Solar array
Camera History

Always the Sun – In Admiration of the Selenium Cell Compact Camera – By Chris Pattison

August 17, 2020

As I write this, a heavy shower has just passed and the sun is beaming down once again. Photons are showering the solar array on my roof and switching our power supply back to free electricity. Solar power has been a long time in the making. The photovoltaic effect was first observed in 1839 by Alexandre Edmond Becquerel at the astonishing young age of 19. From a family of scientists, and also with an interest in photography, he coated platinum electrodes immersed in an electrolyte with silver chloride or silver bromide. When light was shone on the electrodes, voltage and current was produced. The first practical solar cell didn’t appear for another 44 years when the American Charles Fritts utilised the semiconducting properties of the element selenium. One year after his invention, a selenium cell solar array appeared on a New York rooftop in 1884.

Fritts coated selenium with a very thin layer of gold. The system was very inefficient and expensive for large scale use, but the selenium cell eventually found its niche in measuring  light for the calculation of exposure times in photography; the light meter.

The Electrophot DH made by the J. Thos Rhamstine company of Detroit was the first commercial selenium cell exposure meter.  It was heavy, expensive and curiously required battery power. Rhamstine was trumped a year later in 1932 when the Chicago based Westphalen company produced their photoelectrometer; no battery required.

It wasn’t long before camera manufacturers realised the advantage and convenience of having a light meter attached to the camera; either as a clip-on or built into the camera design. The first high end camera to offer an integrated selenium meter was the Contax III of 1936, but the ‘golden age’ of the selenium cell metered camera was roughly between the middle of the 1950’s to the middle of the 1960’s, although there are notable cameras outside this period. Olympus were offering the XA4 of 1982 with a selenium cell around the lens, little changed from that of the Pen EE half frame camera some 20 years earlier. Likewise, the Zenit EM SLR with uncoupled selenium cell meter was produced until 1984.

Going back a few decades, for late 50’s SLR’s clip-on meters were the approach. Cameras such as the Minolta SR2 and Yashica Pentamatic had a bracket fixed to the camera body for attaching the meter – handy and ungainly in equal measure. Meters integrated into the camera body were more convenient and gave the cameras a distinctive look; an area of the camera taken over by what looked a bit like inflexible bubble wrap. For SLRs, the front of the pentaprism housing was usually given over to the meter. For rangefinders and viewfinder cameras it was either a rectangular panel on the front of the body or a doughnut shaped arrangement around the front lens element.

For SLRs, the  more convenient Cds meter was already on the horizon. The Cadmium Sulphide meter required a vastly smaller light-collecting area and opened up the possibility of measuring light from within the camera itself after it had travelled through the lens.

The selenium cell may be old technology, but I think it has had a bit of a bad press in some quarters; seen as unreliable and likely to ‘wear out’. From my experience, I don’t think either is true. There are an abundance of cheap, fully working coupled and uncoupled selenium cell cameras out there on auction sites and car boot sales, waiting to be picked up and used again. I have a few of them, all with meters in accurate, good working order. 

As well as the convenience of not having to carry a separate meter, the selenium cell meter’s major contribution to the development of 35mm photography was exposure automation, and that’s where my interest is. The use of a selenium meter to help calculate shutter speeds, apertures or both is convenient, quick and ideal for novices. 

Olympus Trip 35

I suppose the first camera that springs to mind is the popular and ubiquitous Olympus Trip 35 with fully automatic exposure, manufactured for an incredible 17 years. There are tons of them out there being revived and used; and going for quite silly sums of money when you consider 10 million were made. There must be a lot more out there at the back of wardrobes and in lofts.

The Trip is light, small and can produce quality results. The selenium meter does all the work; selecting one of two shutter speeds (either 1/40th sec or 1/200th sec) and an aperture from f/2.8 to f/22. Before lockdown scuppered things, I had started a project called cathedral views, all images of Durham cathedral from various parts of the city using a Trip. The camera hasn’t put a foot wrong on the first roll of film.

South Street, Durham - Olympus Trip 35

South Street, Durham – Olympus Trip 35

Durham - Olympus Trip 35

Durham – Olympus Trip 35

Off Church Street, Durham - Olympus Trip 35

Off Church Street, Durham – Olympus Trip 35

Student Union Building, Durham - Olympus Trip 35

Student Union Building, Durham – Olympus Trip 35

Riverside Walk, Durham - Olympus Trip 35

Riverside Walk, Durham – Olympus Trip 35

You don’t have to pay over the odds though for a selenium meter equipped camera with a degree of automation. There are earlier incarnations of exposure automation out there that can be had for little money. Some models are a bit ropey with regards to build quality, while others are pretty high end cameras.

PEN and Trip

Olympus PEN EE and Trip 35

Durst Automatica: the stylish Italian

The very first of the automatic cameras was the aptly named Durst Automatica of 1956 (possibly). This is a well made and beautiful viewfinder camera which has a limited form of aperture priority automatic exposure and a unique pneumatic shutter release. Setting the film speed using the innermost dial on the lens is directly linked to aperture selection. There’s only one aperture for any given film speed. The top ISO setting is 400 and the maximum lens aperture is f/2.8, but never the twain shall meet in an automatic exposure! The selenium meter governs the shutter speed in a range from 1/4 second to 1/300 second, which can be read from a needle indicator on the top of the camera. For extra versatility, a switch on the front of the camera disables automatic exposure and you are free to select any aperture and shutter speed combination. I took the Automatica to photograph my local estuary and it produced well exposed negatives.

Greatham Creek - Durst Automatica

Greatham Creek – Durst Automatica

Greatham Creek - Durst Automatica

Greatham Creek – Durst Automatica

Hartlepool Nuclear Power Station - Durst Automatica

Hartlepool Nuclear Power Station – Durst Automatica

Redcar Steelworks - Durst Automatica

Redcar Steelworks – Durst Automatica

Durst Automatica and Kowa H

Durst Automatica and Kowa H: an example of contrasting build quality

Agfa Optima

The very first Agfa Optima of 1959 is another pioneer worth seeking out. I didn’t have high hopes for this chunky viewfinder camera, but it set me right with some lovely colour images. It even survived me dropping it. I watched it bounce three times on tarmac before I retrieved it from under a parked car. 

Agfa Optima viewfinder showing a green light indicating a good exposure is possible

Agfa Optima viewfinder showing a green light indicating a good exposure is possible

The Optima’s claim to immortality is that it was the first camera with programmed exposure. A left hand lever on the front of the camera appears to be the shutter release. It isn’t. It actuates the light meter. The lens is a somewhat slow f/3.9 39mm Color-Apotar. Maximum ISO is 200. The shutter speed range is 1/30th-1/250th second. Based on the light measurement of the selenium meter, and the set ISO, the camera works out if you have enough light for a decent exposure. If you have, it displays a green light in the viewfinder. If not, it displays a red light. It is beautifully simple and proved effective; although you are limited to shooting in good light. 

North Gare - Agfa Optima

North Gare – Agfa Optima

Hartlepool Headland - Agfa Optima

Hartlepool Headland – Agfa Optima

Hartlepool Headland - Agfa Optima

Hartlepool Headland – Agfa Optima

Hartlepool Headland - Agfa Optima

Hartlepool Headland – Agfa Optima

Hartlepool Headland - Agfa Optima

Hartlepool Headland – Agfa Optima

Kodak Retinette IIA

Another German model from 1959 is the Kodak Retinette IIA. Kodak made a confusing array of very similar rigid body Retinettes. This one wasn’t in production long.

Kodak Retinette IIA viewfinder showing swinging needle to be centered for correct exposure

Kodak Retinette IIA viewfinder showing swinging needle to be centered for correct exposure (poor framing by the author!)

The Retinette IIA didn’t quite have full automation, but it was still a very simple camera to use. You turn a ring on the lens to center a needle visible in the viewfinder. You are actually changing the lens aperture, leaving the camera to work out the appropriate shutter speed. One cool feature of this camera is the depth of field indicator. Because the camera does not indicate the shooting aperture, Kodak devised this alternative way of indicating depth of field, utilising two red markers that converge or diverge on a scale on the lens barrel as you turn the aperture ring. One other great feature of this camera is the ability to set ISO to an amazing 3200, enabling the use of fast, modern films. Coupled with an f/2.8 lens this camera has a surprising range.

German 1959ers: Agfa Optima and Kodak Retinette IIA

German 1959ers: Agfa Optima and Kodak Retinette IIA

Blue Day - Kodak Retinette IIA

Blue Day – Kodak Retinette II. Kodacolor 200 developed with Rodinal.

Cooling Off - Kodak Retinette IIA

Cooling Off – Kodak Retinette IIA. Kodacolor 200 developed with Rodinal.

Dead Tree - Kodak Retinette IIA

Dead Tree – Kodak Retinette IIA. Kodacolor 200 developed with Rodinal.

Olympus again

Leaving Germany now for Japan, it was Olympus who were the first of the Japanese makers to exploit exposure automation with the selenium meter equipped rangefinder called the Auto Eye of 1960. The Auto Eye provided shutter priority automatic exposure  by means of ISO and shutter speed selectors both accessible by rings on the lens barrel. A unique “pre-VU” lever on the front of the camera body allowed you to see the lens aperture the camera had chosen via an indicator at the bottom of the viewfinder. The Auto Eye offered a shutter speed range of 1 second to 1/500th second and a maximum ISO of 800. Not bad! Olympus selenium cell technology found its way into their PEN half frame cameras, beginning with the PEN EE of 1961. This camera had fully automatic exposure and fixed focusing. The first version show here had a single shutter speed, a range of apertures chosen by the camera,  and was limited to an ISO of 200. A genuinely pocketable model, I regard it as the first true point and shoot camera. For me, this camera gives poor results with colour film yet surprisingly good results with black and white. I blame the photographer for this discrepancy!

Olympus Auto Eye viewfinder showing selected aperture

Olympus Auto Eye viewfinder showing selected aperture

Upper Teesdale - Olympus Pen EE

Upper Teesdale – Olympus Pen EE

Cauldron Snout, Upper Teesdale - Olympus Pen EE

Cauldron Snout, Upper Teesdale – Olympus Pen EE

Upper Teesdale - Olympus Pen EE

Upper Teesdale – Olympus Pen EE

The Kowa H – lottery in camera form

Last in this sunshine bathed tour of my selenium cell equipped cameras is a fixed lens reflex model. I can’t recommend the Kowa H of 1963, but go ahead and try one if you wish.  I am onto my third and still not quite 100 percent copy of this leaf shuttered SLR. It is a notable camera, being the first Japanese SLR to be equipped with a coupled selenium cell.  It has a kind of crappy charm because the meter is accurate, it has an excellent finder, useful exposure information on the top plate, but poor build quality perfectly illustrated by the  trigger style film advance underneath the body that only seems to cock the shutter every fourth time you operate it; unless you press down firmly on the fulcrum. A rough feeling metal thumbwheel on the rear of the camera changes the ISO between 25 and 400. The change is indicated in the exposure meter window. With the horrible cheap feeling lens aperture ring set to the red A, a needle in the exposure meter window indicates a fixed set of aperture and shutter speeds it has chosen. There are only four sets of options. |t is possible though to get good quality images out of the Kowa H, if you are lucky. The selenium meter is not the problem here, and I believe it rarely is with any of selenium meter equipped cameras. 

Greatham Creek - Kowa H. T-MAx developed with Caffenol.

Greatham Creek – Kowa H. T-MAX developed with Caffenol.

Greatham Creek - Kowa H. T-MAx developed with Caffenol.

Greatham Creek – Kowa H. T-MAX developed with Caffenol.

Of the cameras I have bought, I have only encountered one with a ‘dead’ meter, and that is curiously the only one that came without a case. I believe corrosion caused by heat and condensation resulting in electrical resistance is the chief culprit for failed meters. The solution, with any form of equipment, is care and maintenance.

If you elect to leave batteries in your Cds metered Yashica Electro and stuff it in your drawer and forget about it, sooner or later they will leak and turn your battery chamber into green crud. Leave your lovely solar powered Automatica out in daylight with the meter forever engaged, and physics will do its thing – condensation and compromised circuits. If you want to preserve anything, then best keep it in a cool (not cold) dark and dry environment – vintage cars, the deeds to your house, cheese and wine, your collection of Top Trumps from the 1970’s. Please note though, this approach does not work with living things or marriages.

I’m not advocating anyone makes a selenium metered camera their forever number one shooter, or loads a roll of expensive transparency film in one; but for print film and experimentation I find them fun and fascinating. Some are capable of quality results.

Of course, entropy will get us all in the end, but in the case of selenium metered cameras you can push that fateful day further into the future with basic care and thoughtfulness. 

 

Support 35mmc

For as little as $1 a month, you can help support the upkeep of 35mmc and get access to exclusive content over on Patreon. Alternatively, please feel free to chuck a few pennies in the tip jar via Ko-fi:

Become a Patron!

Learn about where your money goes here.
Would like to write for 35mmc? Find out how here.

23 Comments

  • Reply
    paul brant
    August 17, 2020 at 12:38 pm

    Thanks for a very interesting piece.
    Good to see results from the more accessible end on the market too .
    Nice pics

  • Reply
    Chuck - Detroit, MI - USA
    August 17, 2020 at 3:16 pm

    Nice article! I collect classic cameras and have a present collection of about 150 – mostly with meters of some sort. I get a cheap thrill when I find one with a meter that works reliably or can be made to work as intended. I have found that many quality German and Japanese metered cameras can be rejuvenated by careful cleaning the battery contacts on a Cds meter, or the cell’s ground contact on a selenium unit. If that doesn’t work, I have a couple of repairmen that still dabble in that sorting. Most cameras have adjustment pots to fine tune the readings with a reliable measuring device. Actually there are a couple of phone apts that can be used for this. Personally I like the selenium metered cameras in my collection the best as you don’t need to keep a supply of batteries around as with Cds or silicone meters. Battery powered meters are more sensitive in low light, but mostly mine just sit on a shelf.

    • Reply
      Chris Pattison
      August 18, 2020 at 8:56 am

      Hi Chuck. Great to hear about your collection and that you are rejuvenating some. I take my hat off to you.

  • Reply
    Mike B
    August 17, 2020 at 4:23 pm

    Very informative and interesting read! I had no idea that fully automatic exposure cameras had been around for so long. My circa 1970 Nikon F did not even have a light meter unless fitted with the Photomic FTN finder, and even then the user still had to to center a needle. Nikkormat was around at that time, but it also required manually setting aperture and/or shutter speed. Seems like Nikon’s first fully automatic exposure SLR was the EM in the late 1970s, which was aimed at beginners. As I recall it had aperture priority and would automatically choose the shutter speed. It was my wife’s first exposure to 35mm photography, and was almost “point and shoot” with the DoF of a 28mm lens at f/8-f/16.

    • Reply
      Chris Pattison
      August 18, 2020 at 8:53 am

      Thanks for the positive comments Mike. I think you are right about the EM, although I think the FE was sightly earlier for aperture priority but that had manual options too. Possibly one of the Nikkormats had an aperture priority option as well. Perhaps someone could confirm that?

      • Reply
        Aitchess
        August 18, 2020 at 1:46 pm

        A very interesting and enjoyable read – I’ve a long-standing interest in older cameras and have managed to keep my addiction to them under control for the last 15 years, though reading great articles like this doesn’t help!! I too have a Durst Automatica.

        There was indeed a Nikkormat with the choice of aperture priority or manual exposure – the 1972 Nikkormat EL, which was made until 1976. It is a very handsome camera, quite different from the manual exposure Nikkormat FT series, with a conventionally positioned shutter speed dial. It was very well built, and had CdS metering with electronic shutter control. Operationally it was clearly the direct lead-up to the Nikon FE, with the same style of operation, but considerably larger and heavier. Its EL logo sits in a square on the prism top/front slope, as on the much later little Nikon EM. In 1977 it briefly became the quite-rare Nikkormat ELw, which would accept an autowinder specially made for this model but was otherwise unchanged. In 1978, this variant was upgraded with silicon photocell metering, modernised internal electronic assemblies and the Nikon AI (auto-indexing) aperture registration system (to avoid the to and fro twisting of the aperture ring required when mounting lenses on earlier models). It still looked the same, except for a big promotion – it was now the Nikon EL2, not a Nikkormat! It ran until the Nikon FE replaced it. The EL and EL2 were made in all-black and satin chrome variants, whilst the ELw seems only to have been made in all black – unless anyone knows different?

        I always like cameras with a surprising quirk, and the EL family has one, despite its conventional exterior. They took a PX28 6v battery, which very unusually is fitted under a door in the floor of the mirror box, across-ways!! To change it, the lens needs to be removed, the mirror locked up and the lid popped open. Makes you feel like you’re doing dentistry on the camera! The question is, is this odder than another unique place to put the same size battery? The Yashica FX-1 of 1975 is a quite similarly-styled aperture priority/manual camera to the Nikkormat EL, using the same battery. This time, the battery lives inside the rewind crank assembly – you unscrew the totally-normal looking rewind knob with a folding crank to reveal the cylindrical chamber in which to drop the battery! Understandably, the rewind knob doesn’t pull up to open the back – a lever on the base took care of that. Which is weirder? You choose! The Nikkormat EL to Nikon EL2 way is certainly more stress-inducing (you have to carefully avoid accidentally lobbing a fairly hefty PX28 battery at the shutter or mirror by accident!!

        • Reply
          Chris Pattison
          August 18, 2020 at 2:45 pm

          Thanks. Your comments are fascinating too! I have learned a lot from them, particularly on unusual battery chamber placement.

          • Aitchess
            August 18, 2020 at 3:14 pm

            You’re very welcome – I’m full of trivia like that, I’m afraid! I really enjoyed your article.

  • Reply
    Scott Gitlin
    August 17, 2020 at 6:14 pm

    You’ve certainly done justice to these cameras with your excellent compositions.

  • Reply
    Harry Machold
    August 17, 2020 at 7:09 pm

    There are some amazing images…a very useful article and lined up with my vast experiences for more than 55 years already.
    I enjoy a lot your British humor…
    I will take your advice well into my next marriage…
    Please, keep going here and elsewhere..

    Best

    Harry Machold

    • Reply
      Chris Pattison
      August 18, 2020 at 8:46 am

      Hello Harry. Thanks for your kind words and for enjoying British humour. I will indeed keep going.

  • Reply
    adventure!
    August 17, 2020 at 9:22 pm

    Nice round-up! I don’t have any selenium-cell cameras, but there could be one in my future.

    One correction: The one Olympus XA series camera with the selenium cell is the XA-1, not the 4. The XA-4 was the one with the wide 28 mm lens.

  • Reply
    Rock
    August 17, 2020 at 9:57 pm

    Interesting read and photos, Chris. My selenium light meter (Ikophot) is still going strong and I tend to trust it more over battery ones. The one on my Yashica TLR also seems to do the job properly. Cheers, Rock

    • Reply
      Chris Pattison
      August 18, 2020 at 8:44 am

      Thanks Rock. Those Ikophot meters look very elegant.

  • Reply
    Oscar Durán
    August 17, 2020 at 11:41 pm

    Chris, excelente artículo! Y muy buenas fotos, tanto en blanco y negro como en color. Las tomas con la Olympus Trip 35 están lindas! La foto con la Durst Automática (Redcar Steelworks), consiguió fotografiar la luna?
    Gracias por publicar!
    Oscar.

    • Reply
      Chris Pattison
      August 18, 2020 at 8:43 am

      Hola Oscar. Gracias por tus amables palabras. ¡Sí, la luna está en la fotografía de Redcar Steelworks!

  • Reply
    Kurt Ingham
    August 21, 2020 at 1:02 am

    Fun article
    . It should be noted that a number of very interesting cameras have auto exposure linked to selenium meters that no longer function.And no manual override Using the ‘flash’ settings may work, but not really very well
    I’d say more than half the selenium cells I encounter have ‘given up the ghost’

    • Reply
      Chris Pattison
      August 22, 2020 at 3:16 pm

      Thanks Kurt. Perhaps I have just been lucky with my ‘hit rate’ of functional selenium cell meters?

  • Reply
    Khürt Louis Williams
    August 21, 2020 at 8:31 pm

    I love the colours in the photograph of South Street, Durham captured with the Olympus Trip 35 and the simple beauty of the Hartlepool Headland captured on the Agfa Optima.

    • Reply
      Chris Pattison
      August 22, 2020 at 3:15 pm

      Thanks Khürt. The photograph of South Street, Durham was taken with Kodak Vision 3 motion picture film.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.