The Lomo LC-A

Lomo LC-A – 7 Alternatives to the Classic Lomo – by Alan Duncan

What’s the fuss with the Lomo LC-A?

The Lomo LC-A has become the iconic ‘marmite’ camera of our times. Whether you love or hate this Soviet era zone focus compact and what it has come to stand for (or not) – there is no denying its popularity. In fact, it has become one of the more expensive 2nd hand compacts out there at times rivaling the cost of the Legendary Stylus Epic. But there are alternatives…

Here’s my list of 7 Lomo LC-A alternatives that are a bit easier on the pocket. The cameras here have either similar spec or quirks to the LC-A – there’s no AF here, just scale, zone or fixed focus. I’ve left out the LC-A+ as it is too pricey & close to the original, abet more shoddy if you’ve read Frank Lehnen post, as well as its other siblings the LC-A wide and 120. I reviewed all of the cameras below in more detail over at my blog.

So close but so far… Halina Micro 35

Revue 35FC (aka Halina Micro 35)

Revue 35FC (aka Halina Micro 35)

We kick off the list of Lomo LC-A alternatives with the so called Hong Kong Lomo (also sold in the US as Ansco 2000 and Revue 35FC in parts of Europe). Haking had a reputation for making cheap version of other cameras which were often better than you might think. The micro 35 sadly isn’t one of them. It’s a shame really as the camera on some levels is really quite interesting and has potential. Like the Lomo LC-A it was styled one suspects on the Cosina CX-1 or CX-2. It has a novel slide up mechanism to the front which protects the lens and viewfinder and comes equipped with auto flash and a winder lever. It’s also quite well made for a Haking.

Taken on revue 35FC (aka Halina Micro 35) with Ilford XP2
Taken on revue 35FC (aka Halina Micro 35) with Ilford XP2. Not bad at mid range on a slightly cloudy day

Then there’s the downsides.

Despite its looks what we have here is a fixed focus camera with no exposure metering (bar to turn the flash on). Lens-wise the Halina is a best “quirky” as in pretty mediocre. Focus is okayish a few metres out but nearer or farther thing get soft and there is some pincushion distortion. You could live with this but the exposure system doesn’t help. The camera is typical of a slew of entry level flash compacts that had fixed focus and shutter speeds but adjusted the aperture to match the film speed such as the better Olympus Supertrip. These cameras relied on film latitude to give an exposure range of around 4-5 EV stops  before at around EV(100) 11 triggering the flash system. Haking appear to have stuffed up the exposure calculations and I find this camera tends to over expose in really bright condition. Ideally you’d want to use 400 ISO film to help depth of field but the over exposure seems worse at this speed.  It’s Hong Kong Lomo status makes it one of the most expensive second hand Halina costing up to £30 on eBay, shame really as they made much better P&S that go for less. If the spec appeals I’d by a Supertrip or Konica Pop instead.

Back in the USSR – BelOMO Vilia series

BelOMO Vilia
BelOMO Vilia

Our next Lomo LC-A alternative is the BelOMO, another former Soviet Union (FSU) camera marquee based in what is now Belaruse. The Vilia series are more conventional designed and arguably were more of a rival for Lomo Smena/Cosmic Symbol. The original Vilia is a manual set affair. You set the GOST film speed (about 0.8 that of ISO so 100 ISO/ASA equates to 80 GOST) which in turn set the shutter and you adjust the aperture for weather. This is shown in the viewfinder by pictograms . The viewfinder is probably the worst I’ve ever looked through (and I’ve owned 3) as its coating makes things somewhat foggy and blurry.

Chain Curve Costa
BelOMO Vilia with expired Truprint FG+ 200 shot as 60 ASA. Dumfries July 2015

The lens is quite quirky not as clinically sharp as the smena 8m or symbol but has its own optical aberrations. 2 automatic exposure models were also made the Vilia Auto (selenium metered) and the Siluet Elektro (battery powered CDS metering). The BelOMO doesn’t pick up the Lomo cache like the Smena Symbol so you can often find for around a tenner.

Starter for 10… Fujica 35 Automagic

Fujica 35 Automagic
Fujica 35 Automagic

Auto exposure can be traced back to the pre-WWII era with the Super Kodak Six-20 which was a commercial failure. But in from 1956 a host of cameras began to use automatic metering via battery free selenium cells. This technology is probably best associated these days with each Olympus Trip 35 and its progenitor half frame PEN E series cameras from the 60’s. In 1958 Fujica launched the Automagic which arguably was one of the cameras to set the standard for the next decades.

Vintage Biscuit truck
Fujica 35 Automagic with Agfaphoto Vista Plus 200. Dumfries 2014

This Lomo LC-A alternative is bulky and feels more like a prototype. It’s auto exposure system controls the movement of aperture blades with the shutter speed being fixed. Focus is by moving a small ring just around the actually lens and inside the half cyclops selenium array. Despite this it is a stylish camera and one I find to be a talking point. Yup a Trip 35 is much better clinically but that isn’t the point here. The lens does add a slight colour cast and has some imperfection but give rise to quite pleasing images. A tenner again should see you right for one.

The 120 Choice – The Holga 120 series

Holga 120N
Holga 120N

Okay you might call foul here with a 120 film camera but I’d argue the plastic Holga gives as close an experience to the LC-A unless you wanna spend almost $300 on a LC-A 120.  Granted you get limited choices of shutter speed and aperture – but this camera vignettes well and the lens both in plastic and glass option have their own signature characteristics.

Holga 120N with Kodak Ektar 100 6X6 mask
Holga 120N with Kodak Ektar 100 6X6 mask

Unlike their traditional rival the Lomography Diana F+, they accept a normal flash and have built in cable release. You can also run 35mm film thru easily enough either DIY or with one of the dedicated 35mm backs. Although Holga is now dead as a manufacturer the 120 series is available is bewildering array of models and colours. The plastic lensed 120N pictured here can be found for around the £30 mark BNIB.

The mutant Lovechild – FED 50

FED 50
FED 50

Back to the FSU for this stonking but quirky compact that looks and feels like product of a drunken one night stand between the Olympus Trip 35 and the Lomo LC-A. Not that common in the West, this delightful camera can be imported from its native Ukraine or other FSU states for around £25-30. Like the Trip 35 you have a conventional 60-70’s compact body with a battery free cyclops selenium array on lens bezel (a bit odd as a 80’s camera).

Cupcake Munch
FED 50 with Agfaphoto Vista Plus 200

Is it a worthy Lomo LC-A alternative? Well, it offers in viewfinder icons like the Lomo LC-A and a variable shutter speed up to 1/650. You also have the option of both a Bulb mode and fa flash mode that allows you the potential for manually setting the aperture. The lens is good too (FED was better known for its Leica like rangefinders) but does add a slight colour cast. The exposure is quirky and notoriously fickle but the camera can deliver some lovely shots.

Cosina CX-1 & CX-2

Zenit cameras
The CX-2 and LC-A all cosy up. In fact this export Zenit branded, reskinned LC-A, isn’t even as close as you get with a more traditional model

The CX-1 & 2 are cracking little compacts but are sadly probably known more as the camera copied for the Lomo LC-A (lomography’s own literature confuses which one was the inspiration – the CX-2 is better spec’d and is more common and cheaper)

Mid Steeple
Dumfries, Cosina CX-2 with Expired Kodak BW400CN, 2015

Incredibly similar to the Lomo LC-A, even the lettering used seems from the same font. The only outward difference is the whole front of the lens turns to uncover lens and shutter. More clinically sharp lens with fewer quirks. It looks shot wise like a typical Japanese zone/scale focus P&S. In some ways a more hand able camera than the XA2 but just not quite as sharp IMHO. Worth seeking in the box set with the motorwind unit and the dinky flash unit. Only issue is cost it is rarer and has a cache thanks to the Lomo link. That said you can still get a camera for $30 or less

The Bargain Cult Classic – The Olympus XA2

Olympus XA2 open and closed
Olympus XA2 open and closed

No surprise this is here as often compared to the Lomo LC-A and has its own cult following. The XA2 is a quasi-zone focus ultra-compact developed from the iconic XA rangefinder and shares the same clamshell design.

Turn of Light II
Night shot on the XA2 with Kodak BW400CN. Manchester 2015

A huge success for Olympus and one wonders if the Cosina CX1 was an attempt to rival… The cameras despite its tiny size is technically better with brilliant Zuiko lens and comes with an electronic timer feature. It isn’t a true zone focus as the in good conditions is intended to be used as fixed focus although there a 3 zones for lower light. It also uses a proprietary flash mount and then there’s the membrane shutter (love and loathed). Its shots are clinically great although perhaps lack any characterisation like the Lomo LC-A (why it is so popular as a back up or pocket carry compact. Although popular doesn’t demand the anywhere near the price of the LC-A and with lucky can be got for a fiver.

The Plastic Wonder – Vivitar Ultra Wide and Slim

VUWS in Superheadz wide and slim guise
VUWS in Superheadz wide and slim yellow peace guise. My closest match to the LC-A

Topping out this poll Lomo LC-A alternatives, the Vivitar IMHO isn’t on paper an obvious choice with an all plastic with fixed everything (focus, shutter and aperture) from the toy class. But the VUWS has become known as the poor man’s Lomo LC-A and for once it is a name deserved (although your definition of poor might differ).

Fixed focus Equinity VI
Yup that was taken on VUWS clone. Kelpies at Falkirk on AVP200. 2015

It is a storming camera with a wide angled plastic lens. It is much better than it sounds and has its own characteristics and it vignettes well. The camera holds tolerable focus across a wide range but is limited due to the fixed exposure. You’ll either love or hate its flare rings if shooting into the sun. The VUWS is believed to have been originally a promo give away item but later appeared in thrift stores. Nowadays has acquired cult status so expect to play for an original don’t spend more than £20 as the camera is still made under various brands such as the Superheadz Wide and Slim which on a good day can be found online for that.

…And What’s not in

This isn’t an exhaustive list, and my views on Lomo LC-A alternative options changes over time. I did a similar list at austerityphoto last year and whilst some cameras here were in others weren’t. I’ve dropped the mighty Olympus Trip 35 and other 70’s Japanese Zone focus compacts as they give too clinically good results without quirks (and besides the Fujica is here to represent them).

But what do you think should be in or out ?

Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-free Experience

There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts:

Paid Subscription - £2.99 per month and you'll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
Subscribe here.

Content contributor - become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.
Sign up here.

About The Author

7 thoughts on “Lomo LC-A – 7 Alternatives to the Classic Lomo – by Alan Duncan”

  1. Ken Hindle-May

    I must admit, I love the LC-A and I’d probably never have gotten into film photography had I not bought mine. I don’t go in for the whole light leaks and cross-processing (not often, anyway) Lomography thing, but I find the LC-A’s vignetting, good central sharpness and pronounced pincushion distortion naturally draw the eye towards your subject and help to make photos more interesting (though photographers should always be wary of such crutches). Some of them are robustly built and the metering system is very reliable in most situations (high contrast scenes being the exception, as it tends to expose for the bright sky).

    They’re also not as expensive as they used to be. I bought mine nearly 10 years ago for £70 and it still required a good Roger Lean-ing to get it working properly. For a while you could expect to pay upwards of £80 for one, but it seems like trends have moved on in the past year or two and now you can easily get an LC-A for £30-£60. Sub-£20 is possible, if you’re lucky.

    I think out of these cameras, the Fujica and the Fed most appeal to me as possible substitutes. The XA2, for me, recreates what you’re shooting a bit too faithfully. That’s the crux of the issue, here; what makes the Lomo so popular is its tendency to introduce an element of wonkiness to your shots, so any alternative needs to bring strange characteristics of its own.

    1. You speak my language Ken. The LX-A is a great camera and Roger Lean is a saint for us in the UK. Your comments re the XA2 hit the nail on the head exactly. Too clinically sharp. The XA1 with simpler auto exposure and more basic lens is perhaps a better match in some ways but the optics although simpler are still clinically better

  2. My XA2 vignetted like a silent film close up. The Fuji was one of a string of zone focus 35s, all interesting. Remember the Halina Paulette and barn door Chinon Bellami in a similar class.

    1. Was tempted to list the Paulette or its 70’s plastic re innovation the 2000 or 3000 (weirdly less good IMHO) better than the micro in many ways and certainly quirky lenses. In end however felt they prob opened the door to a host of 50’s shooters and I’d decided I would only do one camera per maker.

      The Bellami is interesting and thought might be mentioned (not used one myself)

  3. Great intro to a few “Lomo” alternatives Alan. I’ve never got an LC-A (often been curious, and still am), even though Lomography had a significant influence on my early forays into 35mm, with the Lomo Smena 8M being my first 35mm camera.

    I had a Superheadz Black Slim Devil for quite a while, and they do make very interesting photographs, which is quite amazing for such a small and lightweight piece of plastic! They feel like they’re going to implode every time you wind on!

    I’m intrigued by the FED50, and have half an eye on one or two on eBay currently, and generally have a fondness for FSU kit.

    Another camera I’ve had fun with a late era (late 90s/ early 2000s maybe?) Minolta AF50 Big Finder. It’s very small, but has (obviously) a very big finder which makes it very enjoyable to compose with (similar to the Canon Sure Shot AF-7 that Christos recently reviewed here on 35MMC).

    The lens is a pretty wide 27mm, and the AF is very quick (either that or it’s fixed focus!) The images I’ve got from mine tend to be sharp in the centre, with a bit of softness and vignetting at the edges and corners, and strong contrast. They certainly make distinctive enough photographs to still warrant a place in my ever decreasing collection of compacts. Oh and they use cheap and plentiful AA batteries. Think mine cost about £9 and it was virtually brand new with instructions.

    The Konica Pop is great fun too, and on a good day can make some very pleasing, contrasty and colour rich photographs with that little Hexanon lens.

    1. The pop is one camera I would like to try but hard to justify yet another Konica. I avoided AF cameras here but can see your idea re the AF-7 (I’m not really a fan of fixed lens length AF and the AF-7S I own doesn’t enamour me)

      1. Alan, I’ve no doubt you have Konica compacts with better lenses than the Pop. But I just really like the whole aesthetic, the design, the colours it was available in, and how simple it is to use. Ironically it was in searching for another Pop something like a year after I’d sold my original one, that I came across its very capable sibling, the C35 EF3, which has become one of my absolute favourite compacts I’ve ever used. But I would quite like another Pop to see what I can get from it. It’s one of those cameras that’s simple but does have some flexibility (eg the three different ISO settings can act as a crude aperture dial).

        I had a Canon AF-7 and wasn’t a huge fan (though the VF was great), and the Minolta AF50 I mentioned, for me has a lot more character to the photographs, and is more interesting a focal length at 27mm to the slew of 35/38mm cameras out there. Plus does have a big finder! Canon made some excellent Sure Shots, but I don’t think they really come into the category of your original post here as, whilst very capable, they don’t have a distinct or different look to the images. They’re just very good for compacts. Same story with the Pentax Espios, fantastic, but not “Lomo” enough for this category.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to Top