Lenses Mods & DIY

Modification of a Russian Slide Projector lens – By Stuart Jenkins

Russian 35KP lens

‘Sharp lenses’ and ‘cheap lenses’ is a Venn diagram with a very small intersection. In search of such a short-telephoto lens for equestrian photography, I started looking at the 1980s Russian slide projector lenses. On paper, the ‘USSR 35KP’ range is very tempting. Prime focal lengths from 50 to 140mm, all are f/1.8, and they’re not very expensive at all compared with the eye-watering cost of other f/1.8 telephoto lenses.

Of course, there’s a catch. What arrives in the post is just a straight aluminium tube, full of glass. No mount, no focusing mechanism, and no aperture. You can try ‘freelensing’, but with a wafer-thin depth of focus you’d better have a steady hand. Time to get inventive.

Salvation came from finding the website of RafCamera in Moscow. They sell a range of extension tubes and lens mount adapters, many of which have the same M65 thread as the Chinese focusing helicoids for sale on eBay. Suddenly this starts to look like a viable project.

So, here’s the setup, from back to front:

  • Pentax K to M42 female flanged adapter.
  • M42 male to M65 female adapter
  • M65 male to M65 female extension tube, 60mm long.
  • M65 male to M65 female focusing helicoid, with variable length from 17 to 31mm.
  • M65 male clamp ring, 62.5mm inside diameter.
  • 67mm aluminium lens hood with the back cut off, leaving just the front tube which fits perfectly over the clamp ring.
  • 3D printed inverse cone, to tidy up the inside of the front.

After a bit of fettling, the 35KP lens fits down the middle and is clamped in place at the front of the helicoid. That makes it really easy to set the infinity focus.

At f/1.8, this lens isn’t very practical for photographing a moving target. It’s also a bit soft and ‘glowy’, so I knew I was going to have to fit an aperture. Opening the lens up is an absolute joy. There’s a threaded stop ring at each end. Unscrew either one of them, and the whole contents of the tube will slide out in one go. There are five elements, and each one is held in its own convenient aluminium carrier. They all butt up against each other (with a spacer tube between 2 and 3) so you can’t get the spacing wrong — just be sure to remember the order and which direction they face.

Advertisement

When you see the optical design, it becomes obvious that the perfect place for the aperture is half-way along the spacer between elements 2 and 3. I knew the aperture disc should be as thin as practical. Time for a beer. No, really — a beer can provided the perfect material. Probably a bit too thin for a disc this size to be self-supporting, so I made support rings for each side (like a big washer) out of 1.5mm aluminium. The total length of the (now 2-part) spacer, the two support rings and the aperture disc is exactly the same as the original length of the spacer.

A bit of experimentation was required to work out the right size hole for the aperture. I made a range of aperture discs and took a meter reading with each one (it’s only a 5-minute job to swap them). By comparing the meter readings with a conventional zoom lens at 70mm, I could graph out the aperture hole diameter against the f-stop number. My preference was f/4.

The last job was to fit a sprung brass pin to the lens mount. For horse photography, my Pentax DSLR won’t hit its maximum burst rate unless you’re using a PK-A lens with the aperture on the ‘A’ setting. I found that one of the contact pins on PK-A lenses is insulated on manual aperture settings but becomes earthed to the mount on ‘A’. After a bit of precision engineering, I reproduced the effect on this lens. It works a treat.

The results are impressive. Stopping the lens down to f4 sharpens it up nicely and gets rid of the glow. It gives a usable depth of focus for photographing horses, with reasonable background separation.

Thanks for reading

Do you enjoy reading 35mmc?

For as little as $1 a month, you can help support the upkeep of this website. The more people chuck me a small amount of cash each month, the more time I can spend building and improving upon it - simple as that!
Or, for $2 a month you can get access to my behind the scenes micro-blog over on Patreon!

Either way, want to help out, become a patron of 35mmc here:

Become a Patron!

Alternatively, if you just enjoyed this post, or like the odd post here and there, please feel free to chuck a few pennies in the tip jar via Ko fi here:


Write for 35mmc: read more here, about how you can help build upon this ever growing resource
Subscribe/Follow: click here, to discover all the ways you can follow 35mmc

You Might Also Like

9 Comments

  • Avatar
    Reply
    Dave Walker
    July 10, 2019 at 10:13 am

    Wow! That’s amazing! A very inspiring piece of re-engineering, there. Thanks for the post.

    • Avatar
      Reply
      Stuart Jenkins
      July 10, 2019 at 10:31 am

      Thanks Dave! 🙂

  • Avatar
    Reply
    Faraz
    July 10, 2019 at 12:16 pm

    Nice and crispy with some impressive contrast

    • Avatar
      Reply
      Stuart Jenkins
      July 10, 2019 at 10:55 pm

      Thanks Faraz!

      • Avatar
        Reply
        Faraz
        July 11, 2019 at 8:35 am

        lots of ‘pop’ too

  • Avatar
    Reply
    Roger B.
    July 10, 2019 at 2:25 pm

    Remarkable work, Stuart. Your step-by-step presentation is very informative. May I suggest you post this entire article at Pentax Forums? You’ll reach thousands of Pentaxians worldwide, many of whom are skilled “fiddlers” as you are, and all of whom will likely be surprised at the quality of the images you got with this “throwaway” lens.

    • Avatar
      Reply
      Stuart Jenkins
      July 10, 2019 at 10:56 pm

      Thanks Roger, I’ll consider that.

  • Avatar
    Reply
    Kodachromeguy
    July 10, 2019 at 9:27 pm

    This turned out really well and the results are fantastic. I admire tinkerers. But after buying the various adapter rings, helical mounts, and paying for shipping, wasn’t the price approaching the cost of a used short tele lens?

    • Avatar
      Reply
      Stuart Jenkins
      July 10, 2019 at 11:05 pm

      Thank you, and yes it did turn out to be more expensive than I’d originally thought, but still a bit cheaper than a used Pentax 70mm f/2.4 prime. To be honest I’ve now got a Pentax 50-135mm zoom, because I was missing too many shots while swapping prime lenses. It’s almost as sharp as the 35KP, but I only ever use it at about f/4.

    Leave a Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Pin It on Pinterest

    Share This

    Thank you for commenting

    ...now share the post with your friends?