Contax iia – first roll and how I ended up with a couple classic cameras

By Art Meripol

As the only photographer many of my friends know, they have sometimes offered me their families no longer wanted old camera, usually another worn brownie of various odd lineage and quality. I have a couple already and don’t need more.

Over the last couple years as I’ve been winding down my digital-based career, my interest in shooting film again has blossomed. I find myself pouring over reviews of various cameras and film types I read about here on 35MMC and in other blogs. I have ‘restored’ some of my old film gear including my old Nikon and Olympus bodies from my 70’s and 80’s newspaper days. I’ve even bought a few new-to-me old film cameras.

I’m on the art and sculpture committee of a lovely public garden here that has a nice gallery space on site. Our committee arranges the gallery shows and I help hang them. A couple weeks ago, before the start of a meeting, another committee member brought in some ‘old family cameras’ she wanted to get rid of. She thought of me and I’m glad she did.

Her old distressed leather camera bag had promise. I watched her pull out a camera still in its leather case. My eyes surely bugged out when I saw a beautiful Contax Zeiss Ikon IIa with the 50mm 1.5 Sonnar. This I believe is the same model and lens combo Robert Capa used going ashore on D-Day.

Contax Zeiss Ikon IIa leather case in great shape except for the center badge.
Voigtlander Perkeo II

 

Perkeo Leather Case

Digging further into the bag she lifted out a nice Voigtlander Perkeo I and two Nikkor S lenses, a  chrome135mm from the 50’s and a 28mm. All the gear came in its original leather case which were in fine shape.  There was even a cold shoe attachment viewfinder by Walz that zooms from 28mm up to135mm.”

Nikkor 28mm with case

 

Nikkor 135mm lens, hood and case
Walz 28-135mm viewfinder

Grinning ear to ear I made her an offer for the bag and she accepted it. As soon as I got home, I immediately spread it all out and dove in to see what was working and what needed help. The Nikkor 135mm aperture blades were frozen and fritzed out. But that lens doesn’t hold much interest for me. I’ll probably sell both the Nikkor lenses.

The Perkeo looks good, shutter speeds seem right too. I haven’t had a chance to run a roll through it yet. But I love a good MF folder. That tiny jewel of a 50mm Sonnar on the Contax is clean and clear as it is on all the lenses she shared . The 28mm S Nikkor  ‘C’ looks like it just came out of the box.

Sadly, the shutter on the Contax wasn’t lifting into the cocked position when wound forward. Back in the 1950’s when it was released that vertical traveling metal shutter was one of the selling points of the camera. The Leica focal plane shutter is made of cloth. Supposedly, leaving the lens pointed at the sun would burn a hole in it. The Contax shutter is built like a tank which appealed to many pros when it was released. A repair shop in Atlanta was willing to take it on the repair. I used them last year for my old Nikon F3 and was very happy. I shipped the Contax and the 135mm lens to them and both were returned in just a couple weeks working perfect.

This week I took the Contax back to the gardens where I got it for its first roll, photographing a reception for the latest show in the gallery. I loaded a roll of Tri-X, my favorite film from my early days.

Sculpture outside with setting sun flaring in the lens.

I arrived as the last rays of late winter sun were leaving the gardens. Outside, walking to the gallery, I grabbed a quick frame of a sculpture at 250 @ f8, testing the flair on the Sonnar.  Inside at the reception I opened the Sonnar to f1.5, keeping my film at box speed and my shutter at 100th. The gallery is a tough place to shoot since the lighting is brighter on the walls than on faces thus making one decide between either shadowed faces or burned-out backgrounds.

Sharing the art
Listening to the artists talk
The four artists represented in the show

Having a lot of fun with it, I was surprised how quickly I became comfortable with its handling. It also served as quite a conversation piece. Another sharp-eyed photographer at the event made a beeline to me when his eyes lasered on it.

I found it a lot faster for me to quickly hit focus than with a Leica M body. Even though the tiny viewfinder window is somewhat limiting for a glasses-wearing shooter like me I had no trouble.

Back home I processed the film in Ilfotech DD-X using the Vintage Visual AGO processor. When the film was dry I used my Nikon Super Coolscan 5000 and quicky scanned the roll. The frame outside on the rabbit was crisp and sharp but  shooting wide open inside the images lost contrast and gained a bit of a glow. But they were still sharp.

I was disappointed to see light streaks across some of the early frames. It was my own fault. When loading the reel in a changing bag I struggled to get the film cassette off the end of the roll. I took my arm out of the bag to grab scissors to cut the film. I think I leaked a little light doing that. It could be the camera back doesn’t seal properly but it’s unlikely since it was only on the first outer frames on the reel. I hope one day to again have a darkroom.

Another photographer and his wife at the show. Light leak

I edited the scans in LR Classic. And just to see what I could do I did additional editing using generative AI  in Photoshop to ‘restore’ a few of them. It did amazing. It sharpened, added contrast and almost eliminated grain but it also took them too far away from the analog simplicity and honesty.

Gallery Patron

You can find more information on the Contax in a wonderful 35mmc post from June 2021 by Phil Calvit here

Share this post:

About The Author

By Art Meripol
Journalism degree. 13 years as a news photographer with a sideline as a concert photographer before 24 years as a magazine travel photographer and the last 13 years freelance for editorial and corporate clients. Official photographer for the US Civil Rights Trail. Now moving away from client work and trying to figure out what's next by returning to film.
Read More Articles From Art Meripol

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £3.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Charles Young on Contax iia – first roll and how I ended up with a couple classic cameras

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

What good fortune to find such fine classic film cameras. You have a. good eye for informal portraits. My favorite new find is a 1955 Kodak Pony 135 from ebay. Appears to be brand new!
I am able to do darkroom work in my kitchen when others have gone to bed.
Chuck
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Art Meripol replied:

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

Truly good fortune! I had to look up that Pony. Nice! It takes some design cues from the Contax it looks like. Or maybe it was just a common design from the era.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Art Meripol on Contax iia – first roll and how I ended up with a couple classic cameras

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

Some edits. The last two frames are a basic edit and then one with AI in Photoshop where I just asked it to restore the photo. Also I photographed two sculptures outside as I walked in. I mentioned the Rabbit sculpture in my story but neglected to include it.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Walter Reumkens on Contax iia – first roll and how I ended up with a couple classic cameras

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

So there were photography enthusiasts infected with GAS syndrome even many years ago. The difference was that they no longer used the equipment they’d bought. That really was a surprise package! The Contax IIa was manufactured and redesigned by ‘Zeiss Ikon’ after the Second World War in a former factory belonging to another Zeiss subsidiary, ‘Contessa-Nettel’, in West Germany from 1948 to 1961. Quite a few active photographers from that era are/were of the opinion that the “IIa” is better and more reliable than the Leica M3, which was manufactured in Wetzlar, Hesse, from 1954 onwards. At least those who lived in the vicinity of the two German rivals. The vast majority of Leica cameras were, after all, exported, primarily to the USA.
A well-written article with great photos – thanks for sharing, Art.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Art Meripol replied:

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

Thanks Walter. Your information echos the research I did after getting g these jewels. The history you provided and what I’ve learned really expanded my appreciation of the gear. I’m not sure I can trust all I read but I did see that Gordon Parks famed American Gothic photo was also done with this Contax. I need to load up that Perkeo too.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

If he’d been taking photos with a Leica, it would be all over the internet. The marketing department at Leica AG would have made sure of that. In photos, he can be seen with Contax rangefinders, a Rolleiflex TLR and also the Nikon F SLR. :-)))

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Art Meripol on Contax iia – first roll and how I ended up with a couple classic cameras

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

Just yesterday I found the ‘badge’ that goes on the front of the Contax case and restored it
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Gary Smith replied:

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

I assumed that the "badge" on the Contax case was a piece of polished mineral. I thought it looked quite nice. I guess the real badge is rather mundane?

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Art Meripol replied:

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

It’s matching leather. I was digging into the small pockets in the bag she brought all these in and found the little round leather patch and glued it back on. I also found a credit card receipt with the name of the original owner when he bought gas at a Mobile station in 1966 in Santa Fe NM.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Steve Abbott on Contax iia – first roll and how I ended up with a couple classic cameras

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

Nice post - although I'm slightly disappointed(!), as I've recently aquired one myself for a bargain price, also with the 50/1.5, and I was planning to do a review of it myself in the near future - never mind. Like you, mine wasn't perfect; I shot a roll mostly wide open (because it's the 1.5 Sonnar), which meant higher shutter speeds - but it turns out that only the slower ones were working, so two-thirds of the film was blank. It's currently away for a CLA (the focusing is also very dry and a little stiff), and it won't be be back for another three weeks. Incidentally, Capa used the earlier model, the Contax ii, as the iia only went into production in Stuttgart in 1952, long after the war (although my lens was just about the last produced in wartime - late 1941 - and - I believe - unusually for it's vintage, coated). I nearly bought a Contax ii, but the technician I use advised against it, as the shutters are difficult to repair (something about the shutter tapes - unlike Leica - being awkward and unreliable), and he won't touch them himself.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Art Meripol replied:

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

I hope yours returns in great shape. My lens was perfect as were shutter speeds. It was only the shutter not lifting and apparently the shop I used found it easy to fix. And of course, if I'd only taken a moment to think about timing, it couldn't have been the same model as Capa. Glad you noted that swing and a miss on my part. I think mine was made in 1957 but I haven't found a way to be sure about dates on them.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Russ Rosener replied:

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

All good and factual information. Actually the older Contax II and III cameras CAN be repaired but you need to send it to Ukraine or shops with a repairman who worked on the Kiev rangfinders. The Kiev 4 shutter is nearly identical to the earlier Contax II and III and they have lots of the silk ribbons and shutter tape required.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Hamish Gill replied:

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

Don’t let someone else’s thoughts stop you from sharing you’re own. I also have a iia and 1.5 I intend to write about at some point…!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Steve Abbott replied:

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

Art - the following web-site (some of it in Italian) will enable you to date the camera, and there's a menu item on the right hand side which will also date your lens: https://leicacontax.blogspot.com/p/contax-cameras-serial-numbers.html. Incidentally, not having the cash for other Contax (or Nikon) lenses, I bought a compatable Russian Jupiter 11 135/4.0 lens in lovely condition for only £27; all of the Contax mount Jupiters are exact copies of the Contax lenses, as they built them for their versions of the Contax ii and iii, the Kiev brand, following "appropriation" of the Zeiss factory and stock at the end of the war. Unfortunately the 35mm Jupiter 12 (a lovely lens - I used to have one in screw mount for Leica) is only good for the older Contax ii and won't fit the iia or iiia as it it protrudes too far into the body and interferes with the shutter, so only the later 35mm from West Germany, or the Nikon equivalent which you have, will work - but both are out of my budget. I am considering the 85mm Jupiter 9 however, also a copy of the original Zeiss Sonnar design.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

Here’s an interesting website on the subject: https://www.klassik-cameras.de/Contax-Nikon-1951.html

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Art Meripol replied:

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

Yes! Please.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

Here are also a few details including the serial numbers: https://altglasfieber.de/altglas/2023/05/01/contax-story-iia-iiia-teil-3/

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Art Meripol replied:

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

Thanks for the link Steve. Looking it over it seems mine was from July '56 to Sept '57. about what I guessed. The best info I can find on the lens just says 1953-1958. I'm guessing it was original to the body though. I'm not sure what other lens I'd add. I think the 135 RF Nikkor I have with it is a bit long for me. Something like that 85 you mentioned sounds really nice, my look.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Art Meripol replied:

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

Great history in that. Thanks Walter. I appreciate the links. Lots to learn.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

The first link in particular, to Frank Mechelhoff’s website – which is also available in English – comes highly recommended. It is very comprehensive, so it takes a bit of getting used to. https://www.klassik-cameras.de/SLR_History.html

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

Here is the home page https://www.klassik-cameras.de/index.html

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Art Meripol replied:

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

Help and information like this is why I love this 35mmc site. Appreciate it Walter.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

I'm glad I can help you, Art.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley on Contax iia – first roll and how I ended up with a couple classic cameras

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

Fascinating story, Art -- and what a trove you've found! I also have had the experience of well-meaning friends offering me antique cameras. All frogs so far -- no princes/princesses! -- though your experience gives me hope. I'm also excited to hear about your thoughts about setting up a darkroom. My initial setup from 2019 was incredibly easy and cheap -- it cost me about $500 total, enlarger, trays, tanks, timer, beakers and reels, all from EBay. Unless you're doing LF or color printing I doubt the materials would be much pricier today, though obviously one needs a space (I use a spare bathroom; tiny but very efficient). I forgot to mention that I love the gallery shots and the classic rendering of the Zeiss glass. Happy shooting! - David
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Art Meripol replied:

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

Thanks David. I have a lot of what you perfectly referred to as frogs. This was a total delight. Good to hear about your darkroom experience. Even having a decent dark space to process film would be good. I hate using that changing bag though it works pretty well. But I’d love to have a dedicated space with a sink and trays and a decent enlarger. Printing would provide self-satisfaction and be a great and rewarding diversion and distraction from so much of today’s world.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 22/03/2026

Perfectly said! Under the safe lights the world feels safer...though I know it isn't!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Jeffery Luhn on Contax iia – first roll and how I ended up with a couple classic cameras

Comment posted: 23/03/2026

Great casual portraits! You're nice and close!
I just finished reading the Robt Capa autobiography "Slightly out of Focus" and he describes being pushed out of the LST landing boat into deep water under severe German fire on Normandy Beach. The first Contax was waterlogged after 5 or 6 shots. He finished a roll of 36 in the second Contax. He scrambled onto a returning LST headed back to the mothership to be the first to get his Normandy photos turned in. Sadly, the over excited technician dryed the rolls with a hair dryer and fried the emulsions on all but seven shots. They were not Capas best, but they were first.
Some other dangerous encounters followed. He was a humble shooter with great talent.
KEEP POSTING. I enjoy your stuff!! If you're looking for a fine rangefinder from 1953, try the Konica III. Good build and sharp lenses,
http://www.35mmc.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Konica-III-scaled.jpg. Less than $200inc shipping from Japan to Calif
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Art Meripol replied:

Comment posted: 23/03/2026

The story of Capa's film disaster and the what if's kills me. He definitely was 'close enough'. I don't know much about his personally but it's good to hear he was a humble guy. Your reminder of the Capa film disaster brought to mind my own similar but much much smaller story about a darkroom disaster. Back in the early 80's before, the fall of the Berlin Wall, I was shooting an international swim meet. There was a big time East German star swimmer who dominated his events. I had some shots of him including some greeting fans and enjoying himself. I had a runner taking my film to a darkroom while I shot. The batch of film of him was mishandled by a young kid loading the reels and was ruined. Meanwhile the swimmer disappeared, escaped his handlers to remain in the US. We scrambled to find at least one frame of him in all those rolls we could salvage and found one, just one for the story about his bid for asylum.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Alan Simpson on Contax iia – first roll and how I ended up with a couple classic cameras

Comment posted: 23/03/2026

A very interesting story, thank you. I've recently had a Contax II and 50/2 Sonnar from 1936 serviced by Ed Trzoska here in the UK. I've added a 'modern' Voigtlander 28/3.5 SC Skopar and I'm now getting to grips with using this set-up.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Art Meripol replied:

Comment posted: 23/03/2026

Good luck with it. I have read that the 50 f2 is a real jewel. I found the handling of mine a natural and easy adjustment. How do you plan to frame up the 28mm? Did you pick up the Voigtlander viewfinder?

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Alan Simpson replied:

Comment posted: 23/03/2026

Yes, the lens came with the Voigtlander 28mm viewfinder. I find the camera's built-in finder for the 50mm lens too 'squinty' for me, so I use an old Voigtlander Kontur 50mm finder with the Sonnar lens.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Tony Warren on Contax iia – first roll and how I ended up with a couple classic cameras

Comment posted: 23/03/2026

Lucky you, Art. What a superb bit of serendipity. The flare test shot is impressive for such an old lens and the post processed comparison is pretty subtle in the difference. Points up the rather clinical look digital has that reduces its appeal to me. Could that vertical flare line be to do with the shutter? Like you my darkroom is a changing bag now and if anything is fogged doing what you did to get your scissors it is never as defined as this. Still, if it is only occasional, probably forgivable with such a delight of a camera.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Kodachromeguy on Contax iia – first roll and how I ended up with a couple classic cameras

Comment posted: 24/03/2026

What a fantastic kit. You did a good deed for photography by having this Contax body and one of the lenses repaired/restored. Classic equipment should be used! I am surprised that the leather cases are still in such good condition. That suggests the previous owners kept the equipment in a climate controlled house (= air conditioning).

The Nikkor S lenses - aren't they intended for the Nikon S rangefinders? They physically fit, but the focus is off?
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Steve Abbott replied:

Comment posted: 24/03/2026

My understanding, for what it's worth, is that the Nikon S system has a slightly different focus register, so that although they physically fit on the mount, focus is out. In reality however, the wide ones - 28mm, 35mm, in fact anything LESS than 50mm - are OK as the greater depth of field of the wides make them good enough. One of the third-party manufacturers (Cosina/Voightlander) produced the same range of lenses with the different registers taken into account, marking them N(ikon) or C(ontax). Incidentally, I pulled the trigger on one of the Jupiter-9 85/2 lenses, which arrived today; glass appears spotless, focus slightly stiff but smooth, apertures nice and easy albeit no click stops (which I don't really mind), complete with one of the lovely Soviet bakelite cases. Pity the camera is still away for it's service!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Alastair Bell on Contax iia – first roll and how I ended up with a couple classic cameras

Comment posted: 24/03/2026

Many years ago I bought the self same camera. I bought it on a well known auction site for a pittance and it duly arrived from Argentina - everything worked perfectly and like yours it had the Sonnar f/1.5 50mm.

It was a lovely camera and is one of 6 I really regret selling.
When they were new they set the standard with a 1/1250 shutter speed that was unheard of up till then. They were considerably easier to use than the Barnack design Leicas of the time but do require a peculiar grip if using the small focus wheel - sometimes referred to as the Contax Claw.

Apparently they cost as much to buy at release as a Chevrolet car!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *