Homeless in Hamilton. Help!

By Ron Duda


The unhoused population in the city of Hamilton, Ontario, Canada has drastically increased in the last five years.  We’re a medium sized city of around 787,000 in 2024 and have never experienced this magnitude of homelessness.  Estimates range between 1600 to 2000 people live without basic shelter.  The city has counted over 200 people living in what have been dubbed as “encampments “ – mostly in public parks at around 76 sites city wide.  I’ve seen tents and makeshift shelters at busy road intersections, in wooded urban areas, along public trails and on the Niagara Escarpment which runs through Hamilton.

What led to this crisis involves a complicated set of circumstances.  The Covid pandemic certainly played a roll.  People living in supported housing situations or shared living were forced out by necessity and/or regulation.  But the underling cause is much more complex.  Demand for housing in all markets from entry level to the luxury homes exploded here over the last 15 years or so.  Prices increased way above the rate of inflation.  Rental apartment buildings were being converted to condominium ownership to satisfy that demand.  Fewer apartments then, were available for rent.  Rents also increased due to decreased supply and increased demand.  The result was to render affordability out of reach for some. Fewer and fewer people at the economic margins of our society are able to afford rent along with the other necessities of life.  Public housing, or socially assisted housing construction had stalled too.  That was a political decision made in times of less need.  The consequences of that and other political and policy decisions in part, contributed to the situation on the street today.

No one wants to live in a tent, in the city, in the cold.  The squalor.  The hunger.  The conflict.  The indignity.  The drug use.

Canadian politicians at the municipal, provincial and federal levels have at least one thing in common.  They’re exceedingly slow to react.  Government red tape and regulations are stumbling blocks to get these folks off the street.  In some cases their “solutions” just make matters worse.  For instance, just this month, city council enacted a resolution to remove all encampments on city properties – its parks.  Where will the homeless go?

There have been some small steps in moving toward finding housing for these folks.  This winter, on the edge of the city’s industrial north end, twenty “Tiny Homes” were installed in a vacant lot to temporarily house some of the homeless.  These are heated, one or two bed huts and cost the city about $35,000 each. Twenty more are apparently on the way.  It’s a start I suppose, but even this seemingly simple, practical solution has come under fire.  Complaints are that the tiny homes are made in China rather than locally.  Nearby residents complain that the shelters are too close to their own homes.

With these five frames I attempted to document the conditions as they were one day in March of 2024.  This particular encampment was on the lawn of our City Hall.  I felt uncomfortable raising my camera to my eye and attempted to be as unobtrusive as I could be.  Note the poor chap collapsed on the park bench.  He was in the process of making a sign – most likely begging for money or food.  His marker and cardboard sign lay beside him.   He hadn’t budged in the 40 minutes or so that I was there.  How exhausted he must have been to fall asleep in that way.  And while I was there police were interacting with some of the residents – all quite civilly.  Some good samaritans were getting out of their van with loads of coffee and doughnuts for the campers. Tim Hortons of course!  People do what they can.

That encampment is gone now. The economic and housing challenges remain.  Where have the homeless gone?

And for those interested, these photographs were taken on a Nikon FE with a 50mm f1.4 lens.  The film was Eastman XX developed in D76.

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

Comments

Wendell Cheek on Homeless in Hamilton. Help!

Comment posted: 24/04/2025

While I recognize the plight of the homeless, and as a Christian feel the responsibility to help in any way I can, I am disappointed to find an article outlining the problems faced by one particular. city in Canada. The same circumstances could apply to virtually any city in America, but what does it have to do with photography? I found the photos compelling, but wish the emphasis were on them.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gus replied:

Comment posted: 24/04/2025

I view it as: the photographer has taken on the challenge of documenting a local issue that is important to them, and they’ve chosen the medium of film photography. Documentary photography raises a slew of interesting ethical questions. I found it interesting, and found the photos intriguing.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Huss on Homeless in Hamilton. Help!

Comment posted: 24/04/2025

This is a tragedy. A huge problem is that people are taking advantage off it. You had mentioned that it costs $35,000 for a single tiny home? At Home Depot they sell tiny homes - installed - for $5000. It's the same here in Los Angeles - insane mark ups on providing shelter. In one tiny home camp they did not erect solid structures but emergency 'permanent' tent type structures and tax payers were billed $75,000 per single dweller 'rigid' tent.

I mention this because the very nature and text of this post discusses this topic so I am staying on subject.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Simon Foale on Homeless in Hamilton. Help!

Comment posted: 25/04/2025

Great work Ron. The final image is especially powerful. Good on you.
https://www.oxfam.org/en/takers-not-makers-unjust-poverty-and-unearned-wealth-colonialism
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Eric Charles Jones on Homeless in Hamilton. Help!

Comment posted: 25/04/2025

Your pictures remind me that many of us came be homeless in today's hyper capitalist economies. This while Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg and Bernard Arnault — have a combined worth of more than a trillion dollars — enough to give away a million dollars a day for nearly 3,000 years. I'm not sure what the solution is but this is not sustainable
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Geoff Chaplin on Homeless in Hamilton. Help!

Comment posted: 25/04/2025

A powerful article - images and text - and a meaningful use of photography. You did well to limit your comments to the background, responses and costs - so tempting to cross the border into politics.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 25/04/2025

Agreed ! It’s a good objective piece

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Pauley on Homeless in Hamilton. Help!

Comment posted: 25/04/2025

Hi Ron, I found your story and photos -- particularly the last one -- very powerful and affecting. In the US, at least in the part of the country where I live, we tend to have an idealized view of Canada and other more "progressive" societies. This tendency is of course even more prevalent these days, and arguably has some reality to it. Yet your thoughtful article also reminds me that the factors that lead to mass homelessness transcend national boundaries. The encampment you photographed could be here in New York or in any of a thousand other communities in North America (and beyond). since the 1930s at least, with Dorthea Lange and the cohort of WPA photographers, documenting human suffering has had a significant place in the vocation and art of making images. Good for you for continuing this tradition.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Shubroto on Homeless in Hamilton. Help!

Comment posted: 27/04/2025

The homeless, too, have their possessions (however meagre) and their needs. And is that a megaphone near the sleeper in the final image?
A gut-wrenching article; the illustrations, too!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gil Aegerter on Homeless in Hamilton. Help!

Comment posted: 29/04/2025

Thank you for shooting this story, which is in the best tradition of photojournalism specifically and photography in general. Some of the answer would seem to be tax policy that prevents that amassing of tens of billions of dollars and instead spreads that around a little.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

James Evidon on Homeless in Hamilton. Help!

Comment posted: 02/05/2025

Some critics just don't get the point of the image, or in this case, the series. Once in Bergen, Norway, while street shooting, I came upon a really pathetic image of a woman who was obviously Roma sitting near a trash can with a cup on the ground in front of her and a forlorn far away look on her face. I discreetly took the picture and when I printed it in monochrome it really carried the message. I entered it in our local competition as a photojournalist entry and really caught very strong criticism from the audience and well as the judge who felt the picture was exploitative on my part. I was really taken aback since it was my intention to tell a story as photojournalism is meant to do, Some people just don't get the point.

Having said that, I felt that your images were an example of good photojournalism and critics be damned.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *