I’ve had the Fuji X100v for a couple of weeks. In that time, the world feels like it’s changed… and no, not because of the camera. Fortunately, my reasons for buying the Fuji X100v haven’t changed, and actually with those reasons being largely around taking more photos of the kids in action – what with me going to be spending a lot more time with them in the weeks and months to come – I think I’m going to be getting a lot out of this camera.
In fact, I’ve decided I might do a little bit of a series of posts covering my experiences shooting the Fuji X100V. Going through the menus and options it offers, I don’t think I feel capable of writing any sort of comprehensive one-hit review. There’s just no way I could cover it all off in one post without sending myself loopy. As such, I think I’ll be approaching talking about this camera by writing something of a diary which I will conclude with a roundup post at the end.
I suspect just this hints at the some of my early thoughts toward it. It’s probably no surprise that I’ve found dipping into the menus of the Fuji X100V a little overwhelming. My ideal camera is one that has as little options, menus, buttons and a dials as possible. And there’s no getting away from the fact that the Fuji X100V is not really that.
Those who follow this website will also know that I didn’t like the previous X100F very much, and was actually inspired by its complexity to write a post accusing Fuji of losing site of the original concept by bloating it with features. You might therefore be wondering why now the 5th iteration of this camera has landed, I’ve decided to put my money down and commit to one of these cameras?
If there was one thing that really piqued my interest when I first saw the design of this camera, it was the reduction in and improved layout of buttons that adorned it. The biggest thing that frustrated me about the X100F was the massive amount buttons and the fact that for whatever reason I couldn’t hold the camera without accidentally pushing some of them. Everyone told me to just switch the buttons off, but with so many of them, that felt counterintuitive to me – it felt like I was going against the intention of the design, if that makes sense? Anyway, I won’t go on, you can read my thoughts on the X100F here if you want to.
As I say, when the X100V was released, the first thing I saw was the fact that the d-pad jog dial thing was gone, the layout of the buttons in general was a lot cleaner and less overwhelming, and that the ‘Q’ (for ‘quick’) menu button has been moved to the side of the grip and sunk into the body of the camera. I could see straight away that I was going to find handling it a lot less clumsy. I was right too, in use I haven’t yet even once touched a button I didn’t mean to.
The flappy screen
The other thing that had me enthralled was the tilting screen. I use Sony cameras at work, and have for quite a long time now become quite reliant on the tilting screens they provide. I don’t need this sort of functionality every day in my hobby, but sometimes when I want to take photos of the kids, I feel like I’m missing out by not having this feature.
A camera for snapping the kids
And that’s really what this camera is all about for me. I wanted something that I could use to take photos of the kids in more creative ways. I’ll use it for other things, for sure, but it’s when snapping the kids that its features will be taken advantage of.
I think I’m some ways I’ve been spoiled by having the Sony cameras at work. For all that they drive me mad with their millions of features and functions, 3 generations in I’ve got quite used to them and have worked out how to harness some of their features rather than be overwhelmed by them. In fact, I’d go as far to say that I find that they allow me to be quite creative when I want to be in ways other cameras don’t.
The idea of shooting them for fun just doesn’t appeal though. For a start, they belong to work not me, but moreover I just associate work with them, rather than play. What I’ve grown to miss within my personal photography is just the sort of ease of shooting that they bring to the table. Sometimes the challenge is fun with the cameras I normally shoot my hobby with, but sometimes I just want to be able to have a creative idea when taking a photo of one of the kids that relies on super-quick eye-detection continuous-autofocus and be able to get the results without too much thought. As I said, I’ve been spoiled.
Which brings me neatly to my first results. The first time I took the camera out and used it in anger was to snap a few shots of Norah on the trampoline and playing in the garden. I’d not even begun to set it up to work how I wanted, so had to faff around in menus and click loads of buttons to work out how to get it into the right sort of modes.
Even now I haven’t mastered the AF modes, so certainly didn’t have a clue about which one to select then so just chose “All AF”, whatever that means. I switched on face detection, then continuous autofocus via the switch on the side. This combination of features and modes was enough to allow me to capture Norah in mid air at f/2 with absolute ease.
I then went on to get a shot of her scooting down the garden on her little bike toy thing (she looks stationary though, right?).
And another of her pretending to be on the phone – though of course, this one was a little bit less taxing on the camera
I was pleased with all these photos too. So pleased that I did some in-camera raw conversions and put them up on my ‘hamishgill’ instagram here, here and here. Though, ultimately, I wasn’t happy with the look of those. The photo above are Lightroom conversions I did later. I’ve decided that I’ll come back to all that in-camera processing and film simulation stuff later. It’s all a bit much for me to get my head around for the time being.
So as I say, the first photos felt like a success. Inasmuch as I did manage to find the modes I wanted in the menus and buttons without too much trouble, and the outcome was what I’d hoped for.
I did come away from the experience with a couple of fairly strong feelings though. The first was that I was very quickly going to need to spend some time customising the way the camera worked to get the most out of it, and the second was an idea I had for harnessing the Fuji X100V’s features to capture something of a lot more movement in Norah’s play in the garden.
I shall be back with my initial customisations to the camera and those results next time.
Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-free Experience
There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts:
Paid Subscription - £2.99 per month and you'll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
Content contributor - become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.
Sign up here.
11 thoughts on “Fuji X100V – First Frames with and some thoughts on why I bought it…”
The shot with the phone is fantastic!!!
Hamish, I feel certain that you’re going to have a lot of fun with this camera. I know what you mean about the menus on digital cameras, but my own experience with Fuji (X-Pro 1 and X-E1, E-M1) is that they have one of the best; the settings seem to follow a logical sequence. Menus may at first seem daunting, but we aren’t making continuous adjustments. It’s like when the first home video recorders first came out, we probably read the instruction manual from A to Z and got thoroughly confused. But when we compartmentalised the functions for specific uses, as and when, it all started to become clearer over a relatively short time as we became more familiar with its functions.
Personally, I find Fuji’s use of the Q button one of its best features as it gives instant access to most of the settings we’re more likely to want to change, and of course the Fn buttons can be programmed to the features you most use.
N.B. The instruction manual can be very useful. :p)
In time, I’d be interested in your opinion of the RAW/jpeg capability with this latest Fuji iteration, as the early models had jpeg engines that gave results every bit as good, if not better, than RAW, perhaps something to do with incompatibility issues with early software and the X-Trans sensor.
Have fun with it, and I look forward to further instalments.
Yeah, that’s exactly it. I used to find them all so much easier to understand, I think there’s just a strong relationship between me getting older and caring less to understand tech, and simultaneously tech getting more complicated (often unnecessarily) I gotta try here though. So much potential!
The Q menu is great though – especially now I’ve cut it down to 4 things ????
I will certainly get to the jpeg processing. There is so much in there I’m convinced I can set it to work pretty much perfectly to my taste. Doing away with a need to process raw files wouldn’t be a bad thing. If I can set it up to have a black and white mode and colour mode, all the better too
Hey Hamish; looks positive! I was only thinking last night about my journey (shit I can’t believe I just wrote “my journey”) with the X-Pro3 and how I’m increasingly satisfied with it. I’ll be interested to follow your ongoing explorations and see how they compare with mine. In particular with how you set it up for jpegs. I reckon I’ve got mine dialled but it’s a secret recipe and if I told you I’d have to kill you. I will say though that I don’t like it at ISO 1600 or higher (for colour anyway) which surprises me a bit. And I really like having the second slot backing up with raw that I just leave on there. Still haven’t filled the card. The rendering in your outdoor shots looks really nice – the lens seems nice too!
I need to work up to setting the Jpegs – that’s a big break from shooting RAW that I need build up to
I quite liked the four way toggles, now gone. I set them up to use the usual features and rarely used the Q menus. I am sure there is a similar quick way to access commonly used settings. Menu systems for me are a bit by bit thing. Nothing is worse than the menus on the Sony digital cameras I have tried (RX 100 earlier series). Supposedly they have gotten better but I sold each one because of the menus. Leica digital menus are the absolute best. No fluff and to the point.
Yeah, Sony definitely know how to ruin a menu
I shot with a Fujifilm X100F last year to have a camera for quick auto focusing. I spent more time fiddling with focusing modes than actual picture taking however. Makes me wonder if it helped at all. Went back to zone focusing in the end anyway.
Yeah, there are certainly a few
Very nice. I have the Xpro3 (only because I wanted the option to change lenses) and it has the same jpeg settings as the X100V. My decision to get the Fuji was to use it as a jpeg camera. I was first drawn to the new Classic Neg simulation, but find it to be far too contrasty out of the box. C41 film saves highlights, this version burns them out. BUT! You can edit the film simulations and save the change in camera – a one time deal if you save it – and so I just pulled down the highlights on the Classic Neg sim so they are maintained.
But.. someone else then recommended the Astia soft setting, and I found that it is perfect if you slightly bump the contrast and save that as the setting.
These are very very nice cameras. I wish Leica would adopt the OVF/EVF hybrid functionality in a future M. Fuji has shown it can be done. Don’t want the M to go to AF, but it would be really nice if they had the standard OVF with RF that they have now, and an EVF at the flip of a switch.
Hamish – thanks for your great articles on the X100V.
Huss – do you mean that you can now set different default settings for the film simulations or are you using the Custom Settings to save your changes.