Zeiss Ikon S 310 – The Last Contessa – Urban shooting in Norwich London and Cambridge in Black and White

By Ibraar Hussain

I bought myself this Zeiss Ikon S 310 recently and have been hooked on it, it’s a little gem. I bought it on a knee jerk; after using my Balda CA 35 and with Hamish kindly lending me his Contax T (coming soon) I’ve a sudden desire to shoot snapshots with a Scale or Zone focus camera. There are lots around, but I wanted something very small, pocket sized, with a sharp Carl Zeiss Tessar lens, something with impeccable build quality and the feel of something which could’ve been made by Leitz and gave instant pleasure the moment one handles it.

For anyone who isn’t familiar with Zone Focus or View Finder Cameras, get familiar with them! They’re relative bargains and a lot less of a bother than Range Finders or compacts with archaic AF systems. Judging distance is easy, I just used that glorious Finder to compose, with determining distance being easy and second nature (I use paces to determine distance – 1 pace is 1 yard = 3 feet. Plus I am pretty good at judging distance anyway. For close up – again easy – distance from the tip of my nose to the tip of my index finger is 1 Yard – 3 feet – 0.9m – all clearly shown on the lens barrel.

Well, there are a wealth of small View Finder cameras, such as ones from Yashica, Minolta, Olympus amongst others. But it had to be German, West German, special, plus something which hadn’t so far been reviewed on 35mmc.

After spending days trawling through every camera ever made by every company not only fitting my description exactly, but also looking at Japanese built cameras, I had hitherto avoided looking deeper into lines manufactured by Zeiss Ikon. Sure, Contessa is on their camera-wiki page but one has to look inside the Contessa link and then do some exploring to find this.

I saw a picture of the Ikon S 310 and instantly wanted to know more.

Released in 1971, It was the last ever Zeiss Ikon to feature the famous and time honoured Contessa marque. Contessa meaning Countess in Italian and the name being a reference to Contessa-Nettel .

The Zeiss Ikon S 310 was also one of their last ever cameras (they went bust in 1972), and it was accompanied by an RF model called the Zeiss Ikon S312 which lacked the Contessa label. The S312 RF is uglier and inferior as has stamped parts such as the wind on lever and is more of a Voightlander (as Voightlander then released the same camera slightly restyled made in Singapore).

Zeiss Ikon Contessa S310 rear
Zeiss Ikon Contessa S310
Zeiss Ikon Contessa S310 with The Contax T

The Ikon S 310 was small but elegantly formed, with a green shutter button and ZEISS IKON prominent on the front of the body. I had to have one. A search on the Evil Bay brought up a few around the world; all very expensive, but one German seller (and I couldn’t recommend them enough – great service and quick delivery ) Had one for a paltry £50 or so. I clicked Watch and an hour or so later I received an offer of 10% off so I clicked Buy. Three days later it arrived beautifully packaged. I opened the box to reveal a beauty. This weighs about 500g around 1 lb and has a solid feel and heft.

Apart from looking marvellous, it felt great. Beautifully die cast, with machined parts and a Moroccan Leather Leatherette. A back which comes off for loading and unloading; all done effortlessly. A fine ratcheting feel to the lever. A satisfying shutter click.

Everything is built and put together with care and beautifully. It’s adorable, just oozes class and I’m amazed it’s not cherished as something very special by collectors and Film users. There’s hardly anything on the Web bar two or three reviews. A couple of low quality videos and that’s it. Even Flickr is more or less devoid of it. I’m amazed as it feels as solidly built as anything else, it’s like a mini Leica M in feel and way beyond any similar Japanese camera I’ve handled or used.

As I said, it’s small! Just slightly larger than the Contax T, with a Viewfinder which is more or less exactly the same size and brightness as that in a Contax T.

Everything is easy, load up with PX125 batteries (which slot into the film take up section) and press the button at the top which lights up the film counter. Load up a Film and the Film loaded indicator ensures you won’t just open it forgetting there’s something loaded inside.

The Zeiss Ikon S 310 lens focal length of 40mm is probably the perfect focal length for snap shots – it’s about the same view as from the naked eye, so when you *see* a photograph, it’s a simple matter of lift and shoot – in seconds all done.
Set the aperture and distance, the photos will be acceptably sharp. As mine are, many aren’t pin sharp perfectly focussed but they don’t have to be. It wasn’t as if I was composing close up fine art, still life nature or portraits. For quick lift and shoot stuff it’s great.

Turn the focus which shows an icon in the View Finder – all the usual stuff. The lovely multi coated 40mm f2.8 Tessar is marked with the usual Distance scale and the snapshot marker at 3m f8. The battery powers the Light Meter making this an aperture priority snap shooter.

Zeiss Ikon Contessa S310 underside levers
Zeiss Ikon Contessa S310 open back

I liked the Zeiss Ikon S 310 so much I bought three! The German seller had another, plus I bought another non-working one for parts in-case I ever need them. I bought a 30.5mm Yellow filter for the lens and set the ISO accordingly.

In use as with others like this, you use the ISO dial to compensate for exposure. Apart from that it’s simple to wind on, shoot. To rewind just lift the lever underneath and rewind.

In use it’s just as I expected, works flawlessly and easily. Just like the Balda I reviewed here. everything about it is satisfying; the wind on lever, the feel of it in the hand, the size, the VF the lovely shutter and the look of it.

The Zeiss Ikon S 310 has shutter speed displayed in the finder which is very useful to assess camera shake and compensation. One can use the ISO dial to sort of lock exposure, with some patience and care.

It attracts a lot of the right attention, with passers by looking at it, others asking about it, and best of all people didn’t mind at all as I was shooting with it or asking to photograph them with it (in one case), it was a case of a guy with a fucking cool camera; a cool old camera.

I shot a roll of Agfa Photo APX 100 in London and Cambridge, which is fast becoming my favourite Film. I screwed the development up but I still managed to save a few. I then shot a roll of Kodak Eastman 5222 Double X in Norwich, which I thankfully took care with during development. Notice how i call it “urban photography”, I cannot do ‘Street’ or ‘reportage’ very well, probably the most difficult theme to get right. So I tend to focus on composition of buildings etc (or even people) and hope to have people in the scene.

I wasn’t too pleased with my results with the Kodak Eastman Double X 5222 – flat and lifeless. I really like this Film, but there’s a timer and place to use it.

Overall, what a classy little camera.

By the way, if you haven’t been to Norwich, go! it’s a beautiful city with so much life and so much going on; a street shooters nirvana.

I only had one roll, I swear I’d have been able to shoot five or six easily.

Yet thankfully Norwich is short on Tourists which plague York, Oxford, Canterbury and Cambridge etc. It’s also much nicer than any of these cities. Trust me.

Zeiss Ikon S 310 Specs

40mm F2.8 Tessar, F2.8 -F22, min. focus 0,9m
Prontor 500 S electronic shutter, 4sec.-1/500s
Size 100 x 74 x 53 mm, 

Weight 451 gr. with batteries
25-400 ISO, hot shoe,

Cable release socket, distance, aperture and exposure time visible in the View Finder.

Dedham, Essex Agfa APX 100 Diafine
Mistley Towers, Agfa APX 100 Diafine
Mistley Towers, Agfa APX 100 Diafine
Cambridge, Agfa APX 100 Diafine
Cambridge, Agfa APX 100 Diafine
Cambridge, Agfa APX 100 Diafine
London, Agfa APX 100 Diafine
London, Agfa APX 100 Diafine
London, Agfa APX 100 Diafine
Cambridge, Agfa APX 100 Diafine
London, Agfa APX 100 Diafine
Dedham, Essex Agfa APX 100 Diafine
Dedham, Essex Agfa APX 100 Diafine
Norwich, Kodak Eastman 5222 Double X
Cambridge, Agfa APX 100 Diafine
Norwich, Kodak Eastman 5222 Double X
Norwich, Kodak Eastman 5222 Double X
Norwich, Kodak Eastman 5222 Double X
Norwich, Kodak Eastman 5222 Double X
Norwich, Kodak Eastman 5222 Double X
Norwich, Kodak Eastman 5222 Double X
Norwich, Kodak Eastman 5222 Double X
Norwich, Kodak Eastman 5222 Double X
Norwich, Kodak Eastman 5222 Double X
Norwich, Kodak Eastman 5222 Double X
Norwich, Kodak Eastman 5222 Double X
Norwich, Kodak Eastman 5222 Double X
Norwich, Kodak Eastman 5222 Double X
Norwich, Kodak Eastman 5222 Double X

 

Norwich, Kodak Eastman 5222 Double X
Norwich, Kodak Eastman 5222 Double X
Norwich, Kodak Eastman 5222 Double X
Norwich, Kodak Eastman 5222 Double X
Norwich, Kodak Eastman 5222 Double X

Zeiss Ikon Contessa S310 – manual

 

Share this post:

About The Author

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
If you think £2.99 a month is too little, then please subscribe and I can manually edit the subscription value for you – thank you very much in advance if this is what you would like to do!

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Thomas Wolstenholme on Zeiss Ikon S 310 – The Last Contessa – Urban shooting in Norwich London and Cambridge in Black and White

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

My first 35mm Camera used zone focus, a Ricoh Super Shot 2.4, with a 40mm f2.4 lens. I quickly became quite adept at using zone focus accurately with it. It also had a focusing aid, a square diamond which increased in size as one focused closer. I gave it to our youngest daughter several years ago, still operating perfectly. The skills learned with it are still valid as there are times when I use these with other old cameras.
I am curious about one aspect of the article: The Eastman 5222 Double X photos appear to be far sharper and with a grater tonal range than the Agfa APX 100 Diafine yet you say it is the latter that is becoming your favourite. Could you please elaborate as, to my eye, the reverse would seem to be a better selection?
Thank you.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Thanks Thomas The Kodak lacks latitude, lacks detail in the sky and and is more block black and white - it relies on bang on lighting to shine - when things are right it’s fantastic The Agfa is more subtle with smoother tone better cloud detail and just to my eyes a more forgiving easier to work with and better general film.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Geoff Chaplin on Zeiss Ikon S 310 – The Last Contessa – Urban shooting in Norwich London and Cambridge in Black and White

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Wow! Now - looking at you images - makes me want one! Excellent shots, one after the other. I particularly like the shots of Kings chapel, and the embankment with people looking over the fence, but many more too.
"many aren’t pin sharp perfectly focussed but they don’t have to be. " absolutely right! Concentration on sharpness misunderstands what photography is about.
Excellent review, many thanks for the GAS attack.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Thanks Geoff I just concentrated on the composition and what tone I’d like Sharpness was secondary and I trusted the focus scale to give me acceptable sharpness Get one!! It’s a marvelous little thing!!!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain on Zeiss Ikon S 310 – The Last Contessa – Urban shooting in Norwich London and Cambridge in Black and White

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Geoff they’ve one left
https://ebay.us/m/TbNO6k
Bargain price excellent customer service and 3 day shipping
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


CHRISTOF RAMPITSCH on Zeiss Ikon S 310 – The Last Contessa – Urban shooting in Norwich London and Cambridge in Black and White

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

For anyone fearful of Zone Focus - there is a way to use your own noggin' and two eyes - and a homemade card - to make a "human rangefinder". Check it out at https://tomchuk.com/rf/. I started out with this when I bought a Rollei 35SE about 10y ago. After using it for a few months I got really good at estimating distances. Speaking of the Rollei 35, the lens on the Contessa looks to be the same as the one on the Rollei 35 and 35T - is that correct?
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Thanks man That’s a very useful little thing there and thanks for the link I just approximate using my arm length paces etc I’ve no idea about the Rollei but I’d guess it probably is the same considering the relationship between Zeiss Ikon Rollei and Voightlander

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Kodachromeguy replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

The Rollei 35 and 35T (not the S and SE models) used a 4-element Tessar lens. It was front element focus. I do not know if the Zeiss Ikon 310 is unit focus or front element focus. So the lenses may be similar but the focus procedure different.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

How would I find out if they are ?

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Curtis Heikkinen on Zeiss Ikon S 310 – The Last Contessa – Urban shooting in Norwich London and Cambridge in Black and White

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Fascinating and beautiful little camera, Ibraar! Lots of very nice images. Thanks for posting this marvelous piece!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Thanks my friend It is a beauty - opening up the spare parts one I see that it is so so over engineered inside that it’s bewildering!!! Typical Zeiss Ikon I also have a Contaflex Super with the leaf shutter I shall get round to using at some point

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Gary Smith on Zeiss Ikon S 310 – The Last Contessa – Urban shooting in Norwich London and Cambridge in Black and White

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Ibraar, I agree with Curtis: lots of great shots (as usual). I have to say that you and Bob Janes have had me tied up in knots over a Contax G1. They are so gorgeous. I certainly don't need another film camera and it does seem that there is quite a lot that can go wrong with a 15-year-old electro-mechanical camera. At the moment the big thing holding me back is the noise of the auto-focus. Given how quiet digital cameras are when they focus, it seems that the sound of the G1 focusing would bug me...

At some point we'll need to see ALL of your cameras laid out in a single shot (if that is even possible).

Cheers!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Hahaha!!! The G focussing sound is a nice sound !! Trust me. You’ll enjoy it as much as you enjoy the sound of a satisfying shutter sound. Get a G2 though - trusssssst me as it’s more refined and the AF along with the VF are superior. As for cameras All I have are: Olympus Evolt E1 Zeiss Ikon Contessa S310 Zeiss Ikon Contaflex Super Durst Automatica Contax RTS II Minolta Alpha 9 Balda CA35 Casio ZR850 Kodak Z950 And that’s the lot. All old has beens and nothing new

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Oh and the Konica Minolta Dimage A200 Which I nearly forgot about Out of these I only now use the Contessa featured here, the Contax, Minolta, Casio and Olympus. The others are stored away with the Contaflex unused

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Gary Smith replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

The G2's are so expensive...

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Another option would be the Konica Hexar AF but no idea whether the lens is as good as a Zeiss G but it’s a fixed one It’s a camera I wish I’d had but was always put off by the 35mm focal length as I prefer 40 - 45

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Andrew Fleetwood on Zeiss Ikon S 310 – The Last Contessa – Urban shooting in Norwich London and Cambridge in Black and White

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Nice photos as always!
I was reading an interesting technical article from Zeiss the other day. 40mm is the widest lens in a Tessar or otherwise symmetrical formula that can be fitted to a reflex camera which needs a larger rear lens to film distance. To go wider than this on a reflex camera requires a retro focus design which wasn’t invented until after WW2, simultaneously by Zeiss (the Flektogon) and by Angenieux (the Retrofocus).
This is why there are no ancient wide angle lenses that you can fit on an SLR.
With a simple rangefinder, there is no mirror clearance to accommodate, so the lens to rear element distance can be shorter, allowing for non retrofocus wide angle lenses. That’s why you can find more ancient wide angles for Leica and Contax rangefinders, but they can’t be adapted to fit on a reflex camera.
And that’s why also you can’t cannibalise the nice 28- 35mm lenses on older point and shoots and fit them to your SLR. They can be made to fit a modern mirrorless though, but that’s another story….
These are probably totally irrelevant facts, but I thought I would share them anyway!
By the way, I am waiting for delivery of a nice example of the Zeiss Jena Flektogon 35mm f2.4 to fit on my Canon 5D. The results should be fabulous, but we shall see….
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Thanks man, that’s some very interesting info I had no idea about Been down the rabbit hole since reading your message ! Hoping you’ll post your results here !!!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Andrew Fleetwood replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

If you want an absolutely fascinating read on wide angle lenses, then get to grips with this: https://lenspire.zeiss.com/photo/app/uploads/2018/02/en_CLB41_Nasse_LensNames_Distagon.pdf It explains why you can’t just stick any old wide angle lens on your modern digital camera and expect good results! It also explains why modern digital systems have been designed with much larger mount diameters than was previously the norm, and why modern digital lenses seem so enormously large- it’s to get a low incident angle of corner rays onto the sensor to minimise vignetting and aberrations. It’s kinda paradoxical. The elimination of a mirror in modern systems allows for a much shorter back focus distance, but it’s hard to use that shorter distance because of the challenges of incident angle on the sensor. So you compensate by using a much larger retro focus lens design, and lo and behold, the overall effect of camera plus lens is not much more compact than a DSLR would have been! It also explains what a challenge Leica have in converting the M system to digital, probably leading to the sort of sensor disaster they had with the M9.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Andrew Fleetwood replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

I just don’t know how you find the time to make these extensive posts! I just seem to run out of time! But I will try……. :-)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Thanks ! This is all new to me, informative eye opening and fascinating What was the issue with the M9 sensor ? Apart from corrosion

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Andrew Fleetwood replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Corrosion was the issue. You will see in the article that the sensor had to have especially thin, bespoke glass to enable it to work with legacy lenses, and it’s that bespoke glass which caused the problem

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Thanks again I’ll do so. A Shame that Leica abandoned the Kodak M9 sensor though That is probably the only digital Leica I’d want

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Kodachromeguy on Zeiss Ikon S 310 – The Last Contessa – Urban shooting in Norwich London and Cambridge in Black and White

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

4 batteries of 1.5 volts. interesting that the exposure and shutter mechanism needed so much current. But you have the advantage of using silver oxide or similar cells. In contrast, my Canonet GIII only needs a single 1.35 volt cell, originally mercury. Many of the Japanese compact cameras had a handy advantage: a filter screwed over the CDS sensor cell, so you did not need to compensate manually when using color filters.

Nice work with this elegant little jewel.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

the issue is battery drain and electronic issues with non working models and as we all know the Japanese have more reliable electronics !! Good observation about the sensor cell - in this I have to compensate the ASA dial Thanks man

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Aitchess replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Great article, by the way! The batteries are an interesting aspect, because right from launch, the S310 and its related models (the S312 and the Voigtlander VF101) required 1.5V 625 batteries rather than the typical 1.35V mercury 625 cells more commonly used at the time. Every battery holder is marked 1.5V and recommends a couple of suitable brands of the time (though the lettering on the adhesive label of the ZI versions is usually worn away by now). The battery holders are easily interchangeable between the S310, S312 and VF101, and the all have the additional pair of large metal claws in the cap's attachment to prevent the inner metal part from rotating with its knurled plastic collar whilst it is screwed into place or unscrewed, as the cap assembly also provides the camera's tripod socket. The shutter and meter only technically seem to need 3V rather than the 6V suggested by the 4 battery set, although the instructions always recommend loading/replacing all 4 at once, but unlike the S310 manual, VF101's instructions also admit that "For temporary use, 2 batteries placed together in either the upper or lower compartment will be sufficient". The batteries are loaded in pairs which face in opposite directions, suggesting they were used a pair at a time, to lessen the need for replacing the batteries as frequently. The same shutter, the Prontor 500 S Electronic, was in fact used in the previous, rather boxily-styled Zeiss Ikon Voigtlander Vitessa 500SE (Tessar lens) and a version without the clockwork self timer (the Prontor 500 Electronic) in the Vitessa 500AE (which was otherwise the same camera but with a Color-Lanthar lens). Both those cameras used two of the rarer 825 cells, which were also 1.5V each but shaped more like one of the larger-diameter modern coin cells - these Vitessas were also CdS-metered cameras with the same auto exposure as the S310 family and actually have an identical viewfinder display to the Contessa S310 - neither had a CRF. As you already know, the batteries can be saved from constant drain in the S310 and its siblings by turning the front dial to the flash symbol, which turns off the metering and sets the shutter to 1/30. Without batteries, the shutter fires at 1/500. I recently read an interesting alternative battery suggestion on the web and have tried it on a cosmetically-challenged spare VF101, and it works. If you remove the red plastic battery holder and all of its metal contacts (easy to do by unscrewing 2 side-by-side screws on the inside of its base where it attaches to the battery cap and then spinning the holder around on the remaining single screw which is at the back of the base - this leaves the battery cap and tripod socket undisturbed - the camera is able to run with no apparent issues on a CR123A lithium battery, which by some amazing quirk of fate fits perfectly (and provides the necessary 3V). I was only willing to try it on a spare camera though! Regarding filters and the CdS cell, it's perhaps useful to point out that the CRF-equipped S312 and VF101 have a retractable focus ring which also serves as a lens hood, and their filter thread is on the inner edge of this, so they do automatically correct the meter for filters. They're usable with the ring retracted too (though the focus scale and aperture scale are obscured in that case, and a filter would probably start to shade the meter cell with its rim). Due to the filter thread's near-external position, a filter doesn't get the benefit of the hood itself in either position of course!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Aitchess replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Since it doesn't seem like I can edit my comment after posting, I'll just add that the one difference between the viewfinder display of the Contessa S310 and the Vitessa 500SE/500AE is that the focus symbols on the Vitessas are arranged in the opposite direction to the Contessa's! Exact same symbols though,.and their aperture and shutter speed scales are exactly the same and read in the same direction as the Contessa's. Also, no idea where my paragraph breaks went, so sorry about that long single paragraph!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Thank you kindly!!!! "...If you remove the red plastic battery holder and all of its metal contacts (easy to do by unscrewing 2 side-by-side screws on the inside of its base where it attaches to the battery cap and then spinning the holder around on the remaining single screw which is at the back of the base - this leaves the battery cap and tripod socket undisturbed - the camera is able to run with no apparent issues on a CR123A lithium battery.." This is what I'll do, as even though I keep the dial on the flash symbol, it's easy to twist and forget - this drained my last set. I've kept a close eye on this and batteries last a long time, however any escape from using the PX125 would be welcome! It's a great camera, there's another article on it coming on the 14th of august, (shot exclusively with Agfaphoto APX 100) followed by the contax T one on the 28th!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Aitchess replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Good luck with doing that - as I mentioned, I haven't tried it on my Contessa S310 nor my S312, just a spare VF101 that is a bit cosmetically challenged, so fingers crossed that it works OK with your S310. I only did this about 5 days ago as an experiment - so far it seems fine (keep an eye on those three screws, so you can return the battery holder to its original condition if necessary - I discovered I seem to have a talent for losing them during such procedures!). One of the pages I discovered this trick on was https://www.nocsensei.com/camera/storia/massimilianoterzi/zeiss-ikon-s310-lultima-contessa/ quite a long way down. Also here: https://www.photo-foto.eu/zeiss/zeiss-ikon-s-310/ This one mentions needing a small, pea-sized ball of metal foil to ensure contact, but my VF101 hasn't needed that.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Aitchess replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Also this site mentions the CR123A battery adaptation, and all three that I have quoted are specifically referring to the ZI Contessa S310... https://www.kamera-sammlung.ch/kamera.php?page=5&typ=66&camera=1190#v A footnote to my earlier comment about the fact that the rangefinder models, the ZI S312 and the Voigtlander VF101, can use filters - I forgot to say that the size they take is 49mm. I wish I could edit my replies after posting, but it seems impossible.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Thanks again for the links and the info And haha yes once a reply is posted that’s it!!! I’m going to have a good look read and see. The battery idea I’ve read elsewhere as well I recall.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Aitchess replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

I just tried it in my S310, and it does need something extra inserted to make contact for this camera to successfully use a CR123A battery, because the S310 has a leaf spring contact at the far end of the battery chamber.(near the top of the inside of take up spool) and it's clearly not as tall as the VF101's contact there, which is a central stud that's quite strongly sprung - I could see that the bottom end of the CR123A was a little further inside the S310 by comparison with the VF101 after I popped it in, and no power got through when the cap was screwed in tight, as I thought might be the case. I had a small flat (but kinked) circular washer/spring handy that fitted nicely on the flat minus contact on the base of the CR123A (the battery's edge sleeving stopped it wandering off-centre) and then it all worked fine. Hope you're able to get it to work to your satisfaction.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Thanks again man.I haven't had the chance yet, but your advice has been copied and saved in a doc! I've two non-working models as they were sent back from Germany!! The seller said I can keep them. Both have stuck leaf shutter blades, I'll give them a go with some lighter fuel to see if they 'un-stick'.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


KH replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

I've recently replaced my S310 battery with a CR123 one. Just reattached 3 bolts from the red holder to the cap as to help with contacts. It seems to work every time, always lighting up when button is pressed, so I guess the batt is making good contact all the time. The only bummer is that the needle of the meter is not moving, but exposures seems to be correct when light is changed and film is loaded. I will soon test it with film and will speak of the results.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Alan Simpson on Zeiss Ikon S 310 – The Last Contessa – Urban shooting in Norwich London and Cambridge in Black and White

Comment posted: 30/07/2025

Thank you for an interesting review and images. I have a non-working S310 that certainly oozes quality in its build. It's a shame it no longer works! I wonder if there is anywhere in the UK that could get it going again. I also have its almost-sister, the Voigtländer VF101, which I've adapted to work on a single CR123A battery. It provides fine results, although I do agree that its wind-on lever is a 'cheap and cheerful' stamped part.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 30/07/2025

Thanks Alan I know of one place which would repair it - Dan Ho https://analoguewonderland.co.uk/blogs/film-photography-blog/dans-camera-repair-journey-7-years-of-passion-and-precision

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Dave Roberts on Zeiss Ikon S 310 – The Last Contessa – Urban shooting in Norwich London and Cambridge in Black and White

Comment posted: 16/08/2025

What a fantastic little camera! I used to be hesitant bout scale/zone focus cameras till I bought a Pen EED half frame. I agree with you - there's no reason to be afraid. I now enjoy them immensely for their point and shoot use.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 16/08/2025

Thanks Dave Once I picked up and used one it all made sense, the camera (and ones like it) are a simple pleasure to photograph with and consistently give pleasing in focus results with none of the errors inherent in AF cameras which rely on electronics.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *