FM2N 16mm

Nikon FM2N & Nikkor 16mm – A Fisheye in French Canada

By Leo Lukens

In 2025 I was fortunate enough to travel quite a bit. A Nikon was with me for almost all of those adventures. In March, my girlfriend and I spent a week and a half in Florence, Italy. I brought my trusty Nikon F2S, a Nikkor 28mm f2.8 AIS and a Pre-AI Nikkor-P 105mm f2.5. Fast forward to a May road trip to Montreal, my F2 was again around my neck with the 28mm and a AI’d Nikkor-H 85mm f1.8. In August, a family trip to New Orleans was captured by the F2 and a AI’d Nikkor K 50mm 1.4. Most recently, a return to Montreal coincided with an exciting acquisition, a Nikkor AI-S 16mm f2.8 Fisheye.

The Nikkor fisheye was on my wishlist for quite some time. Andrea Monti’s article from 2024 inspired me to start hunting for one. A few weeks ago I walked into my local camera store, Lezot Cameras in Burlington, Vermont, and a Nikkor AIS 16mm f2.8 fisheye was sitting on the counter alongside a myriad of recently-inspected lenses awaiting the display case. After handling the lens, mounting it on my camera and taking a few test shots in the lobby, I reluctantly gave it back and left the shop. Why didn’t I buy it on the spot? I wanted to develop the few shots and make sure the lens lived up to my expectations. Unsurprisingly, it did. I returned to Lezot a few days later for the lens. This copy was in pristine condition and accompanied by the full gamut of rear-mounted filters, often lost over the years or thrown away.

Twenty four hours later, my girlfriend and I were en route to Montreal for a weekend of dumplings, mocktails, pastries and plants. The pictures below were all taken with a Nikon FM2N using the Nikkor 16mm f2.8 AI-S fisheye. For this trip I shot TMAX 400 developed in HC110b and scanned with a Nikon D700 and a Nikon 55mm macro lens.

An urban architecture shot
A shot through a handrail on the way to breakfast

The distortion of the fisheye can make even a relatively mundane scene interesting. I found myself searching for scenes with symmetry, like the oversized ornaments in the periphery of this shot and the complimentary trees framing the building in the center of the image.

Cathedral in Montreal
Cathédrale Christ Church in Montreal

Another example of symmetry in composition and the character of the lens. The decorative arches in front of the Cathédrale appear to loom over the street in a way they didn’t in-person.

Cinnamon roll in a cafe in Old Montreal
Close-up goodness with the fisheye

There’s definitely a learning curve to using this lens. I believe this photo was shot wide open at f2.8.

Black and white plants
Plants at Jardin Botanique de Montréal

The Botanical Gardens proved to be a wonderful testing environment for this lens. I shot a full roll of TMAX here before my girlfriend loaded up a roll of Ultramax and proclaimed the fisheye hers to use for the afternoon.

Black and White Plants
Another shot from the Garden

 

Streetview of a live radio show
A local radio station.

In addition to the fisheye, I brought a Nikkor 50mm that I expected to use for most of the weekend. I didn’t use it once. I had so much fun shooting the fisheye that I really never considered swapping lenses. The lens is a mountain of fun to use, although the shooting experience is not without its share of quirks. First, it’s super easy to capture your body in the image. My right pointer finger ended up in the bottom right corner of three of the images in this article. My left elbow ended up in another five or six images from the weekend. The toes of my boots were present in a few shots too. This isn’t necessarily a fault in the lens design, just something to be cognizant of when composing! Second, there is definitely a decline in sharpness as you get farther from the center of the image. Given the realistic use case for this lens I don’t believe this is a huge issue. I really only noticed the softening in certain landscape shots anyway. In the case of my images, a certain amount of softness in the edges can likely be attributed to my negatives not being perfectly flat when scanned. Lastly, don’t lose the lens cap! I’ve read online that they’re expensive to replace. Considering there’s no filter ring on the front of this lens to protect the front element, I’d recommend just leaving the lens cap on until you’re ready to shoot. Unless you’re shooting in a super fast-paced environment, I doubt this’ll be much of an issue.

After running a few rolls through this lens, I can confidently say it won’t be leaving my collection any time soon. Do you shoot fisheye lenses? I’d love to hear your opinions and experiences.

Share this post:

About The Author

By Leo Lukens
I'm an amateur photographer residing in Northern Vermont, working in the hospitality industry. I picked up a camera in college after retiring from collegiate nordic ski racing. In the seven years since, I've shot shot on both film and digital, made plenty of mistakes and realized how little I know about this wonderful craft. My main photographic interests include travel, nature and street photography as well as gear reviews and black and white developing practices.
Read More Articles From Leo Lukens

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £3.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

jfbonnin on Nikon FM2N & Nikkor 16mm – A Fisheye in French Canada

Comment posted: 05/04/2026

Most interesting viewpoints !
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley on Nikon FM2N & Nikkor 16mm – A Fisheye in French Canada

Comment posted: 05/04/2026

Thank you Leo for a most enjoyable read, and for talking us along with you on your weekend of "dumplings, mocktails, pastries and plants" (I'm quoting directly because I love that line!). I've never shot a fisheye lens and probably won't since I have a thing about distortion but your joy using it comes through in the photos and is infectious. Have you used it for portraits as yet? I know that might offend some subjects but it also seems like a great place to play with lens's unique rendering. Love the shot of the cathedral by the way.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Danilo Leonardi on Nikon FM2N & Nikkor 16mm – A Fisheye in French Canada

Comment posted: 05/04/2026

Great set of images. You’ve used the fisheye with intent, and it shows, but there’s also a sense of play in the way you’ve approached it. I own two KMZ fisheyes in F-mount, the 16mm f/2.8 that covers the frame in full, and the 8mm f/3.5 circular, and I’ve found much the same. They are great fun, but best used like spices to brighten something here and there, rather than a main course. In the right scene, they create something distinctive that no other lens quite can. I tried my circular fisheye in London for a project a few years back, and prepared a short piece for the blog Analog.Cafe, ("London in a Fishbowl") and it confirmed that feeling. Your shot of the local radio station creates a world in a bubble and the fisheye is perfect for that. And the photograph at the cafe also shows the fun side of it, and the isolation it can create in close-up. As if creating a separate world. Your choices here feel spot on. Well done!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Thomas Wolstenholme on Nikon FM2N & Nikkor 16mm – A Fisheye in French Canada

Comment posted: 05/04/2026

I had looked at these and the more modern equivalent, the AF-D version albeit with different optics, many times and decided that I could not justify the cost against how ,many times I would use the lens. I instead optede to purchase a Tokina 17mm f3.5 AT-X, Mark 1. The majority of my lenses are AF-D as I use them on both my FE, (as essentially AI-s lenses), and with full function on my D750. The Tokina even looks like at Nikon AF-D. Like your Nikon, the corners get soft but at least 85%, probably more, of the remaining image stays sharp throughout with good contrast. It went with me last Summer to the West coast of Newfoundland and was used well for any number of excellent panoramic shots. The colours and contrast were excellent and for this purpose, the softness in the corners was generally not noticeable unless one was actually looking for it. (And yes, I got my feet in one photo too)! It's a useful focal lengthe without being too outrageous. And the next time I am in Burlington, Vermont I will look up Lezot Cameras; thank you for that.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Thomas Wolstenholme replied:

Comment posted: 05/04/2026

And the Tokina accepts standard 72mm filters in front of the lens. Yay!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Andrea Monti on Nikon FM2N & Nikkor 16mm – A Fisheye in French Canada

Comment posted: 05/04/2026

Leo,
I'm glad you found inspiration in my poor use of this lens! It looks like you're getting the most out of it!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *