Kodak Ektachrome E100 – Forgetting my Expectations & Embracing a bit of Failure

A little while ago now I shot a roll of Ektachrome E100 in a camera that turned out to be broken. The camera itself feels pretty irrelevant to this story, other than the fact that it was a manual focus SLR, it was broken and was quickly sent off for repair after I saw the results. What is more relevant is my reaction to the images verses my wife’s reaction when she happened to spot them on my computer. And then, more significantly, how my response changed to them after she commented so positively about them.

I must admit, I’m not one to embrace the idea of serendipity in my film photography all that often. As you’ll read in next week’s post, sometimes I take risks, but more often than not I like to feel like I’m in control of the outcome. That said, one of the big factors that makes film photography satisfying to me is finding out that I got it right takes a little more patience. That’s not to disparage digital at all, getting it right can be just as hard, but with film you have to wait longer to see if you got it right.

This wait has always been part of the joy for me. When I was a kid waiting the few days for my dad to bring home my envelope of prints was exciting. When they arrived and they were good, or at least not terrible, I was happy. When they came back and something had gone wrong, I was sad.

This mentality has followed me into adulthood. It’s taken me a lot of effort to appreciate cameras (such as the Lomo LC-Wide) that respond best to allowing large chunks of luck dictate the “quality” of the results. Of course, to a certain degree all point & shoot cameras – especially in an age when they are all fairly old – require the user to let go and trust the camera a bit. I certainly set my expectations slightly lower when shooting a point & shoot compared to when I’m shooting fairly high quality SLR camera for example.

In fact, when I’m shooting higher quality cameras, it would seem that I can sometimes set my expectations too high. That was certainly the case when shooting this particular high quality camera. My expectations were set to near-perfection. And actually, short of the fact that I’m still struggling to focus SLR cameras a little, I think my expectations were warranted. If you can see passed my missed focus and the massive light leaks, and look at the images and parts of images that did come out, you can see good qualities and exposure.

But, of course, most of them were largely ruined by the camera no longer being light tight! The camera had failed and I’d lost my precious photos… or at least that was my gut reaction when I first saw them. It wasn’t the end of the world, I’m not saying the images would have been particularly fantastic, but my disappointment that the camera had failed blinded me to any sense that the images themselves were anything other than a massive failure.

The Hannah factor

Ok, it’s no secret that some people love light leaks. You can even buy film that is pre-exposed in such a way to guarantee a light leak effect on every frame. In fact, there seems to be an unstoppable trend for this sort of thing at the moment – and more power to those who enjoy it, I say!

It’s not for me though. I don’t like leaving that much to chance, and when I see a lightly leak in my own photos I don’t thank the gods of film photography for the wonders of serendipity, I curse the broken camera, either bin it, or send it off for repair, and never let the photos see the light of day.

On this occasion though, they did see the light of day, or at least – as I said – my wife saw them. And what did she see…? Well, of course, she didn’t see a broken camera or even my missed focus, she saw pretty photos of her kids with random streaks of vivid red and orange… and she liked it.

I dismissed her at first, but as she got me to flick through them, cooing at how pretty they were, I stopped seeing the failure and started seeing what see was seeing, and I found myself liking it too! I was no longer seeing a broken camera, I too was seeing the aesthetic of the images and not the failures that created them.

I’m not sure what the moral of the story is here really, but I suspect there’s a couple of personal learnings for me around sometimes letting go a little more… Not least when it comes to my desire for control over things, but also perhaps that sometimes deviation from the expected outcome isn’t always a bad thing. As to whether or not I will pursue light-leaky photos in the future… well, I’m not sure I’m ready to let go that much, I certainly don’t regret sending this particular camera off for repair. Next time something like this happens though, I hope I won’t write the photos off quite so quickly and fervently.

Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-free Experience

There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts:

Paid Subscription - £2.99 per month and you'll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
Subscribe here.

Content contributor - become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.
Sign up here.

About The Author

15 thoughts on “Kodak Ektachrome E100 – Forgetting my Expectations & Embracing a bit of Failure”

  1. We all know that our children are blessings from above, but to have that divine light singling them out for illumination is simply spectacular.
    I can see why your wife liked them Hamish.
    I am like you, and sometimes need different eyes to show me what is there for all to see.
    Thanks for sharing these

  2. con quei PAZZI che ci sono la fuori, che comprano pellicole scadute decine di anni fa, che usano attrezzature che come minimo hanno vent’anni, Tu ti preoccupi delle macchiette rosse??? ma daiiii,
    ps: uno di quei pazzi, sono IO !!!
    Ciao a Tutti.

    1. (Google translate: with those CRAZY out there who buy films that expired dozens of years ago, using equipment that is at least twenty years old, do you worry about red spots ??? but daiiii,
      ps: one of those crazy, I’m I!
      Hi everyone.)

      The film was new, but yeah the camera was old … it didn’t appear to have any issues though

  3. Don’t be so hard on yourself. I think if every shot you took were “perfect”, assuming that perfection can be defined, then the whole endeavour would soon become boring.

    I recently tried using Kodak Ektar 100 film in my college film camera, a Pentax P3, after over 20 years of shooting digital cameras. I didn’t notice the problem with the door, that it was ever so slightly ajar; just a crack. The results were flawed: https://islandinthenet.com/2019-08-11-09-19-13/

    But it seems I am so partial to the subject matter, that even a flawed image has value to me.

  4. Your wife is so absolutly right on that! These pictures have the mojo I like. Especially the last one is just plain perfect.(maybe because of it’s technical imperfection… can’t describe it better) And this statement comes from an analogue Leica user. I begin to really understand the saying that sharpness is overrated! Thank you!!!

  5. Hamish, like your wife I think you’re photos are wonderful. I didn’t know that people are now deliberately looking for light leaks. Of which there are different types like the hundreds of shutter pinholes in my first leica years ago which produced photos although not the ones (I thought) I wanted. Your photos with the leaks are reality just not the same reality you saw through the finder.

    Couple of Winogrand quotes: ” I photograph to find out what something will look like photographed.” “A photograph can look any way ”

    Not sure what the Hannah factor refers to but it linked up with ‘Hannah’, the linguist’s daughter in the remarkable movie Arrival which i saw again last night.

    The one other Winogrand that i like to keep in mind, ” when I’m reloading my camera, there are no photographs.”

  6. I lke the photo’s too. Your ‘luck’ is that he leaks are so nice and vividly red, orange and yellow, that match the pictures wonderfully. If they would have been green, I don’t know 🙂 It is an interesting thought. Expectations versus actually looking. Something for me to dwell upon a bit of time.

  7. Hey Hamish – Thanks for the discussion!
    Leaks aside, it’s Interesting to see this roll of E100. I like your colours and the DR looks pretty good. I reckon you exposed Hannah’s face well and made good use of the interior light. Good to see these, as I’m about to head off on a trip with a roll of E100 to kinda test but hopefully use.
    So – light leaks. I reckon your wife is right no question. (Wives are always right regardless, but she’s doubly right eh?) To test this hypothesis imagine you’re pulling these out of a drawer in 20 yrs having not looked at them in the mean time. I propose that you’ll see firstly Hannah and the moment the shots recorded, think “wow” and then think, “Oh, that’s the light-leak roll.” And there will no regret. It’s not like this was the roll with the Afghan girl on it; it’s personal stuff.
    In a more formal sense, I think what light leaks do is reinforce the nature of photograph as object. i.e. you know you’re looking at a photo when it has a light leak in it. It puts an extra layer between you and the subject, if you like. It becomes more “here is that photo of Hannah” than “this is Hannah” if you get my meaning. Art-wank optional here, but yeah.

    All the best

  8. I agree – there are some “failures” in a technical sense in my own rolls that have turned out to be some of my favourite pictures after spending some time thinking about what I’ve managed to distil.

    I think your wife’s reaction shows that it’s more important to catch the moment than to be technically perfect and when it’s a picture of someone as important as a loved one it’s the moment that really matters in the end. Many of us have childhood (or teenage or adult) pictures that are in no sense technically perfect but are cherished for the capture of that moment, and all of the associated things we felt at that moment, in our lives.

    1. Absolutely! I certainly wouldn’t look at a photo of my late dad that I took when I was a kid and question my composition …

  9. Pingback: Contax RTS Review - Second Time Lucky - 35mmc

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to Top