I first became interested in the Pentax 6×7 system when I saw one in a camera shop window in 1976. I thought that the camera looked like a giant 35mm SLR, and in a sense, that’s what it really is. I thought the design was very clever and intuitive. Other 6x7s that I had seen were box cameras; this one was different. I bought one in 1988, and ended up buying three more over the years. I’ve been using this system professionally since 2000.
As my first lens, I bought a 105mm f/2.4, as this was considered the normal lens for the camera. This is also the most well-known lens for the Pentax 6×7 system, but in this article, I would like to highlight some of the wide-angle options. Wide-angle lenses for this camera system are mostly used for landscape work, so that’s what I will focus on. I also bought Pentax’s 75mm f/4.5 near the same time as the 105. It’s an amazingly sharp lens but I prefer a different 75mm lens now.
Anyone accustomed to 35mm cameras will struggle a bit, at first, in trying to shoot with the Pentax 6×7. The challenge is in the difference in DOF (depth of field) between the two systems. The longer lenses seen in the 6×7 system are the culprit. The 45mm lens for this system is similar to a 21mm lens in a 35mm format system, in field of view. However, the DOF of the 45mm is much less than a 21mm. The maximum DOF on the 45mm is 4 feet to infinity at f/22. So, one must be very careful about shooting landscapes with objects near the camera. Large “depth of field” shots are so much easier to accomplish with 35mm systems.
The 55mm lens for the 6×7 is a classic because it is so well corrected for aberrations. It’s more accepted for wide-angle work than the 45mm, due to its angle of view. It’s similar to a 28mm lens in the 35mm format.
The 35mm lens for this system is a fisheye and is a limited use lens. I didn’t find it to be as sharp as the rectilinear lenses for this system. It can be used for pro work but one might have to crop the edges to remove the softness seen there.
There are three 75mm lenses for this system, (75 f/4.5, 75 AL and 75 Shift). I prefer the 75 shift lens over the other two because it has an f/32 stop that’s important for added DOF work. It’s at least as sharp as the other two lenses, plus it has the added ability to shift.
The only wide zoom lens for this system is the 55-100. It is easily my favorite lens for landscape work. Not only is it sharp at all focal lengths but it has the f/32 stop, which gives it an advantage over most of the prime wide lenses regarding DOF. It’s a gem but it’s heavy and a bit slow at f/4.5. It does not have a DOF scale on the lens barrel, so a system must be devised to accomplish this. I use colored dots on the lens barrel as hyperfocal distances to aid in landscape shooting, but the details of how this is done is beyond the scope of this article.
Going beyond f/32 for added depth with the wide lenses can be a mistake. The 90-180 zoom has the ability to use f/45 at all focal lengths but that can run into diffraction issues. Using the 90mm setting at f/45 has proven to be useless, so f/32 is the smallest practical stop when using the wide lenses.
This camera can be used hand held in instances where a tripod cannot be used, such as on boats. Fast film and f/8 stops work well in these instances, especially with the wide lenses.
The wide lenses for this system can be used for other purposes beyond landscapes, and I have done a bit of this over the years. Group portraits are one example. I have taken a few macro shots with the wide lenses with extension tubes but longer lenses are better suited for this endeavor.
All of the wide lenses for this system are inaccurate regarding their DOF scale found on the lens barrels. One must use a slightly more conservative setting to get good results. An example of this is on the 45mm lens where one has it set to f/22. The DOF scale must be set to f/19, so that the infinity mark is on f/19. When possible, use the f/16 setting on the DOF scale instead of f/19. There will be a slight improvement in far sharpness when doing this, however one must back up from the nearest part of the subject in the frame because it will be slightly soft if you don’t. In nearly all shots with the 45mm lens, where I want maximum depth, I use the f/19 DOF scale setting.
This camera system was not intended for the beginner, so to use this camera successfully, it is recommended to have experience with smaller formats first. Once the basics of framing, composition, exposure and finding your own creative style are solved, the move to the Pentax 67 can be quite successful. To my mind, the wide angle lenses are the logical place to start.
Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-free Experience
There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts:
Paid Subscription - £2.99 per month and you'll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
Content contributor - become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.
Sign up here.
18 thoughts on “Pentax 67 – Successfully Use With Wide Lenses”
Great article and has great pictures. I just got a 67, a 75 (for walking around more easily) and a 55-100. Love both of them.
Thanks Steve! The 55-100 is a monster.
great read. Brings back memories. I used to shoot interiors on chrome for a shelter magazine back in the 90’s. The Pentax 67 and that 75 shift were a great combo that I bet a lot of others figured out.
Thanks Art! Love the 75 shift.
You seem to be able to successfully hand hold the camera. I never bought one because of the supposed issues with blurring due to mirror slap when camera is hand held. What has been your overall experience with this issue.
I try to use 400 speed film when hand holding this camera to keep the shutter speed high. But I have used it with slower film successfully too.
I’ve used the Pentax 67 for travel photography quite a bit of late and have gotten sharp images handheld at 1/60s with the 90 f/2.8 and 165 f/2.8 lenses
Yes, 1/60 second is quite possible with the shorter lenses and even the 165 and 200mm.
I remember the first time I saw a Pentax 67 .. probably 40 years ago, on the Charles Bridge in Boston, waiting for July 4 fireworks to start. I was younger then, toting an Olympus OM, and my head snapped around in surprise. What’s that? I circled back through the shifting crowd, trying to look closely without appearing to do so. My god, I thought, that has to be a 120 format SLR. How fantastic!
Thanks for a great article on the ins-and-outs of a legendary system.
I saw one in a camera store window in 1976 and thought that the design was genius. Have owned this camera system since 1988.
Great read and stunning photos – thanks for sharing!
Thanks John! Glad you liked it.
Beautiful photographs! Lush colour and really show off the razor sharpness and detail!!!
Thanks so much!
Thanks so much!
These photographs are stunning. Thank you for sharing.
Thanks so much KHÜRT!
Thanks so much Khurt!