5 Frames with a Large Format Camera – The Death of a Giant

By CHRISTOF RAMPITSCH

I didn’t know that this silo’s days were numbered, I just liked the baked, dusty “Wall-E” vibe – if you ignore the plants (there weren’t any on Wall-E’s earth). Although the Intrepid isn’t a great choice for architecture, it’s a terrific choice if you have to lug everything even for half a mile. I used Fomapan 400, because it’s cheap like me and if you just expose it at 200 ASA and then develop it normally, many of its flaws disappear.

All of the photos here were printed on Ilford MG paper using E72 developer. For those interested in printing, I use a Saunders LPL 4500ii enlarger with a 135mm Schneider Componon S lens. I photographed the prints with my phone, and of course they now look a bit worse than the originals.

Concrete silos. 150 mm lens, Fomapan 400 rated at 200 ASA, 1/125 sec at f/22, with a red filter. Developed in Rodinal (1+50) 11 min.
The process of taking it down had just begun. 150 mm lens, Fomapan 100, 1/15 sec at f/22⅔, with a red filter. Developed in D-23 stock, 11 min.

One day they started taking one of the silos down – the slow way with a jack-hammer on the end of a Cat. This made for some nice grey scenes and the whole process took more than a month, so I went back a few times. Here is one of them photographed fom the original location.

Concrete Silo coming down. 90mm lens, 1/10 sec f/32, Fomapan 400 rated at 200 ASA with an orange filter. Developed in Rodinal (1+50) 11 min.

I wasn’t sure when the destruction would look optimal, so I kept going back. I like the hairy look of the rebar in this next one.

150 mm lens, 1/8 sec, f/32⅓. Fomapan 400 (200 ASA) with an orange filter. Developed in Rodinal (1+50) 11 min.

It didn’t last too much longer after this. I think the pile of rubble on the right is the remains of it. If I had to do it again, I would use D-23 more. I have a few more sheets from this scene that are difficult to print because the Rodinal gave too much contrast. I have a weakness for Rodinal, partly just sentimental nonsense.

Almost done. I feel like the Cat is looking tired. 240 mm Lens, Fomapan 100, 1/8 sec. f/32 with an orange filter. 30-Apr-23. Developend in Rodinal (1+50) 9 min.

Sometimes I wonder if I learned photography backwards: like many, I started with 135, graduated to 120, and finally 4×5. What if you start with 4×5, even though the deep end is very deep? This idea was planted in my head by a friend and we both ended up agreeing. Each image, each decision is remembered much more clearly, because each photo is really an event. Less time elapses before you see the result, because you can develop it that same day. No roll waiting inside a camera for maybe weeks or months. Also, individual processing of sheets removes a lot of compromises in development that you have to make with roll film. My 135 camera, a Canon A1, can be set to auto-everything and by the time I develop the film, I definitely don’t recall any settings and mistakes become impossible to troubleshoot. Just a thought.

I am on Instagram here, but I’m starting to get disillusioned with IG, so I don’t post as much as I should.

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By CHRISTOF RAMPITSCH
Analogue film shooter and printer since the mid 1980s. Also a home-brewer.
View Profile

Comments

Ibraar Hussain on 5 Frames with a Large Format Camera – The Death of a Giant

Comment posted: 09/05/2025

When I first saw the title I assumed the Giant was the Large Format camera dying ! Instead I was treated to lush black and white with lovely tones and also quite a sad story
Thank you
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thomas Wolstenholme on 5 Frames with a Large Format Camera – The Death of a Giant

Comment posted: 09/05/2025

I like all but the last image - it just doesn't appeal to me for whatever nonsensical reason of my own - but given the technology used, I am disappointed with the contrasts and tones. That combination of film, paper, processing and chemistry should have produced stellar results, and I can well imagine how they likely look in the original form, but I believe employing a mobile phone to create the e-file versions removed a lot of virtue from the images. Perhaps this invites a follow-up article: making a comparison amongst scanned negatives, scanned prints, photos of prints made with a reasonable digital camera and lens setup and lastly the cell phone copies?
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Art Meripol on 5 Frames with a Large Format Camera – The Death of a Giant

Comment posted: 09/05/2025

Great documentation and explanation of what lens/film/developing combo was used. Funny, but unlike Thomas I like that last one quite a bit. I do imagine the phone copies are barely rude versions of your originals.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *