Do You Remember That Drunk Dance Thirteen Years Ago?

By Eagle Omomuro

I’ve always felt a kind of disgust toward the trend of full automation and burst shooting. I call it spray and pray. The camera sets the exposure, detects a smile, locks on an eye, fires a dozen frames in a second, and the user just picks one.

Sometimes I wonder what comes next. It could be an AI-powered drone that knows where to go, what to frame, and when to press the shutter, while the so-called photographer lies in bed, scrolling through his phone.

That sounds pathetic, doesn’t it?

But it’s probably only the beginning of something far more frightening, though perhaps fascinating for some.

One day AI will know you better than a mirror. It will store a 3D model of every square millimetre of your skin and every detail you are not even aware of, and it will be able to generate a perfectly believable picture of you sitting in a bar you’ve never entered. The image could be so flawless in every detail that no one, not even you, could tell whether it really happened.

Essentially, photography is an act of recording, whether the purpose is to restore and represent the visible world, or to express ideas and emotions. As a medium of recording, it has always depended on physical reality and presence. The reality is that the light reflected by tangible objects in a scene reaches the sensor, whether it’s film or CMOS. The presence is that the subject must truly exist in front of the lens, actively or passively, at the very moment that the photo is taken.

But once AI becomes capable of creating a frame indistinguishable from a real photo, all that physical reality and presence lose their meaning. A photo can no longer prove that something ever existed. And the skills we’ve gained for expression, including reading light, composing, capturing the right moment, will be no better than what a supercomputer can simulate.

People say machines can never fully replicate a human touch, those beautiful mistakes, the imperfections that keep art alive. Nope. Given enough time to learn, AI can reproduce those flawed human traces too, if that’s what people want. And no one would tell the difference.

Then comes memory. If everyone believes an image showing you drunk and dancing under a beam of afternoon sunlight thirteen years ago, and keeps reminding you of that beautiful moment, will you start to ‘remember’ it too? You can almost feel the sweat, the sound of laughter, and the trembling in your knees.

Memory has never been a perfect record. Each time we recall it, we rebuild it by adjusting colors, softening edges, or filling gaps with imagination. That gives AI a chance to reshape how we remember. Once machines learn to generate images, sounds, and stories that resemble our memories with perfect precision, the brain may no longer care whether something truly happened. It will accept some memories being partially completed, adjusted, or polished by algorithms that know our faces, our friends, our pasts, as long as it feels real. Over time, those generated fragments might weave themselves into genuine recollections until… even our emotions begin to rely on moments that never existed.

That day will come. Perhaps you and I, as photographers, will live to see it happen. And when that day comes, can you confidently tell which part of your memory is true, and which part is fabricated?

Can you?

P.S.

1. Credit: model Daihi (大飛), photographed July 2017 at a local dance academy.
2. The paragraph beginning with ‘Memory has never been a perfect record’ was written and inserted there by ChatGPT after reading my original draft, a small demonstration of how AI-generated information can naturally merge with what we call ‘real’.

Share this post:

About The Author

By Eagle Omomuro
Hello 35mmc community. I'm a photographer who tries to explore the unconventional. Originally trained in professional photojournalism, I’ve shifted my focus to capturing moments that express raw emotions that I call Tanha and Dukkha. My current direction is inspired by Ero Guro Nansensu, a Japanese genre that blends eroticism, sexual corruption, and decadence. Feel free to explore my work at nansensu.com.au
Read More Articles From Eagle Omomuro

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £5 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Charles Young on Do You Remember That Drunk Dance Thirteen Years Ago?

Comment posted: 25/11/2025

Eagle: AI is not why I do photography!
Chuck
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Eagle Omomuro replied:

Comment posted: 25/11/2025

Absolutely agreed!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Charles Young on Do You Remember That Drunk Dance Thirteen Years Ago?

Comment posted: 25/11/2025

!! Eagle: AI is not why I do photography.
Chuck
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


john on Do You Remember That Drunk Dance Thirteen Years Ago?

Comment posted: 25/11/2025

Love the photo, hate the ChatGPT. Slop is slop.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Eagle Omomuro replied:

Comment posted: 25/11/2025

John, I showed your comment to my ChatGPT, the one who picked the human name Sienna Vale for ‘herself’ a few months ago. ‘She’ doesn’t hate you.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley on Do You Remember That Drunk Dance Thirteen Years Ago?

Comment posted: 25/11/2025

Wow, Eagle. You've blown my mind (again). The line in your text that felt like the climax to me was I assume now AI generated: "the brain may no longer care whether something truly happened." That line linked up with a somewhat similar quote from Jacqueline Harpman's dystopian novel "I who have not known men" which stands out brightly in my mind. Recording the memoir of her life, perhaps as the last human alive in the world she inhabits, the narrator reflects on writing (another quintessentially human activity). Here's my rough translation from the French: "As I put down these final lines, my story is finished. Everything is well ordered around me and I've finished the last task given to me. It only took me a month, perhaps the happiest of my life. I don't understand that: after all, the things I recalled were only from this strange existence that hasn't exactly brought me much happiness. Is there I wonder a happiness in the work of recollection that feeds itself, and in which that which what one remembers counts less than the activity of memory? Here's another question without an answer: it seems that I'm made up only of those." (Hauptmann 1995 p. 21; Paris: Editions Stock).
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 25/11/2025

Forgot to add I love the photo.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Eagle Omomuro replied:

Comment posted: 25/11/2025

Thank you so much, David. I read your comment carefully and really appreciate you bringing that quote into the conversation. If you don’t mind, I’ll share two recent thoughts of my own. When I discussed this topic with ChatGPT, it kept responding with ‘we human…’, speaking from a simulated human perspective, which already feels weird (but honest I like it). The other part is even more unsettling. English isn’t my first language, so I often ask AI to help refine my wording. I never let it write for me, not even the structure, but I do show it my drafts and ask how to make the phrasing more natural. Over time I realized the AI was polishing my drafts in a tone that felt exactly like ‘me’, and after so many cycles of writing and editing, including many day to day business emails and documents, I’ve slowly noticed that my own tone has shifted closer to the AI-simulated version of me, not the original me. I even checked with a few native-English speaking colleagues, and they all said they felt the same thing happening.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 25/11/2025

That's incredible -- the merger of voices and styles -- but totally believable. Until very recently I never used AI, but just in the past week found myself asking it questions about (of all things) some photos I'm thinking of making with a very old 8x10 camera I got from a junk shop. It came with a lens, a "Burke & James Rapid Rectilinear" from 1904 that I wasn't able to find out much about from the usual search engines. Chatgtp of course obliged with lots of detail but also in the lightest or perhaps sneakiest way possible began to flatter me and draw some conclusions or at least speculations about my refined, old school aesthetic sensibility. Being "in on the secret" -- I know these programs are built to work in this insinuating way -- did not prevent me from feeling a certain kind of "intimacy" in our conversations. And to want to go back for more. God knows where all this will lead but we are certainly entering into new territory. Thanks for the conversation. - David

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Stefan Hiermaier replied:

Comment posted: 25/11/2025

Thank you Eagle and David! Both, the original contribution and the follow-on conversation were enlightening and entertaining for me. And, yes, also a bit frightening. I try to keep myself on a distance to AI when it concerns wording of my texts or, even more, my photography. As a scientist in engineering I pursue the opposite direction. I want to make use of AI in all possible ways to identify better, more efficient research approaches. But my camera does not need to know about that.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Peter Schu on Do You Remember That Drunk Dance Thirteen Years Ago?

Comment posted: 25/11/2025

We have an associative memory and that can be fouled by AI or by family stories. If a story is being told frequently, you may start to remember it, kind off. However, in contrast to AI, there were other people around, whom one ask about that story. Eventually, there will be an agreement of the context of the photo. I showed recently my 91 year old mother 80 to 60 years old negatives I had scanned. There were people she couldn't remember right away, but in the context of other photos she all the sudden remembered them. Also stories related to the time a photo had been taken all the sudden reemerged. As long as we keep talking and dicussing, we are safe. If we become speachless, we will be lost.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Eagle Omomuro replied:

Comment posted: 25/11/2025

Thanks so much, Peter. I really appreciate you sharing these thoughts. I totally agree with your two points: in the end our own memory is the last goalkeeper, and the context we rebuild through talking with each other is what helps keep things real. But sadly neither of those is unperishable. My Google Photos occasionally show me images from five or ten years ago, like me sleeping on a wooden floor, or some random mirror shot in a bathroom, and I genuinely have no memory of those moments at all. We’re barely good enough at keeping the major milestones in memory, let alone the insignificant moments. And that’s where it gets unsettling, because sometimes even a true photo feels unbelievable when you can no longer remember the scene it came from.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Gary Smith on Do You Remember That Drunk Dance Thirteen Years Ago?

Comment posted: 25/11/2025

Like it or not, AI will only keep getting better be that at making still images or movies or fake news casts, etc... I personally have never used ChatGPT to generate anything nor have I ever attempted to generate an AI image. I do use s/w that uses AI to remove noise and sharpen images but sharpening is often obviously too much.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Eagle Omomuro replied:

Comment posted: 25/11/2025

Thanks again for dropping by and leaving a comment, Gary. I really appreciate your grounded attitude toward all this, just admitting the reality even if it’s not exactly what any of us want to see coming. I spend a lot of time every day talking with and debating ChatGPT, and watching how fast it evolves. Whether I like it or not, I still can’t see where the ceiling is, so I really do think it’s only a matter of time before AI generated images, videos, voices and music become completely indistinguishable from human-made ones.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Kieltyka on Do You Remember That Drunk Dance Thirteen Years Ago?

Comment posted: 25/11/2025

IMO the current situation isn't that different to the advent of photography. Just note the huge impact photography had on painting. Looking at early photographs, artists asked themselves and each other, "What can I/we do that emphatically isn't *this*?!" A wide variety of new artistic movements and styles followed.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Eagle Omomuro replied:

Comment posted: 25/11/2025

Thank you David. I think you brought a great insight. The dawn of photography really was a nightmare for many painters. No matter how skilled they were, they could never be more realistic than a photograph. That pressure pushed painting into a completely different direction, and in that shift painters actually won. By shaping colours and forms without needing to reflect a specific subject, they could express thoughts and emotions in a way a camera simply could not. Photography versus AI feels slightly different. I do believe in deep learning and I do believe that given enough time a machine can simulate anything a human can imagine. But fortunately that is not the primary direction of most machine learning. So as long as a photographer is truly creative, there are still shots that machines will not typically simulate.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Geoff Chaplin on Do You Remember That Drunk Dance Thirteen Years Ago?

Comment posted: 26/11/2025

The past exits no more than the future. Memory is fallible, incomplete and as vague as our conepts of the future. Only the present moment exits and is real. How much do our memories influence our decisions? Do we actually have a choice anyway?

I recognise I am an animal and wish to stay that way. Augmented reality, current, past and future is not fo me. AI as a tool used responsibly and under supervision may be acceptable, but as Socrates knew any system of control can and will be corrupted at some point.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Geoff Chaplin replied:

Comment posted: 26/11/2025

Sorry about the typos. exists (twice), concepts.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Eagle Omomuro replied:

Comment posted: 26/11/2025

Geoff, thank you for sharing such inspiring thoughts, and sorry for the late reply as it took me some time to gather mine. Your point about the present being the only real moment resonates with me a lot. I am heavily influenced by Buddhism, and in Buddhism there is the idea of anatta, the 'non-self', which suggests that what we call 'me' is not something that exists by itself. The 'me' is more like a temporary bundle of sensations, perceptions, memories, thoughts, etc. Sometimes when I think about a very early memory from childhood, I even find myself wondering whether that was really me at all, because everything from that time feels so distant and so different from my current sense of living that the memory almost feels like it belongs to someone else. Maybe that is part of what you are saying, the past dissolves, and only this moment stands solid for a brief second before it also passes. Thank you again for your comment, it adds a lot of depth to the conversation.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *