Film

Ilford Ortho Plus Review – My First two rolls

January 13, 2020

I must admit, I wasn’t all that excited when Ilford Ortho Plus was announced. I mean, I was enthused by the fact that Ilford had brought a new stock to 120 and 35mm – this sort of activity bodes fantastically well for the state of the industry – but on a personal level I just saw it as a specialist film that I probably wouldn’t shoot. Stupid Hamish, crap conclusion, I actually love it!

As regular readers will know I’ve been primarily shooting with Kodak P3200 as a black & white film of choice recently. I love that stuff, it’s so versatile and has a great look to it. Funnily enough though, after shooting it almost exclusively for quite some time now, I’ve developed a little bit of a desire to shoot something with a little bit less grain. I’ve got a stock of HP5 in the fridge, so have been expecting to find myself defaulting back to that at some point. That point never came though… perhaps because of my now overly-documented grumpiness…

What instead happened was a short email from Michelle at Ilford asking if I might like to try a couple of rolls of Ilford Ortho Plus. With nothing to lose, of course I agreed. A week or so later I had a plan to visit Paul from Analogue Wonderland. We were going to meet, have a bit of a chat on camera for my (very slow burning) YouTube channel and then go and take a few photos nearby. He’d not shot Ilford Ortho Plus yet at that point either, so it felt like a good opportunity for us both to give it a run.

When we first met and had a coffee in a little cafe near where he lives the sun was out, then as Sod’s law would have it, as soon as we started our way to the car the weather started changing. By the time we got to the area he wanted to go shooting it was raining, cloudy and very cold. Not exactly ideal weather for shooting an ISO80 film – especially as I’d elected to shoot a roll of 120 in my Makina.

Fortunately, it was just about light enough for me to shoot handheld at 1/60th and f/4 or 1/125 and f/2.8. Because I was freezing and actually shivering a fair amount, a lot of the photos were shot wide open. I mentioned this to really highlight the point that the aesthetic of the outcome really was as much, if not more of a product of circumstance than creative desire. In fact, walking around in the freezing cold, I was a little concerned that I was wasting the film on what would be largely out of focus or motion-blurry photos. It really was that cold and hard to concentrate…

As it turned out, the combination of wide open shooting, the tonality and sharpness of the film and the crap English weather would all add up to something a lot more special than I expected. Now don’t get me wrong, I’m not about to claim some sort of compositional genius here. Me and Paul actually joked a fair bit as we walked around about how we were just taking facsimiles of millions of other photos of lone trees and the like. But, nonetheless, what’s innate in this film’s character is still very evident, and as such I was actually quite blown away by the results I got… despite them not being the best photos I’ve ever taken.

First roll of Ortho

First roll of Ortho

First roll of Ortho

First roll of Ortho

First roll of Ortho

Spurred on by this success I decided I would shoot the roll of 35mm whilst out on a photo walk I organised in Worcester a few weeks later. I knew I was going to be taking a lot of photos that I’d taken before – I have walked the walk we all went on a lot of times with a camera before – but was still really interested to see how the results came out.

On this occasion I was shooting my Konica Hexar with the Minolta G-Rokkor 28mm f/3.5. This lens vignettes a bit, though I had a good feeling this might add something to the look of the images from this film – especially when shooting the industrial estate I had in mind. Again nothing new or world changing in these images, but I’m really pleased with how they came out.

I had both rolls developed by Duncan at SilverPan Film lab – I just went with his advice for the development process. He tells me they were developed in Perceptol for 8.30 minutes at 24 degrees in his Jobo. The negs were also scanned in such a way as to retain as much of the innate character of the film as possible, I also didn’t tweak them very much at all in Lightroom. Only a couple of adjustments to the horizon and a slight crop to couple of the frames of 120 and some very slight adjustments to contrast on the 35mm roll (mainly to combat my lackadaisical exposure). As such, these images should fairly strongly indicative of what you can expect from this film.

Ilford Ortho 35mm test roll

Ilford Ortho 35mm test roll

Ilford Ortho 35mm test roll

Ilford Ortho 35mm test roll

Ilford Ortho 35mm test roll

Ilford Ortho 35mm test roll

Ilford Ortho 35mm test roll

Ilford Ortho 35mm test roll

Ilford Ortho 35mm test roll

To my eye, and obviously this is based on two rolls both developed in the same chemical, there’s something here that I can definitely see me getting onboard with. The ISO80 film speed is a little bit of a limitation of course, but the gains in terms of the lack of grain and sharpness seem quite evident to me. With a little bit more thought, I could see myself getting into this film for landscape work. Sometime last year I started compiling some of my favourite bleak landscape images on my website in a bid to inspire me to capture more similar shots. It didn’t really work, but actually looking at those images, I could see this film working very well for that sort of style.

What’s particularly nice about the contrast is the way shadows seem to naturally fall off quite quickly, yet there still seems to be a lot of detail in the mid-tones. I often tweak my black and white images in this direction anyway, so having something that works like this naturally might work really well for me. But as I say, this is just gut response from two rolls, I have a way to go yet before properly getting to grips with. It’s definitely a film I will be shooting more throughout this year though. In fact, as soon as Paul gets more in stock I’ll definitely be ordering a 5 Pack of 120!

Words of thanks and recommendation

Finally, I just want to say a thanks to both Ilford Photo and Duncan from Silverpan Film Labs. Ilford supplied the film for this post, and Duncan is doing an excellent job at developing the film I shoot as well as giving me useful and insightful feedback – this being a service he offers to all of his customers.

If you want to buy this film, I also recommend Analogue Wonderland as my chosen film supplier. They stock Ilford Ortho Plus, but also supply something like 200 other films making the website interesting to explore as well as purchase from.

Support 35mmc

For as little as $1 a month, you can help support the upkeep of 35mmc and get access to exclusive content over on Patreon. Alternatively, please feel free to chuck a few pennies in the tip jar via Ko-fi:

Become a Patron!

If you would like to write for 35mmc, find out how here

12 Comments

  • Reply
    Trev
    January 13, 2020 at 11:05 am

    Interesting to read/see this when some commentators have questioned the point/worth (and price) of this film. Looks nice to me.

    Being newish to monochrome, I’m not quite sure what is meant by “shadows seem to naturally fall off quite quickly”. Would you take a moment to clarify, please? What am I seeing? Ta.

    • Reply
      Hamish Gill
      January 15, 2020 at 10:51 am

      Sorry, these words are always quite subjective. I mean that areas of shadow seem darker than one might expect. The shadow contrast is high. In lightroom to get this look I would be dropping the “blacks” slider – I didn’t need to here, the film just produced those dark shadows naturally.

  • Reply
    Neil
    January 13, 2020 at 11:59 am

    Very interesting, you mention lackadaisical exposure, what did you set the camera to with it being ISO 80?

    Had a mooch on your website also, really good. Cheers Sir.

    • Reply
      Hamish Gill
      January 15, 2020 at 10:49 am

      I don’t use the meter in the Makina, I used my phone. I set it to 80, but only took a reading once, aybe twice whilst we were out, so there wasn’t much precision or thought to exposure

  • Reply
    Leo Tam
    January 13, 2020 at 2:35 pm

    What would have been different in these shots if they pan f+ or fp4+ was used?

    • Reply
      Hamish Gill
      January 15, 2020 at 10:47 am

      I would imagine, a lot less contrast

      • Reply
        Leo Tam
        January 23, 2020 at 9:34 pm

        How does the lack of red sensitivity translate in landscapes?

        • Reply
          Hamish Gill
          January 24, 2020 at 4:09 pm

          I don’t really know yet. There seems to be more contrast, but I can’t yet correlate that with lower red-sensitivity

  • Reply
    Huss
    January 14, 2020 at 10:03 am

    If you like the Ilford Ortho try Silberra Ortho 50.
    Analogue Wonderland sells that too. It is so sweet.

    • Reply
      Hamish Gill
      January 15, 2020 at 10:47 am

      Noted. I’ve still not received my Indegogo film mind…

  • Reply
    Recommended reading : Down the Road
    January 18, 2020 at 10:00 am

    […] 📷 Hamish Gill shoots the new Ilford Ortho Plus film and is surprised by the lovely results he got. Read My first two rolls of Ilford Ortho Plus […]

  • Reply
    Roger B.
    January 22, 2020 at 12:34 am

    Very timely post for me, as I’ve just received some of this film in 35mm and 120 formats. Your contrasty but grain-free images will motivate me to get out while it’s still winter and shoot. BTW, in the USA The Darkroom in California processes this film.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.