Fish-eye-Takumar 17mm – Takumars in a Digital Age #1

By David Mackay

Last Christmas my father-in-law gifted an old Spotmatic. I was taken aback as it had belonged to his father and so I knew how much it meant to him to pass it along. While the camera may not be worth much on the market, to me it is worth its weight in gold. The camera itself needed a bit of work as It had sat in a closet for over two decades.The light-meter didn’t work, and the shutter seized up after every fifth or sixth shot and so it went in for repairs.

The camera did however come with a pristine SMC Takumar 55m F1.8 lens. After buying an M42-RF adapter I fell in love.

That was the last moment my feet could be seen sticking out of the rabbit hole.Since then I’ve purchased several Takumars and sold my modern lenses, replacing them with:

  • Fish-eye Takumar 17mm F4
  • Super Takumar 28mm F3.5
  • Auto Takumar 35mm F2.3
  • Macro-Takumar 50mm F4
  • Takumar 85mm F1.9
  • Takumar 200mm F3.5

I like the idea of having a single set of lenses that I can use on both my analog and digital camera. And while that means eschewing features like auto-focus and stabilization, it is not quite such a definitive step into the past. Mirrorless cameras are well suited to these old lenses and I feel like an absolute cheat being able to use focus peaking.

So I’ve decided to start documenting my experience with these lenses. While this website is mostly tailored towards analog photography, I have thoroughly enjoyed reading others experiences with adapting older gear to modern setups.

The first lens I want to show case is the Fish-eye Takumar. It may seem an odd choice but there is a very simple for that – this lens is fun – and was a joy to use on an APS-C sensor. At 17mm (roughly 25-26mm on crop sensor) it has a refreshingly wide field of view. On a crop sensor I have always struggled, especially indoors, to retain some context of the scene. Due to the cropping, the fish-eye effect is much reduced (much to the disappointment of the skateboarding community), making it a great option for someone seeking a wide-angle prime. With a maximum aperture of F4 it’s not the fastest lens in the world, yet I found it performed admirably in most situations.

The fish-eye has an exposed front element with no filter ring (more on that later), and while not a true pancake you could call it pancake-like, like a deflated muffin. The exposed glass does give me some cause for concern as it wouldn’t take much to scratch it. Like most Takumars of this era it feels solid and satisfyingly heavy and the focus ring is smooth.

Gram, our favorite neighborhood cat

The wide-angle coupled with a short minimum focusing distance of 20cm means that it can be easy to forget just how much distance there truly is between you and your subject. Taking this shot quickly I didn’t quite nail the focus however, I love it all the same, producing a dreamy effect with some distortion. The lens is capable of much sharper images close up, however when a shot doesn’t quite work out I often camera away quite happy with the imperfections.

Sorry to disturb you Hammo

 

Close up with a longer exposure
With a crop sensor this wide-angle prime allows for more context in more confined spaces. My wife is thrilled…
Landscape shot at dawn shooting into the sun with minimal distortion along the horizon.
Stormy afternoons provide the best opportunities for naps.
We’ve became quite avid walkers since adding this guy to the family

While the fish-eye doesn’t come with a filter thread – it does come with built-in filters of its own. There are three to choose from, a UV (L39), Yellow (Y48CY2) and Orange (O56). The orange and yellow are not particularly useful on a digital sensor, but I know I’ll get plenty of use out of them on the Spotmatic. I knew they wouldn’t produce the same effect as with film, but that didn’t stop me trying.

 

 

 

Share this post:

About The Author

By David Mackay
Is a Northern Irish amateur writer and photographer based in the United States. Writing about his descent into the world of photography, as an educator he aims to document the learning process in order to help newcomers like himself find their feet, while giving old-timers a chuckle in the meantime.
Read More Articles From David Mackay

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
If you think £2.99 a month is too little, then please subscribe and I can manually edit the subscription value for you – thank you very much in advance if this is what you would like to do!

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Jeff T. on Fish-eye-Takumar 17mm – Takumars in a Digital Age #1

Comment posted: 25/08/2025

Some very nice pics there, David. Imo you can't beat those old Super-Takumar M42 mount lenses for overall excellence. In terms of sharpness they were the equal if not better than their other Japanese lens counterparts, and besides, they were smaller and lighter. As for tonal range, I believe they excelled compared to the fine lenses made by Nikon and Canon. This made them appear to have slightly less contrast, especially when compared with Minolta lenses of that era (1960s and 1970s) which appeared to offer greater contrast, to my eyes at least. But if it was tonal range you wanted, you had to go to Leitz lenses to get a look that was like the S-Ts, and of course the Leica system was far more expensive, save for the under-rated CL. As for I believe that compared with digital zoom lenses of today the S-Ts still offer, even on digital cameras, excellent results. The 55mm f/1.8 Super Takumar was (according to users as well as tests published in magazines like Modern Photography) among the very best lenses ever made, while the early 50mm f/1.4, eight-element Super Takumar is still highly sought after today, and commands a high price. So, good wishes for your shooting with these S-Ts and their close relatives, both on your repaired Spotmatic (which camera models unfortunately haven't held up as well over the decades as the Super-Takumar lenses) and your digital cameras.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Gary Smith on Fish-eye-Takumar 17mm – Takumars in a Digital Age #1

Comment posted: 25/08/2025

Some nice shots David although some of the b&w seem a little on the dark side.

Looking forward to reading more of your learning process and hoping for the occasional chuckle.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Bob Janes on Fish-eye-Takumar 17mm – Takumars in a Digital Age #1

Comment posted: 25/08/2025

I'm very jealous of your Takumar collection - I have the 28 in an SMC, and I do have a preset Super Takumar 200, but that is an f/5.6...

I look forward to seeing your other posting with ths Takumars!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Tony Warren on Fish-eye-Takumar 17mm – Takumars in a Digital Age #1

Comment posted: 25/08/2025

You have a real family heirloom in the Pentax David and good results. Like you, I have adapters to use my film era lenses on digital, Nikon F mount in my case. One of my favourite lenses if a Tamron 17mm but not a fisheye. Still, it has a character hard to beat.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *