The Olympus OM-1 was my first real camera, I bought it as-new in 1981, when I was a student, for £95. That was a lot of money in those days, and my bank account didn’t recover for many years (in today’s money, that’s £350). That it was fully manual was all-important. My photography was going to be all down to me – forcing myself up the learning curve of understanding the relationship between aperture and shutter speed.
Growing up in the 70s, I was captivated by the monochrome documentary photography in the Sunday newspaper supplements. Horrified and educated too. With only three TV channels and no media other than print, newspapers were the only way you saw stuff and learned what was going on in the world – and the glossy supplements were full of high-quality reportage photography. It’s where you saw work by people like Don McCullin. Work that I wanted to emulate, albeit in London, and not a war zone.
I took the OM-1 everywhere and documented the lives of my student/social cohort. As I digitise that archive, I realise now that I took a fairly cavalier attitude to exposure and focusing when shooting people (they moved around a lot).
I loved the fact that the shutter speed dial was around the lens. And how small it and solid the camera was. For many years I only had the Zuiko 50/1.8, which in itself was great – I never had to think about which lens to use: even more simplicity.
I used a lot of bulk-loaded Ilford film. While I knew that not all films were the same, I did have the attitude that “film is cheap” and that taking (lots of) photographs was the main thing. Again, I now realise that that bulk Ilford film was not brilliant (overly contrasty). I don’t know what it was as it’s not indicated on the film. Most of my work in those days was on Tri-X or AgfaPan 100 though.
I did all my film developing at home, having been taught how to do it by a babysitter when I was 12. In the early 80s I used to use the darkroom at the Photographer’s Gallery until I got my own darkroom going, which, when living in rented accommodation, was quite a challenge. An interesting thing I’ve realised as I digitise my archive is just how few of my negs were printed back then. It was an expensive business, printing. Most of the images you see here were never printed so have been rediscovered this year. If only I’d known what was lurking on all those contact sheets.
Sadly the camera is sort of no more. I think the light meter has lost all its sensitivity as adding fresh batteries with the relevant adapter is a bit of a dead loss in terms of exposure metering. The metering needle moves from rest a bit but only when the aperture is wide open and the shutter speed is cranked up to long exposure times. I had such high hopes of using it again as I dived headlong back into film photography a couple of years ago. I ended up having to replace it with an FM2, which I love.
All the images have been digitised with a Sony A7r and Nikkor 55/2.8 Macro with extension tube for 1:1 reproduction. As an aside, this is a process I’m loving as I revisit 40 years’ worth of 35mm negs.
Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-free Experience
There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts:
Paid Subscription - £2.99 per month and you'll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
Content contributor - become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.
Sign up here.
18 thoughts on “5 Frames with an Olympus OM-1 taken back in the 80s – By Nik Stanbridge”
Nice article. I have the almost exact same combo as your black paint OM-1n and 50 f1.4 but mine is no an ‘n’ version. If you do want to try and bring it back to full working order consider sending it to Luton Camera Repairs in Guildford Street Luton, they may be able to bring it back to life fully. Cheers for now. Julian
Thanks Julian. I might just do that!
I was just about to say that there must be an OM-wrangler not too far away who could make it purr. Great stories and pictures, and a reminder of long days of self-education expending shoe-leather and cheap film. Thanks for sharing!
The OM1 is mechanical, doesn’t need the light meter to work. I use a light meter app on my phone with mine. Works fine.
Nik – I love the tube train shot! Reminds me of the sort of thing I was doing back in the 80s – I was a photography student in London back then and enjoyed wandering about with my camera just photographing anything and everything that caught my fancy – even asking people to pose on occasion (I don’t think I could get away with something like that today – probably end up in hospital). It seemed that time was endless in those days – I used a multitude of cameras including Nikon, Spotmatics, Olympus, Canon, Hasselblad and Sinar, etc, – I’ve recently started the mammoth task of scanning many of those older negatives and some of them, I must admit, are not that bad and do capture an era that is now long gone- perhaps I might do what you’ve done and post them on the site.
Thanks for the comments Chris. We’ve been on the same journey it seems. I too found being a photographer in those time as being a carefree and much simpler process.
Brings back lots of memories, Nik. I like your desk… and had that Walkman, too ;))
Thanks Thorsten 🙂
People spend thousands on various film cameras with no light meter at all and you ditch your favourite camera because the light meter quit working? Lol
You make a very good point!
Man in fog is walking like a man having a bad day. Great article 🙂
Thanks Alex. Yes, perhaps rueing his decision to only be in shirtsleeves…
Nik, I may be slightly older than you but a lot of what you say resonates with me,
I have an OM-1n which was my second SLR camera ever and started me on the OM road with several lenses and an OM2n eventually. A beautiful system even today.
The OM1n is essentially the same but with a “flash ready” LED, improvements to the winder, modified springs to hold the film cartridge and other improvements to the internal mechanics.
I second the recommendation to send it to Luton Cameras as they have helped me in the past and are Olympus specialists
Thanks Dave. I’m going to be in touch with the guys in Luton very shortly.
Awesome shots with an awesome camera/lens! The FM2n relegates mine to a shelf most of the time also but if you get it working again, OM bodies compliment Leica bodies nicely. 😉
Thanks Johnny! There’s an overwhelming consensus that I have to get the OM back on the road. I’ll have to go begging to my youngest daughter though as I gave her the 50/1.4 Zuiko (to go with the OM-10 I bought her a few years ago).
My OM-1 is also broken, but the camera works great, I use it with an external meter and I love it!
Great article, and great pictures!