Lenses

Sigma 45mm f/2.8 DG DN – A mini-review – By JK Lockwood

May 1, 2020

Sigma introduced the 45mm f/2.8 DG DN lens last year for Sony E-mount and Leica L-mount cameras. Sigma had four goals when designing this lens: small size, high optical performance, a short minimum focus distance, and exceptional build quality. I believe they succeeded on all counts and deliver excellent image quality and performance in a very compact AF lens. Let’s look at how they managed all of these goals to produce a uniquely modern lens with classic rendering.

Sigma 45mm at f/2.8

Background

It all started when I purchased a pre-owned Leica SL (Typ 601). My idea was to utilize small M-mount lenses (that I already owned) on a more modern, digital platform than my Leica M4-P. Reports were that the Leica SL excelled with M glass and offered focus aids like peaking and zoom (something I had no experience with). All was going well with the camera and manual-focus lenses, but I felt I might be missing out on some of the capabilities of this modern mirrorless marvel. So along came the most compact L-Mount prime I could find, the Sigma 45mm f/2.8 DG DN.

Sigma 45mm at f/2.8

Why 45mm f/2.8?

For street and walk-around use, the 45mm focal length is marvelous, fitting right between classical 50mm and 35mm. It is as close to the measured diagonal of our 35mm shaped frame as one can get. Considered a “normal lens”, it doesn’t impose an opinion on our images, it just looks natural. It doesn’t compress like a telephoto lens, nor exaggerate like a wide-angle. Because of this, however, creating strong images is incumbent on the photographer.

As for its relative lack of speed at f/2.8, I answer two-fold: The modern EVF cameras this lens is designed for already have a bright viewfinder experience. Gone are the days of needing a faster lens to create a brighter image to facilitate manual focusing. Also, without film’s fixed-ISO, f/2.8 is rarely a problem. Photojournalists live and die by their f/2.8 zooms. So, plenty fast and practical for me.

Sigma 45mm at f/5.6

Sharpness

A frequent complaint about this lens is a lack of sharpness (at f/2.8). According to Sigma, design emphasis was placed on producing “exceptionally beautiful bokeh” over wide-open sharpness. Stopping down to f/5.6 reportedly equals their Art lens line. Focus on the image below, shot wide-open, was on the trolley sign:

Sigma 45mm at f/2.8

Another “feature” of the lens, related to perceived sharpness, is what appears as a veiling haze when shot wide-open and focused closely. Note the top left edge of the street sign below. This haze disappears as one stops down the lens and sharpness improves greatly. Sigma goes into great detail on how they harnessed spherical aberrations in this fascinating behind-the-scenes design article https://www.sigma-sein.com/en/ohsone/45mm-f2-8-dg-dn-contemporary/

Full frame vs. crop shot at f/2.8

Pixel Peeping

Admittedly, I’m not normally a pixel-peeper or an optical expert. I rarely dissect lens performance by scrolling about at 100% on a color-corrected monitor. Nor do I pay any attention to MTF charts. But this once, I thought it might be interesting to proceed a little more scientifically and compare the Sigma with adapted Zeiss and Leica M lenses that I already owned. This involved a tripod πŸ™‚

The following images were taken at approximately 3 meters, focusing on this speed limit sign. I compared the Sigma 45mm, with a Zeiss Planar 50mm f/2 ZM and a Leica Summarit-M 35mm f/2.5 with some surprising results. Since these lenses offer similar angles of view and could be used interchangeably, I felt a direct comparison might be interesting.


Sigma 45mm at f/2.8 Full frame vs. crop


Zeiss 50MM at f/2 Full frame vs. crop


Leica 35MM Summarit-M at f/2.5 Full frame vs. crop

Indeed the above images show an interesting comparison between modern lenses. I initially picked up a “busyness” in the leaves in the upper left corner and circular bokeh to the right of the sign. It was especially pronounced with the Leica and Zeiss lenses, but not the Sigma. To my eye, the Sigma just renders a smoother, drama-free bokeh. The sort of bokeh my eyes are used to seeing from the stable full of Zeiss glass I used with my Hasselblad 500 Series cameras.

Sigma 45mm f/2.8

Sigma 45mm at f/2.8

Conclusion

To my eye, the Sigma 45mm f/2.8 DG DN lens offers a unique, classic rendering. Its inherent close-up softness is actually a benefit for portrait subjects and could be utilized to soften skin texture in both still and video images. Overall, the AF is quick, with close-focusing capability far greater than any rangefinder lens. The build quality is also beyond reproach, with an all-metal body and weather-sealing. The size is perfection on my Leica SL and looks amazing on the Leica CL too. I hope Sigma continues down the path of offering small autofocus prime lenses like this modern-day classic.

Sigma 45mm at f/2.8

Support 35mmc

For as little as $1 a month, you can help support the upkeep of 35mmc and get access to exclusive content over on Patreon. Alternatively, please feel free to chuck a few pennies in the tip jar via Ko-fi:

Become a Patron!

If you would like to write for 35mmc, find out how here

12 Comments

  • Reply
    KhΓΌrt Louis Williams
    May 1, 2020 at 12:26 pm

    I don’t own a Leica, but I wanted to comment that this was one of the most pleasant mini-reviews I have read on 35mmc. Thank you for including interesting colour photographs of people and places.

    I agree with everything you wrote in the “Why 45mm f/2.8?” section. In my opinion, the 40-45mm focal range is perfect for the street photographer as that is within the normal field of view of human vision.

    • Reply
      JK Lockwood
      May 1, 2020 at 4:20 pm

      Thank you for the kind words. I’m glad you enjoyed the review!

  • Reply
    Huss
    May 1, 2020 at 8:23 pm

    The Zeiss Planar seems sharper and has nicer bokeh.
    It is smaller, faster and cheaper. But no AF.

    Thanks for the test!

    • Reply
      JK Lockwood
      May 2, 2020 at 2:13 am

      The 50mm Zeiss ZM has a current price of $903 USD, the Sigma is $549, and was $499 when I picked it up.

      • Reply
        Huss
        May 3, 2020 at 5:47 pm

        Ahh, did not realize the Sigma was much cheaper. I picked up my Zeiss for $550 used like new, then again you could also get the Sigma cheaper used.
        Do you actually prefer the Sigma to your Zeiss seeing you have both? AF is handy but the SL2 is very easy to focus manually.

        • Reply
          JK Lockwood
          May 3, 2020 at 9:09 pm

          The Zeiss and Leica M lenses were already in my stable, in use with my Leica M4-P. The color and contrast of Zeiss lenses are a favorite. Purchasing the SL Type 601 was, for me, a way to obtain a digital Leica platform, inexpensively.

          The compact size and IQ one can get from M lenses on FF 35mm is truly amazing. They really are a marvel compared to the modern (bloated) AF lenses that produce the same size image circle. The Sigma is the only choice if one wants a moderately sized AF lens for the L-mount.

  • Reply
    Marc Wick
    May 2, 2020 at 5:13 pm

    A very good review, not so dry but very informative. I think that Sigma lenses also are a very good option for the SL user. Especially the zooms will be not as huge as the Leica zooms. The Sigma 2.8/45 looks good on the SL and is very tiny in comparison the the 50 or 35 version from Leica.

    • Reply
      JK Lockwood
      May 3, 2020 at 4:17 pm

      Thank you, glad you enjoyed the review. Compact size mas my main reason for choosing this over their other L-mount options. Hope there will be more!

  • Reply
    Scott Mackie
    May 3, 2020 at 2:42 am

    Really enjoyed this review. Caught my interest as I just picked up a used Sigma 45mm to play with on my CL. It’s a really nice complement to the CL – not too big and a bit lighter than the 35mm Summilux-TL.

    The link to the Sigma article was *really* helpful tho. I hadn’t fully got the old-school lens aspects of this so when I shot it wide open last week I was pretty surprised. Once I’d gotten over the fact that it looked like a mid-50s LTM on an adapter when focussed close and wide open, I started to get into it. If you get close to the minimal focus distance, there really is a nice ethereal quality to the image. It doesn’t look forced tho – more organic, which is obviously the design intent. The effect pretty much disappears if you step down to f/4.0 or back off of the focus point.

    On the CL, it’s more like a slightly short portrait lens because of the APC-C sensor so it’s an interesting combination. Don’t really do a lot of portrait work but might be tempted given what I’ve seen.

    • Reply
      JK Lockwood
      May 3, 2020 at 4:14 pm

      The Sigma should be a stellar lens on your CL. Glad you enjoyed the review. You clearly “get it”!

  • Reply
    jh
    May 3, 2020 at 7:15 am

    I own the Sigma Fp & had a choice of this lens, the Rokkor 40/2 & Voightlander 40/1.4. In the end I went with the Rokkor as it’s compact size was my main reason & it is super sharp. Bokeh is not as smooth (similar to the Summarit), but for a street pocket rocket I’m glad I went this direction. (I also own the Voight 25/4 CS & Voight 75/2.5 CS) All these lenses can fit in my pocket and have a full range. However I hear Sigma will be bringing similar ‘small’ lenses https://www.dpreview.com/interviews/2134621161/sigma-interview-smaller-high-quality-lenses-coming-in-the-near-future This will be interesting, as will see how they compare to the compactness and rendering of the x3 compact lenses I have. Thx for the review

    • Reply
      JK Lockwood
      May 3, 2020 at 9:42 pm

      You are very welcome JH. Glad we can discuss and share our passion for image making and I’m thankful for the 35mmc community!

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.