5 Frames with a Nikon F100, AF Nikkor 24-85mm f/2.8-4 D & Kodak Ultramax 400

By Walter Reumkens

The Nikon F100 was produced from 1999 to 2006 and was widely regarded as Nikon’s second-best analogue SLR with autofocus, after the F5 for professionals. I’ve only owned it for 12 years, having bought it after selling my Nikon F4s, which eventually became too big for me and, with the fixed battery grip, too cumbersome to handle. I have not regretted this ‘swap’.

It was chosen more or less by chance for a roll of unexposed film – Kodak Ultramax 400 – of which I had bought several cans to replenish my stock. My rather extensive collection is stored in cupboards, cases and bags, which I unfortunately never labelled. So I happened to look into a bag that was in my way, saw the F100 and decided to use it for my next roll of film, fitting it with Endeloops rechargeable batteries and the Nikon AF Nikkor 24-85mm f/2.8-4 D lens, which is in its original box in a cupboard and easy to find. I don’t know when I last used the F100, but first of all, it worked perfectly. This combination, complete with lens hood, wasn’t too big for my LOWE Pro waist bag, which I like to carry for my kit on my bike rides.

I won’t go into the technical details of the camera and lens in any great detail. Nikonians are familiar with this camera and the lens. If you’re interested, there are plenty of reviews and information about them online. Even after such a long time, I found the F100 easy to use, as it is very similar to my Nikon D750. The lens can also be used on both cameras without any issues and even works on the DSLR without any AF problems, contrary to what was recently claimed by an author here on the blog. And I wouldn’t want to be without this lens either.

The Kodak Ultramax 400 is one of the more affordable 35mm colour films here in Germany; I’ve been using it since the Fuji X-TRA Superia 400 was discontinued. I’d been disappointed by that, but I’m now happy with the Kodak; I use it even in sunny weather around midday and expose it at box speed. If I want pastel-like colours, I overexpose by one stop. The photos shown were exposed using the camera system, after I had taken a comparative reading with an external light meter beforehand, just to be on the safe side. The film was developed using the C41 standard process with Fuji chemicals at a specialist lab, where it was scanned at 4K resolution. I made minor adjustments to the gradation of the images in LrC.

As already mentioned, the photos were taken on a 16 km cycle ride in my local area.

This is the second wooded area I had to cycle through on my short trip. I live on the outskirts of a major city, and the first wooded area is just 300 metres away. They aren’t huge, but they’re still relaxing for someone from the city, as you don’t come across many people – often just walkers with their dogs or cyclists. Here, the backlighting and the shadows it cast inspired me to take this photo.

I then continued on to ‘Haus Horst’, situated in the woodland and surrounded by a pond where waterfowl thrive. The former manor house now houses a sleep clinic.

After leaving the woodland, I saw this tractor and its driver working in the fields in the spring. Here, too, I have a side view from the front, which has its own charm.

I continued along the avenue running in the background and reached the outskirts of Liedberg-Steinhausen, which administratively belongs to my neighbouring town.

Between this grain silo and “Liedberg Castle” – which can be seen in the background, is privately owned and has been restored in recent years – lies a quiet little residential area, consisting mainly of detached houses and the odd farm here and there.

I am now on my way back from my short walk. Clearing work is currently taking place in a landscape and nature conservation area. As it should be, everything has been tidied away properly, and many new trees have even been planted as replacements – species that are less susceptible to the bark beetle that inhabits this area.

Still in the neighbouring village, but situated right on the outskirts of Mönchengladbach, lies ‘Myllendonk Castle’.

The castle is privately owned; the extensive grounds include an 18-hole golf course belonging to a golf club, which is also permitted to use the outbuildings for its own purposes. I took the photo from the cycle path of a district road that runs alongside the grounds. This is the only spot from which you can photograph the castle in its entirety. It’s not a telephone line that spoils the photo, but the edge of the ball-catcher net. Golfers do have the odd wayward shot, and analogue photographers don’t have to retouch everything away.

I hope I haven’t asked too much of you, and that everyone can get a sense of the camera, lens and film. And of a little piece of my home. Thank you!

 

Share this post:

About The Author

By Walter Reumkens
Walter Reumkens lives in Mönchengladbach, a medium-sized town in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. He is a retired graduate in public administration, worked in the IT sector for 40 years and has been a passionate photographer for over 50 years. In addition to numerous analogue and digital Nikon cameras (SLR, DSLR, DSLM), he also uses cameras and lenses from other manufacturers. To find out whether, alongside the ‘typical, highly touted luxury cameras’, other manufacturers also produce very good, reliable and user-friendly products that fully satisfy experienced photographers.
Read More Articles From Walter Reumkens

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £3.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Ibraar Hussain on 5 Frames with a Nikon F100, AF Nikkor 24-85mm f/2.8-4 D & Kodak Ultramax 400

Comment posted: 26/04/2026

Thanks Walter
The F100 was on my radar once, as was the F6. But never did go down the Nikon route
Really enjoyed the read and photos
Would love to explore these parts
Thanks my friend
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 26/04/2026

Thanks for your kind comment, Ibraar. Any other camera is fine too; you just need to know it and like it. As my first attempt with the Fujica ST901 didn’t work out, I ended up with a Nikon. It could just as easily have been a Minolta or a Pentax back then. If you look at the map showing the North Sea, I don’t actually live that far from Suffolk. On the Dutch border between Düsseldorf, Cologne and Aachen.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 26/04/2026

Ah yes direct to Harwich, which is but 10 miles from home

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 26/04/2026

Little known fact. Frisian is the closest language to Anglo Saxon / old English

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 26/04/2026

I’ve often been on holiday in De Haan (Belgium) or on Walcheren (Domburg, Westkapelle) in the Netherlands. It’s a good 200 km from where I live. I don’t know if you could see Harwich from there on a clear day. I’ve never tried...

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 26/04/2026

Probably on a tall ship in the crows nest on a clear cloudless day! :)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Miguel Mendez on 5 Frames with a Nikon F100, AF Nikkor 24-85mm f/2.8-4 D & Kodak Ultramax 400

Comment posted: 26/04/2026

Fotos muy agradables , felicitaciones.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 26/04/2026

Muchas gracias por tu amable comentario, Miguel.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Charles Young on 5 Frames with a Nikon F100, AF Nikkor 24-85mm f/2.8-4 D & Kodak Ultramax 400

Comment posted: 26/04/2026

Thanks for sharing your photos. Is a fine camera, and I enjoyed your excursion through the woods. Great way to get out of town!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 26/04/2026

Thank you very much for your kind comment, Charles.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Pauley on 5 Frames with a Nikon F100, AF Nikkor 24-85mm f/2.8-4 D & Kodak Ultramax 400

Comment posted: 26/04/2026

Hi Walter,

Thanks for this post and the chance to visit your corner of Germany. I'm impressed by the lushness of everything and by how well that came through in your photos. For this fellow city-dweller the landscape was also quite soothing. In the summer I expect to do a fair amount of cycling in upstate New York. Often I don't take a camera along with me but your post is inspiring, so that may change. Unless GAS gets the better of me, it won't be a Nikon -- I don't at present have any of those on the shelf! -- but your post makes a good case for the F100. So glad that the warmer season is finally approaching. Thanks again, -David
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 26/04/2026

Hi David, Thank you for your kind comment. I’m glad you like the photos of my home town. It’s just a small glimpse, though. I live on the outskirts of a town with a population of 270,000, not far from the major cities of Cologne and Düsseldorf, which of course can’t be compared to New York. It has all the pros and cons of a big city. I always take a camera with me on my almost daily rides. I can highly recommend it. It doesn’t have to be a Nikon, of course; any other camera you’re familiar with and can get up and running quickly will do the job. Thanks, David. I hope you have a great time on your upcoming bike rides and – hopefully – take some good photos too.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Andrew on 5 Frames with a Nikon F100, AF Nikkor 24-85mm f/2.8-4 D & Kodak Ultramax 400

Comment posted: 26/04/2026

Nice photos, thank you. I occasionally get my old Nikon F301 out. As far as I know, that was the first Nikon with an integral motor drive. Compared with my usual digital, there is real satisfaction in the “clunk-whirr” as the shutter fires and the film winds on. Compared to digital, you really know you have taken a photo!
Mind you, so does everyone around you. And here in the UK, the price of film plus developing and printing means that “clunk-whirr” just cost you about £0.80. That, if nothing else, makes you slow down and consider each picture very carefully.
If only film was about 1/3 the price I would use my old Nikon far more!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 26/04/2026

Thank you, Andrew, for your lovely, detailed comment. You’re quite right – the F301 was the first Nikon with a built-in motor drive. It really does stand out, just as you say. I actually own one myself. I learnt from the very beginning to take my time and be mindful when using an analogue camera. Film, development and prints have always been expensive. I still shoot digitally in the same style today; I never come home with a full memory card. But it’s still fun, even if a 36-exposure roll might take you almost a month to finish. It’s worth the wait! I don’t get paper prints made; a 4K scan from a specialist lab is enough for me, and I pay €10.50 for development and scanning. All the best!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

John Andrews on 5 Frames with a Nikon F100, AF Nikkor 24-85mm f/2.8-4 D & Kodak Ultramax 400

Comment posted: 26/04/2026

Hi again Walter, you have taken some fabulous images. I have the same lens. The 24-85 2.8 is a very good lens and mine is a very early version though. I have a Nikon D7000 and a D610. I tried an F100 but it suffered with really sticky rubber grips so took it back to the shop and ended up with a Canon EOS 3 as I use both systems. Very lovely images, I also cycle too having given up my business of restoring classic road bikes last July. Keep shooting to give us beautiful images. John.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 26/04/2026

Thanks for your kind comment, John. My F100 doesn’t stick at all – I’ve been lucky in that respect. It didn’t when I bought it, and nothing’s changed since. The lens is really good, even on the D7000. With the APS-C sensor, I also appreciate the longer focal length of 127mm. Two years ago, I replaced my 1993 trekking bike with a new one fitted with a full 30-speed Shimano Deore XT groupset. Not an e-bike, of course. Just as it should be for an analogue photographer. Even if you’re 77 years old. Both are fun – cycling and film photography. They complement each other. All the best, John!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith on 5 Frames with a Nikon F100, AF Nikkor 24-85mm f/2.8-4 D & Kodak Ultramax 400

Comment posted: 26/04/2026

Thanks for your post Walter. Ultramax v. Portra as far as color and grain is an interesting point for me (I just shot a roll of Portra through a Nikon F2). It seems that your daylight varied quite a bit over the course of your excursion? The difference between the tractor shot and the one immediately following is dramatic. I suppose that I'll eventually land on a favorite color film. I'm not sure that Portra will be it, the grain seems a bit much (in color as opposed to a b&w film where it adds character).

It's good to get out with a camera!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Walter Reumkens on 5 Frames with a Nikon F100, AF Nikkor 24-85mm f/2.8-4 D & Kodak Ultramax 400

Comment posted: 26/04/2026

I’d also like to thank you for your comment and for pointing out the two photos, Gary. The weather had indeed changed; it had been a bit hazy for a while and then cleared up. After your comment, I thought about it and realised I’d made a mistake. The photo of the tractor, where I was struggling with backlighting, was taken before the photo of the manor house with the pond. It had just cleared up there, the sun was really coming out, so I took the opportunity to have a short break on a bench. I’m not entirely happy with the next shot (silo + castle) myself. The shot was overexposed and I played around a bit too much with the saturation slider in Lightroom afterwards. At least with the file I’ve uploaded here. You spotted that very well, Gary! I can’t say anything about Portra; I’ve never used it, and it’s too expensive for me anyway. I’d set my sights on the Fuji X-TRA Superia 400, but it wasn’t available here in Europe anymore, so I switched to the Kodak Ultramax 400, which I’m happy with and the price is right too. I wish you all the best and hope you continue to enjoy your photography hobby!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Graham Line on 5 Frames with a Nikon F100, AF Nikkor 24-85mm f/2.8-4 D & Kodak Ultramax 400

Comment posted: 27/04/2026

My 24-85f2.8/4 has been a trusted lens from my F100 up to the current favorite D750. The only caution is 24mm framing at f/2.8. Early reviewers seized on the barrel/pincushion/wavy distortion at those settings when this zoom first came out and lots of web followers piled on. They did make my lens less expensive than it should have been but unjustly gave the lens a poor reputation. Like any piece of equipment, you have to learn how to use it and see if it works with your program.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 27/04/2026

I usually use my Nikons with prime lenses, but this 24–85mm f/2.8–4 is my favourite Nikon zoom lens. You’re right in what you say. Some things take on a life of their own. Sometimes they veer too far into the negative, sometimes too far into the positive. I tend to rely more on my own experience and have always been lucky so far. Thanks for your comment and all the best, Graham.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Curtis Heikkinen on 5 Frames with a Nikon F100, AF Nikkor 24-85mm f/2.8-4 D & Kodak Ultramax 400

Comment posted: 27/04/2026

Beautiful shots, Walter! Thanks for the post and look at this Nikon camera. My wife and I will be visiting Germany next month. Looking forward to it. Your images give us a taste of your country.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 27/04/2026

Thank you so much for your lovely comment, Curtis. I’m delighted that my photos are helping to build your anticipation for your upcoming trip to Germany. Although it’s a very small country compared to the US, there’s actually a great variety of landscapes here. Apart from perhaps Cologne, it’s rather unlikely that you’ll get to visit my home region. But let yourself be surprised. I wish you a wonderful and rewarding trip. All the best!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *