5 Frames with a FED-3 Rangefinder with Industar 61 L/D 2.8/55mm

By Walter Reumkens

In mid-2025, I added a Soviet 35mm rangefinder camera, an FED-3 with an Industar 61 L/D 2.8/55mm lens, to my collection. The camera and lens had been freshly CLA’d and were offered for sale on eBay by a dealer in Ukraine. It wasn’t my first purchase from this dealer, whom I had come to know as reliable. Although he lives near the war front, delivery was very quick and hassle-free. I had the camera and lens in my hands after just one week.

The FED-3 is a very handy camera and can be operated like a modern camera thanks to its quick-release lever. Manufactured between 1961 and 1979, it was a mass-produced product with over 2 million units built. It has a 39 mm screw thread and shows similarities to the German Leica. It was manufactured by FED in Kharkiv, now located in Ukraine. The Industar 61 L/D is considered one of the best lenses ever produced in the Soviet Union. It has a long tradition; the earliest Industars were Leica Elmar-type kit lenses derived from Carl Zeiss Tessar, which were mainly adapted to the Soviet Leica copies of the time, namely the FED-1. It continued to be manufactured until the fall of the Iron Curtain and is a winner. The 61 L/D version features lanthanum glass elements, which have a higher refractive index to improve sharpness and resolution. The build quality does not set the global standard, but the lens quality does not differ much from other lenses from competitors. One can be very satisfied with it, especially at the price. I paid £65 for the newly serviced lens in mint condition.

For my first film role, the camera was loaded with Fujifilm 200. The shots were taken near my flat at Rheydt Castle in Mönchengladbach. The film was exposed at ASA 200. The exposure was measured using a Sekonic L-208 Twinmate with light metering (calotte). Development and scanning took place in a minilab near my home.

Herrenhaus Schloss Rheydt

Here you can see the rear of the Rheydt Castle mansion in Mönchengladbach with its arcade. On this particular Monday, the museum housed there was closed, so there were only a few visitors. After my first publication here in 35mmc, there were comments about the few people pictured. I must say that it has become difficult to photograph people in Germany. According to EU and German law, consent must be obtained for both photography and publication. When you ask, you usually don’t get permission. A country without people is hard to imagine when I look at the old picture books by American photographers and Henry Cartier-Bresson.

This building is painted red, in contrast to the manor house. Finally, here are two photos of the castle’s inner courtyard with a bench and the toilet facilities. The three building complexes belonging to Rheydt Castle are surrounded by a moat. You can walk around the grounds both inside and outside the pond. Now for three more impressions.

 

Thank you very much for your interest.

Share this post:

About The Author

By Walter Reumkens
Born and living in Moenchengladbach (Germany), retired administrative expert and IT specialist, hobby photographer analogue + digital since 1975, no main topics.
Read More Articles From Walter Reumkens

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £5 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Charles Young on 5 Frames with a FED-3 Rangefinder with Industar 61 L/D 2.8/55mm

Comment posted: 02/12/2025

Walter: Thanks for your report on your Fed 3. Great photos.
I really like my Fed 2 and Fed 3. Have a bit of preference for the Fed 2 'cause it looks the most like my Leica IIIg. Lucky us to have discovered these good old rangefinder cameras that don't use batteries!
Chuck
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Charles Young on 5 Frames with a FED-3 Rangefinder with Industar 61 L/D 2.8/55mm

Comment posted: 02/12/2025

For these Feds and my old Leica, I found it very tricky to attach the film to the take up spool. My solution is to attach the film to the take up spool with a bit of clear tape.
The tape comes off the take up spool clean when I rewind the film back into the cartridge.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 02/12/2025

Charles, thank you for both comments. I also have both FED versions, they work perfectly and the lenses are in no way inferior to other, sometimes much more expensive lenses. I have the original take-up spool for both cameras and have no problems using them. I find the FED-3 visually appealing, and it also has a practical quick-release lever. For me, the comparison with a Leica is not important. I live only 90 miles from the company's headquarters, but I don't own a Leica and never will. When viewed up close, some things appear more realistic. :-)))))

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


John Andrews on 5 Frames with a FED-3 Rangefinder with Industar 61 L/D 2.8/55mm

Comment posted: 02/12/2025

Hi, nice pics, I love the russian cameras and have quite a few rangefinders, there is just something special about them. A very nice piece.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 02/12/2025

Thank you, John. I couldn't agree more. In addition to this FED-3, I have other rangefinder cameras from FED, Kiev and Zorki. They all work perfectly, and the lenses are good and have their own charm.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Fred Nelson on 5 Frames with a FED-3 Rangefinder with Industar 61 L/D 2.8/55mm

Comment posted: 02/12/2025

Great intro to the FED cameras. Also nice pics.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 02/12/2025

Thank you very much for your comment, Fred.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Christopher Welch on 5 Frames with a FED-3 Rangefinder with Industar 61 L/D 2.8/55mm

Comment posted: 02/12/2025

Hi Walter- thank you for the article and for sharing your experience with Soviet rangefinders. I have a FED 3 in need of some work and just got a new, old stock FED 5. I am fascinated by Soviet cameras and can't wait to hit the streets with the FED 5. How do you like the color rendering of the Fujifilm 200 through the Industar lens? I plan to shoot Kodak Pro Image 100 and Tri-X through mine.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 02/12/2025

I'm glad that you also enjoy working with old Soviet rangefinder cameras. Most of them are replicas of German Zeiss and Leitz cameras/lenses. They often need maintenance, like all older cameras, even the expensive Leicas. I like the colours here with the Fujifilm 200. It's not the emulsion of the earlier C200; if you believe the reports on the internet, it's the Kodak Gold 200, or at least it's manufactured at the Kodak factory in Rochester, USA. The Tri-X is definitely a good choice. I've read a lot of positive things about the relatively unknown Pro Image and have just bought a few rolls, but I haven't tried it yet. If you need more ASA, I would also consider the Kodak Ultramax 400, especially at midday when there are strong shadows. I like to expose it and overexpose it by 1 f-stop to get pastel-like colours. My articles on the Nikon F2 and the Canon P feature photos taken with Kodak Ultramax 400. Thank you and enjoy your FED 5.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Andrew on 5 Frames with a FED-3 Rangefinder with Industar 61 L/D 2.8/55mm

Comment posted: 03/12/2025

I have a copy of the Industar 55mm 61 L/D Tessar-type lens on its way to me thanks to this article. I’m looking forward to trying it out in comparison to my Jupiter-8 50mm Sonnar type lens (which is super for portraits).
I had to buy a complete FED 5B camera (in working order minus the rangefinder) just to get the lens, but at a total cost of £22 it was a bargain and way cheaper than the lens on its own.
A word of warning too- there are many of these lenses advertised on eBay, but take a close look at the front view. Most advertised by U K sellers (no matter what the advert says) are (Cyrillic) N-61. These don’t have the lanthanum glass and are reputed not to produce such a sharp image.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 03/12/2025

I'm glad, Andrew, that my article prompted you to make your purchase. I got my lens directly from the former production site in Ukraine, and it has the designation 61 L/D. It is available on the market under different names, as it was produced for many years and therefore in large quantities. The newer lenses can also be better coupled to the rangefinder body. There are also variations in quality during production, which is common with Soviet lenses. I also own a Jupiter-8 50mm, but I must admit that I haven't yet thought to compare the two lenses. I wish you good luck and hope you enjoy your new purchase. Thank you for your comment, Andrew.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Andrew replied:

Comment posted: 03/12/2025

Have a try at a comparison! The Sonnar type lens is much faster aperture wise, so you can achieve a shallower depth of focus, but wide open it is soft-ish in the centre and very soft elsewhere. It can be flattering for portraits, but you wouldn’t want it for landscapes or architecture. The Tessar type has a very flat field, and should be much sharper across the frame, especially stopped down. Rumour has it that they were well used by the Soviet espionage services for document photography and other clandestine activities…..

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Omar Tibi on 5 Frames with a FED-3 Rangefinder with Industar 61 L/D 2.8/55mm

Comment posted: 14/12/2025

Walter, excellent shots, and thanks for sharing! Glad to see some appreciation of Eastern bloc glass and gear, the FED & Industar combination is a reliable choice. I really like how sharp yet dreamy your photos came out, it's not too soft to be distracting, but it has a warm, vintage feel to it. Wish you many great shots with your FED!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 14/12/2025

Thank you very much for your kind comment. I also like the photos from the first roll with this combination. But I'm not particularly surprised, as I have several rangefinders from FED, Zorki and Kiev with matching original lenses in my collection. When they've been serviced, they're reliable and can hold their own against much more expensive rangefinder cameras from Germany. Just don't say it too loudly. :-)))

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *