Rolleiflex SL35 – A Review of a West German made 35mm SLR

By Ibraar Hussain

This is a review of a camera (or cameras) I once had. As with most of what I had I sold on a knee jerk and regret it ever since. The Rolleiflex SL35 was Franke & Heidecke first 35mm SLR, and the original SL35 (and the far more rare and expensive SL350) were Rollei’s best.

There are three versions of the SL35; the German-made SL350, German made SL35 of 1970 – 1972 and the later Made in Singapore SL35 version 1972- 1976 – both identical on the surface, but not the same underneath. Sure they are made using the same looking parts, but the Singapore versions aren’t built with the same love, care and precision as the German-made ones. I have had both examples and you can feel the difference.

The German made one is superior in build, feel and the VF which is always brighter in my experience. (I’ve had 2 Singapore SL35 and 2 German).

The German-made SL35 and SL350 are collectors items, a mint example is a camera to keep. The SL350 differs, it came later and released in smaller number, it solves the stop down metering method and is a better purchase.

Later SL35E and SL35M aren’t in the same class as even the Singapore built SL35 and to be honest, aren’t worth bothering with as collectors items (though they are worth it if you want to use the nice optics and the more advanced features they have).

The SL35 is very nice  to behold, it has a simple, totally spartan but elegant bauhaus like design, devoid of superfluous switches and dials, even the hotshot is an after market accessory. The simple lines are difficult to date, 50ies? 60ies? 70ies? the design is timeless.

Rolleigon 135mm f2.8 Agfa APX 100 Rodinal
Bedfont
Schneider Kreuznach SL-Xenon 50mm f1.8. Agfa APX 100, Rodinal. Silver reflector.

The Rolleiflex SL35 I had was the stealthy black, and the attention to detail on it makes one smile and it begs to be used. It is crafted of solid metal, and feels dense, weighty. Ken Rockbuster describes a Leica as feeling like a well oiled revolver, this isn’t quite like that but using it did bring that quote to mind. I also had a Mint German-made SL35 Silver body which is also a lovely piece of work. Ok, I have heard that the Leicaflex is a better made camera but I have yet to handle one.

A snap in Medieval City of Nottingham SL Xenon 50mm f1.8 Agfa APX 100 Rodinal

Comparing it to the redoubtable Olympus OM2n, the Olympus looks and feels sort of similar in comparison but the Rolleiflex SL35 seems to have a more quality feel – Sure the Olympus is a better camera, by better I mean it has Aperture priority and a user-friendly light meter plus the very nice bright finder, The Rolleiflex doesn’t need any extras, its simplicity is its strength.

The Film wind crank winds forward with a precision mechanical zip and it’s released to be eased back with a nicely damped slide. The shutter emits a satisfying thunk as it trips.

Looking at top of the camera, the only controls we have are the Film wind crank, shutter release with the stylised “R” situated on top of the shutter speed dial, the button near the shutter release is the stop down/ depth of field preview button. On the other side we have a solitary film rewind knob/ dial.

At the front we have the self timer lever and that’s about it! Basic as it gets!

Olympic Stadium Stratford, London. SL-Xenon 50mm f1.8 B+W Yellow Filter Agfa APX 100 Rodinal
Contax TVS III at the ready

The Rolleiflex SL35 has a built-in light meter, powered by a small watch size battery and this is activated by pressing the Stop Down Button, it manifests itself in the form of a needle, visible through the big bright viewfinder (almost as big and bright as the VF on an Olympus OM2n)

The meter isn’t the highlight of this camera, as it’s annoying pressing the stop down button, then having to control aperture and shutter speed to get a correct exposure. I have used it, and it’s fairly accurate but only to test it out – I find it easier and thus tend to use a hand-held incident Minolta Autometer III which is pretty good, but the internal meter is there if ever required.

Young Cadet 50mm SL-Xenon B+W Yellow Filter Agfa APX 100 Rodinal

The lenses, well, there are some nice lenses available for this camera, lenses made by Zeiss with the HFT coating (HFT is Rollei trademarked T*) Schneider Krueznach, Voighlander and Rollei Rolleinar lenses. They render tastefully, they probably aren’t as sharp as more modern equivalents but that doesn’t matter, as they manifest a lovely feel in the photographs.

By Lord Byron’s House, Nottingham. SL-Xenon 50mm f1.8 B+W Yellow Filter Agfa APX 100 Rodinal

The Zeiss and Schneider lenses are expensive, some more than others, the Voightlanders are rebranded Zeiss and Rolleinars, the Rolleinars can be bought for peanuts, but that doesn’t mean the Rolleinars are crap – on the contrary they’re superb lenses, made by Mamiya in Japan, well built and of very high quality, in fact tests show they’re to a hairs breadth of the Zeiss and Schneider in terms of quality. I had the Schneider 50mm f1.8 and the Rolleigon 135mm f2.8 portrait lens.

Bird over Bedfont Lake. Middlesex. SL-Xenon 50mm f1.8 B+W Yellow Filter Agfa APX 100 Rodinal

To sum it all up, the Rolleiflex SL35 is a very nice piece and a classic, if you can find a mint German made example with a clear bright Viewfinder – go for it, if you find an SL350 you’ll be even happier but lighter of pocket.

 

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
If you think £2.99 a month is too little, then please subscribe and I can manually edit the subscription value for you – thank you very much in advance if this is what you would like to do!

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

About The Author

By Ibraar Hussain
I enjoy taking snaps. From East London. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsU-amzCbwU Youtube
View Profile

Comments

Gerard on Rolleiflex SL35 – A Review of a West German made 35mm SLR

Comment posted: 05/05/2025

Thank you, Ibraar, for this review of a forgotten 35mm camera. As I owned a Rolleflex SL35 and a Leicaflex SL at the same time, I can make the comparison. I still own the SL because I prefer Leica/Leitz optics even to Zeiss (like Nikon lenses, too steep a curve, but contrast is not the same as sharpness). I liked the Rollei a lot as a camera, and although lighter than the Leicaflex SL, it was well built and very easy to handle, and perhaps even more beautiful.
I like your photo's a lot. You've been using my favorite combo of film and developer: Agfa in Rodinal was a game changer for me and I' ve been stuck to it for over 40 years. Especially with Leitz/Leica glass you almost can't get more tonality - it approaches working with a Rolleiflex or Hasselblad.
Thanks again!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 05/05/2025

Gerard, Thank you so much for your comment my friend. I've never handled the Leicaflex SL before, bodies can be bought at reasonable prices but lenses are quite expensive and that is what keeps me from getting hold of my first ever Leica. The West German made Rolleiflex Sl35 are now quite expensive and rare, the Singapore can be bought for quite cheap. The SL350 is even rarer and very expensive. I was quite lucky to own a few of these and though I've just added a few pictures here I shot a lot more using colour slide and the metering was very good! And yes that Agfa in Rodinal combination is perfect - this was real Agfa APX rather than Agfaphoto (which I believe is Harman, though it is a very nice film) You've sparked my interest in a Leicaflex or even a later R series! thanks again and I hope this post does inspire people to look out for, shoot with, appreciate and cherish this beautiful camera

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gerard replied:

Comment posted: 05/05/2025

Hi Ibraar, If you'd want to see a little bit of that combination: Leicaflex, Agfapan 100 and Rodinal, you might Google "A Leica in the Limousin" published on emulsion.org a couple of years ago. And...go for the Leicaflex or Leica R and an Elmarit 35 mm lens, they're made for B&W photography... Cheers, Gerard

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 05/05/2025

I can't find the article though I searched every search engine and emulsive as well. Any link please? Ah man, those lenses are out of my budget for now! In my experience and in those of others some lenses such as the contax zeiss G lenses can be a bit 'too' sharp and contrasty for B&W

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jose on Rolleiflex SL35 – A Review of a West German made 35mm SLR

Comment posted: 05/05/2025

Thank you for reviewing a camera that doesn't get much love (my opinion). I bought the German made (lucky me) on a whim. It was a 2 for 1 deal at a thrift shop not knowing what I was getting ($70.00 for both). I'd say if you're looking for perfection with this camera, you're not getting it. Perhaps a more artisanal experience. The black and white shots are always a joy. Portra 400 renders some pleasantly mixed results. I'm on the fence about selling it. Your article is making me want to keep it.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 05/05/2025

Thank you Jose. It's worth keeping and keeping it in good order - even if you don't use it prices will only be going up for the German made one!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith on Rolleiflex SL35 – A Review of a West German made 35mm SLR

Comment posted: 05/05/2025

Not because I need another camera but simply out of curiosity, I checked the inventory at Blue Moon (my semi-local, film camera store) and that didn't have any Rolleiflex SL35's. I suspect that it feels much like the Canon FTb and the Nikon FE of the same vintage (both of which handle great).

Thanks Ibraar!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 05/05/2025

Hi Gary I’ve no idea as the only manual focus SLR’s I’ve ever handled apart From this have been Contax ST, Aria, RTS II and III, a couple of Yashica’s and the Olympus OM2n It’s more refined than the Yashicas I had and nicer looking.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Alastair on Rolleiflex SL35 – A Review of a West German made 35mm SLR

Comment posted: 05/05/2025

My first SLF was a Rollei SL35 with a 50mm f/1.8 Rollei HFT lens given to me by my uncle as a birthday present (I'd previously been using my dad's old Zeiss Ikon Contina II) in 1976. Sadly the Rollei was stolen and the Zeiss seemed to just disappear in the basement but I have since bought both in recent years (and both currently have film loaded Agfa APX 100!

Personally I love the SL35 (even if it is a Singaporean one) and find it's simplicity engaging. It has everything you need to take great images and nothing else. No frills. No gimmicks. I prefer it to my Minolta SRT100X because of that. I bought Rolleinar 135 f/2.8 and 200 f/3.5 lenses for it (as well as a superb CZJ 135 f/3.5 M42 lens which has clear family ties to the Rollei 50mm).

The SL is my second favourite SLR - beaten only by the awesome Contax RX with it's Zeiss vario Sonnars.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 05/05/2025

Thanks Alastair. It is a very nice camera - the simplicity of it is its beauty in more ways than just the design I regret selling my collection of them And now reasonable priced mint ones with a clear bright finder and mirror are hard to find My favorite Manual focus SLR is my contax RTS II - my second body having seriously sold an anniversary LE the first time round

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Pauley on Rolleiflex SL35 – A Review of a West German made 35mm SLR

Comment posted: 06/05/2025

Hi Ibraar, fascinating review of a camera I know very little about. As usual regardless of camera your portraits blow me away! Especially the young cadet -- you capture a soulfulness and innocence that contrast mightily with his serious uniform and (I'm sure) very adult responsibilities. Great!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 06/05/2025

Thank you sir ! As others have said, it’s an unloved and oft forgotten camera. Considering the marque and pedigree I’m surprised.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 06/05/2025

When I shot the cadet photo, I had in mind Marlon Brando's photo as Colonel Kurtz in Beret which is passed around to Captain Willard in Apocalypse Now. I told the boy to turn and look side on. Then going back to the Movie I saw that I got it completely wrong!! Ah Cadet's grow up and move on to the army, years pass and one loses touch, so I doubt I'll get to shoot another one like this

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Curtis Heikkinen on Rolleiflex SL35 – A Review of a West German made 35mm SLR

Comment posted: 06/05/2025

Very nice article! I was curious about the SL350. There seems to be very little on the internet about it. There are very few seemingly available. Do have significant experience shooting the 350? If so, did you like it? Thanks!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 06/05/2025

Thanks Curtis The SL350 is exactly like the German built SL35 except it’s rarer, has the slight different model number and most importantly has an improved metering system which isn’t ’step down’ as the SL35 It’s far more expensive as well

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jeffery Luhn on Rolleiflex SL35 – A Review of a West German made 35mm SLR

Comment posted: 06/05/2025

Ibraar,
I always enjoy looking at your pix and reading your casual style text. This time you had some really nice people shots.
Your posting got me curious about the Rollei SLR, because I'm a Rollei fan. I have a couple of TLRs that are incapable of taking a bad photo...if they are pointed at something interesting. A long time ago - last century - I was a wedding photographer and the guy I worked for loaned me his Rollei 2 1/4 (SL 2000?) and his SL35 because he thought it would be good to get familiar with the 'good stuff' if I was going to stay with him and eventually take over his business. I was shooting with a Nikon F and a Rollei TLR, so his bias was unfounded, but he was a great mentor and I used his Rollei cameras for several jobs. The Rollei SL35 was no better than my Nikon in performance, but it did have a certain panache. The Rollei SL 2000 was a big step up from my TLR in the handling. I never took over his business because bridezillas and their overbearing mothers were more problematic than shooting in war zones for United Press International, but those Rollei cameras made an impression on me. After reading your post, I researched the prices. Not unreasonable. I'm going to start looking around for a Rollei 2 1/4 SLR. In conclusion: Your posts are dangerous.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 06/05/2025

Hehehe!! Very dangerous - to some anyway, who appreciate some unloved gems. The more these are reviewed and there to view on the net the more people will appreciate them and use these. A shame they’re not popular even though they have Schneider and Zeiss optics!! It’s worth purchasing The SL35 if German made and minty - even better would be the rarer and more expensive SL350 Regarding the SL2000F - I was once going to buy it - well, it was either that or the SL3003. Looks like a shrunken medium format system camera with VLF - same lenses QBM mount as the SL35 - is this the one you are after ?

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Higgins on Rolleiflex SL35 – A Review of a West German made 35mm SLR

Comment posted: 07/05/2025

"Schneider Krueznach, Voighlander"

You forgot Cal Zeitz and Leytz.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 07/05/2025

Thanks Higgins What do you mean ?

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

John-Paul Menez on Rolleiflex SL35 – A Review of a West German made 35mm SLR

Comment posted: 07/05/2025

Lovely photos Ibraar.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 07/05/2025

Thank you kindly my friend

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain on Rolleiflex SL35 – A Review of a West German made 35mm SLR

Comment posted: 08/05/2025

For anyone interested, there's currently a mint SL350 with flashes lenses etc all on eBay on sale from Germany. One bid and it's at 85 Euros right now with 3 days to go.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *