Svema NK-2SH ASA 100 Soviet Cinematic Film Review

By Ibraar Hussain

Svema NK-2SH is a black and white film that is a remake of the classic Soviet film NK-2. It is produced in the same city as the original, Shostka in The Ukraine, and partly with the same equipment. This film is described as “cinematic,” originally intended for use in motion pictures as a Cinema Film.

Astrum, a Ukrainian manufacturer, took over the production of Tasma films (Tatar Sensitized Materials or Татарские светочувствительные материалы) when they went out of production and now produces several black and white film stocks, including NK-2SH. The roll I have has been re-spooled by Chinese companies and is readily available online.

“..The Svema NK-2SH film is known for its fine grain and sharpness, though it requires careful handling and development to achieve the best results. It is recommended to shoot the film with consideration for lighting conditions and developer choice to manage contrast..”

Svema have many different Films available and a quick search online will reveal their whole series.

Camera Gear and Development

Now, I had no idea about the qualities of this Film and did no research whatsoever until after I had shot it. I knew it was an ASA 100 B&W Film and that’s it. As I use Diafine or rather Bellini Duo Step I am no longer concerned much about dev times and use a standard time, being 3 minutes solution A followed by 3 minutes Solution B then a water bath followed by the Fixer.

I had just received a Carl Zeiss 50mm f1.7 Planar and I have had a 40-80 f3.5 Vario-Sonnar lying around for a few months and this was an opportunity to try those lenses out with my Conttax RTS II.

The Shoot and Disaster

We went out on a family drive along the Suffolk Coast, I also had my Minolta a-7 loaded up with the other Film I was to test, disaster struck with both, the other I’ve written about elsewhere, but this had it’s own series of disasters.

Firstly after we left to see Orford Castle in Suffolk, the Zeiss 50mm Planar wasn’t focussing to infinity, it obviously had a fault, I twisted the focus ring too hard and it unscrewed and fell apart! I was then forced to use the 40-80 Vario-Sonnar.

The 40-80 is one of the worst lenses I have ever used; not in terms of optical performance but in terms of handling. It uses a push and pull focus and is quite a heavy metal chunk which meant the RTS II was front heavy, any slight movement and the lens crept, it’s like having Auto Zoom without any control of the matter. What rubbish. Not something you can pre-set to a certain focal length lift focus and shoot. Creep creep creep.

Then visited some beaches and Framlingham Castle – a spectacular one, for all its faults I managed to get some very satisfying compositions and the light was good. I shot with the yellow filter attached and using the camera’s meter did my usual exposing for the shadow areas (zone V) then reducing  2 Stops to get them to Zone III – this usually works well with the highlights which all fall into place.

We got home and I got my stuff ready, this is when disaster struck again, I made a foolish mistake allowing light into the changing bag with the film in it – after developing I was devastated to see that I had lost every frame apart from the first 10-12 I had shot and every frame taken of Framlingham Castle and most of the beaches and coast had gone forever. I haven’t shot anything for over 6 months and haven’t developed any B&W for the best part of a year so I guess I was being careless and rusty, no excuse.

Results and Conclusions

These are the results I had after scanning. Not much to work with considering this was supposed to be a review and test of the film but it’s all I had. It’s enough for me to determine and write about the characteristics of the Film and my thoughts on it though so it wasn’t all in vain.

The Film reminds me of a cross between Rollei Retro 80s and the worst Film I’ve ever tried; namely the junk which is Ferrania P30. I don’t mean that as a criticism, this film is very good, it’s very tricky to shoot with as you’ll need to understand that it has a lot of contrast and shadow detail is limited, but it has some lovely highlights and inky deep black shadows.

Too much contrast in the scene and it’ll let you down if you’re not careful as can be seen here in this photo of my son (looking annoyed as he hates being photographed). Shadow areas have merged with dark areas.

But with a more balanced light and you’ll be rewarded as with these two photos of Mrs Ibbs.

Zeis Vario Sonnar 40-80 f3.5

This film is excellent for work with shapes and shadow and gives a rich tonal separation and a lot of contrast with wonderful detail and resolution. Buildings, stone work and railings all work well, especially when the sun is out. Giving it an almost IR look a la Rollei Retro 80s

Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 40-80 f3.5
Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 40-80 f3.5
Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 40-80 f3.5

It’s easy to scan as well with no issues. It has very very fine grain and is smooth and would suit ‘Noir’ type scenes beautifully, much better than that junk which is (again) Ferrania P30.

So a disaster, having lost most of my hard work, but a Film I will be sure to buy and use again, more carefully this time and maybe without the Yellow filter for less contrast. I’d also set the shadows as Zone IV if wanting less contrast and then boost the highlights in post or in the darkroom if printing.

By the way I managed to send the Zeiss 50 back for a refund which was fine, for now I’ll stick with my Yashica ML.

All Photos:
Contax RTS II
Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 40-80 T* f3.5
Developed in Bellini Duo Step (Diafine)
Scanned on an Epson 4990 using Epson Scan software.
Edited in Lightroom 5 on an Apple Macinttosh Pro 2013.

This film was supplied for this review by Mark Xiao, who is currently running a business/project that imports films and other photographic accessories produced by reliable Chinese companies. He currently works closely with major producers from China such as Reflx Lab, Lucky and Alienfilm, but also connected with minor artisan workshops such as 617 Club who re-spool top quality Svema films from Ukraine. He is currently working with Aperture Printing in London and expanding his cooperation sphere further. If you are interested in these films, they will be available in Aperture Printing from April 2025. If you are interested in Mark’s business as a retailer, feel free to contact him via email at [email protected]

 

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Ibraar Hussain
I enjoy taking snaps. From East London. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsU-amzCbwU Youtube
View Profile

Comments

Geoff Chaplin on Svema NK-2SH ASA 100 Soviet Cinematic Film Review

Comment posted: 28/04/2025

I find (and maybe that's just me) the black and white building shots are so much more striking and evocative than the colour shots you took recently - great images! Yes the film looks good, photographer good, equipment....er... Let's hope your replacement is more reliable!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 28/04/2025

Yes, I agree, I only regret the 25+ images from the Film which have been lost. I also have to admit I generally prefer almost all of my B&W stuff to the colour. Hehe! Yes, I sold the Zeiss and returned the other one for a refund. I've only a Yashica 50mm ML f2 (the very small short stubby slower one which in my opinion has so much character and more so that the others) The Helios 44-2 a Pentacon 135mm f2.8 and a Chinon 35mm f2.8., to be honest I don't think I need anything else, the Pentacon for portraits is exceptional. I have an Industar 50mm Tessar in mint condition and if anyone wants it for free let me know, just pay postage!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Pauley on Svema NK-2SH ASA 100 Soviet Cinematic Film Review

Comment posted: 28/04/2025

Hi Ibraar, given the limitations and disasters, you seemed to wrest some pretty great shots from this unknown film! The film's rendering reminds me a bit of Kodak XX, also, if memory serves, a cinema film (albeit one with larger grain). I really like the portraits even the one of your unwilling son (my daughter and he could perhaps form a support group!). Thanks for some great writing.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 28/04/2025

Thank you David ! It does have a slight XX feel to it now that you mention it. I wrote about Eastman XX here https://www.35mmc.com/13/06/2023/eastman-kodak-5222-double-x-with-a-contax-rts-ii/ a film which is now my favourite. The XX is more forgiving but the lovely shadows and highlights are in some ways similar

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith on Svema NK-2SH ASA 100 Soviet Cinematic Film Review

Comment posted: 28/04/2025

Hi Ibraar, Sorry to hear that you had a lens fall apart. I guess that I was lucky with my similar situation with an old e-series Nikon lens described here: https://www.35mmc.com/02/03/2025/validation-a-one-shot-story/

Also, sorry that you lost images while using your changing bag. I have yet to try a bag. My film has all been transferred to my tank in a dark closet.

As I mentioned in comments on your last post, I'm unlikely to try Svema NK-2SH however I did a couple of quick searches and came up empty. Amazon doesn't show it as one of their choices and my local shop (Blue Moon) lists 114 options for 135 film and it isn't among them.

As always your photographs are inspiring - alas I have no castles nearby to visit.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 28/04/2025

Thanks Gary You can get it from eBay or from Etsy https://www.etsy.com/listing/1694571334/fresh-svema-nk-2-sh-13535mm-36exp-iso Where do you live? The US has lots of options. Here in Britain we have analogue wonderland, the film usually is sold under a different name https://analoguewonderland.co.uk/search?type=product&q=svema I used to use the cellar at my parents house, and also my darkroom, but here I need another solution as I find using a changing bag very frustrating.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Andrew replied:

Comment posted: 28/04/2025

You can order from them directly. I have done this.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

TonyD on Svema NK-2SH ASA 100 Soviet Cinematic Film Review

Comment posted: 28/04/2025

My understanding is that Astrum is simply a distributor and repackager of film, and it has no real manufacturing capabilities in Ukraine or anywhere else.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 28/04/2025

Thanks Tony I had no idea. After receiving the Film I did some digging on the web to see what I could find about it Who makes these now ?

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jeffery Luhn on Svema NK-2SH ASA 100 Soviet Cinematic Film Review

Comment posted: 29/04/2025

Ibraar,

If you hadn't told us about your disasters and just posted the pix, I would have thought, "Hmmm, somewhat contrasty, but great for shots with textures." I'm wondering how Pyro CMK would tame those highlights. I've had some good results with Ilford FP4 and Pyro lately. In harsh daylight that combo produces easy-to-print long scale negatives. It's the most compensating developer I've used. D-23 is also good. Great for stand development.

I can really relate with you on two points:
1- Push-pull zooms suck. I paid top dollar for a Vivitar 80-200 zoom when it first came out in the early 1980s. When it was in focus, the multi-coated lens produced sharp images. But that push-pull feature was not a feature, it was a headache. I still have that lens, but never use it because it drifts so bad. I always thought that a button on the lens that locked-in the chosen focal length would have been good. Perhaps a spring loaded grip that only zoomed when it was squeezed would have been a solution.
2- I too have done, dare I say, 'idiotic' film processing errors recently. I had 12 sheets of 4x5 HP5 loaded into a Yankee daylight tank. Good shots of the last snowfall of the year in Yosemite. I had completed the developer step and was pouring out the juice when the top fell off the tank and spilled my sheets onto the sink in full room light. I gathered them up, put them into the open tank, poured fixer over them, and shut off the lights. I now have 12 could-have-been-Ansel-level-shots in a weird state of solarization. Creative? Nope, not really!
My goodness, I've processed hectares of 4x5 film in my life and never made that mistake! When do we stop learning?
Fortunately, I had shot some 120 with my Rollei, so the day wasn't a total loss.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 29/04/2025

Hi Jeffery Thank you kindly sir. I admit I'm not familiar with many developers, I started off with DDX then onto ID11 then settled on Rodinal until I then used Rollei Supergrain and finally the Diafine. ID11 was very good but didn't store for as long as I'd have liked, and took some time mixing, hence the Bellini/Diafine makes life easier - easy to mix, stores for years and not much to worry about in terms of critical time and temp. I should read up on what you mentioned. Martin Henson on Youtube is quite an avid user of Pyrocat HD, it's from his videos that encouraged me to try Diafine (or rather Bellini Duo stop) https://www.youtube.com/@martinhensonphotography/videos Push Pull zooms in my experience, as with yours, are a headache. I avoid them almost completely - I didn't know the Zeiss I had was a push pull! There was plenty of scope for design improvements but as we see now, correct me if I'm wrong, but push pull has been completely abandoned. Digital cameras aren't immune from such things - corrupt memory cards and mistakes often occur. Back in 2002 I went on a 3 week trip to the Punjab and had a Fujifilm compact - I lost the entire 3 weeks of shooting because I pressed the wrong option on the tiny menu and wiped the XD Card! Also corrupt CF cards have meant I've lost entire days of shooting!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Russ Rosener on Svema NK-2SH ASA 100 Soviet Cinematic Film Review

Comment posted: 29/04/2025

Well you Persevered through this arduous film expedition. I read your article on the Wolfen color film shot at the same time. This SVEMA 100 looks like an interesting emulsion. Reminds me of the early films Russian director Tarkovski did. "Alexander Nevsky" comes to mind in particular. I think the yellow filter gave things a surreal look. SVEMA is indeed making film again. Astrum mostly sells the SVEMA films to aerial survey companies. So these do have an infrared or near infrared capability. I had a friend who worked for an aerial survey company and they used these emulsions quite a bit.
Don't give up on that beautiful Contax RTS camera! Look for the Yashica 42-75mm zoom lens. Although a modest range it's much better made and quite cheap compared to anything with the "Carl Zeiss" badge on it. Their ML 50mm F1.4 Yashica lens is a real stunner too.
We are generally using older equipment years or even decades past its prime. Sadly I have experienced nearly all of these equipment failures at least once, and my own human error more than I'd care to admit! On the other hand I've gotten stunning results with lenses I assumed were ready for the junk yard. And I don't mean "vibe" results.
I look forward to your next photographic adventure! Hopefully it will be a smoother one.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 29/04/2025

Thank you Russ! Yes the film does have that characteristic. I was quite pleased as I like a 'Noir' type look. The Rollei retro 80s is similar but has more of an IR look to it, the Eastman Double XX has a similar feel as well, albeit without the deeper shadows. The Contax I'll never get rid of, I hope it maintains it's reliability which makes me wonder whether I should look for another body in mint condition just in case!! Thanks for the Yashica 42-75mm zoom recommendation, since reading your comments I've looked it up and it's had stellar reviews. The only thing putting me off is the push pull!! Though if it can be found very cheaply it will be worth a look! ML lenses are very very nice, the 50 f2 I use is probably my favourite 50mm lens of any type I've used. the rendering is very very pleasing to the eye. Contrast is also very good, not too contrasty like the Zeiss's which I think hinder B&W work. Thanks again!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *