5 frames in France with a Contax RX

By Alastair Bell

I have a problem. I love cameras. Especially older film cameras. It’s that tactile feeling of holding it and finding all the controls under my fingertips.

A couple of years ago I dug out the remnants of an earlier collection I had and started adding to it. Every camera was a joy to handle in its own way. Friends heard that I was collecting and I was given a Yashica 108 Program. It didn’t work but I soon brought it back to life. I bought an adapter for the 35-70 MC lens it came with and tried it on my Fuji X-T4. I was pleasantly surprised. It prompted me to look for Zeiss lenses for it. It wasn’t long before that morphed into a desire to build a full Contax kit.

This led to a purchase of a Contax RX, followed by 28-85 and 80-200 Vario Sonnar lenses and a Sigma 24mm. As soon as I picked up the RX I was in love.

With the 28-85 lens it’s a big heavy beast. Given I gave up on my Nikon D3 because of its weight and size it was interesting this was such an instant favourite. It could only be the feeling of carved from granite solidity and the beautiful tactile feel of those Zeiss lenses. The RX did suffer from the usual slipping mirror issue but this was easily fixed with help from my local camera store who told me what I needed to do. An easy and permanent fix.

I regularly travel to France and of course the RX found space in the bag. In fact it’s been every time I’ve been since I bought it. Every time it reminds me why I love it so much.

Here’s a small selection of images all processed and scanned by the minilab in Northampton, England.

Mont St Michel early morning, Fuji 200 expired 2008, exposed at 100. Vario Sonnar 28-85mm.
La Rochelle Lantern Tower, Fuji 200 expired 2008 exposed at 100. Vario Sonnar 28-85mm
Field of Gold, Charente Maritime, Fuji 200 expired 2008 exposed at 100. Vario Sonnar 28-85mm.
La Rochelle Bicycles, Fuji 200 expired  2008 exposed at 100. Vario Sonnar 28-85mm.

Interestingly the Yashica that started this all off has yet to have a film through it. For some reason that camera just doesn’t gel with me.

 

Share this post:

About The Author

By Alastair Bell
I've been interested in photography since I was 15 though have taken breaks at various times as life got in the way. The latest break was for 10 years and at the end on if I sold all my Nikon gear and bought into the Fuji X system for its lighter weight and previous good experiences with it. I've done stock photography and wedding photography (never again) but mainly use photography as a way to express myself and show my world as I see it. I have recently started using film again and my photography now is a mix of film and digital.
Read More Articles From Alastair Bell

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
If you think £2.99 a month is too little, then please subscribe and I can manually edit the subscription value for you – thank you very much in advance if this is what you would like to do!

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Peter Schu on 5 frames in France with a Contax RX

Comment posted: 07/10/2025

I got myself an RX on ebay, but had to send it back. It had also a mirror issue and a film transport problem, although it had been advertised as in perfect condition. That was only true for its body. So, I didn't trust the seller anymore and didn't take it back after they had fixed the mirror problem. What I noticed and wasn't aware of before, is that the RX is build like the AX, just without the AX autofocus system. I own the AX and therefore I stopped looking for an RX body. Otherwise, I would have certainly looked for one in good shape. It is a very solid tool. Nice photos with the expired film.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Omar Tibi replied:

Comment posted: 07/10/2025

My understanding is that the AX is the successor of the RX; as you said, there's not much of a difference between the two. In fact, if I remember correctly, there's only 2 years of difference between the two models. How is the AX's autofocus system? Is it fun to use?

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Paul Taylor on 5 frames in France with a Contax RX

Comment posted: 07/10/2025

I have an RX with 4 or 5 of the excellent lenses for the system, and it is probably my favorite of all my 35mm cameras. I bought mine in excellent condition but the first roll through it only captured half the frame - the common mirror slip. I warmed the mirror and pushed it up, secured it with a couple little dots of glue and it has been awesome every sense. Everyone is always praising Contax’s expensive compact cameras - but the RX IMO is superior and worth way more than they sell for.

I recently took my RX and the C-Z 50mm 1.4 to a museum exhibit of Stradivarius instruments, with some Portra 800 it did a great job in some pretty challenging conditions.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Gary Smith on 5 frames in France with a Contax RX

Comment posted: 07/10/2025

The bigger brother to the G1. Looks like you have gelled with it nicely!

Love the shot of St. Michel!

Thanks for your article Alastair!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Omar Tibi on 5 frames in France with a Contax RX

Comment posted: 07/10/2025

Great shots! The first one is especially beautiful, and a touch mystical. When I saw the big "CONTAX" on the title image, I felt I had to look. Contax SLRs are my favorite, and between the beautiful design and the Zeiss C/Y glass, I think it can be argued that they were the peak of manual focus consumer SLRs in their time.

I have an RX body, sadly with a shutter capping issue, but my 167MT shoots like a dream. I've got a small bag of Zeiss primes, and I do most of my shooting with the classic 50/1.4 Planar. Love the way the 167MT feels, and I hope to get the RX CLAed when I have time, since it was even nicer in the hand.

Perhaps thankfully, the influencer hype wave that swept up all of the compact Contaxes, the T and G series, skipped over the SLRs for some reason (because of manual focus?), so just as Paul above said, pretty much all Contax SLRs can be had for far less then they should be worth. Some of the glass too is still a bargain, compared to the similar Leica R mount lenses that go for exorbitant prices.

Have fun shooting and enjoy your RX!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *