Kodak Portra 400 – My First Roll – by Simon King

Until recently my film photography had more or less been exclusively shot on either AGFA Vista 400 for colour, or XP2 for black and white. I’ve played around with Fujifilm and other Ilford stocks, but had never really needed anything more than what Vista and XP2 offered me.

However, there are a number of projects I hope to spend the next few years working on that required something more. I needed consistent results, the latitude to shoot at 1600 (I usually shoot all of my film at ei800, regardless of box speed), as well as accurate colour and sharpness. Portra 400 is a film with quite a reputation – I had avoided it because I wanted my film work to be distinct, and as different from my digital colours and approach as possible.

By introducing Portra 400 to my workflow it marks an acceptance of film as a valid professional tool for exclusive use, as opposed to being used alongside a digital option.

I loaded my first roll of Kodak Portra 400 into my Contax G1 about ten minutes after arriving at a Fashion presentation in South London, where I had been invited to photograph backstage.

After this I used the rest of the roll on days out and about in London, shooting street mainly on the 45mm Zeiss lens.

I managed to get 37 shots from the 36 exposure roll, out of which 16 were “keepers” to my eye. I’m really happy with the colours, they’re exactly what I needed them to be, with strong skin tones, and close to my favourite shades of green. I especially liked the images which combined different light sources for a cinematic aesthetic.

Thanks for taking the time to read about my experience shooting Kodak Portra 400! If you enjoyed my images here then consider following me over on Instagram! If you enjoyed my thoughts and perspective then you might enjoy my other featured articles on this site, or my own blog where I discuss my day-to-day life as an artist and photojournalist.

Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-free Experience

There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts:

Paid Subscription - £2.99 per month and you'll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
Subscribe here.

Content contributor - become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.
Sign up here.

About The Author

11 thoughts on “Kodak Portra 400 – My First Roll – by Simon King”

  1. Good article, I too have only recently shot my first couple of rolls of Portra 400. I have to say the results were exactly what I wanted. Perhaps a touch brown on some but overalll I was really pleased. Keep up the good work!

  2. Hi Simon, the “usual” speed employed for Portra is 200 or slower, giving Portra a “light as air” feel. It’s interesting to see good results at 800. From the computer monitor, there is not as much grain as I would have expected. I like the moodiness evinced at this speed. Thanks for the post.

    1. Thanks for the feedback Louis! I’m not sure I’ve ever seen people recommending to pull Portra to 200, if anything that would increase saturation and contrast? I’ve read that many people prefer the results of Portra 400@800 than the actual 800 Portra stock itself! I was definitely impressed by the lack of grain, but not surprised! It’s renowned for being versatile!

      1. I think Louis is saying meter for 200 speed effectively over exposing by 1 stop rather than pulling in the dev’ process – I generally do the same when shooting Portra.

          1. Appreciate it Adam! I actually have an upcoming project which I’m quite excited to be shooting, and that will be exclusively on film! Looking forward to sharing the results!

  3. Dominique Pierre-Nina

    I recently shot my first roll of colour film roll and I was Portra 400 and liked it very much, I found by giving an extra stop works better and its not as dull as metered. Currently I haveKodak Ektar 100 in the M3 so lets see what it brings. Great shots and article.



  4. Hi Simon – great shots. I’m a little surprised, to be honest, since underexposure tends to bring out the absolute worst in film. As a rule I shoot at box or +1 and expose for the shadows, then pull the exposure down in post if I’m after a moody look. But I have to say, your way seems to work for you.

    Just on that overexposure thing again, I was once testing a lens on an old Minolta XD body with a dead meter, so I took incident readings with a handheld. Once I’d shot the whole film, I discovered that the lens’ aperture blades were stuck and I’d been shooting wide open the whole time – on a bright summers day, on a beach. Every shot would have been overexposed by at least 3 stops, and up to 10+ in the most extreme cases, so I wasn’t expecting to get anything useable back. I was stunned when every single shot came out beautifully, and I’d almost go so far as to say that up to about 6+ stops, you couldn’t even notice the overexposure. Seems Portra 400 in particular will eat as much light as you can throw at it. Since that day, when in doubt, I dial in 3 extra stops without a moment’s worry.

  5. Pingback: Pushing Kodak Portra 400 to 1600 - by Simon King - 35mmc

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to Top