Photos & Projects

‘Unremarkable Architecture’ – Kicking of a photo project (with Kodak 400 TMAX)

January 28, 2018

I’ve decided to start a photography project. I’ve had some sort of ill-founded fear of such things for quite some time now, but thanks to a few inspiring words from Rob Knight on ep.85 of the Sunny 16 Podcast I’ve realised many of the things that’ve stopped me from getting started are frankly nonsense. As such “Unremarkable Architecture” is born.

To be honest, even naming a project has given me a sense of discomfort. I have such an overly strong sense of caution around being artistically-pretentious that even something as simple giving something like this a name has just felt like something I couldn’t do. I think I’ve got over that problem now. The conclusion I’ve come to having listened to the above mentioned podcast is that actually I’m not sure I care even if it’s pretentious. I’m not doing this for the benefit of sharing it online or even sharing it with other people – though as a blogger, I no doubt will be sharing it. I’m also not doing this as part of some sort of bid to promote myself as it as an “artist”. I’m doing it simply because it amounts to the sum total of a whole bunch of things I like doing. As such, fundamentally I am doing this for myself. Doing these things for your own benefit was a one of the key take-aways from Rob’s message, and though this doesn’t feel like a new idea to me, somehow hearing it on the show really kicked my brain into gear.


In the case of this project, I’m going to be tapping in to the fact that I really like architecture; I find huge satisfaction in the design of buildings, and as such also find satisfaction in photographing them in a way that captures something of that design. Beyond that I also find satisfaction in how the act of photographing something can increase the pleasure in the viewer of said something through the innate satisfaction that good photographic composition imparts.

In terms of the type of architecture that interests me, I think I’m a bit of a contrarian so I tend to find most pleasure in architectural design that others would likely find ugly, uninspiring or worthy of being knocked down. I am, above all else, a fan of Brutalist architecture. Brutalist architecture is so often frowned upon because of how “ugly” it is. At the same time, there are many (like me) who see beauty in the hard shapes and pronounced facets. Brutalism will therefore no doubt find a place in this project, but actually the type of architecture I’m going to be most regularly framing is that which isn’t often quite a divisive.

Unremarkable Architecture

Like in any given UK town or city, there are a lot of fairly unremarkable buildings to be found in Worcester – most of which best fit into the more broad classification of “mid-century architecture”. It’s this sort of architecture that I want to focus on the most – the sort that sometimes raises an eyebrow through being fairly dislikable, but doesn’t generally cause quite as much upset as full blown Brutalism.

In Worcester we’ve actually recently lost a quite a prominent chunk of mid-century architecture which used to be located directly opposite our famous 10th century cathedral. To be fair, given it’s proximity to one of our key tourist attractions, it was a bit of an eyesore, and what’s replaced it provides a much better focal point for the city – though, in a way I miss it. You can see an old picture of exactly the building I am talking about in this local news article that talks the old “Giffard Hotel”, and another picture of it as the later Travel Lodge here. That old frontage was knocked down and replaced with the “Cathedral Square” frontage you can see here – if you compare the images you can see the statue of Elgar and the tall part of the hotel that remain.

Kicking things off in a car park

I mention all this as I kicked off this project by taking some photos of the old car park behind part of the new frontage and the tall part of the hotel. I say kicked off, but actually when I took these photos I didn’t know it was going to turn into a project – it’s only liking them as much as I did then hearing the podcast that made me put tow and two together…

The car park in question is the city centre NCP. To be honest, I don’t know that much about it, but as I understand it, it was built in the 50’s/60’s. I’m pretty certain was part of a post-war redevelopment of Worcester that, believe it or not, saw the destruction of part of Worcester’s most historic Tudor street.

Fortunately, there were some successful petitions to save some of the Tudor buildings, so we still have the Tudor house museum and further up the road, Greyfriars as well as the rickety Tudor buildings that surround them. Looming over the Tudor house museum is the car park in question. I will at some stage revisit and take a shot of the landmark spiral entrance from the outside (you can see an old image of it of mine here).

To kick this project off I started inside the car park. This first shot was taken half way up the upper ramp of the car park looking back down into the empty penultimate floor.

Car park ramp down

This next image (the same as the one at the top of the post) is the same ramp, in fact almost the same spot looking up – the building at the top is the top of the old Giffard/Travel Lodge Hotel that can be seen from the other side as referenced above – they did a lot to improve the view, but this chunk of mundane still towers above it all…

Car Park ramp up

At the opposite end of the top of the car park, this lump of brick and metal houses one of the car park stair well and lift shafts. The flare and unusual vertical artefacts are a bit of a happy accident – though I did have a feeling framing the lamp just out of frame would have some impact on the old lens I am using.

Car park stair well

An uncertain direction

Something else I took from the interview with Rob Knight was not to worry too much about the direction and goals of a project. It’s actually this particular part that made me realise I should do this. As it currently stands, the above photos best fit the theme that I have in my head, but actually, I really like this next shot too – it’s either going to fit, or it will become part of something else I might or might not have in mind…

Stair well

Thanks to Kodak Alaris – the TMAX choice

Unlike most of the content I post on this blog, I’ve decided to end with a note about the kit and film I have and will continue to use. To start with I want to say thanks to Kodak Alaris for sending me the TMAX 400 film I used to take these photos – as I also mentioned here, they recently sent me a bit of a care package of film to try. It was purely an experiment that I went out with my camera loaded with this film, but having shot it I realise just how suitable it is for my chosen subject matter.

I usually shoot HP5+, a great all purpose film that frankly withstands my usual bullshit-haphazard approach. Where Kodak Tmax 400 has proven itself particularly ideal for this project is in that it’s quite evidentially higher resolving than HP5+ – I’m not usually so interested in fine details, but for this sort of subject, I feel it’s quite appropriate to attempt to capture more detail in the subject. Tmax also has a much finer, though still evident grain. Despite shooting with a tripod, I feel that shooting a finer-still 100 speed film would perhaps impart too much of a smoothness to the results. I want a grain, I just don’t quite want the level I find when I shoot HP5. It seems, almost serendipitously, Kodak 400 TMAX has provided me with exactly the look I want. As such, I intend to continue this project shooting only with it.

An SLR and a Tripod

For consistency, I also largely intend to stick to one camera and lens. The lens being the most important piece in the puzzle. In fact the type of lens has in itself insisted upon me two bits of equipment I rarely use, an SLR and a tripod. The SLR being my trusty F2 with either its non-metered prism, or if I’m feeling fruity, I might use a waist level finder. I haven’t got one yet, but I also intend to add a geared head to my tripod.

The lens

As mentioned, it’s the lens that’s forced my hand in terms of the camera. That’s because I’m going to be shooting with a 1970’s Nikon 35mm shift lens. There is literally zero way this lens can function on a rangefinder – to use it, you have to be able to see through it. If you’re unaware of the nature of a shift lens, for now you’ll have to wait as I’m going to come back to what the do and how another day.

Despite my usual ranting about small cameras, not carrying too much stuff etc, I actually really appreciate the time I spend with gear like all this. People always talk about how film slows them down – I don’t really get that so much. Using a tripod, manual stop down shift lens and really concentrating on framing does. It also offers me a good opportunity to crack out the spot meter and overthink exposure too – which I quite like doing once in a while

The exception to the rules

Whilst largely speaking I’m going to be taking some more advice I’ve heard in Rob’s interview (and then repeated by Stephen Dowling in the following week’s podcast) to stick as much as possible to one film stock, one camera and one lens when shooting a project, I am going to say now that there is a very strong possibility that I will pick up my 4×5 camera at some point. It makes perfect sense to use it for a project like this. I just want to find my feet a little before I commit to the expense…

So that’s that… I’ve come out as having a “project”… Thoughts?

Support & Subscribe

35mmc is free to read. It is funded by adverts. If you don't like the adverts you can subscibe here and they will disapear.

For as little as $1 a month, you can help support the upkeep of 35mmc and get access to exclusive content over on Patreon. Alternatively, please feel free to chuck a few pennies in the tip jar via Ko-fi:

Become a Patron!

Learn about where your money goes here.
Would like to write for 35mmc? Find out how here.


  • Reply
    Rob MacKillop
    January 28, 2018 at 9:50 am

    Glad you included some “concrete” examples 🙂 Looking good so far. I’ve no idea why you agonized over projects being pretentious. Bollocks to that, just get on with it!

    • Reply
      Hamish Gill
      January 28, 2018 at 10:38 pm

      Thanks Rob… There’s a joke here somewhere about producing a load of pebble dash… 😉

  • Reply
    John F
    January 28, 2018 at 10:43 am

    A great set of images – ‘atmospheric’ without being too ‘theatrical’
    I particularly like the ‘ghost’ in the last one ! There’s another potential project for you – long exposures in spaces with lots of people…

    • Reply
      Hamish Gill
      January 28, 2018 at 10:39 pm

      Thanks John – I think I know what you mean about not being theatrical, I’m definitely not into that sort of thing.
      And yes, I do feel like the last shot has a direction of its own, thanks

  • Reply
    Terry B
    January 28, 2018 at 11:15 am

    Hi, Hamish. As I started to read this post I fully understood why you had a slight problem in what you would title it. “Architectural Photography”, why even the term could be slightly elitist as calling for special skills and/or equipment. Then I thought why not something less imposing, like Photographing Buildings? But even this wouldn’t embrace all the types of images we will see if we examine in detail of what the building actually is. From far away we see it whole, but as we get closure we become more aware of what goes to make the building, windows, doorways, what its made of – concrete or brick, wood even – that leads to texture that changes with light and also gives us shadows so we can play with form.

    What did ring a bum note with me is what our City Fathers did to our cities. I’m not familiar with Worcester to the extent that I know what happened, but I’ve lived in Birmingham all my life and have memories from the early 1950’s of what it looked like. From around 1960 I was in a position to have photographed the city centre and very much regret I didn’t document it as much as I should have done (very little in fact) before a lot of it was knocked down. But then I didn’t know how much certain areas were to change so dramatically in the name of progress.

    I believe this is why old images of places how they once were and I know now are so fascinating.

    Have fun with your 5×4 if you try and give this a go! :D) I once went out with my MPP Mk. VIII technical camera and my Benbow Mk.II tripod (Ah, those were the days) but it was back-breaking work, even though the MPP was loaded with a Grafmatic back for ease of changing film sheets.

    Good luck, and have fun with this project. I look forward to updates.

    • Reply
      Hamish Gill
      January 30, 2018 at 11:28 am

      Thanks Terry, I didn’t know you were so close by! You should pop out and say hi on the 24th of march!

  • Reply
    Ashley carr
    January 28, 2018 at 6:15 pm

    Welcome to boring world of boring buildings! I’ve been shooting a series based around my home city of Birmingham for nearly two years now, an ongoing series if you will.

    I had no problems with the whole ‘starting a project’ problem as mine kind of crept up on me in that I was shooting all this work with no particular aim at first but, if you do enough of something, it kind of takes on it own purpose. This is how I arrived at the ‘Urban Malaise’ series.

    I’ve found that having this framework to work within has helped carry the work forward, it adds impetus at those times when you feel aimless or that you’re just wantonly taking pictures. I won’t bore you with the reasons why I feel archiving the areas in Birmingham that I do but working on this series has informed me of many things regarding both my environment and the reasons why I need to record these places.

    Like you I started with a Nikon F with both 28 and 35 PC-Nikkor lenses but getting deeper into the project has pushed me into wanting better resolution and tonality so alongside my 35mm work I’m also using a Pentax 67 with the superb 75/4 shift lens. I doubt that move would have happened if it were not for wanting to produce the best work I can within this series.

    As a side a side note I have no problem with naming a project, the thing that I feel very uneasy about is giving titles to individual images…to me that’s the essence of pretentiousness but that maybe because I like to work on groups of images making up the whole as oppose to stand alone single images.

    Good luck with your project, I look forward to seeing the ongoing results!

    • Reply
      Hamish Gill
      January 28, 2018 at 10:46 pm

      Thanks Ashley – please reply with a link! As for kit, I’ve had “plaubel proshift” on my ebay watch list for a long time. Must resist. What you saying about impetus is exactly what I am hoping to find. Funnily enough, writing this has given me another idea about a project I think I might have started a while ago – something else to reduce that sense of wantonly taking pictures. Thanks – I look forward to your link! 🙂

  • Reply
    Malcolm Myers
    January 28, 2018 at 9:06 pm

    I’m really pleased that you’ve started a project, and I’m even more pleased that you’re not doing it to “share with other people”, although I’m glad you will. As I said in my Rollei 35s review – and it was confirmed in the comments – we really should do these things for ourselves, not because we seek the affirmation of others. If other people like it then great, but really, if you get pleasure from it then why should anyone else’s opinion count? Perhaps a post on “Take photos and don’t give a damn what other people think” might be in order?

    I also hope that it will inspire others, including myself, to start a project. I still don’t know what mine would be but I do feel I need one as I think it would allow me to compete against myself, and hopefully improve. Perhaps starting with something on my doorstep would be best, something mundane and unremarkable just as you have. Because actually I really like the shots, they have a tranquil yet hard feel to them. Thanks for sharing and I look forward to hearing about your progress.

    • Reply
      Hamish Gill
      January 30, 2018 at 11:25 am

      Thanks Malcolm – Yes, I remember what you said in that post, I even commented on it when I shared it on social media. So many people worry so much about what other people thing about their work… I can’t fathom why. The doorstep has to be the easiest place to start… That was another conclusion I came too!

  • Reply
    Art Tafil
    January 28, 2018 at 10:32 pm

    After reading your post and seeing the types of Architecture you are going to shoot, I find myself eagerly awaiting your posted results.

    Try shooting with Kodak CN400 if you can find it. It’a a C-41 process B&W film that the local developer can use. It WILL NOT contaminate the processing chemicals for the rest of the color processing like some processors here in the USA have tried to tell me.

    My all time favorite was Kodak Technical Pan film ASA 25. When developed normally it’s black and white, document copy film. Black is pure black and white is pure white with nothing else in between. If however you develop it in D50 I believe at 50:1 what you get is every shade of the grey scale from 1 to 9. Prints are virtually grainless and can be blown up to wall size 6′ X 8′. amazing stuff.

    • Reply
      Hamish Gill
      January 30, 2018 at 11:20 am

      The d&ps you’ve been talking too sound like idiots – it says C41 on the side! That’s a film I shot a little just before it got axed – I used to shoot a LOT of xp2 so it was backup when I couldnt get hold of it.

  • Reply
    Olli Thomson
    January 28, 2018 at 10:41 pm

    Excellent project. The designer buildings are photographed to death while the ordinary buildings that most of us live and work in are thrown up and pulled down with hardly a thought. It’s good to record the ordinary and the mundane. And it’s hard to beat a good car park picture!

    • Reply
      Hamish Gill
      January 30, 2018 at 11:17 am

      Thanks Olli!

  • Reply
    January 29, 2018 at 3:03 pm

    I really love this first glimpse, great photos. I agree with the reticence about calling something a project and have found myself in the same situation as Ashley. I’d be interested to know how you are metering at night – It’s an area I want to explore but uncertainty about metering is preventing me from getting started.

    • Reply
      Hamish Gill
      January 30, 2018 at 11:16 am

      Hi Adrian,

      In this case, it was just with my iphone and the lumu app (not even the device) – My intention is to use my spot meter moving forward, with a sort of zone-system-lite approach. I might write up the approach properly some time, if your interested… but in the meanwhile, using an app that shows you the exposure its taking a reading from on the screen works quite well as a slight-cheat

      • Reply
        January 30, 2018 at 2:05 pm

        Thanks Hamish. I think I’m just going to dive in and see what happens. If I get any usable results I’ll attempt a write-up.

        • Reply
          Hamish Gill
          January 30, 2018 at 9:58 pm

          Great stuff, keep me posted!

  • Reply
    Ashley Carr
    January 29, 2018 at 3:48 pm

    Hi Hamish,

    I too have looked (drooled) at the Plaubel Proshift but felt the Pentax was a touch more versatile for use outside of the project. Speaking of which, I don’t yet have a curated final cut of the project as its still ongoing although I do have a ‘dumping zone’ where I put images I think will fit well with the series as a whole. By doing this I can keep track of the work and, if I ever get to that point, this is where I’ll choose my images from to make the cull. I suppose this is a rough cut/first edit.

    The ongoing work can be seen here

    • Reply
      Hamish Gill
      January 30, 2018 at 11:12 am

      Spot on! I love this sort of thing – I’s really pleased it’s not just me too! Keep in touch, I’d love to see it “finished” – I’d be very happy to publish something on 35mmc if you wanted to pen a few words too…?

  • Reply
    January 30, 2018 at 12:44 pm

    Dear Hamish,
    you’re about a decade older than I, and hence I can probably understand why you’re «a fan of Brutalist architecture». —— I guess, you *haven’t been over-exposed* to that particular architecture during your childhood. Just a decade or two earlier, you very likely would have been: my older sister’s in the 1960s, and even ten years later my childhood books which covered the topic «How Will Mankind’s Future Look Like», or so, were full of depictions of exactly that stuff. … Oh, and people having chips implanted in their brains so that they could do higher mathematics immediatly, thanks to a constant connection with a huge computer on a space station, and many more weird things, like mobile telephones, and so on 😉
    Cheers, Alexander

  • Reply
    January 30, 2018 at 11:23 pm

    Looking forward to seeing how this develops; assuming you will be sharing some of it via 35mmc. T-Max is a great film, not used it for years as I have only relatively recently come back to the joys of film photography. I will be using it again some time. Keep up the great work Hamish.



    • Reply
      Hamish Gill
      February 1, 2018 at 9:09 pm

      Cheers Ian, I will indeed, I’m not sure how much I’ll share yet, possibly all of it, possibly less… I’m just going to go with it I think. Very pleased to have the support/encouragement, thanks!

  • Reply
    Photographing Buildings and Places in Hannover – by Christian Schroeder - 35mmc
    March 17, 2020 at 10:00 am

    […] special. Hamish already expressed the fascination for “ugly” structures in his article about Unremarkable Architecture. (Check it out, it is very worth reading.) To honor the brutalist architecture, I chose the former […]

  • Reply
    A Leica R6.2 Review - by Hamish Gill of 35mmc - Casual Photophile
    March 30, 2020 at 12:00 pm

    […] when I first picked up the Leica R6.2. To be fair, that’s a bit of an exaggeration, I had shot my Nikon F2but only when I wanted to use a shift lens, and that had been very […]

  • Reply
    Architectural photography with a 50mm lens (and some thoughts on minimalism) - By Daniel Sigg - 35mmc
    June 9, 2020 at 10:00 am

    […] Unremarkable architecture photo project (Hamish Gill) Bremen Ports – industrial architecture (Christian Schroeder) The beauty of basic – life with one lens (Will Mordell) The Lure of the Uncomplicated Camera (Hamish Gill) […]

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.