AI: The Beginning of The End of Photography

Image above created by the AI image generator (DALL-E)

“There used to be big men in the world, men of mind and power and imagination. There was St. Paul and Einstein and Shakespeare… There was Julius Caesar and Tolstoy and Immanuel Kant. But now it’s all robots. Robots and the pleasure principle. Everybody’s head is a cheap movie show.” 

― Walter Tevis, Mockingbird 

I know the title is a little melodramatic. The demise of photography has been prophesied for the past several decades but something feels a little different this time. AI is moving at such a pace that it is set to fundamentally disrupt industries, livelihoods and lives.

On March 14, 2023 German photographer Boris Eldagsen‘s eerie image entitled Pseudomnesia: The Electrician was selected as the winner in the open “Creative” category at the prestigious Sony World Photography Awards. Eldagsen refused his award, revealing that it was not a photograph crafted by a person but an AI generated image. Eldagsen confessed that his submission was done to test the judge’s ability to recognize images produced by artificial intelligence and to start a conversation about its impact on photography.

Boris Eldagsen, PSEUDOMNESIA: The Electrician

The debate that Eldagsen desired never took place with Sony. They accepted his refusal of the award. Then issued a well-crafted sanitized press release that communicated nothing of substance and quickly moved on.

Through the centuries photography has evolved from the oldest surviving photos produced in the early 1800’s on chemically treated light sensitive metal plates to our current digital media. The one constant has been human control and direction. Eldagsen’s rejection of his award highlights AI’s impact on photography. There is no blueprint for our current path. No one can guarantee if AI will bring increased productivity or curtail human creativity.

Image created by AI image generator (DreamStudio)

AI Generators

AI image generators utilize algorithms to create “new” images based on a set of input parameters or conditions laid out by programmers. To teach the software to form pictures a huge data-set of existing images are used. Mostly taken from the internet, these images include everything from paintings to photographs. Images produced by these generators also bring into question copyright concerns due to images being formed from existing pictures.

Image created by AI image generator ( Dream Studio)

A Curious Trend

A trend since the 1990’s has seen a steady lowering of IQ scores on standardized tests worldwide. This decline has coincided with our increased dependence on AI. There are no definitive answers for the cause. One theory does suggest an over reliance on technology and smart devices. The technology that is making life simpler and more convenient is potentially making us all dumber. In the future, what will we prioritize, ease and comfort or increased human potential based on our own abilities?

Image created by the AI image generator (DALL-E)
Image created by the AI image generator (DALL-E)

Undoubtedly, AI will make us more productive but will the cost be our creativity? How do we foster it, when AI can generate images within minutes with a few selective prompts on a computer? In a few short years, it has become increasingly more difficult for the average person to tell the difference between artificial images produced by algorithms or with a photographer’s eye. The possibilities of what it could produce consistently in a few years is frightening.

Image created by the AI image generator (Midjourney)

The Future for Photographers

In 1987 Thomas and John Knoll developed Photoshop and firmly put us on the path we are on currently. This software dramatically made it easier to manipulate digital images. Since then, there has been a generation of photographers utilizing this software and other tools to mold and bend images. More importantly, there has been a viewing public accepting and consuming incredibly stylized photoshopped pictures from advertisers, companies, influencers, etc. that is already pushing the boundary of what is real and authentic. The next logical progression is images entirely produced by AI.

Despite artificially produced images becoming more common, there will always be people who value authentic photography. There will always be a need for cherished moments captured in an image. Photographers who build rapport with subjects that can translate their unique personality or character onto a picture is a skill that IA can not duplicate. Wedding photography, photojournalism, street photography, event photography, and portrait photography are some areas that should be safe for the foreseeable future.


AI image generators like DALL-E and Midjourney still have their limitations. They are far from perfect. However, AI’s ability to mimic reality and learn improves exponentially every year. Recently, firms have been experimenting with hybrid chips incorporating human neurons with silicon based chips. These hybrid chips are learning faster than previous silicon based chips. Translating to less time, data, and energy needed to train AI. These new chips are not economically viable yet, but the time is fast approaching when they will be.

Market forces and the masses wanting on-demand and convenient images will give these artificial “artisans” the advantage in some areas. We continue to surrender our control to algorithms that influence what we watch, read and create.  Like any tool, how it is used lies firmly in the hands of those who possess it. We should be wise in its use. Otherwise, we run the risk of losing far more than we gain by letting AI get out of control.



Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-free Experience

There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts:

Paid Subscription - £2.99 per month and you'll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
Subscribe here.

Content contributor - become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.
Sign up here.

About The Author

30 thoughts on “AI: The Beginning of The End of Photography”

  1. This isn’t in any way “photography” – it’s a form of automated photoshopping and image manipulation and thus a separate genre/field altogether.
    like saying playing Fifa on the Playstation is the end of soccer.

  2. Malcolm Myers

    I think that professional image making will undoubtedly suffer with the takeup of AI. Hobbyists should be ok. After all, I take photos because I enjoy playing with cameras and making images for me and my family. AI won’t replace that, although it might help me correct a poorly executed shot by refocussing or changing the exposure in a clever way.

    At a broader level AI will impact a lot of industries that rely on human thought and creativity. As you mention in your post, I think any changes are likely to be rapid from now on. Only time will tell where that leads us.

    1. On a wider macro-level we need to have these conversations. They are starting to use AI to produce music, write books, etc.. Recently here in Japan, the 1st A.I. produced manga was sold a few months ago, “Cyberpunk: Peach John”. Needless to say, many illustrators and writers here saw this as a direct threat to their livelihood. I think that commercial/business interest will be the driving force in AI, why pay and value skilled artisans if the general public can not tell the difference?

  3. I see it the other way around because these images are still an imposture. And it motivates me even more to continue creating my own images with light. In retrospect I think that the origin of fake news started with Photoshop, which is a sensational program, no doubt about it. But photography is a wonderful art and we can’t lose it by pressing the keys on a computer keyboard.

      1. Agreed Eric, maybe we can train Artificial Intelligence to detect and inform us when AI has been used on an image. Sort of like being a double agent. I don’t believe AI has any morals and would be happy to join the Resistance and become an informer

  4. My one beers’ worth:

    In the coming years we’ll see the definition of the word “photography” become scrutinized and more well defined. Just as the revolution from painting to photography occurred, we’ll see a shift from photography to “image creation” (or whatever term society deems fit for the outputs from AI). Just as painting exists still today, so will photography tomorrow.

    Eric, you make an excellent point that event documentation and photography will never go away. Nothing can replace a photographer at a wedding, sporting event, or concert. That’s a point that often gets overlooked in this discussion, so thanks for bringing it up.

    1. Thank you for your views Charlie. I totally agree with you about how we define imagery and photography. For us photographers, there
      will always be a distinction but for the masses who just want a convenient image the lines will definitely be blurred.

  5. This is an area where film can really shine because it’s remained authentic in ways that digital photography never has. Plus you have the original film negative which makes it that much harder to duplicate. But just as DSLR users have bemoaned the rise of iphonography here’s one more thing they can decry. I do see a problem in AI images winning photography awards (and especially in Sony’s response to it) but will it kill photography? I’m not ready to say that yet but on a human level I see bigger problems down the road.

    1. Hi Joseph,

      I agree with you 100%. I shoot film and digital but I always gravitate more towards film. Not just for the look but also for the process
      of producing that negative. What I found interesting was that when I sent these AI generated images to individuals who normally use their iPhone or consume Instagram on a daily basis, they could not see any difference and told me how great the pictures were. Their reference points were highly processed Photoshoped images or Instagram filters.

  6. AI is not going to stop me from loading film into my camera and go out and take pics, so I’m not sure how it is the end of photography?

    If all you care about is acquiring an image without taking a photograph, well you don’t care about photography either!

    1. Thanks Huss!

      Keep shooting that film!
      I think us dedicated film shooters look at photography a bit different than someone who exclusively uses digital photography with a heavy use of Photoshop and filters.


  7. These things are digital illustrations from the ground up.

    Photographs are photographs and photography still is what it always was.

    I’m sure the terms will shake out at some point. In the meantime it’s illustrators who have much more to worry about than photographers.

  8. Maybe the division between art and artifice can be put down to one human attribute.

    Namely, the human hand, as Gil Aegerter suggested in the first comment, above.

    A skilled artisan, can with his/her hand/s make a paintbrush, or hammer and chisel, sing.

    As for the camera, we will never know for sure how much of a given photograph (analogue or digital) was art, and how much was artifice.

    After all, Sir. Arthur Conan Doyle who wrote countless books and magazine articles on detection, was fooled by two young ladies Elsie Wright and Frances Griffiths, who created the Cottingley Fairy images.

    Or as one Gelett Burgess wrote in 1906…

    “I don’t know much about art, but I know what I like.”

  9. A main fulcrum of the author’s fears seems to rest on this claim:

    “A trend since the 1990’s has seen a steady lowering of IQ scores on standardized tests worldwide. This decline has coincided with our increased dependence on AI. ”

    The Reverse Flynn Effect (as this decline is termed) is not an entirely straight line down to begin with, there are rises in some measurements and falls in others. The Flynn Effect (the rise in IQ) seems more correlated to developing nations with increasing nutrition and wealth whereas the Western World is somewhat stagnate at this point in history. There is no correlation noted anywhere that I can find, besides here, that AI has had any demonstrable impact on any of this. Not that correlation equals causation anyway.

    Depending on your definition of AI, it hasn’t really been widely accessible to or in use by the public before recently. I mean, I’ve had a Roomba since the early 2000’s but I don’t think that the my lack of manual vacuuming has had a negative impact on my IQ! Maybe I’m wrong!

    Such a bold statement feels like more of the AI melodrama trend referenced at the beginning of this article, from which the author seems to want to distance themselves. It would be interesting to see the author’s research into this claim.

    1. Hey Johnny

      Here are some of the articles/journals
      that I went through.

      I tried to be very careful with my wording and stated the following “ There are no definitive answers for the cause. One theory does suggest an over reliance on technology and smart devices.”

      A theory is just that a theory until it’s proven. Thanks for the feedback.

      I checked out your site. Great pictures.


  10. Arthur Gottschalk

    I had this experience last year. I was walking through a park in Manhattan when a young woman stopped me and asked if I would participate in her Vice Media article about AI. She asked me to name an artist and I came up with Arshile Gorky, a painter whom I had been reading about. Within minutes she came up with an instant print of a new Gorky picture, somewhat similar to the real thing. Why was I not surprised?

  11. Sacha Cloutier

    I think that it is a double edged sword that can also be used as a great creative tool. It makes art more accessible, which I believe is a great thing. I was never against when photography became more accessible to the masses. Yes, cell phone cameras have altered photography to an extent. The digital camera changed a great many things as well.

    If you look at wedding photography, which I agree is relatively safe from AI generated images, it has been changed before. The advent of the digital camera allowed more opportunities for a different generation of photographers. It is no longer the photographer holds the negatives and if you want additional prints, the photographer has all the leverage, it is now, you will get a large number of pics. If I look at three weddings, including my own, all of them included a huge cache of pics.

    AI generated imagery can also be used as a guideline. I write a lot in my spare time. I can take a great picture of a drawing, but there is no way that I can draw. I am pathetically horrible at drawing. So my characters reside in my mind, without a tangible image to see them come to life. With AI, I can now see what I write. I can also take this imagery and be inspired to create more stories. Some of my narratives can be altered by seeing what is at the tip of my imagination.

    The same can be said about my photography. With film, I am very strict on how much I alter my photography, and I do not tend to control the scene as much as I do with digital. The inverse is true about my digital work, I can take a digital image for what I want the final product to be, not the image in the viewfinder. That can be costly though. My largest digital shoot had more than 20 people working on the set, all working from my direction and an image in my mind. With AI, that image can become tangible for all involved, as a blueprint. It’s a tool just like location scouting or costume design, and it can be to our advantage.

    Or maybe it’ll just take over the world, who knows.

  12. The author only pointed out a subject which is part of a (much) larger debate everywhere, AI impact on photography. I do understand where he’s coming from here, and I do agree to a certain extent that the emergence of new, improved AI software apps are changing the world as we see it.

    Will AI impact on the future of photography, film or digital? Hell, yes. It already has started to do so. Will it impact other forms of artistic creations, such as painting, drawing, etc? Again, yes. But we haven’t the foggiest to what extent this will be. Humans taking photographs with a physical camera, digital or film, will not go away I believe. However, do I see an impact on say, art photography or journalism or indeed media outlets? I do, no doubt about this; costs, speed, opportunity, market demands, all of these are taken into account when you have various options to achieve something for sale.

    Obviously, I know next to nothing about this entire subject, but I thought to chime in with my 2 cents. I do hope this is all right.

  13. A very interesting and timely discussion thank you Eric Charles Jones. As someone involved in television news gathering and other TV filming including some advertising for 5 decades I don’t believe that “News” will be safe from being manipulated by AI. No the likes of CNN and BBC are unlikely to stoop to creating false news stories, at least for a long time to come. But there are plenty of “rogue” states, lobby groups, and the likes of Big Oil, mining, and cigarette manufacturers which might create their own propaganda using AI, encouraged by their PR people, advertising agencies and “video content producers”.
    Where I live in Aotearoa New Zealand is as far away as you can get from a “rogue state”
    But already the main opposition party in our upcoming government elections in 3 months time has been found out for producing AI generated images for television campaign advertising. They were found out by legitimate responsible news organisations.
    So if a political party uses AI in their election campaign, what is to stop them using AI if they were and quite possibly will be in power in 12 weeks? I’m not suggesting they would but I’m suggesting they could continue to use AI for political messages unless legislation is passed to prevent this. But what government already using AI is likely to consider such legislation?
    So as AI becomes more sophisticated and will no doubt often be used for propaganda purposes, it will be a task for responsible news organisations such as BBC and CNN and many others to try to find them out.

    1. You are welcome, Graham.

      Thank you for your comments and perspective as well.
      In the much larger picture beyond photography, one doesn’t want to be a fear-monger but one should not blindly embrace AI. As a society we need to have open educated discussions especially at this technology’s infancy.

      1. Yes Eric the larger picture of AI use in propaganda is more of a concern than how it affects our hobby or job ( which is also a concern ) Whether or not AI was used I have no idea but we have already seen real evidence of Russia influencing the 2016 US presidential elections by way of Prigozhin’s internet facility. Just the other day immediately after a Russian submarine commander was targeted and assassinated using Strava to check his movements, the Russians produced a video of the so called assassin being arrested. The video looked incredibly staged to me and many others.
        No doubt in my mind that as it becomes more sophisticated AI will be used more and more both for propaganda purposes and in social media, not to mention producing “wonderful” Instagram photos.
        ( even as I type this my iPad is suggesting the next word I should use )

      1. Ibraar Hussain, yes it was remiss of me not to include Al Jazeera and Television New Zealand. Some ex staff of TVNZ ( where I once worked ) now work for AJ

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to Top