5 Frames with a Braun Super Paxette using Dragon No.1 film

By Alastair Bell

I love old film cameras. It’s led me to build a small collection including a Kodak Retina IIIc (which I’m not a massive fan of), Voigtlander Vitomatic IIa (which I love), Voigtlander Vitessa A, Zeiss iKON Contina II and most recently a Braun Super Paxette.

It was on a visit to my local camera shop (always dangerous) when I first saw the Paxette sitting at the top of the glass ‘Used cameras’ display cabinet. As soon as I saw it I knew it was coming home with me.

For those who aren’t familiar with them it’s a very small full frame coupled rangefinder camera with a Prontor leaf shutter and interchangeable lenses. When I say very small it’s tiny. Barely any bigger than a Rollei 35. With the lens removed it comfortably fits in a pocket.

This particular example came with what is arguably the best lens option – the Schneider Kreuznach 50mm f/2.8 which I’ve used previously on the Retina (on a different mount).

The lens mounts on a 39mm thread but due to the leaf shutter the lens sits much further from the film plane than a Leica L39 (or LTM) lens. This mount is sometimes referred to as a B39 mount. Mounting an L39 lens will never get focus.

Fortunately there is a decent range of lenses from a number of manufacturers covering focal lengths from 35mm to 200mm.

The camera top plate contains the film advance lever, a cold shoe, the film rewind knob and the frame counter. The frame counter has to be set manually and is advanced to the correct position by pushing the serrated edge at the rear. The film advance is a two stroke affair which is ratcheted to allow partial strokes if desired. The advance also cocks the shutter, the release for which is on the right side of the lens. The film rewind knob freewheels until raised by a gentle pull upwards. Just to the left of the film advance lever is a tiny button to disconnect the transport  whilst rewinding the film. It must be pressed the entire time the film is rewound.

The rear of the camera has the tiniest viewfinder of any camera in my collection. This is the biggest flaw, especially for spectacle wearers. It’s near impossible to accurately frame a shot whilst wearing spectacles. There is also what looks to be some kind of adjustment screw which I’m guessing is for the rangefinder.

Underneath the camera is a large central knurled knob which once unscrewed allows the entire back and base of the to be removed to load film. Once the back is removed the film pressure plate (which is not removed) hinges out the way, a lever beneath the film canister swings out the way and film can be loaded. This is about as painless as it gets on vintage cameras.

On the front is the heavily buttressed lens mount and Prontor SVS shutter. Unlike the Retina the aperture control and focusing helicoid removes with the lens. This brings up another flaw in the ergonomics of the Paxette. The arrangement of controls goes (from the camera side) shutter, focusing then aperture. When focusing care must be taken to use the scalloped focusing ring instead of grabbing the smaller aperture ring, especially if making final adjustments on focus before shooting. It’s very easy to change the aperture inadvertently. Above the lens there are the two windows for the viewfinder/rangefinder.

There is no light meter.

Overall the camera feels very sturdy and is surprisingly heavy, especially given it’s diminutive size.

So overall it’s quite quirky and charming but what’s it like to use?

Well aside from the issues already mentioned  the only thing to be careful of is not to trip the shutter inadvertently. It’s very easy to do given it’s location.

Image quality was surprisingly good. In fact it actually surprised me but you be the judge.

The film used here is Dragon No.1 100 ASA shot at box speed though the distributor says it can be used at 25-320 ASA. This is hand spooled in the UK from rolls imported from Ukraine. It was the first time I’ve used Dragon No.1 but I’m very pleased with the results and can see I’ll use it again.

All images were taken at Goodwood Revival 2025.

This camera is a joy to use even if the really tiny viewfinder makes framing difficult while wearing spectacles!

 

Share this post:

About The Author

By Alastair Bell
I've been interested in photography since I was 15 though have taken breaks at various times as life got in the way. The latest break was for 10 years and at the end on if I sold all my Nikon gear and bought into the Fuji X system for its lighter weight and previous good experiences with it. I've done stock photography and wedding photography (never again) but mainly use photography as a way to express myself and show my world as I see it. I have recently started using film again and my photography now is a mix of film and digital.
Read More Articles From Alastair Bell

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £5 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Tony Warren on 5 Frames with a Braun Super Paxette using Dragon No.1 film

Comment posted: 20/11/2025

Thanks for such an insightful coverage. I have thought about trying one of these but you have managed to curb my ideas here. While it is a well made camera and with a good lens, I shall be happy with my Retinna IIc. I had a Voibtländer Vitomatic IIa and a Vitessa which were excellent cameras producing some very good images.

That film is very contrasty. Do you process yourself or use trade? It is effective here though with most of these subjects.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Alastair Bell replied:

Comment posted: 20/11/2025

Unfortunately I don't have the facilities to self process (I could do the films but not printing as even though I possess an enlarger I don't have a suitable workspace). The film is very contrasty and personally I was blown away by the results when used in this camera and with these subjects. I have another to use at some point and also a roll of Dragon IV and Dragon VI to try. Looking forward to brighter days to get out with it again. Strangely I don't really get on with my Retina IIIc - not sure why as in theory it has everything I look for in a vintage rangefinder - we just don't gel.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Gary Smith on 5 Frames with a Braun Super Paxette using Dragon No.1 film

Comment posted: 20/11/2025

I agree with Tony that the example shots seem very contrasty. At the moment I have both the Voigtländer VITO CLR and the Kodak Retinette 1B loaded with Ilford FB4+but I haven't been shooting them much (following getting a Nikon D700 and D810). I need to take those guys out and finish of the rest of the rolls (then mix up fresh developer and fix).

Thanks for your article Alastair.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Alastair Bell replied:

Comment posted: 20/11/2025

Thank you for commenting Gary. It is a very contrasty film which I really like the results of though can appreciate its not everyone's taste. I have just acquired a Fuji GFX so am back in the digital world for the moment (at least until the sun comes out again) and really need to finish a roll of film in my SL35, Retina IIIc and Zeiss Contina II before February when I need them for a talk at my local camera club. Thanks again

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Bob Janes on 5 Frames with a Braun Super Paxette using Dragon No.1 film

Comment posted: 21/11/2025

Interesting and well observed shots (although a little dense).
The Paxette's are really charming little cameras. I have a little Super Paxette I (fixed lens, coupled rangefinder), which I have noted has certain similarities to the British AGIMatic. It has a certain miniaturised charm. Unfortunately, mine shows a tendency to shred film perforations.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Stephen McGonigle on 5 Frames with a Braun Super Paxette using Dragon No.1 film

Comment posted: 21/11/2025

This was an interesting article and I found myself agreeing with the author's comments on the Paxette. In short, I too found it awkward to use, although paradoxically I was also pleased with the reults I got. I love small 35mm cameras from this era, but they are invariably fiddly and frustrating. My Voigtlander Vito iia and Vitomatic ii being cases in point. While grappling with awkward cameras is satisfying when decent results are obtained, I've become less inclined to indulge in self flagellation entailed. The outcome is that my Voigtlanders now sit on a shelf in preference to later models such as the Olympus 35RC. That said, I still retain an affection for the build quality and aesthetics of early cameras such as the Paxette. One similar camera I do still use is my Franka Super Frankarette although this is a fixed lens camera.

I am also a regular attendee at The Goodwood Revival Meeting, and (very) easily managed to run through a dozen rolls of 35 mm as well as half a dozen in 120, such are the delights on show and the whole atmosphere of this wonderful and unique event.

The Dragon film looks interesting, and I confess that I'd not heard of it prior to reading this article. I like the contrasty images that it looks to produce, and may well give it a try after seeing these results.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Alastair Bell replied:

Comment posted: 21/11/2025

Thanks for commenting Stephen. Interestingly I don't find the Vitomatic IIa fiddly to use at all though with that long lens mount on the front it is difficult to carry in a pocket! You took a lot more film images than I did - wow - a dozen rolls! I only took the one (and a few images on digital). I've recently returned to the dark side (Digital) as I often do over winter when the light fades too far for slow films but hopefully will find a few sunny days to to get out again soon.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *