5 Frames with a Praktica MTL5B, a Pentacon 50/1,8 and a Roll of Portra 400 (expired in 2011)

By Andrea Monti

An afternoon of urban exploration looking for derelicted places gave me the chance to test a Praktica MTL 5b with its standard (pun intended) lens: the Pentacon 50/1,8, which I had never used before. To make things more complicated, I also took out from the basement a roll of Portra 400, expired in 2011.

Net of the limitation of a (poorly maintained) roll more than 10 years old, the shooting experience was not that exciting. Loading the film proved to be more complicated (at least for me) than with my Pentax ME Super, Nikon F3 or Voigtlander Bessa R2A, and I lost the first three frames. Maybe more training will make it easier, but so far the fact remains that some shots have been wasted before even starting the session.

I took all pictures wide open, and the lens showed a visible purple fringing.

Purple, Purple, Purple…

It does not look capable of producing razor-sharp images wide open.

Focusing is easier if you start wide open and then close the aperture to the desired value: this means that for impromptu photography zone focusing or hyperfocal shooting are mandatory.

Colour rendition is fair enough for a film that is decades old: the rust has been captured about correctly, as have the green and the blue, but a stint of purple fringing is visible in the vertical poles, together with an overall greenish tone.


Bokeh looks flat and lacks personality.

To sum up, the Pentacon did not impress me very much; still, I will give it another try, maybe with a non expired film to ascertain if the image quality issues are related to the age of the roll.

I tried to stick to the rule of thumb of over-exposing the film by one stop per decade, but I am not sure I always did, as I sometimes forgot to measure the available light with an external light meter. This reminded me of how lazy technology can make a photographer. Of course, there is no point in forbidding yourself from using the camera’s automatic features, but using them blindly is bad for your (photographic) eyesight.

As far as postprocessing is concerned, I first converted the images with Darktable (I crop them to have only the film in the frame, so as not to mess up Negadoctor’s results). The resulting images were exported in 16bit/Tiff and then furtherly processed with Pixelmator Pro.

P.S.: I know: I said ‘5 frames’. But I lied.

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Andrea Monti
My name is Andrea Monti. I’m an Italian free-lance journalist, photographer and – in my spare time – an hi-tech lawyer. The works I am more proud of are covering live jazz, pop and rock concerts for an Italian online music magazine and Opera and prose for a 200 years-old theatre. I also do sport photography mainly in athletics and fighting disciplines. You may find out more about me on https://andrea.monti.photography
View Profile

Comments

Kai Lietz on 5 Frames with a Praktica MTL5B, a Pentacon 50/1,8 and a Roll of Portra 400 (expired in 2011)

Comment posted: 28/03/2024

Nice write-up. Thank you! The Pentacon 50 1.8 really is not a too desirable lens. However, stopped down, it is much better. Try stopping down to at least f4 if you really want sharpness.
Genrerally, the Pancolar 50 1.8 is a way nicer lens. Both lenses, however, feature an automatic aperture. Check for a lever at the lens to switch from M to A. On M, aperture is closed always (say manual). On A, it will only be closed when you fire the shutter (automatic). Also, the Practicas feature a specific film guidance help intended to waste less film while loading. Check out the manual. That one should be same for all Prakticas with the letter L in their model name, just in case you cannot find the MTL 5 manual.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

JC on 5 Frames with a Praktica MTL5B, a Pentacon 50/1,8 and a Roll of Portra 400 (expired in 2011)

Comment posted: 28/03/2024

Hi Andrea,
thanks for your short review.
The Pentacon 50mm f1.8 is a famous lens, like a Canon FD 50mm f1.8, a Pentax SMC-M 50mm d1.7 or a Zuiko 50mm f1.8 or a Rokkor 50mm f1.7, that should be clear. For my opinion we should treat these lenses with dignity.
The Pentacons are quite different, one copy is soft at f1.8, another copy can be sharp at f1.8. When your MC type isn't that good, try an early single coated Pentacon.
But : all Pentacon lenses are always wonderful in rendering colours !
Another choices for standard M42 lenses on the Praktica are the CZJ Pancolar 50mmf1.8 or the Helios 44M 58mm f2 ( i recommend 44M-4 and all higher versions up to 44M-7 ).
My recommendation for ALL analogue cameras : Please, please read the manual slowly and carefully !!!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

TonyD on 5 Frames with a Praktica MTL5B, a Pentacon 50/1,8 and a Roll of Portra 400 (expired in 2011)

Comment posted: 28/03/2024

While the Pentacon 50 1.8 may be far from an exciting lens, I’ve always found, stopped down a bit, to get the job done, and fairly well at that. I don’t think you can fault a lens when you’re shooting it strictly wide open (which isn’t a strength of this particular lens) on decade-expired film.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Philip Lambert on 5 Frames with a Praktica MTL5B, a Pentacon 50/1,8 and a Roll of Portra 400 (expired in 2011)

Comment posted: 28/03/2024

I went from Pentacon to Exakta (also Eastern bloc) then to Nikon....can you guess which produced the best results? Lately the best film results were from a Contaflex with interchangeable front cells. I am not sure my results with a Leica M4-P subsequently were any better, so I sold it. I still use the 1972 40mm Summicron from a film Leica CL and like the results on an M240.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Geoff Chaplin on 5 Frames with a Praktica MTL5B, a Pentacon 50/1,8 and a Roll of Portra 400 (expired in 2011)

Comment posted: 29/03/2024

Memories: I had a similar Practica and the 50 1.8 lens many years ago and was very happy with both though I didn't shoot wide open generally. Your first, 4th an 5th shots are very nice - stopped down and with decent film they would have been wonderful!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

JC replied:

Comment posted: 29/03/2024

Agreed ! 1. A better film 2. Apertures at f2.8 or higher

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Michael Zwicky-Ross on 5 Frames with a Praktica MTL5B, a Pentacon 50/1,8 and a Roll of Portra 400 (expired in 2011)

Comment posted: 29/03/2024

Nice article, thank you. I had a similar Praktica decades ago but can't find it now so I must have sold it. Further to the comments above, I was wondering what your motivation was for shooting all your frames with the lens wide open?
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Steviemac on 5 Frames with a Praktica MTL5B, a Pentacon 50/1,8 and a Roll of Portra 400 (expired in 2011)

Comment posted: 29/03/2024

I'm always glad to see a Praktica given a moment in the sun. It's also the case that an article like this reminds me why I mistrust expired film. I always imagine that the elusive stand out image may present itself and it'll be ruined by degraded film stock. The Praktica M series are great cameras, and I suspect you may have got a lens that eluded the quality control. If I may make a suggestion, try the very wonderful 50mm CJ Tessar f/2.8 which was often as not the standard offering with these cameras in the UK. It may not be very fast, but it's a beautiful lens in every other respect. It's also plentiful and cheap.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

canapedemondongo on 5 Frames with a Praktica MTL5B, a Pentacon 50/1,8 and a Roll of Portra 400 (expired in 2011)

Comment posted: 31/03/2024

That is the exact camera + lens combination I used when learning to take photos. I don't remember it to be difficult to load, but it's something you have to get used to (it was much easier than a Kodak point and shoot I had at the time, with that one I had to tape the film to the take up spool). The 50/1.8 is not great, but closed a few stops is decent (or my copy is at least). And it focuses closer than most non macro 50's (33 vs 45cm IIRC). I still think that camera had the best shutter placement of all film cameras I've ever used, it felt so natural to me (most people not used to the camera found it awkward tho). And the focus screen, with the diagonal double split prism, it may not be the brightest screen and it sucked on long/dark lenses, but for a normal lens it's the best focusing aid I've ever used in any camera.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Roger on 5 Frames with a Praktica MTL5B, a Pentacon 50/1,8 and a Roll of Portra 400 (expired in 2011)

Comment posted: 02/04/2024

Thank you for an interesting post that reminds me of my first ever SLR camera, a Praktika (Pentacon?) SL, bought in the USA in 1969. That came with a Praktika Domiplan lens, which I understand was even cheaper than the Pentacon or the Tessar. Given that I recall mine took decent pictures (though I replaced it with a Pentax with Super Takumar lens as soon as I could afford one), I would expect yours to be better. Like an earlier responder, I am curious as to why you did not take a few images with the lens stopped down a bit.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *