Lomography Instant – Uncontrollable, Unpredictable, and Somehow Worth a Few Shots

By Eagle Omomuro

I mentioned the Lomography Instant briefly in my earlier article about the Polaroid Go, and I think it deserves its own short story.

The Lomo Instant was my first instant camera. It became my everyday companion for capturing small moments of my wife since 2019. I wouldn’t use an SLR for those purposes. Whenever I picked one up, a ‘serious mindset’ kicked in and I started overthinking, trying to make every shot technically worthy. It quickly became exhausting.

When I bought the Lomography Instant, I chose it over Fujifilm’s Instax mainly because of a comparison video showing how it often overexposed under sunlight, creating that typical ‘lomo vibe’ that the millennial instinct inside me could not resist. I also loved its moving front panel, a brilliant design compared with Instax’s popped-out lens which reminds me of those consumer grade 5x zoom point-and-shooters from the 1990s.

Unfortunately, that is where most of the good news ends.

This camera is a total disaster when it comes to exposure. It is uncontrollable and unpredictable. Despite having four exposure modes that sound great on paper, it’s nearly impossible to get a correctly exposed shot in either auto or manual mode, whether the flash is on or off. The shutter speed seems to stay around 1/125 second except for bulb mode, which means it only captures something under strong sunlight or with fill flash. In bright light or with flash, it almost always overexposes. And for anything shot in less ideal light with the flash off, or slightly beyond its very short flash range when the flash is on, the result is often completely blacked out. Most of the time I ended up with either overexposed or underexposed frames, and sometimes both within the same image.

I am listing mine on eBay, though I do not expect it to sell. I just hope whoever buys such a camera has a high tolerance for film wastage. It is good for experiments, and once in a while, it gives you a moody and unexpected shot. Those rare moments remind you why you spend money on such a toy in the first place.

Every small moment from the past few years was captured by this camera, overexposed, underexposed, or terribly both (and who cares?)
A nude pregnant shot in nature or a dressed morning shot in bed. The high contrast gives each scene its own strange mood.
The 27mm equivalent perspective isn’t my ideal choice for people shots, even in a playful sense. But sometimes it can be fun.

Share this post:

About The Author

By Eagle Omomuro
Hello 35mmc community. I'm a photographer who tries to explore the unconventional. Originally trained in professional photojournalism, I’ve shifted my focus to capturing moments that express raw emotions that I call Tanha and Dukkha. My current direction is inspired by Ero Guro Nansensu, a Japanese genre that blends eroticism, sexual corruption, and decadence. Feel free to explore my work at nansensu.com.au
Read More Articles From Eagle Omomuro

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
If you think £2.99 a month is too little, then please subscribe and I can manually edit the subscription value for you – thank you very much in advance if this is what you would like to do!

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Paul Taylor on Lomography Instant – Uncontrollable, Unpredictable, and Somehow Worth a Few Shots

Comment posted: 12/11/2025

So it is a typical Lomography product then. Don’t get me wrong - I do like them and I do own a few of their products, but they aren’t exactly known for great engineering or quality for their products. I own their little 110 camera, and it is pretty hit-or-miss on working correctly. I will be interested to see if their much hyped MC-A 35mm camera is an improvement, or typical. I have been laughing at all the people comparing it to the Pentax 17 (and not having either camera to make an actual comparison) as I am willing to wager that the Pentax is a much better built/engineered product.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Charles Young on Lomography Instant – Uncontrollable, Unpredictable, and Somehow Worth a Few Shots

Comment posted: 12/11/2025

Obviously worthless camera, plus the price per photo is outrageous.

I am sticking with adjustable 35 mm cameras that don't use batteries. I Estimate exposure from
the table that comes with the film. I've got lotsa bulk 35 mm film to go.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *