Lenses

7Artisans 55mm f/1.4 aps-c lens – Mini-review

The 7Artisans 55mm f/1.4 is so inexpensive that I decided to add one to my own collection. I’ve not been using it that long, and haven’t taken a huge amount of shots with it, but thought I’d share a few early impressions…

The first thing that strikes my every time I take one of these lenses out of a box is how much more expensive they feel than they actually are. It’s fair to say that the less expensive 7Artisans lenses aren’t made to quite the exact tolerances that you’d expect from a bigger brand (or even the more expensive lenses from 7Artisans). But bearing in mind in this instance we’re talking about a brand new 55mm f/1.4 lens for £107 (inc vat), the quality is quite impressive.

Quality shortfalls

My biggest gripe with the build quality on my copy it that when mounted on the camera, the lens rotates very slightly on the mount. Whilst well damped, the focusing isn’t quite as smooth as you might expect from a higher end lens either – it just has a slight grain to it.

The aperture isn’t clicked either. To some this might be an advantage, but more than anything it just seems like a cost saving exercise to me. Fortunately, it is more damped than the focusing so it’s not too easy to accidentally change it.

The size advantage

I think for me, the biggest advantage of the 7Artisans 55mm f/1.4 lenses over mounting a vintage lens on an adapter comes down to the size of the thing. It’s no pancake lens, of course, but for the specifications it’s impressively small. If you wanted to adapt a lens of this sort of specification, and have it as small as this, you’d be looking at something in M-mount which would of course cost a lot more money.

That said, I do wish they’d have made this lens for full frame cameras, rather than just aps-c. I tried it on my A7rii, and the image circle is definitely too small. But I guess you can’t have it all… and of course making it for full frame would have likely increased the size of the lens, not to mention the cost.

Advertisement

Image Quality

Image quality wise, the 7Artisans 55mm f/1.4 lens seems to be pretty good. As mentioned, I’ve not shot mine exhaustively yet, but I have given it a pretty good run. I’ve seen a few traits that will no doubt cause those with a nervous disposition about anything short of optical perfection to get all up in arms, but actually, again, it comes back to the cost/quality ratio being quite impressive.

If you click on the photos below, you can see them bigger on flickr

Malverns in the snow

COnnie

Solstice

Solstice

plant

Worcester Cathedral

Snow

Beers and Cameras

Beers and Cameras

I suppose the best way to describe the character of one of these lenses is to say they’re a little like vintage lenses, but with modern coatings. They aren’t perfectly corrected for every type of aberration in the same way that a lot of vintage lenses aren’t, but unlike some vintage lenses, the modern coatings give them a good amount of contrast. It’s also pretty sharp wide open – which is more than can be said for a lot vintage kit of this sort of spec, especially at the price point! Interestingly, for those who are into this sort of thing, it also has loads of aperture blades like some vintage lenses have too.

Skip to the end

To my mind, the 7Artisans 55mm f/1.4 makes for an ideal manual focus, short tele lens for those on a budget looking for something for their aps-c mirrorless camera. There are, without doubt. a lot of other options out there – some just as fast and just as cheap on the second hand market. The beauty here is that you get something new with what seems to be pretty decent modern coatings that’s also pretty damned tiny.

Ultimately, you whilst you should set your expectations somewhere  short of both optical and mechanical perfection, you can still be prepared to be impressed by the bang you get for your buck.

If you’d like to buy a 7Artisans 55mm f/1.4, you can find them on my shop here. I don’t stock many, so if there aren’t any, you can also backorder one here. Or if you don’t want to buy one from me, you can 

 from someone else 🙂

Do you enjoy reading 35mmc?

For as little as $1 a month, you can help support the upkeep of this website. The more people chuck me a small amount of cash each month, the more time I can spend building and improving upon it - simple as that!
Or, for $2 a month you can get access to my behind the scenes micro-blog over on Patreon!

Either way, want to help out, become a patron of 35mmc here:

Become a Patron!

Alternatively, if you just enjoyed this post, or like the odd post here and there, please feel free to chuck a few pennies in the tip jar via Ko fi here:


Write for 35mmc: read more here, about how you can help build upon this ever growing resource
Subscribe/Follow: click here, to discover all the ways you can follow 35mmc

You Might Also Like

5 Comments

  • Avatar
    Reply
    ScottP
    January 7, 2018 at 1:56 am

    This is (almost) exactly the lens I want them to make; a 50ish f1.4. But I want a full frame one, in Leica M or LTM mount.

    All the same, on APS-C this is equivalent to roughly 83mm, which is useful. I’ve always wondered why the 85 to 105mm lengths, which were so important in 35mm photography, have gotten such short shrift in APS-C. Until recently, there weren’t many fast-ish lenses in the 55 to 75mm range, while every 35mm manufacturer had both an 85 and a 100-105.

  • Reply
    7Artisans 35mm f/1.2 - my new mini super-sonnar - 35mmc
    January 20, 2018 at 10:09 am

    […] 35mm f/1.2 doesn’t feel the most highly polished bit of kit. It’s fairly similar to the 55mm I recently wrote about – though there are some build quality advances. Like the 55mm, the […]

  • Avatar
    Reply
    Pete
    January 24, 2018 at 10:22 pm

    I think perhaps you may have been unlucky with the looseness of the lens when mounted on the camera and the disappointing graininess of the focus ring. I received my x-mount version today from a supplier in Hong Kong and I have to say it is rock solid on the camera, and the focus ring is well-damped and silky smooth.

    I am also very pleased with the results. It is a very nice lens and extremely good value.

    • Avatar
      Reply
      Hamish Gill
      January 26, 2018 at 7:55 pm

      Interesting – thanks!

  • Avatar
    Reply
    MHarris
    January 29, 2019 at 4:01 am

    Nice review, thanks for your work. I have read elsewhere that this lens has a lot of glow or ‘ghosting’ when wide open, even for items at distance. Have you experienced this? I use micro four thirds and am looking for something brighter and longer than my 12-40/2.8. This should fit the bill, but I’m afraid that if it isn’t useable wide open, or at f/2, I’m not much further ahead. I read that the 50/1.8 is sharper… but it’s not as much faster and longer than my 12-40/2.8. Thanks again

  • Leave a Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Pin It on Pinterest

    Share This

    Thank you for commenting

    ...now share the post with your friends?