SmartConvert – Inverting negatives smartly

By Marco Andrés

There are many methods to scan and convert film negatives into positives. One common method is to scan into a raw file with a scanner or, more commonly, a digital camera. The process inverts the negative while mitigating the affect of the film base,

But first how we got here to this post.

The journey

Several months ago wrote a post on programs that converted negatives into positives. Each program had different options and approaches to do a valid comparison.

And then there was the pesky matter of not including scans with digital cameras. At the beginning of the scanning journey, standalone scanners were de rigeur. But now digital cameras are the go-to, at a significant cost in time and money.

Scanning and converting was an iterative process, the result of being dissatisfied with the results.  Since the scanner came with bundled software, I started using that until it was obviously inadequate, the colours were not as expected, the dynamic range not as great. You know the drill.

I bought Silverfast software for scanning. Initially pleased with straight scans, I eventually became disenchanted. Switched to scanning to tiff as positives while manually inverting, in Gimp. When Silverfast introduced scanning to dng. I decided to take the plunge even though it meant converting to tiff. I briefly considered freeware DarkTable. But just didn’t bond.  RawTherapee, could do just that and it was free. Problem solved.

Even using dngs was too complicated. Although recently Gimp supports DarkTable, it does not work well for me. Even RawTherapee has become problematic. You guessed it. I had to embark on a quest for a standalone program to invert dng scans directly and then let Gimp tweak the result (curves, colour temperature) This resulted in even more research and testing.

SmartConvert

So here is the lowdown on SmartConvert from Flmomat. It’s not free but, as you will see, it is simple to use and effective and the best, for me, of three standalone programs I tested.

Disclaimer: Filmomat provided the software at no cost in exchange for an unbiased review here. The software is available for a 14 day free trial and with a monthly, yearly or lifetime subscription.

I will include some manual conversions to demonstrate how SmartConvert fares in comparison to manual inversion.

Main screen after launching.

To process a negative, just drop file into the pane with the Smart Convert logo or click Add Images button (top right) to add image or all images in a folder.

Convert image of negative scan (café at Getty Center,  Los Angeles).
Main window after dropping the negative into the panel.

SmartConvert automagically inverts and fixes colour negatives, adding the ‘Edit Crop’ button beneath change the aspect ratio via a pulldown on the left with ‘Free’ being the first option and ‘Apply’ applying the crop and rotations.

Aspect ratios: Free [basically none], 1 x 1, 2 x 3/ 135 / 6 x 9, 6 x 4,5 / 6 x 8 and 6 x 7.

SmartConvert produces a result that is very similar to manual inversion, while removing the bluish colour temperature cast.

Converting Camera scans

Fortunately, I found some raw scans shot with digital cameras. To say that the digital camera scanning procedure is complex is an understatement – in my opinion, at least. The source for these was a Raw Fuji scan.

Manual inversion yields this without applying auto-levels, which frankly makes it even worse.

Let’s just not manually convert any more negs scanned with a digital camera…

Another conversion of a Fuji negative.

 

Two monochrome negatives

A Nikon file. Cropping allows you to specify the boundaries of the negative and to adjust for skew by entering the rotation in hundredths of a degree. Invert to crop more easily and then uninvert.

 

And this one is a scan of another b/w negative, this time in Fuji RAF format.

Converting images from a scanner

Here are three colour images

An image of the exterior of The Icon photo lab on Miracle Mile in Los Angeles.

 

Clark Court  West Hollywood, California.

 

Mural, Sunset Junction, Silverlake, Los Angeles

And two monochrome images

Mural of Zapata, Sunset Junction, Silverlake, Los Angeles, California.

 

Mural on Sunset Blvd in West Hollywood, California

Controls

Basic controls for transforming an image. I will cover them briefly; starting at the top.

‘Add Images’ – click to add a file or a folder of images
Clear Images,Skip image’ – basically do not process
‘Reset Settings’ – Obvious
‘Mirror, L & R’ – rotate 90 degrees or Mirror

Manipulate Contrast, Density or Saturation.

Manipulate colour balance in CMY or RGB space, Auto White Balance, Recalc or Reset White Balance. I usually just do either Recalc or Auto White balance.

Auto Crop, Invert, Show Thumbnails (takes up too much real estate), Grayscale

Previous Image, Next Image, Export Current Image, Process All (converts and exports all).

SmartConvert exports jpg and tiff into separate folders within the specified folder and overwrites any file with the same name.

Menu Options

To be honest, I have not used any of these. Some of the menu options:

Conclusion

SmartConvert more than adequately converts scans from flatbed scanners and from digital cameras. Where I find manual inversion of digital camera scans to be problematic.

Preferring to use film in a camera, I’ll pass on digital cameras with their planned obsolescence, high cost and, frankly, ugly (utilitarian) look/feel. Yes there are some beautifully designed digital cameras (pricey) but I’ve had enough with screens and pixel peeping,  preferring the leisurely pace of film photography. And yes, I make digital images with an iPhone. Sure, it’s clumsy to use but it does the job and it’s thre whenever I go out IRL It’s well worth the tradeoffs.

SmartConvert is elegantly designed and simple. It is better in my experience than the commercial competitors I have tried (Filmlab and ChemVert). Although most of my work is monochrome, I still use SmartConvert, since it is simpler and has a better workflow than manual conversion.

Having purchasing colour chemistry, plan to do more colour work once I select a sous-vide heater. I am well aware that the shelf life of colour chemistry is considerably shorter than b/w, particularly Rodinal, which seems to keep forever. And yes, colour film is more expensive to purchase and process.

Bottom line: converting with SmartConvert is certainly faster than manual inversion, requires less effort than manual conversion with results that are either comparable to manual inversion or even better. I’m not going back.

At the time of publication, SmartConvert is now on version 3.10,

 

Share this post:

About The Author

By Marco Andrés
Computer scientist – graphics, design computation and human-centred design. The analogue as a tonic to the digital. Takes delight in built-form, detritus, design, movies, words and humour.
Read More Articles From Marco Andrés

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
If you think £2.99 a month is too little, then please subscribe and I can manually edit the subscription value for you – thank you very much in advance if this is what you would like to do!

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Jeffery Luhn on SmartConvert – Inverting negatives smartly

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Marco,

Thanks for this article/tutorial. I have a flatbed scanner but do my critical work with a Sony body and Nikkor 55mm macro lens. I have never made a conversion from a color negative that I liked! So your suggestions could be exactly what I need. Thanks!!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Marco Andrés replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

Certainly appreciate your enthusiasm. Trust that the simplicity of the SmartConvert software will mean that the software will not get in the way.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith on SmartConvert – Inverting negatives smartly

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

As I have retro-actively noted on your earlier article, I am quite content with my digital camera scan and FilmLab color conversion. B&W is easily done using my preferred post s/w: Affinity Photo.

Unlike you Marco, I happily shoot digital alongside my recent foray back into the film realm. My film excursion has prompted my return to self-developing and scanning. I have to admit after fooling with doing developing in a cramped corner of the garage that it would be a whole lot easier if I had the room to set up a wet darkroom (like I had 50 years ago). I only recently did a few rolls of color here and while the use of a Sous Vide device for water temperature control makes the criticality of water baths/chemistry temperature easy, the fact that I have to set-up my limited space and pack it all up afterwards makes it somewhat of a pain. My last roll of color I just sent off to a lab. Time consuming and certainly expensive (when compared with what film developing cost 50 years ago when there was a PhotoMat in almost every parking lot).

I looked at Filmomat prior to deciding on FilmLab s/w. Filmomat has an entire ecosystem of film handling that seems geared towards going into the film processing business. You description of the color inversion s/w was thorough, but I have to say that I prefer the FilmLab s/w.

That said, color is all about personal preference and taking into account the individual characteristics of the film.

I suspect any of my future color film will be lab processed and scanned (which argues in favor of a pure analog approach to film skipping the entire digital portion and going directly to wet-processed prints rather than digitizing the negs).
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Marco Andrés replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

While colour is a personal choice, there is more to selecting a software package than just relying on the results. With a background in human computer interaction, I am heavily influence by my thesis advisor Bill Buxton, a world-renown expert in the field. The result – a preference for simplicity and ease of use. One over- arching idea is « The Tyranny of Choice » [https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-tyranny-of-choice/]. In the words of the architect Mies van der Rohe, « less is more ». The Filmlab interface is just too complicated, laden with plethora of choices [film stock. scanning light, scanning device and more].¿Ånd will it handle a new film stock correctly [Kentmere Phoenix 2]? ¿And how can one choose the options for a flatbed film scanner or the output of a lab scan? And it has crashed several times. Perhaps because I just happened to do Quality Assurance. While Filmlab does not fit into the «  less is more camp », SmartConvert does. As you say Filmlab is oriented to professional labs. In contrast, SmartConvert is a product of Filmomat, with its mission « film processing made simple » Filmomat offers with a variety of products for small batch [bespoke] development and scanning [https://shop.filmomat.eu/]]as well as software Have their PhotoPlug for testing camera shutter speeds. So workflow is important to me. SmartConvert gets the job done, producing a result that can be tweaked later [s-curves etc.].

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2025

I guess that having been a UX designer for a billion-dollar s/w company in a former life, the UX aspects of various s/w just seem to me to be exercises in dissection. While I grant you that the UI of Gimp is pretty obscure, Im pretty comfortable with FilmLab (which IMHO is not targeted at individuals doing massive amounts of color inversions).

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *