5 frames with...

5 frames with a Canon Prima AS-1… – By Linda Terstad

…or: the bittersweet joy of falling in love with a film long discontinued.

Over the Christmas holidays, I was pleasantly surprised to receive some old 35mm films from my aunt. Expired, but she had kept them in the fridge like a pro. There was some (lower ISO) Superia, then some Swedish or Norwegian budget brand that doesn’t exist anymore, and one black and white roll, Kodak Plus-x 125 Pro. I hadn’t shot true black and white for over a decade, when I was a teenager on an exchange year in England, having access to a darkroom at school (what beautiful times). Then last year I shot two or three rolls of (the “non-true” black and white) Ilford XP-2 Super 400, but me and that film don’t seem to like each other at all.

About the camera then. I had been thinking of selling my Canon Prima AS-1, as it seems to be a quality lens (well, for an underwater point and shoot), and it seems to have something of a following, but I bought it quite cheap. I hated the first roll I shot with it. It was a Portra 400 shot over a weekend of very dull light, and although I suspected this wasn’t really my camera, I also knew it was unfair to judge it from that boring roll alone.

So off we went, the toy looking camera with the old film, and me, for a day trip to Falsterbo in southernmost Sweden. It’s very sandy making the sealed underwater compact an apt choice. The camera is very pleasant to shoot with, responsive, not too noisy. It is nice with a 90s compact that doesn’t feel all fragile and flimsy (like my Konica a4) nor heavily oversized (like some other underwater cameras).

I am happy I moved past that dull test roll, and will hang on to my Canon for a while. I dearly wish I could shoot more Kodak Plus-x 125. What a bitter sweet thing, falling in love with something that is gone.

If anyone can recommend a replacement, please speak up.

instagram.com/ilonabjork

Do you enjoy reading 35mmc?

For as little as $1 a month, you can help support the upkeep of this website. The more people chuck me a small amount of cash each month, the more time I can spend building and improving upon it - simple as that!
Or, for $2 a month you can get access to my behind the scenes micro-blog over on Patreon!

Either way, want to help out, become a patron of 35mmc here:

Become a Patron!

Alternatively, if you just enjoyed this post, or like the odd post here and there, please feel free to chuck a few pennies in the tip jar via Ko fi here:


Write for 35mmc: read more here, about how you can help build upon this ever growing resource
Subscribe/Follow: click here, to discover all the ways you can follow 35mmc

Advertisement

You Might Also Like

16 Comments

  • Avatar
    Reply
    Lukas Hromek
    March 19, 2019 at 11:05 am

    Beatiful pictures 🙂

    • Avatar
      Reply
      Linda Terstad
      March 19, 2019 at 11:23 am

      Thank you Lukas, much appreciated! 🙂

  • Avatar
    Reply
    Malcolm Myers
    March 19, 2019 at 11:16 am

    Thank you for the great review Linda. By the way, your English is excellent! Interesting that you don’t get on with XP2, I love it. But I guess it shows we all have different tastes. However, I have shot one roll of Plus X, just before they discontinued it. I can’t say I know what current film is closest to it, but Kodak Alaris appear to be on the up, so maybe they will bring it back in a year or two and we can all try it again.

    • Avatar
      Reply
      Linda Terstad
      March 19, 2019 at 11:25 am

      Thank you Malcolm for your kinds word and also yes, I keep seeing lovely results from others with XP2… I had sort of washed out results, but also somewhat inconsistent? I have some in the fridge and will give it another chance though, with some camera and lab I really trust.

  • Avatar
    Reply
    Olle Pursiainen
    March 19, 2019 at 5:28 pm

    If you are using old films, you should be aware of the fact that with this camera all non-DX-coded film cartridges are automatically registered as 25 ISO

    • Avatar
      Reply
      Linda Terstad
      March 19, 2019 at 8:34 pm

      good point. I was surprised this actually had DX-code – package looked very 80s/90s, and I think expire date was around 00

  • Avatar
    Reply
    lori_brooks
    March 19, 2019 at 7:30 pm

    That’s a cool looking camera. I don’t think i’ve ever seen a camera with a 32mm focal length. I wonder why they chose that.

    • Avatar
      Reply
      Linda Terstad
      March 19, 2019 at 8:40 pm

      Yes I guess it’s quite unusal? I actually like it, despite usually prefering say 38 or 42mm over 35mm..

    • Avatar
      Reply
      Oliver
      March 20, 2019 at 5:24 pm

      They chose that specific focal length because, underwater, light behaves differently. As light travels slower through water, it actually increases the focal length. This lens then becomes a 45/50mm lens underwater.

  • Avatar
    Reply
    Mark Kronquist
    March 19, 2019 at 7:39 pm

    You will probably like Kodak Super XX 5222 which is a 35mm movie film. There are many who respool and offer it on auction sites but it’s cheaper to just buy from a Kodak Cine Film Dealer and roll your own. Also there are, still catalogued, Plus-X and Panatomic-X 5″ Aerial Films…they have remote baking (simple soak in hot water to sulfate water before processing…you’ll have to hunt for them, but Kodak shows 29,000 feet in inventory of Plus-X…cutting and perking for 35 a pain, but 122/116/616/120/220/46mm-127 cry out also Astrum Svema iso 64 is lovely Plus X like…and Kodak says if enough folk preorder (something like 25000 feet they’ll, within reason, remake a film…

    • Avatar
      Reply
      Linda Terstad
      March 19, 2019 at 8:39 pm

      oh thank you Mark. After writing this ( but before having it published) I actally bought some old plus-x, so now I have some. but this is very interesting to know.. 🙂

  • Avatar
    Reply
    Damon Lapas
    March 19, 2019 at 8:15 pm

    The Ilford FP-4 is a good stand-in for Plus-X.

    • Avatar
      Reply
      Linda Terstad
      March 19, 2019 at 8:40 pm

      Thank you, I think I read that somewhere else too.. I’ll try that next 🙂

  • Avatar
    Reply
    George Appletree
    March 20, 2019 at 7:10 am

    Rather common falling in love with what you can’t achieve. Or usually wishing to have a quantic body, like that amazing shot. But nothing like a good eye to take good photographs like those. Any film would do a great job on them.

    • Avatar
      Reply
      Linda Terstad
      March 20, 2019 at 7:22 am

      haha thank you George! and yes you’re right, probably I’d be just as happy with some existing ilford or kodak alternative, just some consumerist logic having me want what I can’t buy (except I did on ebay, regretted it when I got a custom invoice from the post…)

  • Avatar
    Reply
    Daniel Steinle
    March 20, 2019 at 11:18 pm

    Hi Linda, I too mourn the loss of PlusX but am sitting on a few 100′ rolls 🙂

    I found the look of Arista EDU 100 in D76 1:1 has a very similar feel to Plus X. Arista is pretty cheap as well. Have fun.

  • Leave a Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    By using this website you agree to accept our Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

    Pin It on Pinterest

    Share This

    Thank you for commenting

    ...now share the post with your friends?