it as C41 is underrated. However any positivity I feel towards this is balanced by the awareness that this is a very limited experience. FujiFilm has killed off so many lines of its film that it may as well rebrand as just Fuji. As much as I would like to shoot other discontinued lines, such as their 1600 colour film many have started to either expire, or are valued at (for me) unreachable prices for a single roll.

However for Neopan 400 (CN) at least there is something of a solution available. There is a bit of a conspiracy theory that I’ve found online that this version of Neopan 400 is an identical emulsion to Ilford XP2, the original black and white film I had shot my early film work on. When it came to looking for similarities I didn’t have to go far for a few rolls to view side by side with Neopan (CN). While I can see some similarities, especially in the way that midtone greys are rendered I should take into account that I treat my XP2 quite differently to Neopan – Neopan I developed with a push of +1, whereas the XP2 I have been developing at box speed but shooting at 640 (although I used to treat it as 800 with a +1 push, and will likely be doing so again with upcoming rolls).

My decision to set my search for Neopan aside and not hunt for more rolls in a diminishing market, and instead focus on using XP2 is not as difficult as the compromises some other photographers have had to make. However something that hadn’t really been an important factor to me suddenly became more urgent as a result of this experience. I want to support the film community. I’ve always written about my experiences as a photographer, and more recently as a film photographer, and hopefully I’ve been able to help people to make decisions about their own film journey.

However there is a far more empirical and economic factor to the film photography industry, and that is that money needs to actively support the manufacture and production of film, film chemistry, and general film equipment. If I buy film from an eBay seller selling discontinued lines that money is not going towards the active production of a film I (or anyone) will shoot. If I buy from FujiFilm, a company that barely manufactures film anymore I will not be supporting lines of film that I want to continue to shoot. Despite their recent announcement of Acros 100 II I’m still skeptical, and more discretionary of where I want to be “investing” in my film future.

Advertisement

However if I buy film from Ilford, or Kodak, who actively produce film and support the heritage of film photography then I am making an active investment in supporting brands who care about my existence as a film photographer. I can support the specific emulsions I shoot with my wallet and hopefully enough other people will that those films will continue to be produced. It is a collective effort, and I assume that the majority of people reading this blog are a part of that effort.

A recent development in the market is the reintroduction of Kodak Ektachrome E100 which is one of the first films to be resurrected after being discontinued. I have hope that other companies may take note (hopefully of a success) and fresh life may be breathed into the film market. Again, this will only really happen if as a community we continue to support the industry by purchasing film and shooting it to the best of our ability; not leaving it to influencers and artists to simply promote and enthuse over.

Shooting Neopan 400 Professional

After all of this I had still never actually experienced shooting Neopan 400 Professional, the true black and white emulsion that had originally interested me. Shortly after writing the majority of this article I had the opportunity to chat with Walter about my search for the original, as I’d found some rolls in Germany and bought those. To my surprise Walter gifted me two rolls of his own on the spot!

This meant I now had four rolls of Neopan 400 Professional to work with – a mildly stressful prospect, as I really wanted to produce something special with such a limited artefact. I’ve only shot through one roll so far, and I’m quite proud of the images I produced.

If you really want to see this film done justice I strongly urge you to look at Walter’s work – I linked his website at the start of this article, and his Instagram contains a larger selection of his work.

I’m really happy with the way the Neopan Professional 400 rendered my exposures. While the CN variant shines through with mid-tones the aesthetic of Neopan 400 Professional is rooted in the extreme highlights and shadows. It has the clearest white tones I’ve seen from any black and white film – I’m used to shades of grey even in the lightest areas but this has an incredible contrast to it.

I also think there is almost a hint of “colour” which I find hard to describe – even when I am 100% sure the image is black and white, in images with lots of highlight detail I am certain I see a hint of a very light reddish tint. Maybe I need to get my eyes checked, or my screen calibrated, but even in prints and in other peoples work I think it’s there. Aside from the tones of the film the aesthetic of the grain is really interesting. I like how clear it seems, but without being intrusive in any way.

It’s a real shame, as I feel I have enough to talk about with this film in terms of both technical and aesthetic qualities – its similarities to Delta 400, one of my favourite black and white films, the sharpness and overall rendering – but what would be the point? As I’ve discussed shooting this film is a limited experience and my opinions are more closely related to the way I felt while shooting, and the excitement at reviewing my images – that is all this film can mean to me, and nothing more. I definitely received the results in terms of the look of my images I was hoping for from this film, and the “look” of the film definitely informs with the drama and emotion in these frames.

I really enjoyed seeing this aesthetic in my work, and I do regret that this will be a limited experience. I have to really ration out my remaining rolls, and make sure that I produce the best work possible with what I have left. I also hope that this isn’t something I’ll have to be thinking about with my other emulsions – it feels like Portra, Ektar, Delta 400 and so on are “safe” but I think this has been a reminder of just how lucky I am to have been able to shoot as much film as I have done, and I’ll enjoy shooting it for as long as I can!

Thanks for taking the time to read this article, I hope you enjoyed the images and opinions I put forward. If you’ve liked my work here, please consider following me on Instagram, where I share a steady feed of my best work!

Are there any discontinued films that you’ve grown attached to? Or are you looking to try films that may replace the aesthetic others offered you? I look forward to the discussion in the comments!

Do you enjoy reading 35mmc?

For as little as $1 a month, you can help support the upkeep of this website. The more people chuck me a small amount of cash each month, the more time I can spend building and improving upon it - simple as that!
Or, for $2 a month you can get access to my behind the scenes micro-blog over on Patreon!

Either way, want to help out, become a patron of 35mmc here:

Become a Patron!

Alternatively, if you just enjoyed this post, or like the odd post here and there, please feel free to chuck a few pennies in the tip jar via Ko fi here:


Write for 35mmc: read more here, about how you can help build upon this ever growing resource
Subscribe/Follow: click here, to discover all the ways you can follow 35mmc

You Might Also Like

7 Comments

  • Avatar
    Reply
    Tim Gallo
    August 4, 2019 at 12:43 am

    is neopan a tabular grain? no need to nostalgy about the film fomapan will give you pretty much the same results… have you tried it?[(i have few 120 of neopan still, but found that it pretty much the same results as fomapan)
    and fomapan is cheap.

    • Avatar
      Reply
      Simon
      August 4, 2019 at 1:24 am

      As far as I’m aware T-Max, Delta, and Neopan are the only T Grain black and white films – I wasn’t aware that Fomapan is? Fomapan is one of the first BW films I tried, in the 100 varient, but I found it a bit too grainy and contrasty. Perhaps it’s worth revisiting if you have any tips, or anywhere you can direct me for further reading on the subject?
      Thanks!

      • Avatar
        Reply
        Tim Gallo
        August 4, 2019 at 7:19 am

        Yes, fomapan is also in the same league. It is grainy and contrasty, but I cant imagine what is more grainy and contrasty than what you already showed here :). From my experience fomapan has few different looks depending on what you are exposing it on… i have experience with it being grey-ishly flat and over the top contrasty… in both ways one of my favorite films. I have a long experience with it and for many years I shoot on it… including 120. Its definitely has a character.
        I dont know any readings on the subject, just my experience. And my experience is 200 and 400 fomapan are very flexible, but 200 has a tendency to look less contrasty… and if you over-expose it even little bit – it can be almost flat. 400 is very contrasty and looks exactly as your pictures of neopan if you under-exposed it a bit (i have a feeling your pictures are under-exposed a few stops?). 400 actually looks contrasty no matter what you do with it lol

        few examples:
        https://timgallo.exposure.co/nineteen – bw is all iso 400.
        https://timgallo.exposure.co/bless-your-tender-heart – iso 200-400.
        https://timgallo.exposure.co/over-the-edge-of-emptiness – under-exposed a few stops.

        • Avatar
          Reply
          Simon
          August 4, 2019 at 1:18 pm

          Thanks for your examples, I’ll definitely be looking to give Fomapan a second try! I metered dead on for my exposures here, so if you’re seeing underexposure artifacts I’d assume it was due to the age of the film rather than anything else.

  • Avatar
    Reply
    Tim Gallo
    August 4, 2019 at 7:21 am

    the scans are a little bit poor quality, thus it looks more grainy than neopan, and in reality it is more grainy… but not much. just a little bit.

  • Avatar
    Reply
    Christian Schroeder
    August 4, 2019 at 7:37 am

    Hi Simon, interesting read!

    I suppose this reddish tint in your images is an optical illusion. Sometimes I observe a similar effect in my prints made from (scans of) Fuji Acros 100. It occurs when there is a fine, high-contrast pattern in the image – e. g., jalousies with alternating white and black lines. Very strange, indeed.

    Last year, I bought three of rolls of Fuji Superia 1600 – just wanted to try this emulsion before it’s gone. The results were good, but I didn’t fall in love with this film (fortunately).

    • Avatar
      Reply
      Simon
      August 4, 2019 at 1:17 pm

      I agree, it may be a result of high contrast patterns. I’ve seen some wonderful results from Superia 1600, it would be great to have another true high speed colour film, as I’ve never had the opportunity to shoot anything over 800 🙁

    Leave a Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Pin It on Pinterest

    Share This

    Thank you for commenting

    ...now share the post with your friends?