Retinette 1A

Kodak Retinette 1A Review – A compact piece of Kodak History – by Carlos Argott

Kodak is no longer a household name, but for a long time, if you spoke about photography, most people would’ve thought about them, such was the success of their push to bring cameras to the masses.

While photo journalists were recording history using Leicas, and Hasselblads were going into space; Kodak was more comfortable living in every living room in the US, tasked with the more mundane but no less important job of capturing all those kodak moments” that would end up in the family photo albums, and  eventually become a great record of the golden age of the middle classes.

Introduced in 1939, the Retinette was one of these cameras, designed to be a cheaper alternative to the more famous Retina series, it is still a very capable camera and much more compact than its more expensive brothers.

The particular model that I own – discovered in a long forgotten box in my father’s closet after his passing – is the 1A Type 042. By this model, the bellows of the pre-war Retinette cameras had been retired for a much more durable solid body design (built in Germany no less). As was the design in those times, the shutter is integrated into the lens so the controls are in a somewhat unusual position for anyone used to more modern compact cameras, but in exchange, you get a very nice setup in which you can adjust all your settings with a single hand without having to move it away from the lens.

Portrait taken with Retinette
Being able to operate without looking at the controls, allows for some good candid shots

The Lens

Speaking of the lens, the 45mm Reomar (three element design, instead of the more common Tessar four element of the Retina models) is actually closer to a normal lens for 35mm format than the usual 50mm more commonly used nowadays, this makes for a very natural looking perspective in most photos that really show its family life documentary purpose. The lens holds 3 different rings for the three main functions, these are from front to back: focusing, shutter speed and aperture. 

Focusing the Retinette

The Retinette focusing ring is nice and smooth on my copy, with a long throw of over 180 degrees and very clear engraved markings in the front. This is useful since there’s no rangefinder focusing on this camera, it is all done via zone focusing, made easier by the three dot” system on the focus ring. This includes clicking stops at 6.5 feet, 10 feet and 30 feet, which roughly equate to portrait, everyday scene and landscape (30 feet being hyperlocal distance at f/4).

This system allows for very quick rough focusing in most conditions and allows for finer focus once you’ve developed the feel for distance estimation, with practice, you can achieve pretty good and consistent results. The lens also includes very clear zone markings, with a special marking for f/4 where the lens is at its best. 

Example of Retinette Bokeh
Bokeh is very nice wide open

The aperture

The Retinette’s control for aperture is the ring closest to the camera body, and includes a metal tab to recognize it without having to look at it, it’s marked in full stops, though the manual states that intermediate points can be used safely.

The maximum aperture of f/2.8 is good for a compact camera of it’s time, and should allow plenty of versatility in general use, though you’ll have to be more careful with your focusing when going wide open. You will also notice that the results are less crisp than at f/4, but still very usable and with experience, even allow you to melt the background away into a very soft creamy bokeh.

At the other end of the scale, at f/22, this lens stops down far enough to allow you to just drop in your Tri-X film and walk around ready for most conditions, even if you decide to push it to 800 (like I did for the shots in this roll). 

Street photo of a sculpture taken with a Retinette
Fully stopped down, enough to use on a sunny day even with 800 film

The shutter

The third component to the Retinette’s lens is the shutter speed ring; nested between the aperture and the focusing ones, it is the hardest of the three to use. This is mostly due to this being a fully mechanical shutter meaning you’ll be winding and unwinding the spring as you move it around, if you listen closely you’ll hear the wonderfully old-school sound of the timing spring as you adjust the shutter speed (the manual does state that it’s safe to adjust speeds with a tensioned springs, unlike other cameras of the time).

The available speeds go from 1/250 to 1/30 in full stops and a bulb mode. Also note that for the shutter speed, Kodak advises against using intermediate stops unlike the apertures. 1/250 might not be very fast, but it should be enough for most uses, and the small amount of possible values, mean that the timing tends to be very good, even on very old models, since the mechanism is somewhat simpler than on other cameras (I’m looking at you Nikon F2).

Picture of a tree taken with a Retinette
Though small and simple, the lens can be very sharp if used well

The self timer

The controls on the Retinette’s lens is rounded out by a self-timer lever on the bottom of the lens, that give you a 5 second timer for the shutter. In my particular camera, it tends to stick so I’ll have to get it cleaned at some point, but I rarely use this functionality.

One thing of note here, is that since the film advance is coupled to the shutter button, but not the shutter itself, if your self-timer ever sticks without you noticing, the camera will allow you to advance the film even if the shutter didn’t actually fire, (happened to me once), so that’s just something to watch out for.

Street photography with the Retinette
The finder might be small, but it’s good enough to get decent framing

The film Advance

The Retinette’s film advance mechanism is located on the underside of the camera instead of the more usual top, it seems to make for a great conversation starter when people see you wind it. It’s still a fast wind mechanism, so it only needs one stroke, and even in this old camera that hasn’t been CLA’d in a long time, the spacing was precise between every frame.

Right next to the lever, is the film release button, even though it is located right next to the lever, I never found myself pressing it by accident, so you don’t need to be too careful when winding. On the other hand, the back release button located on the left underside of the camera does feel like it might be in a riskier position, though when using the leather half case, it’s nicely protected, so I’d recommend using it with the case.

Close up motorcycle shot with Retinette
With some experience, close focusing is possible

The top plate

Rounding out the top of the Retinette, you have on the far right, a frame counter, this one is a decreasing type, so that’s slightly uncommon, but perhaps clearer, since it always tells you how many frames you have left. This camera doesn’t auto reset the counter though, so when loading your film, you’ll have to reset it to the starting diamond sign. As a quirk of the time in which the camera was designed, the second diamond mark is for a 20 frame roll and not the more modern 24. 

The far left of the top plate is your film rewind knob and a very crude film type indicator, usually I don’t even bother with it, but I guess there might be some people which might enjoy the novelty of it.

The camera does have a built in cold shoe, and since the lens includes a flash terminal, you could use a flash, but that seems like more trouble than it’s worth, and I would instead prefer to have either a light meter or a rangefinder mounted there instead. 

The Shutter button

The final feature of the top of the Retinette is your shutter release button – this one is oddly under-designed compared to the rest of the camera, just a little tube on the top of the camera. It is threaded if you want to use a cable release, and the action itself is nice and pleasant, with enough resistance to prevent accidental shooting, but not enough that you’ll be afraid to shake the camera when you press it. This makes it very usable at even the slowest speed of 1/30, especially since the lens shutter means there’s no detectable shutter shake and almost no noise.

Low light street photo taken with Retinette
The three dots allow you to focus quickly…just remember to actually stop moving before taking the shot

The viewfinder

The last important part of the Retinette, is the finder. It is positioned in line with the optical axis, which has the great advantage of reducing the parallax error by not having any horizontal displacement and only vertical, which I find easier to correct for anyways. The finder is not large by any means, but good enough for the purposes of this camera, and the lines are bright and clear. It even includes a parallax correction marker at the top of the frame that you’re supposed to use when shooting close subjects! The finder on my camera is somewhat dark, but this is understandable given the age of the camera. Given that there’s no focusing mechanism in there, it’s not really a problem even when shooting in low light conditions. 

Backlit image shot straight into the sun
Surprisingly good when shooting straight into the sun

Final thoughts

All technical aspects aside, the Retinette is very fun to use, it gives you a very portable very capable film camera that forces you to be involved with the photo by making you operate every setting every time. It’s elegant design make it a pleasure to hold and I’ve found it’s retro look is one that people will feel inclined to ask you about. Add to it the quality construction, and you’ve got yourself an excellent compact 35mm camera for those that aren’t afraid to take photographs without any automation based help from the camera.

Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-free Experience

There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts:

Paid Subscription - £2.99 per month and you'll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
Subscribe here.

Content contributor - become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.
Sign up here.

About The Author

25 thoughts on “Kodak Retinette 1A Review – A compact piece of Kodak History – by Carlos Argott”

    1. Thanks Jim! I was also surprised by how well the little camera has stood up the test of time and got better images out of it than I originally expected.

  1. Carlos the Retinette is a wonderful little camera. Your shots with Tri-X are as better than 95% of those taken with a $15K Leica.

    It is the photographer not the machine. I found recently some slides from a 70’s trip to NYC taken with my Mom’s Kodak 126 Instamatic. I was amazed by the lifelike qualities.

    Time allowing I might write a piece on my Retina I typ 119 from the 1937.

    1. Thank you for your kind comment Mick! And what you mention about finding slides is another that I really like about film; the wonder of running across some old negatives, some forgotten slides. Every now and then, as I go through all of my father’s belongings I find a couple of frames of film tucked here and there, and it’s a really nice experience to discover those, something that doesn’t happen with digital as easily.

  2. Richard Williams

    Lovely review thanks. There is (or at least was) one of these in a charity shop in town, but it was a tenner and I’ve bought enough cameras recently. I do have a lot of fun shooting with a manual Voigtlander viewfinder camera though, so I get what you mean by being involved in the photo. Love these old 50s and 60s cameras!

    1. Yeah, I get what you mean about having bought too many cameras Richard hehe; I have the same problem, that’s why I try to avoid looking around old camera shops or ebay, waaaay too tempting.

  3. Very nice review of a very special camera. I inherited my late father’s Retinette 1A just a few years ago. It was the camera that recorded our family’s life until he bought a Vivitar 220/SL sometime in the 70s, but he kept the Retinette. That was the camera that inspired me to take pictures and as a child, it seemed like such a complex machine. I guess it was alongside my Kodak Instamatic X-15 in the mid-70s! Over the years my gear has grown pretty sophisticated but for me the Holy Grail of cameras has always been my dad’s Retinette 1A.

    1. Glad to hear that there’s other Retinette’s being passed down generations out there and being used still instead of being relegated to being just decor pieces or trashed!

  4. Well well, what a coincidence… add me to the “passed on from my late father” Retinette 1A list! My mother only just found it and gave it to me since I’m the ‘camera guy’ in the family. Just took it out for a spin and got similar results to you, Carlos, on Ilford HP5. Wish I could post a couple here. Also came with the original leather case which was pretty cool. It’s the memories that make these little cameras special.

  5. Just to keep the them going – I have a Retinette IIa that was my father’s too. I know it’s somewhere in the house and every now and then I have another unsuccessful hunt for it… It’s probably hanging out with that 6×9 Voigtlaender folder and a couple of Agfas that I also can’t seem to find!

  6. Jenny Kinnear

    I am so glad to have found this lovely website. I have just acquired a little Retinette 1A in beautiful condition, and can’t wait to try it out.

  7. Well as it happens I was given a Retinette 1A today and am pleased I found this article. Can’t wait to test it out, haven’t used film for years. It belonged to my wife’s cousin partner and she was going to give it to a charity shop but decided to give it to me, that way it would stay in the family.

  8. I’ve never owned a film camera before, and I just bought one of these on a whim. Purchased 3 rolls of Tri-X after being inspired by your review and your photos! Looks like I’m going to be turning that spare room into a dark room…

  9. Lachlan Burrell

    I borrowed one of these from a friend a while back, and I was stunned by the results, and I really enjoyed the shooting experience. I completely agree with your review, it’s exactly as I experienced the camera. I’m going to have to get one I think!

    1. ???? Glad to hear that! I think they are wonderful little cameras that get you in touch with the raw act of photography! Glad to hear people still appreciate it out there!

  10. Hi, having read your review of the Reinette, I went onto Ebay and bought one for the princely sum of £8.99 and 4 quid postage. I needed to get back into film photography as I felt I was losing creativity with my DSLR. Ive already got a couple of old Minolta’s but wanted something with a bit of style and a little camera thats going to make me work and genuinely excited about waiting to get the film/prints back.

    Ive got to say, the photos that have come from that little camera are fabulous, really impressive and the DOP is beautiful. I’m assuming that you know your stuff and have experience with zone focusing…me on the other hand, do not so its going to be a slightly expensive learning curve 🙂 Though it did come with a Krester rangefinder, an old sixty light meter etc.

    I’m glad I found your post. Very informative, interesting and most of all, it prompted me to go and buy one.

  11. Hi- great article. Question- any idea what size the filter threads would be for a Retinette 1A (type 44)? Having an unsuccessful web search so far…. Thanks

    1. I do not know off the top of my head; I do have some old horseman filters in odd sizes, so I can try and see if any of them fit on my Retinette and let you know if I find a match Steven

  12. I have a mint Retina 1a with a case I got for $10 at a camera show. I always thought that Retina cameras, especially the late ones, are one of the most beautifully finishes cameras out there. I have had it for quite a few years. The article inspired me to pull it out. Too bad it only has a triplet lens. I once read an article that one of the reasons that the Japanese camera industry overtook the German was that lower end German cameras came at a higher price but with a triplet lens while the Japanese put right away a four element Tessar formula lens on their “starter” cameras. On the mid range cameras the Germans put a four element f2.8 lebs but the Japanese put a 6 element f2 (1.9,1.8). The top German cameras came with the 6 element lens F2 lens with the f1.4 (1.5) as a top option at an expensive premium, whereas the Japanese made the f1.4 lens as a very affordable option.

  13. I use a Retina IIIc. It has six elements. Will I be less pleased with the lens performance on a Retinette 1A or 1B, each of which I believe have three elements? Thanks!

    1. Personally, I like all the personality that the optics in these older cameras bring; modern lenses can sometimes be so perfect as to feel sterile, so I wouldn’t worry too much about having three vs six lenses if those are the cameras you can get your hands on. It will always be a matter of personal preference, so if you can find some sample images shot on those cameras and you like the results, that’s what matters

  14. La primera Retinette IA que compre fue por el año 1960, y siempre la utilice con pelicula B/N PLUS X, mi segunda Retinette fue una model F con la lente Angenieux F 3.5. Todavia sigo teniendo a las dos, para mi fueron dos camaras perfectas, junto con la pelicula.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to Top