These days I use my little Fuji X100V for a ‘walking around’ camera. I like my iPhone camera just fine but usually want something a little ‘better’ than the phone. If I carry the gear I use for work, it feels like work. I just like to have that nice little capture machine for the unexpected frame I might come across in my day, one I can keep at my side.
Long before digital, long before the iPhone, I had the same desire for a small ‘walking around’ camera and found the perfect solution in the original Olympus XA and its little clamshell pocketable body. I used that sweet little camera often when not working.
In January 1994 my new bride and I traveled to San Francisco and Napa on our honeymoon where the Olympus unfortunately gave up the ghost. I can’t remember now what the problem was but just that it was not going to be repairable, or at least not worth it to me at that time. Now I see the prices they’re getting and wish I’d held on to it.
I ‘had’ to have a camera of course to document our honeymoon and my new love. There were camera stores aplenty back then and I stepped into one in downtown San Francisco to planning to grab another XA. They didn’t have one. We were heading to Napa’s wine country and I didn’t want to take the time to shop around in other stores, so I bought the new Nikon Lite Touch, released 10 months earlier in March of 1993. At 108 x 62 x 32 mm it was even tinier than the XA, the ‘right size’ for my immediate needs and even offered a ‘pano’ setting.
When the salesman showed it to me I didn’t ask any questions. I was in a hurry to get on the road to Napa and took off with it and it’s 28mm F3.5 lens. I used it during the rest of our honeymoon. We had our 31stanniversary this past January.
Last week I saw another photo blog’s post about the Lite Touch. Officially known as the Nikon Mini AF600QD, on release it was touted as the World’s smallest and lightest 35mm AF camera. That was what I wanted, something to stick in my pocket.
The long story in the blog dives into detail about how the Lite Touch AF was developed and the vision and people behind it. If you’re interested you can read more about it at Nikon’s site “The Thousand and One Nights” No. 94 https://imaging.nikon.com/imaging/information/story/0094/
I continued to use the camera for a dozen years before moving into digital and setting it aside in a drawer. Just last month I pulled it out from my collection, put a new battery in it and it fired right up.
I haven’t run a roll through it yet but hope to soon. Honestly for what I wanted it for even the X100v isn’t as compact and easy as that Lite Touch AF from 1994. How often do you read about a camera that supposedly fits in your pocket. Unless you’re wearing a clown coat most of them really don’t. This one does.
The photos here are from older scans done some years ago. The original slides are buried in my files.









Share this post:
Comments
Geoff Chaplin on Nikon Mini AF600 – Shooting with a Lite Touch
Comment posted: 23/08/2025
David Hume on Nikon Mini AF600 – Shooting with a Lite Touch
Comment posted: 23/08/2025
Comment posted: 23/08/2025
Comment posted: 23/08/2025
Comment posted: 23/08/2025
Comment posted: 23/08/2025
Zheng Li on Nikon Mini AF600 – Shooting with a Lite Touch
Comment posted: 23/08/2025
I'm also puzzled by the last photo, since I don't know how you can make a true panorama (two conjoined frames) with this camera. I re-read the manual already. ;-)
Gary Smith on Nikon Mini AF600 – Shooting with a Lite Touch
Comment posted: 23/08/2025
I see that a Nikon AF600 can be had for $159 on eBay. My last eBay purchase of a Kodak Retinette was out and about yesterday loaded with the same film Dave shot as discussed in his article posted 15 AUG 2025.
Thanks for your story Art!
Comment posted: 23/08/2025
Comment posted: 23/08/2025
Keith Drysdale on Nikon Mini AF600 – Shooting with a Lite Touch
Comment posted: 24/08/2025
Comment posted: 24/08/2025
Gordon Ownby on Nikon Mini AF600 – Shooting with a Lite Touch
Comment posted: 24/08/2025
Jeffery Luhn on Nikon Mini AF600 – Shooting with a Lite Touch
Comment posted: 25/08/2025
Loved the photos! Especially twins Marian and Vivian. I had a commercial photo studio in San Francisco from 1979-2000 and I used the twins for many advertising shoots. There was one cute TV ad for AT&T where they're talking on phones in what looks like a split screen, but the 'wall' between them gets pulled away and you see that they are two different women talking to each other. It was a bit corny, but that was on purpose. After that ad, I got a lot more work using them. They were delightful. Thanks for triggering that pleasant memory! Those Chinatown shots could have been done yesterday. The place looks exactly the same. Thanks! Jeffery
Comment posted: 25/08/2025
Mats on Nikon Mini AF600 – Shooting with a Lite Touch
Comment posted: 27/08/2025
I think the lens is a bit better than the lens designer gives it credit for. I've seen some very sharp images come out of this camera under the right circumstances. The whole thing is also incredible small and light. So much that it feels a bit flimsy, like it could break easily. But mine is still going strong. The viewfinder is bright, but tiny. You sort of get used to it.
One of the few prime lens model that it still somewhat affordable (there are quite a few 80's models as well, but like the article states they are often twice the size or more) and one of the even fewer 28mm options. I like the Fuji DL-500 even better, also a 28mm 3.5 triplet from around the same time. Slightly bigger but a lot more responsive, and with a better viewfinder and flash. Also usually cheaper:) The lens holds it's own as well, though I think the Nikon might be a tiny bit sharper. Anyway nice read! And yeah, that last panorama is definitely from a different camera as the the Nikon just crops the image with a mask:)