Hitting the “Zone” – Shot-by-Shot street shooting with a Hasselblad 500CM

By Scott Ferguson

Going out to shoot still photos can be a bit of a ‘hit or miss’ experience for me.  While always starting with high hopes to shoot beautiful and/or memorable photos, I’ve had many outings where it just isn’t happening no matter how hard I try.  Whether it’s the conditions on a given day or an environment that isn’t offering much to draw the eye, heart or brain, the single biggest factor is always ultimately…  me.

If I’m ‘switched on’ I’ll probably figure out a cool way to shoot something in even a pretty mundane situation, but if I’m not feeling it, I won’t be able to get much out of even the most gorgeous days and locations beyond bland ‘snapshot’ photos that don’t do much more than remind me where I was when I shot it.  Unfortunately, I can never really predict in advance which version of me will be behind the camera when I pack up the gear to head out, or even how long it will last when it comes around.

Some days I’ll wander the streets with my camera in search of, but not finding people who invite my attention or draw me in.  While I’m learning to burn less film on those days, I’ll usually still shoot something.  But the shots are usually from a greater physical and emotional distance from the subject and rarely of anything memorable unless I stumble onto something by sheer chance.  In that mode, I tend to feel more introverted or ‘shy’ about taking photos.  But it can also feel like the world is also a bit withdrawn and everyone is kind of pulled back a bit.

But sometimes it all just comes together and I’m feeling relaxed and confident and I happen into a place where there are lots of fascinating people who are happy to make that connection.  And the shots just flow one after another…  I had a magic hour like that pretty close to actual magic hour on the Friday evening going into Labor Day weekend when I decided to go to Washington Square Park to try some street shooting with my Hasselblad 500CM.  I spent a lot of the spring and summer focusing on street shooting with my Leica M3 and I felt ready to give medium format a try.

What follows is literally every shot, good or bad, in shooting order over the course of about an hour, sometimes swapping between the two film backs; the black & white shots were with a 645 back on Ilford XP2, with a Yellow/Green filter unless noted otherwise, and the color shots were on a 6×6 back with Portra 400.  While I had the 150mm Sonnar f4 in one pocket, I’m pretty sure everything was shot with the 80mm Planar f2.8.

I took a couple of ‘warm up shots’ en route, here catching the famous view of the Manhattan Bridge from Washington Street in Brooklyn.

The light was getting quite beautiful on the Manhattan side as I made my way down Fifth Avenue heading to the Park.  This shot of Washington Mews has what I used to call “Hopper” light when scouting film locations.  We used to joke that the film would get made if someone mentioned Edward Hopper.  I already had a good feeling that this was going to be a good outing…

Once I got into the Park, it didn’t take long before I was approaching people to ask for photos.  First up were some nice young woman who were part of a group selling second hand clothing laid out on the paving stones.

They seemed sweet and cool and had a kind of timeless “Greenwich Village” vibe, like people the Fugs might have written a song about when my camera was new.

Next was a ‘shaman’ type who was offering “Fitness, Mynd, Spiritual Assessment & Remedy” services for anyone passing by.

He looked even more timeless, like someone who could have been around a thousand years ago…

…or maybe a thousand years in the future.

While definitely leading an alternative lifestyle, I think this gentleman seemed quite physically fit and may have been having the best time of anyone in the Park that night.  He was fully aware of being photographed and gave me consent for every shot, including getting pretty close up.  Who knows, he may be on to something with his spiritual ways…

Next up was a fellow balancing a broom stick on a fingertip without drawing too much attention.  The park was hopping that night.

I took another shot to lose the man in the foreground with the iPhone, but I probably should have reframed entirely to get “Broomstick Man” clear of the trees.

But my attention was drawn to the incredibly dramatic sky that moment, so I put on the red filter and lined up a cityscape showing the view up Fifth Avenue including the Empire State Building framed by the Washington Square Arch.

This might be the best graphic compositions I’ve shot since coming back to New York.  I’m envious of people who excel at making great shots of architecture, and I can see a few places I’d try to improve if I have a second go, including getting a clearer view of the Empire State Building with less foreground obstructions.  But it will probably be hard to beat the drama of this shot in that light in that sky.    I hadn’t set out that evening to do graphic cityscapes but it’s good to keep your eyes and your mind open for what the world is giving you at any given time; many of my favorite shots are things I grabbed on the way to shooting something else.

Next I saw a young man who had a bit of a soulful look sitting on the side of the Fountain and asked him for a shot, which he obliged.

I realized that I had miscalculated exposure a bit, forgetting to compensate for the Yellow/Green filter, which was back on after code-switching back to ‘street portrait mode’, and asked for another take, which he also obliged without much fuss.  (What a difference changing filters makes on the buildings and the sky for shots taken in the same direction a few minutes apart!)

I like the exposure better on this one which gives a slightly stronger read of his face, while the composition of the first one is probably better.  I think I may have rushed a bit on the re-take because I probably felt a bit awkward asking for a second one (he was quietly friendly, but also pretty deadpan.)

There was a strange little scene playing out on my periphery with a young woman being ferried about in a shopping cart by a group of friends which I kept wanting to grab.  But they were on their way out of the park by the time I was ready to shoot that direction, and I fell short (or long) of nailing focus on that one.

Next up, I found these two young men, Taji and ‘Cam1’, and ended up doing a series with them.

They had an interesting style of posing for shots.

I decided to swap film backs to get some color, this time including EJ, who is a photographer himself and recognized the Hasselblad as the camera that went to the Moon.

Coming out of my chance meeting with the great Jamel Shabazz, I’ve been developing a style of street photography/portraiture that I think of as ‘High Engagement’, where I’ll try to collaborate with the people I meet in a kind of ‘Five Minute Film Friendship’ where they play an active role in how they are shot.

EJ was super excited to see a Hasselblad in action and asked if he could try taking a shot.  I was happy to let him have a go.

First he grabbed a two shot of Taji and Cam1.

photo by EJ Barthelemy

And then a three shot that included me hamming it up a bit…

photo by EJ Barthelemy

EJ was unfamiliar with the controls of a Hasselblad and accidentally misfired while he was lining up a solo shot of me…

photo by EJ Barthelemy

But when shot as intended I was surprised, not unpleasantly, by his framing with me pushed over  to the right edge of the frame.  He mentioned that he likes shooting with a Fujifilm 690, the ‘Texas Leica’ which has a more panoramic format than the square frame of the ‘blad, so maybe he’s used to having a lot of negative space in his compositions.    Or perhaps he had noticed the much more interesting and intense girl in a stroller center bottom of frame who might be a tad sharper than me.

Maybe it’s actually a shot of her…

photo by EJ Barthelemy

In any event, I like the depth and layers of life in EJ’s frame that give a feel for the atmosphere of the park on a very busy late summer evening.  On the subject of atmosphere, these photos don’t include the soundtrack of the park which included a rapper who started singing about us taking photos.  We were drawing a bit of attention with our poses and antics, including from the gentleman in the head scarf in the background of EJ’s shot.

It seemed like he wanted me to take a shot of him, so I asked for one and he proceeded to choose the environment of the outdoor chessboards and struck a very interesting contemplative pose.  He more or less co-designed the shot, my input was limited to deciding to shoot him pretty close from a low angle to get the soft focus chess pieces as a foreground element.  One of my better shots on the night…

I felt like this was a pretty cool portrait and decided I wanted to try doing another one in black & white.  While I was fiddling with the gear swapping backs and mounting the Yellow/Green Filter, we made a some small talk.  When I asked where he was from, he said “The X”, which meant the Bronx.  When I was finally ready for a second shot, he said he had only agreed to do one and that was that.  Luckily I was pretty happy with the one I got.

Next, I tried a shot of a young man offering “Free Bad Dating Advice”, but missed balancing exposure between his skin tones and the bright white sign, frequently a challenge when trying to shoot handmade signs.

How could I resist taking a shot of this character from Austin, Texas who mixes 21st Century Metro styling with Gilded Age Dandy?

It didn’t seem right to move on without grabbing a shot in color, which he happily obliged.  Head to toe, with those Texas ropers anchoring the look, he almost comes off like one of those Surrealist ‘Exquisite Corpse’ drawings where they folded the paper three times and a different person drew each section.  But somehow he was managing to pull it all together with panache.

Then I was called on some timely family business relating to our travel plans for the impending Labor Day Weekend and had to leave the park.

On the way out, some colorful characters asked me to take a shot of them, so I took two…

First a group fist bump for some people having a great time that night in the Park.  I wonder if they had undergone a Fitness, Mynd & Spiritual Assessment?  It seemed a distinct possibility…

And finally a cheeky send off for me that the fellow on the left said he wanted to submit to a T shirt contest.

After I stepped out of the Park, things went immediately back to ‘normal’ and the magic spell that had lasted about an hour was gone, disappearing into the night like this fellow in the Chinese hat.

After my family missions were accomplished I stopped at an outdoor table to sort out the gear and make sure I hadn’t lost anything in the general hubbub a very dynamic session of street shooting.

Fortunately, everything was there!  Here’s my Hasselblad ‘street kit’ —  the camera, two lenses, a spare back and a small stack of filters (and off camera the lens caps and a smaller hood for the 80mm Planar.) Next time I might not bother with the 150mm, since it didn’t go on the camera once that evening.  You might notice that both lenses are equipped with focus handles, which is an absolute must for anyone who might want to attempt street shooting with a Hasselblad, especially with the O.G. early edition C lenses.  The throw of the sharply knurled focus rings on those brilliant Zeiss lenses is endless, especially on the closer end of the range which is critical for doing portraits.  Adding that lever handle makes it possible to focus with a quick major ‘sweep’ to rough in, followed by a small bit of fine-tuning to lock in focus that feels almost comparable to the speed of focusing on my 35mm rangefinder.

I have to say that the Hasselblad is a brilliant camera for my emerging style of doing street portraits — it is a bit of a magnet for people who are open to being photographed.  Even people who don’t know its glorious history are drawn to its distinctive look and sense that it’s a special camera.  While large, there’s a stylish elegance about a ‘blad that feels kind of inviting compared to a big digital SLR with a giant honking zoom lens.

While I was taking my inventory, a server from the restaurant asked what I wanted?  While I was actually keen to hightail it back to the Park to catch whatever was left of that gorgeous light, I sensed my moment was over.  So I ordered a cool beverage and reflected back about the amazing time I’d just had, which I knew was one of my best-ever NYC street shooting sessions.

I wish I could figure out how to bottle the inspiration that puts me into a photographic ‘flow’ state.  It doesn’t always happen when I want it to happen.  And I can’t make it happen.

It just happens when it wants to.

For now I have to live with that, and be happy that it happens at all!  As a dedicated hobbyist, I am taking the photos I want to take, and sharing the ones I feel happy to share.  So I suppose I can afford to wait for those special moments where a special photo unfolds in front of me, or those exciting sessions when cool shots seem to flow like water, and endure the days when it’s more like pulling teeth to get a single shot — or maybe it’s more like looking for a tooth that you lost under a pillow and can’t find.  It’s a game of enduring the many lows to get to the memorable highs.  I suppose what separates a happy amateur like me from a professional may be in how much they are able to raise their ‘floor’ so they can get at least a 7 out of 10 every time they go out on assignment, no matter how much or how little their personal muse is singing in their ear.

While I’m pretty new to shooting film stills as a serious hobby/avocation, I’ve been in and around creative pursuits at least since dropping out of the engineering program at Cornell University about two weeks into my freshman year and wandering over to the Theater Department, if not going all the way back to when I was four or five years old taking acting lessons from my grandmother who was a silent film extra back in the late ‘teens and early 20’s.  Having been blessed in my day job to work professionally with world class talents in a number of fields, I don’t pretend to have that kind of gift in any of my creative pursuits.  There’s no accounting for genius, and some people just have something special that the rest of us can only dream about.

For the rest of us mortals who still like to try to be creative, I think the most important factor — more than talent, luck or inspiration — is just figuring out how to stay in the game.  That is the key to whatever success I’ve had professionally in filmed entertainment, and will be key to making the most of my new hobby.  That evening in Washington Square was made possible, first by showing up with a loaded camera, but also by the ten or twenty previous photowalks I took before that one.  From those first landscape shoots in Canada where I learned that a boring or ugly shot in a viewfinder isn’t going to turn out great because I shot it with a famous camera, to all of those outings in NYC when I first started dipping my toe into street shooting on 35mm, to the day I ran into Jamel Shabazz who opened up a whole new way to think about shooting photos of people, and also importantly, through all of the dull and uninspired days where even the dull and uninspiring shots I took were helping me develop the physical muscle memory of how to handle the controls of the camera and the mental muscle memory of how things look in different lights with different film stocks, lenses, filters and camera settings.

At this stage, I feel happy to have raised my ceiling as much as I have to be ready to take advantage of a magic evening like the one in Washington Square Park, even for the short hour that it lasted.  And I’m learning more and more, the price of admission is “Just keep showing up…”

Share this post:

About The Author

By Scott Ferguson
Scott Ferguson is an independent film and television producer known for such films as Brokeback Mountain, Only Lovers Left Alive and The People vs. Larry Flynt, and the television shows The Night Of and Succession. While working around cameras and recorded images for his entire career, shooting still photography with vintage all manual cameras is a new and very stimulating passion.
Read More Articles From Scott Ferguson

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
If you think £2.99 a month is too little, then please subscribe and I can manually edit the subscription value for you – thank you very much in advance if this is what you would like to do!

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Gary Smith on Hitting the “Zone” – Shot-by-Shot street shooting with a Hasselblad 500CM

Comment posted: 28/09/2025

Hey Scott, great shots! I don't shoot what folks generally call street although I do shoot in the city from time to time. Anytime that I go out with a camera, I wonder if I'll shoot anything. Yesterday I took the new-to-me D700 out with me on a trip away from home and took 30 shots in two hours. It felt like I was shooting everything.

Thanks for sharing!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Scott Ferguson replied:

Comment posted: 28/09/2025

Thanks Gary! How do you like the D700? 30 shots in two hours feels quite slow and deliberate to me, particularly on a digital camera. I'll shoot a fair amount of film if I'm feeling it, like I was that evening, but nothing like I would on digital. I rented an M10 a few weeks ago and even though it has the layout and feel and takes the same lenses as a film M, I still tended to overshoot with it. I look forward to seeing some of the things you shot!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Cdlinz on Hitting the “Zone” – Shot-by-Shot street shooting with a Hasselblad 500CM

Comment posted: 28/09/2025

Great shooting. WSP is probably my favorite photography destination in the whole world.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Scott Ferguson replied:

Comment posted: 28/09/2025

Thanks! It's a great spot! Maybe I'll see you there some time...

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Gordon Ownby on Hitting the “Zone” – Shot-by-Shot street shooting with a Hasselblad 500CM

Comment posted: 29/09/2025

Scott - Thank you for the photos and the essay. You articulated many of the same thoughts that I typically have during a day of street shooting here in L.A. (I've found that Venice Beach has a vibe similar to what you experienced in Washington Square Park as for the acceptance of its habitues being photographed.) And while I don't take the big Hasselblad out for street photography, I completely agree with you on its "magnet" factor.

One of my favorites in the set is that layered photo with the arch, buildings, sky, and iPhone photographer. You mentioned that you are "pretty sure" you shot everything with the 80mm Planar and didn't use the 150mm Sonnar. But darn, that photo and the Manhattan Bridge photo stand out for their gobs of compression.

I'll check out your other posts and look forward to more of your NYC photos.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Scott Ferguson replied:

Comment posted: 29/09/2025

Thanks Gordon! I was just in LA, but didn't really have time for any more concentrated shooting, just grabbing a few shots here and there. I'd love to shoot in Venice some time! I'm curious what you shoot with when you go there? I usually take my 1966 M3 with with a 1949 collapsible Summitar, and that also works a bit for the curiosity magnet, but not to the same degree as the Hasselblad. I see what you mean with the compression, especially with the Washington Square shot, but I don't think I swapped lenses. But one of the issues about that 'flow state' I'm writing about is that it's not really compatible with notation or disciplined record keeping, and I'm concentrated enough on absorbing what I'm seeing and finding a shot that I could see myself losing track of a detail like that. I could probably figure it out next time I'm there with the camera and line up a similar frame and see which lens matches the image. I will definitely be in both Washington Street and Washington Square Park again with the Hasselblad before too long. Best, s

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Hume on Hitting the “Zone” – Shot-by-Shot street shooting with a Hasselblad 500CM

Comment posted: 29/09/2025

This is a great piece thanks Scott. There's a quote I really like of someone asking Francis Bacon, "Why do you paint so many portraits?" and his answer was, "Why, they're all self portraits of course!" And I think that's pretty true for what I see in this series. It feels to me this piece is a record of your interaction with these people more than anything else, and since you are in every interaction you are therefore in every photograph. I don't think we learn nearly as much about them as we do about you, and how you chose to interact and engage on this occasion. (Maybe the exception is the guy with the chessboard, because he seems to take himself off in to his own world and just wants you to witness that.) And yes, when the interactions end (guy with Chinese hat) the energy is suddenly gone and the story has wound down. So - I don't know what you think about all that, but it's interesting to me because there have been three stories recently that have all had a sort of visual narrative; one by Sien Hong on a Mandler lens for street, in which every person who was aware of having their photo taken looks (to me) rather pissed off by the experience and Sien was in his own world, and one by David P in which you can see the relationship between him and the model develop over the shoot and which is also reflected in tandem with the telling of the story. So - this is interesting for me to think about and thanks for sharing!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Scott Ferguson replied:

Comment posted: 29/09/2025

Hi David, Thanks for the very thoughtful and perceptive post. I love the Francis Bacon quote. I think you are onto something in terms of how a photographer's images convey something about them as much as whatever they are shooting. However, I also think there is/was a collective energy in the environment that will also influence what we shoot, especially if it's about people. I think there was a pervasive happy mood in Washington Square Park on a gorgeous evening rolling into a holiday weekend that was kind of infectious. It got me as well as the people I ended up engaging with for shots and you can see that we were all having a fun time. Interesting about Sien's and David's pieces, I would also add a remarkable post a few weeks ago by Alexandre Kreisman. I feel like my experience of doing impromptu portraits with people I meet is in an ongoing evolutionary process, and I don't know where it will end. With no judgment, I started by trying to shoot like Sien appears to, grabbing shots of people out in public where the only engagement is pointing the camera at them, but with much less success and quality than he does. I am now at a stage where shooting people has become collaborative and they are aware of being shot and participating in the creation of the photo. Even the shaman was throwing poses for the camera -- although he never stood still for even a fraction of a second, they were kind of rolling poses. I think David's outstanding extended session goes further and deeper with his sitter than I have yet -- I feel very conscious of how I'm interrupting someone's day and haven't pushed past going for around 4-6 shots in about 5 minutes. Finding a complete stranger with the time and openness to do an extended photo shoot in different environments like David has shows a lot of perceptiveness, confidence and finesse on his part. Not surprising, given what I know about David, both from his writing and now some in-person visits that grew out of our 35mmc connection. Alexandre Kreisman goes even a step further in his portraiture, in that he connects with the people he's photographing in a way that goes beyond a posed photo and appears to be catching them in moments where they are either unaware of the camera or no longer conscious of its presence in a way that impacts their behavior. As well as being technically excellent I am very impressed with the intimacy of some of his portraits. I think his style requires a good deal of time with any given subject, something that is beyond the scope of my current approach to shooting, which tends to fall on days I have to schedule in advance a bit, and trying to go out with the cameras in the mid afternoon rolling into evening when I like the light the most. I am intrigued by the idea of a bit of spectrum of engagement that is getting ever closer to the subject of a photo, with Sian on one end, and Alexandre on the other, and David and me somewhere in the middle. I've gotten some shots I like a good bit where people are posing/presenting, but I'm interested in figuring out how to get a little deeper. But it's possible I could go in an entirely different direction as I continue to try to evolve and grow, but for now the most important thing is that I'm enjoying where I am and happy to learn and grow with the help of people like you, David, Sean and Alexandre. Best, S

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley on Hitting the “Zone” – Shot-by-Shot street shooting with a Hasselblad 500CM

Comment posted: 29/09/2025

Beautiful series of photos and reflections, Scott. Washington Square was certainly a yielding and receptive medium for you on this visit in the "zone"; your comfort and a certain playfulness with the various characters there comes through abundantly in the photos. I especially love the hooded chess-player and the soulful young man. They seem willing to be themselves for the camera and stake their claim to that fraction of a second of time, oddities and all, which bespeaks a certain comfort with you and with the portrait session setup. Perhaps our sense of being in the zone is also connected to the happy confidence of finding such willing and photogenic partners. Your monochrome cityscape with the Arch is just gorgeous; alongside your Homage to Bruegel photo from BC from last summer it's definitely a candidate for a print and a privileged spot on a wall. Lovely photos and writing.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Scott Ferguson replied:

Comment posted: 29/09/2025

Thanks David! Very interesting reflections on the people who feel more 'themselves' in a posed photo that relates a bit to my conversation with David Hume on this thread. And I do feel that with the soulful young man and the chess player, and maybe the close up of the 'Shaman', but with a completely different kind of energy. I'm intrigued about the chess player shot, because in some ways his was the most stage-managed shot of the entire session, a moment completely set up for a photo -- he went over to the chess table and sat in that position as long as needed for the shot and then moved on. Some people have different ways of connecting to the camera, I suppose. Yes, I love that shot of the arch -- it looks almost like the sky is photoshopped in, but that's how it looked that evening, I only did some very minor Lightroom adjustments. It also shows the dramatic impact of colored filters on b&w when you compare it to the other photos in the session. In retrospect, I might have kept the red filter on for that shot of the soulful young man, as the clouds would have added a lot to the up angle I was shooting, but maybe next time I have a sky that good... Best, S

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain on Hitting the “Zone” – Shot-by-Shot street shooting with a Hasselblad 500CM

Comment posted: 30/09/2025

Thanks for this stunning essay and journey through NY
I’ve never been there but your photos sure the flavour and feel of the place
I have only visited it in dreams - a recurring dream where I’m by what seems like what in Britain they call an ‘off licence’ in America I guess it’s a liquor store cum grocers. It’s always night and the street and people are all what I imagine NY to be
Been having this dream for decades
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Scott Ferguson replied:

Comment posted: 30/09/2025

Thanks so much for the kind words, Ibraar! Fascinating dream... When I first came to NYC about 40 years ago, there were old school bodegas and cigar stores that would be open late or all night where you could duck in and grab some beer. There may have been liquor stores as well, I have a vague image in my mind of places with very thick bullet proof plexiglass and very low end products like small pocket sized flasks of gin or vodka and very cheap fortified wine -- but those were less common and not the kind of place I'd go to. Now not so many people smoke and the old bodegas have been replaced by bright and clean Korean deli's. But I'm happy that there are still plenty of characters in our wonderful city. Best, s

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Jeffery Luhn on Hitting the “Zone” – Shot-by-Shot street shooting with a Hasselblad 500CM

Comment posted: 02/10/2025

Scott,
I like your style of collaboration with people you meet and photograph in public places. Very spontaneous shots. I see many postings of 'street photography' with the backs of people's heads, or large groups of people with no connection to the camera. Boring. As you mentioned, it's important to be in the right mood for collaboration with strangers, but when it works, it's great.
I observe the two arm length rule. I reach out my hand and ask the subject to reach out and touch my fingertips. I'm now close, but not threatening. I've also made physical contact with the subject, which is an ice breaker. Then I frame the shot and look at my model, not through the camera, while I fire some frames. Wow, people brighten up when they can see both of your eyes. This approach is particularly useful in countries where I don't speak the same language as my subjects.

Handing your Hasselblad to a stranger was certainly a leap of faith. I never hand my camera to anyone I cannot outrun...and those people are getter to be fewer and fewer!
Jeffery
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Scott Ferguson replied:

Comment posted: 02/10/2025

Hey Jeffery, Thank you! I started out shooting exactly that kind of 'remote' 'no engagement' style of street shooting and struggled to get any kind of consistently interesting photos. Mostly I got those oblique angles and or wide shots that didn't really resolve onto anything that are more like landscape/architecture with the incident presence of people. Every once in a great while I might catch something interesting, but more often I would just miss something interesting because I was too clumsy or slow with the gear or didn't have the right lens on. Learning to make those brief "Film Friendships" was transformational, and something I've been building on over the last 4-5 months. Your technique of making eye contact with the person you are shooting sounds really interesting. I might still be a little nervous about moving off the eye piece, but I like the idea of that. It feels like a good technique to use with a 6x6 camera with a waist level finder for some reason. Although I also think it could easy work with a wide lens on 35mm, like a 28mm. I was interested in the post a week or so ago that noted that more and more people are using 28mm's for portraits because that matches the iphone screen's primary focal length. Shooting with a lens like that would probably make your 'two arms length' rule a little tougher to uphold. I like shooting portraits on a 50mm on 35mm or an 80mm on 6x6, but have also had some good result with the old school approach using longer lenses, like. the 90mm and the 150mm. I've done the Hasselblad hand-off twice now, but I wouldn't hand the camera off to just anyone I met on the street. In both cases the person I let take a few shots was a young photographer who mentioned that the Hasselblad is the camera that went to the Moon when they approached me. I figured if they were that serious about photography, they were likely to treat the camera and me with respect, and I was not disappointed either time. EJ, the young man in this post is a very impressive fellow, finishing up his degree at Harvard. We're planning on doing a photo walk at some point soon.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Alexandre Kreisman on Hitting the “Zone” – Shot-by-Shot street shooting with a Hasselblad 500CM

Comment posted: 19/10/2025

Dear Scott,
first of all, all my apologies to reading your article so late, but I wanted to take the time the read it correctly and study your shot. Also, thank you for your kind words in the comment, it's much appreciated!

About your post: I love it, love the emotion you convey through your text and pictures. A very nice one! I have to admit I was amazed you would do such a shoot with a blad! Not that I'm against it, I love them and also own one, however I haven't shot it for a while now, due mainly to the price of films.

If you allow me, i'll use the comment section for some tips i learned the hard way and might save you some time. Please, feel free to do the same!

In all the pictures, my favorites are the ones, you are close with your subjects! It gives you that missing connection (even if you haven't talk to them) to transform your shot in a more intimate portrait/image of the person. Whilst the others are too far away or not cropped enough to attracts the attention on them, which are the subject if i'm not mistaken. The first tip i give you is to find a viewfinder for your blad like the PM. It will allow you to see the image inverted comparing to the waist viewfinder, thus rendering composition far more easier, and by experience, my accuracy increased a lot with it.

You mentioned you also had the 150 with you. I do not know it's rendering, but if is the same or near-ish as the next generation, that would be my go to lense for portrait. The stuff you get from that beast is just so beautiful on a 120 neg, I think, It's one of the lense I had the more keepers with. That said, even though the 80 is considered one of finest lenses ever produces, I admit I hate it. Everything about it, from the longest twist you have to do to focus, to its rendering and the transition between focus and bookeh. Question of taste i suppose.

Also, when using such lenses, I would not use filters, first because the result of the lenses unfiltered are gorgeous and with a lot of contrast, then in the case of red/green filter, simply because my subject is more important, and my reading of the light will be focused on the subject. I want it to naturally be the center of the picture. If I had a beautiful and menacing sky for instance, it would add another subject to the image that might confuse the viewer. My point of view off course.

When it comes to shooting 120, it's an entire different world from 135, also depth of field is completely different and you need to shoot enough with each lens to really know it. All these translates buy subject not enough in focus. Again, If I were to shoot that day, i would use 400 iso, f8 minimum and adjust the speed for each subject. The Depth of field in 120 is so narrow than it would be like shooting your 50 135 at 4/f5.6 max.

Coming to engaging your subject, there are a lot of techniques, some you already practices very well, others you may not know or tried. Jeffery Luhn has an excellent technique that I use a lot. A photographer constantly on his/her camera for too long break any link one might have with his/her subject. Thus, again a lot of practice ... and making one's life easier. The best assignment I ever got during a workshop was "Embrace your fear of the streets" (it's not the original title, but close). The goal was on the first day, to go in the streets, take someone and make a portrait whilst getting approval. We were paired and each one had to have received ten NO during the day. I think I asked around 30 to 40 people and ended-up with a mear 5 NO. If approached correctly, whether by non verbal communication, or through verbal communication, the lesson was pretty clear and it builds up a confidence to approach strangers and get a picture. The second day: same as the first, the minor difference was that we couldn't ask permission. One no was my result that day. In 2 days of workshop, I gained maybe 5 years of tries and error, maybe even worst. The plus side, is that the whole group were already a bit advanced, and in the critique session, in the streets, each gave a trick to approach someone. Wow, I love your hat, here let me grab an image! 9 times out 10 the person will agree and you just have to make to your shot. Sometimes directing the person, or discuscussing with him/her, so the camera ready the person forget about it and you have your shot.
Getting and remaining steady with a camera, especially a blad requires training and practice as it's a beast! but feasible. Now to be fair, I do not shoot with a blad for such events, as there are too many complications, plus again the price of a film.

Also, your position and the position of you subjects matters a lot, an makes your life easier whilst getting better shot. If I take the photo you made from the young gentleman with his earphone, the second is much better, however, there are still too much in the background to have him come out the photo naturally. A meter to the left (he would move to) and behind him would have been nothing leaving only him important, in focus with that specific stare. I think I would have taken the shots at his heights for more direct connection and better effect. Moving would also eliminate the dark part in the left in front of him that distract the eyes from your subject, thus making a bit less interactive shot. A more intimate shot. Same think for the gentleman in pink, 1 meter to the left would have liberate your shots from all the unnecessary people in the shot, especially the legs in jeans right behind him. As a general rule, I shoot at the subject height, whether a children or here the two first of your shaman. At his level, your pictures would have more impact and direct connections with him.

Two more things and I'm done

Regarding the mood you mentioned, it's a skill that you develop over time. Off course you need to be able to (not to many stress, being upcoming and forward in your non-verbal conversation). Like you I live in place, where gathering are part of life with a lot of open minded people. This helps a lot. In the beginning, I was very shy, and used alcohol as a mean to disinhibits myself. At this time of my life, the more I drank, the more I was conquering the environment i was in, engaging conversation with everyone, resulting in a lot of images that turn out excellent. Nowadays, the need is not there anymore and I have no trouble at all engaging people and usually making a portrait or an image. I believe than I do not waste their time, nor interrupt them in their life, but "au contraire" I offer them an experience they seldom have! Sort of a win-win scenario. The ones that are not interested will tell it to you, ok a sorry and let's move one to the next one. I called that mood : opening my eyes. Not always evident, but in the right circumstances, it frees you, you are alert to everything around you constantly adjusting what needs to be, prepared for moments that will arrive. A pure bliss. I strongly recommend you to do small concert in small bars, low light. That will teach you a great deal about lighting, movement, quick focus, surrounding and anticipation.

Eventually, you mentioned my portraits earlier, which a bless you for that, just know that usually i spent less than a minute to make my shot (or a couple), I never made any shooting requiring more than 5 minutes, nor long series. A lot of the time, people are not conscious I'm there, or the camera is there. it's this anticipation and observation that allows me to sense when the moment will arrive. At this stage, all tuning is done (speed, aperture,pre focus, pre framing) and a lot of time the moment arrives quickly making it even more easier and brings immense satisfaction.
Too bad, we are living in different part of the world, I think a couple shooting sessions together would teach us a lot.

Final word: always have your camera ready. If you use an M or similar, it's so easy and fast that you just pick up your camera, focus, frame et voilà!

I hope this is not too much and is in no way meant to be negative, rather constructive.

I wish you happy shooting and to continue finding your bliss!

Alex
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *