A few frames with a Konica Hexar RF, Voigtlander 50mm f/1.2 and Kodak Portra 800

It sometimes feels like a few of the pieces of the puzzle just come together. This might be to do with light, or the subject matter, mood, gear, whatever; it’s a nice feeling! I’ve recently had this feeling from a Konica Hexar RF and Voigtlander 50mm f/1.1 when combined with Kodak Portra 800

I wasn’t convinced by the Konica Hexar RF when I first got my hands on it, but as time has gone on I’ve warmed to it. More than that, in fact, I have found myself really liking it. That said, one particular feature of it that initially bugged me was its weight and balance. It’s quite a heavy camera, and so with smaller, lighter lenses, it tends to tip back on its strap. I’d actually begun learn to cope with this annoyance by the time I got my hands on the Voigtlander 50mm f/1.2, but the heavier lens just made that particular issue go away completely, letting all of its other positive traits appeal to me even more.

Funnily enough, I didn’t initially think to mount the Voigtlander onto the Konica. The Konica Hexar RF has a lower magnification viewfinder than a lot of rangefinders, so it didn’t seem to be the ideal camera to go with such a fast lens as the 50mm f/1.2. I then spotted a picture of the Konica 50mm f/1.2, a lens that I’d forgotten existed. If they made a lens that fast to go with this camera, then I figured there’d be no reason not to try the Voigtlander. As soon as I mounted it and held the camera I had a good feeling about the combination. It felt right in the hand and it hung perfectly off the strap. It’s not even like it’s a particularly big or heavy lens – in fact, it’s quite small and light for a 50mm f/1.2 – but it’s just heavy enough to balance the Konica perfectly. And despite my initial concerns, it works really well with the camera too.

I cover this more in the review I’m currently writing, but the rangefinder patch in the Konica Hexar RF isn’t perfect. The short story is that you have to look straight through the viewfinder, else it can show focus incorrectly. Once I worked this out though, despite the lower magnification of the viewfinder, I’ve found it quite easy to obtain good focus with this lens, even shooting closer to wide open.

I’m also writing a review of the Voigtlander 50mm f/1.2. It’s taking me longer than usual, mainly because of how blown away by it I am by it. I’d never expected to find another lens I like as much as my ZM Sonnar – but this thing is right up there. It is admittedly much more modern in the way that it renders and shoots. Stopped down to f/2.8 and it’s very sharp and very contrasty – almost too much so sometimes. It’s still fairly sharp wider open too, yet it manages to also have a really nice fall-off to out-of-focus, spot-on bokeh.

The final piece of this puzzle was a roll of Portra 800. Almost every time I mention this film, it gets flagged up by someone that it’s an expensive film. This is true, but it’s so good it’s definitely worth it for me. Exposed correctly it seems to have a really fine grain for such a fast film. It’s also very receptive to underexposure. A couple of the shots below, rather than open the lens wider, I set the camera to EI1600, possibly 3200 (I can’t really remember, I’d had a drink). I expected to find a lot more grain but actually, provided I took the underexposure into account in the scan, the results were spot on!

That’s just low light of course, but thanks to the higher maximum shutter speed of the Hexar RF, I can still get away with shooting wider-open with this 800 ISO film without having to rely on overexposure latitude.

Here are a few of my favourites so far:

Konica Hexar RF, Voigtlander 50mm 1.2

Konica Hexar RF, Voigtlander 50mm 1.2


Konica Hexar RF, Voigtlander 50mm 1.2

Konica Hexar RF, Voigtlander 50mm 1.2Konica Hexar RF, Voigtlander 50mm 1.2

Konica Hexar RF, Voigtlander 50mm 1.2

Konica Hexar RF

Konica Hexar RF

Konica Hexar RF

In short, all in all, it feels like a very versatile combination of kit and film. More importantly, I’m very pleased with the photos too! Reviews about both camera and lens will be coming in the next month or so – you can expect plenty more shots taken with Kodak Portra 800 too!

Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-free Experience

There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts:

Paid Subscription - £2.99 per month and you'll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
Subscribe here.

Content contributor - become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.
Sign up here.

About The Author

19 thoughts on “A few frames with a Konica Hexar RF, Voigtlander 50mm f/1.2 and Kodak Portra 800”

  1. An interesting read as always Hamish, thanks.

    I am sure I read somewhere that Portra 800 didn’t employ the same “fine grain” technology as 400 or 160, so it’s helpful to get real life views on the look of 800.

    I recently purchased a secondhand copy of the Voigtlander 40mm f/1.2 and it’s glued to my M6. Very similar to the 50mm I think.

    1. Very similar lenses, yes.
      As for 800, it is one of the old Portra range, but in real terms it’s still a very nice film with a fine grain for its speed. I prefer it to 400 slightly these days.

  2. I’m a bit confused, Hamish. Are you singing the praises of the Voigtlander 50mm f/1.2, or the Voigtlander 50mm f/1.1? The title of the article refers to the f/1.1, but the text refers to the f/1.2.

  3. Hamish,

    I’ve been reading 35mmc for a while now. It a great blog! Sorry I’ve not said so earlier.

    I have a Voightlander Nokton 50mm f/1.5 (screw mount) that lives on my M2 and I love it! I rented a Leica 50mm f/1.4 (sweating and praying I’d not drop the camera for the 36 hours I had it) and failed too see any real difference. Granted I wear glasses, but the shots from a roll of Illford HP5 400 but did not seem to be any different or justify the 6 times more in cost. I think they make great glass!

    1. They certainly do – I think most people would need to look very close to see a difference, especially shooting film

    2. Nice shots, no question !
      But some critical thoughts :
      Nobody talks about the heavy weight of the 1.0-1.2 lenses.
      What’s about the bag, which contains more lenses than this one heavy beast ?

  4. Great photo’s and I love your site.
    I also use the Konica RF and I found the handeling of the camera was improved by using the Fuji xpro 1 thumbrest by Kiwi. It fits the camera perfectly.
    Just a small tip and keep up the great site.

  5. The images are confirming my intent to trade in my Voigtlander 50mm f/1.5 for the 1.2 on my next visit to Tokyo. Have you shot the lens at f/8 at all? I am Kyle like a lens that I can still use for everyday/ landscape photos while I am traveling. And since I got the Zeiss 50mm f/1.5, I don’t need the Voigtlander 1.5.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to Top