Point & Shoot

The Ricoh FF9s and a roll of IR friendly Rollei 80s – Guest review by Ivan B. Palli

Ricoh ff9s

These year’s long holidays have been to southern Greece and I decided to take with me a recently purchased Ricoh FF9s and a roll of IR friendly Rollei 80s, along with a red filter. This is the story behind that decision, with some of my favourite shots from the roll.

I’ve been shooting film for many years, all of it with vintage cameras from the early 20th century up to the early 80s. During the last couple of years I sometimes take one of these film cameras on our holidays, usually a medium format folder or the compact Yashica FX3 Super 2000, along with my digital mirrorless, which I use with manual lenses. So it’s fair to say I’m not a fast photographer (not many ‘decisive moments’ for me). For many years (after I discovered Ebay, of course) I considered getting a compact camera with the idea of taking more spontaneous shots, bringing some unpredictability to my holiday snapshots, a bit Lomography style, but in the end I never quite did. Then last winter I got a Voigtlander Vito B as a birthday present and its small size and great lens re-kindled the desire of shooting more film and less digital.

Discovering Hamish’s site hasn’t precisely helped to put away my old interest in compact photography. So when preparing the trip to Greece I was tempted to take the Vito with me. Something that put me off though was having to pre-focus, which doesn’t help with snapping away. More importantly, with the distances on the focus ring being in feet I have to spend some time doing the maths into metric and by the time I’m done my wife’s smile has turned into a less photogenic expression. So that got me thinking again about compact cameras and, after a bit of research and a spontaneous winning bid I soon received a Ricoh FF9s.

The Ricoh FF9s

The Ricoh FF9s was released in 1990 sporting a 35mm f3.5 lens, 4 elements in 4 groups. What attracted me to it was the different exposure modes that it’s capable of (I guess I’m not yet ready to give up control over exposure completely). These modes are:

  • Panorama: infinity focus (no flash).
  • Night photography mode: infinity focus (no flash) at ¼th of a second at f3.5 (with ISO 100).
  • TV Mode: 1/30th at f4 (again, no flash).
  • Continuous Shooting: as the tin says.
  • Interval Shooting: 1 frame every 60 seconds.
  • Multiple Exposure: again, as the tin says.

So not bad for a point and shoot. Even though there’s no specific flash-off mode, using the infinity focus lock is a good compromise if you don’t want to use faster film, or don’t want to rate fast film as their box speed. I also thought I could use the multiple exposure to have some fun and get something different than the pictures I usually take with my digital camera. And the TV Mode seemed also useful to take some shots without flash, maybe interiors or at dusk.

A roll of Rollei 80s

Thinking about what films I could take in order to get something different, Rollei 80s came to mind as it’s a film I’ve been shooting regularly for the last few years. I wondered whether the TV mode would provide enough overexposure with a red filter in front of the lens. So I did a very quick and probably inaccurate calculation of how many stops of overexposure 1/30th at f4 represent on a sunny day with a film rated at 100 ISO (the camera’s native ISO for non DX coded film). Would it be enough? Would it be too much? In the end I decided not to worry, take it along, have fun and hope for the best. And boy, was I (pleasantly) surprised!

Mystras, and old Bizantine city.

Mystras, and old Bizantine city.

ff9004_35mmc

Showing a bit of wood effect.

Showing a bit of wood effect.

The lens shows good detail here.

The lens shows good detail here.

Granted, most of them are not super sharp, as 1/30th is a bit slow if you’re not careful and holding a 55mm red filter in front of the lens didn’t help, I guess. A few of them are a bit skewed too but they show the characteristics of IR film, a bit of wood effect, darker skies and, more visibly on the portraits, pale and ghostly faces.

The ones that are sharper show a very capable lens, especially at closer distances. It seems too me that the level of overexposure was right to work with a simple red filter under the Greek sun. Since I didn’t want to mess up development I cut a piece of the film to develop first, willing to sacrifice one frame. Luckily though I had cut between frames! What are the chances?

Monemvasia, Peloponese.

Monemvasia, Peloponese.

ff9011_35mmc

This one shows the pale skin typical of IR film.

This one shows the pale skin typical of IR film.

ff9022_35mmc

An improvised photo-shoot after breakfast.

An improvised photo-shoot after breakfast.

The camera seemed to miss the focus, but it's a nice portrait nonetheless.

The camera seemed to miss the focus, but it’s a nice portrait nonetheless.

Olive tree. This shot shows the lens sharpness.

Olive tree. This shot shows the lens sharpness.

To conclude, I’m really satisfied with how the little experiment with the Ricoh FF9s came out, especially since I wasn’t 100% sure I’d get anything usable, and this is precisely the kind of ‘something different’ pictures I was after. Now I can’t wait to have developed the Lomochrome Purple and Rollei CN200 that I also shot with the Ricoh. The only negative I can think of is that this success has set a dangerous precedent, and I’m already keeping an eye open for other interesting compact cameras out there…

If you want to see some of my work (not holiday related) please visit my website at www.ivanbpalli.com. And thanks to Hamish for having my wee article on his blog!


Show your support for 35mmc – A message from Hamish

If you found this post interesting or useful, or if it helped you make up your mind about buying one of these cameras, then why not

By clicking that link, as long as you buy, bid on or win an auction within 24hrs – at no extra cost to you – I will receive a little kick back from ebay to help keep 35mmc up and running.

Additionally, if you would like to contribute a post of your own to 35mmc, click here!

Thanks,

Hamish

Do you enjoy reading 35mmc?

For as little as $1 a month, you can help support the upkeep of this website. The more people chuck me a small amount of cash each month, the more time I can spend building and improving upon it - simple as that!
Or, for $2 a month you can get access to my behind the scenes micro-blog over on Patreon!

Either way, want to help out, become a patron of 35mmc here:

Become a Patron!

Alternatively, if you just enjoyed this post, or like the odd post here and there, please feel free to chuck a few pennies in the tip jar via Ko fi here:


Write for 35mmc: read more here, about how you can help build upon this ever growing resource
Subscribe/Follow: click here, to discover all the ways you can follow 35mmc

Advertisement

You Might Also Like

4 Comments

  • Avatar
    Reply
    anil mistry
    October 8, 2016 at 9:26 am

    great post! I found one of these recently- “Ricoh shot master af super” – love the way the flash pops out and great to hold. Decent results too, I felt it was similar in output to the olympus mju.

    • Avatar
      Reply
      Ivan Bernal
      October 10, 2016 at 9:16 am

      Thanks Anil! You’re right about the flash, I was surprised by how it pops out. Hope to see some results from yours!

  • Avatar
    Reply
    George Appletre
    October 8, 2016 at 12:56 pm

    Nice photographs.
    There’s actually much more fun if not knowing what exactly you’re going to get.

    • Avatar
      Reply
      Ivan Bernal
      October 10, 2016 at 9:19 am

      Thank you, George! You’re right of course, and I’d say that’s one reason a majority of us use film. However, there’s also a bit of apprehension when experimenting with film on your holidays as there’s always a slight chance you might not get anything…

    Leave a Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Pin It on Pinterest

    Share This

    Thank you for commenting

    ...now share the post with your friends?