5 Frames with a classic SLR – Why I Chose the Nikon FE

By Ronald Lips

I recently purchased a Nikon FE analog camera with a 50mm lens. Here’s the story behind it.

So I decided to buy a new camera. You’d wonder why. Do I not own enough cameras as it is? As you may know, I am a big fan of Leica and I own both digital as well as analog Leica cameras. When I bought my M10 I fooled myself to say ‘I don’t ever need another camera now that I own an M10’.

A second hand DLSR

For a trip to Indonesia last year, however, I decided to invest in a second hand DSLR with some long lenses. You are not always able to be close to your subject when traveling and DSLRs really shine in that area, where Leica usually requires proximity to your subject.

So, enter my new Nikon D700. A full frame DSLR which is famous for its image quality and color rendition. Only 12MP, but totally satisfying, as you can see on my portfolio site.

 

Along with the D700 I bought a 28-70mm, a 80-200mm as well as 50mm lens. This gives me a good coverage in many situations. Now, having these lenses and being a film photographer as well, I got the idea to use these lenses on an analog Nikon camera as well. However, I did not own an analog Nikon camera. The search began.

Selecting an SLR

My first decision was that this camera needed to have a classic design of the analog SLR era. This ruled out D700 lookalikes like the F5 or F100. Though very familiar to use due to them being the blueprint for all Nikon DLSRs, I needed something more classic.
Second criterium was that I needed a professional or semi-professional camera. This meant choosing from the classic F line of cameras or something similar like the FM, FE. All of these cameras feature full-metal bodies and are built to last a lifetime.

Narrowing down

Next, when shooting digital I usually use aperture priority mode. Granted, my Leica M4-P is a manual only camera, but if I’m honest I prefer aperture priority. This meant the like F3 would be a very good candidate: a legendary professional camera that was built between 1980 and 2001.

However, when I was reading up on the F3 on Ken Rockwell’s blog, I saw his reference to the Nikon FE. His review of the Nikon FE basically stated that the FE has everything that the F3 offers, but being smaller it was easier to handle. Moreover, the lightmeter of the FE features a needle indicator, whereas the F3 has a LCD readout that is more difficult to read. This made the FE my ideal candidate.

But there is also the successor of the Nikon FE, the FE2. Why not get the FE2?

As in the end money is also a criterium, I noticed that the FE2 is substantially more expensive than the FE. The FE2 has a mix shutter speed of 1/4000s, whereas the FE goes up to 1/1000s. However, it is also stated that the FE in aperture priority mode goes way beyond the 1/1000s. Furthermore, the FE features a battery indicator that tells you when to change batteries. The FE2 does not have that, which means you run out of power in the middle of shooting.

The purchase

So, the Nikon FE was the camera of choice. I could also have considered the Nikon FM3a, but this advanced analog camera was way out of my budget.

Looking on EBay, I noticed many Nikon FE cameras were offered with a 50mm lens. As this is one of my favorite focal lengths, I was prepared to spend around €200 for a body including a lens.

Reading up on the manual focus Nikon lenses, I again read an article by Ken Rockwell on the Nikon 50mm 1.8 pancake lens He praises the lens as being one of the best 50mm manual focus lenses ever made by Nikon in a very small package. I noticed this lens alone would be around €200, so if it came with the a Nikon FE body for around €200, I would go for it.

The Nikon FE

In the end I bought my Nikon FE with 50mm pancake lens for €180 excluding shipping and taxes. I ended up paying €250 for the whole deal, with a near mint Nikon FE and a 50mm pancake in very good condition. I purchased it from a Japanese seller, which I can recommend if you are in the market for a classic Japanese camera. They sit on a very large stock of used cameras that are in many cases taken very good care of.

Below a couple of frames I took with my new purchase.

All in all, a very good deal and I am enjoying the camera very much!

Share this post:

About The Author

By Ronald Lips
A user of both analog as well as digital Leica cameras. I have a passion for street photography both in color as well as black & white. I love high contrast pictures where the light is the primary subject of the picture.
Read More Articles From Ronald Lips

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £5 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Walter Reumkens on 5 Frames with a classic SLR – Why I Chose the Nikon FE

Comment posted: 13/01/2026

A good choice, Ronald, camera and lens. The Nikon FE became my second SLR camera in 1979, replacing a hastily purchased Fujica ST901 that didn't live up to my expectations. A solid camera, that's all you really need. The difference between it and the FE2 was a faster shutter speed, a brighter focusing screen and TTL flash metering. The battery indicator is negligible; it seems to last forever. Back then, that wasn't a criterion; it only became a problem with digital cameras. I can't say how long the FE will work; I later exchanged it for an F3HP, which still works. The same goes for my Nikon FM2, which I bought in 1985 as a second body for the FE and which I still use occasionally. I hope you enjoy the set.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Stephen McGonigle on 5 Frames with a classic SLR – Why I Chose the Nikon FE

Comment posted: 13/01/2026

An excellent article, and I fully concur with your praise for this camera. I bought my example in the mid 1990s, and I too bought it because it was (a) made by Nikon and (b) was at a price I could then (just about) afford. My desire then was to own a Nikon F or F2, but they were simply beyond me. It was my thinking then, that I could replace the FE with one of the top flight Nikons sometime in the future. Here I am, some 30 years later, and I still have my FE and don't own an F or a F2/3/4 etc even though I'm now in the fortunate position to be able do so should I so wish. The reason for this is that my FE has done everything I ever wanted it to do, and has done so reliably. It's never been serviced despite having uncounted rolls of film through it, in fact my only expense has been to buy batteries. So familiar is it, that operation is truly second nature. The 50mm ai lens that mine came with has recently developed fungus, and I have temporarily replaced that with a 50mm series E lens, and this has proved indistinguishable in terms of results. I shall continue to use mine until such time as it stops working, and I may not even last that long!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Thomas Wolstenholme on 5 Frames with a classic SLR – Why I Chose the Nikon FE

Comment posted: 13/01/2026

That's a good buy. I have had and used my FE since buying it new in 1980. While I also use a mirrorless and DSLR digital as well as 2 120 roll film SLR cameras, the FE still handles better than anything else I've ever had in my hands. Great camera and built to last. In all this time, i have only had to finally replace the light seals 2 years ago.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *