Coney Island with A Tele-Rolleiflex

By David Pauley

A flattened, sandy oval pressed like a wad of gum into Brooklyn’s ample instep, Coney Island has been a draw for photographers for as long as the medium has existed. Although its marshes and dunes gave way to urban sprawl by the late 19th century, the island retains a ribbon of beach that during the stifling summer months is a godsend to untold thousands of city-dwellers and the photographers who document their presence. Every summer day New Yorkers come here in droves, disgorged from nearby subways, seeking boardwalk, beach and ocean, a minor league baseball game or the charms of an amusement park. 

They travel long distances—two hours by subway from the Bronx!—for the same reasons their parents and grandparents did, or would have if they could: to claim their inheritence beside the Atlantic in the city’s most egalitarian public space. They come despite a lingering seediness, despite rats, overcrowding and biohazards. These include rip-currents, melinoma and such colorful urban bric-à-brac as spent condoms or used syringes bobbing on the tides. (Sightings of these last two, perennial in decades past, are thankfully less common these days). 

BEACHSCAPE, 2025

While I’ve not bathed in the waters off Coney Island since my twenties—July ’91 to be precise, a month endured like each of my early summers here without the benefit of air-conditioning—I have returned many times since to soak in the atmosphere. More than any other place I know, its boardwalk and beaches retain a sense of an earlier New York, flamboyant and unapologetic, at ease with its outer-borough accent and ready to strut. The island is in its way a rebuke to Times Square, a numbing mega-plex whose corporate makeover at the close of the last century dazzles out-of-town visitors but leaves many New Yorkers cold.

STOREFRONT DETAIL, 2025

In recent years my visits to Coney Island have unfolded in the company of my Tele-Rolleiflex, a camera tailor-made for the setting. Its telephoto lens, shot from a waist-level position, allows me to get close to the action without crowding my subjects. More than any other camera in my collection, its double-barreled snout also marks me as a character— “Mister Photographer,” as one Puerto Rican woman of a certain age (not so very far from my own) said as she called out to me on a recent visit. She is the beaming lady, second from the right, in the photo below.

“HEY MISTER PHOTOGRAPHER!” 2025

In any other place, that salutation, uttered aloud, might come with a dose of sarcasm, but here it was conveyed with an affectionate wink. In hindsight, this neoyorquina’s message reflects a deeper credo that these days seems almost quaint: wherever you’re from, however weird or eccentric, you belong here. On Coney Island, at least, that idea—hopelessly schmaltzy; American in the least xenophobic, the best sense—continues to flourish.

The “film roll” of frames below is composed from photos taken on two visits to Coney Island one year apart. In summer 2024 I made exposures mid-morning, when the light was still soft and the beach was filled with young children and their grandparents, many of them immigrants from Eastern Europe, Russia and Latin America. The later outing, this past August, occured in the heat of the day, with abundant exposed flesh and the beach and boardwalk under relentless direct sunlight having the quality of a great broiling bazaar (epitomized in the featured image at the top). The commodity peddled?

Summer—in all of its sweat and vitality.

Film Roll

TOES, 2024
BOREDOM, 2024
SISTERS, 2024
BOARDWALK, 2025
EIFFEL TOWER, 2025
CRABS, 2024
LIFEGUARD TRAINEE, 2025
DANCE, 2024
POISED, 2025
“LOOK, GRANDMA!” 2024
MERMAID, 2024
WONDER, 2025

Historical Note

The fifth image in this series shows the Parachute Jump, which soars 260 feet (80 meters) above the sand. A highlight of the 1939 World’s Fair, this structure—yes, it was an actual parachute jump—was relocated from Flushing Meadows to an amusement park in Coney Island in 1942. A landmark sometimes called “Brooklyn’s Eiffel Tower” (whether earnestly or ironically depends on the speaker), it ceased operations in 1960.

Technical Note

I shot these images on Kodak Tri-X 400 with a 1960 Tele-Rolleiflex whose native lens is the 135mm f4 Zeiss Sonnar. For frames dated 2024 I used PMK Pyrocat Developer; those dated 2025 were processed in Kodak HC-110. I scanned the negatives with a Fujifilm XT-50 digital camera with a 200 mm f2.8 Fujinon macro lens. Aside from cropping adjustments no digital alterations were made. I’ve printed most of the series in the darkroom on Ilford FB paper. Unsurprisingly, this makes the photos look great.

COVER IMAGE:  Great Broiling Bazaar, 2025

Share this post:

About The Author

By David Pauley
I'm a Brooklyn-based photographer and psychoanalyst. My journey with photography began in middle school in the late 1970s and revived in 2019 when I bought a used film camera and installed a darkroom in my basement. For 2025 I've decided to use just one camera, a Rolleiflex 2.8F, to document the year. While I am not on social media, you can reach me at [email protected].
Read More Articles From David Pauley

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
If you think £2.99 a month is too little, then please subscribe and I can manually edit the subscription value for you – thank you very much in advance if this is what you would like to do!

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Jukka Reimola on Coney Island with A Tele-Rolleiflex

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

Fine photos, indeed, David! They remind me of Coney Island photos by Harold Feinstein and Bruce Gilden, so you are in a good company.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

Thank you so much, Jukka! It's a great compliment to be mentioned in the same breath as HF and BG. I'm so happy you enjoyed the photos.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Stewart Waller on Coney Island with A Tele-Rolleiflex

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

Great images. Thanks for sharing.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

Thank you Stewart!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Matthew Bigwood on Coney Island with A Tele-Rolleiflex

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

Great shots, very atmospheric.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

I appreciate your kind words, Matthew!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Sergio Palazzi on Coney Island with A Tele-Rolleiflex

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

Fine and well told
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

Thank you so much, Sergio!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Stefan Wilde on Coney Island with A Tele-Rolleiflex

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

I second every praise written above! The black and white images bring a timelessness with them that I enjoy a lot. These wouldn't be out of place in a nice large photo book sitting on a coffee table!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

Thank you, Stefan! There is something about monochrome images that gives a timelessness for certain. I so appreciate your kind words.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Curtis Heikkinen on Coney Island with A Tele-Rolleiflex

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

Wonderful images! They look so good in black and white. Thanks for posting!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

Thanks so much, Curtis!!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Gary Smith on Coney Island with A Tele-Rolleiflex

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

Fantastic photos David. My mom visited Coney Island back in its heyday. Despite living in NJ with relative out on Long Island, I never made it there before beginning my long trek across the country (ending on the west coast). I keep thinking about a Rolleiflex, but so far I've resisted.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Kodachromeguy replied:

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

Don't resist. Just go buy one! It will be good for you.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

Thank you for the kind words, Gary! I've often wondered if there is a west coast equivalent to Coney Island. Venice Beach is the place that comes to mind, but I'll bet there are others as well. The Rolleis are wonderful -- even the earlier versions with the Zeiss Tessar or Opton lenses shoot beautifully , and they are much lighter weight and easier on the wallet than the later "F" models. I had an unfortunate accident with my Automat MX-EVS, a 1950 model I purchased for about $300. I need to get it repaired (I dropped it from a wall and mangled the viewfinder). When it's back in shape I may do a comparison with my fancy pants and much pricier 2.8F. I doubt most people could tell the difference in the photos they make. Sorry for the long digression but I really do love those cameras!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

Couldn't agree more!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Alastair Bell on Coney Island with A Tele-Rolleiflex

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

What a fabulous set of photos!

The feel is almost timeless and it's only really the clothing that gives it away.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

Thank you so much, Alastair! It's a very special place!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Kodachromeguy on Coney Island with A Tele-Rolleiflex

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

Fabulous, well done! As you noted, "wherever you’re from, however weird or eccentric, you belong here." That is what is so fun and entertaining on Coney Island.

A Tele-Rolleiflex, nice! Is the taking lens on your body intact, with no deamination?

Unfortunately, I have not been to Coney Island since 1999:

https://worldofdecay.blogspot.com/2017/12/from-archives-coney-island-1999.html
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

Thanks so much for your comments and for sharing the link to your article and photos, which I really enjoyed. Were the color photos kodachromes? I really missed the boat on shooting that particular emulsion. As for the Tele-Rolleiflex there's no delamination in the lenses thank goodness though I know that's a problem that can manifest itself at any point. My particular copy was pretty beat up and needed a CLA but since then has been working beautifully.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Kodachromeguy replied:

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

Indeed, those were all Kodachrome 25 film. Sorry you missed using Kodachrome. Sadly, we will never see it again.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

It's a real regret that I only returned to shooting film cameras in 2019, the better part of a decade too late as far as Kodachrome is concerned. Yours are a reminder of what all the fuss was about.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Stefan Wilde on Coney Island with A Tele-Rolleiflex

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

Never resist a Rolleiflex. It's you who loses out
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

Words to live by! I do love those cameras!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Walter Reumkens on Coney Island with A Tele-Rolleiflex

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

Great photos and beautifully written article.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

Thank you so much, Walter! I appreciate it!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ron Duda on Coney Island with A Tele-Rolleiflex

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

I really enjoyed your photographs. Before reading the text I looked at them and thought they were from another time. That’s part of the charm of black and white photographs. Perhaps in another generation from now someone looking at them might think they were taken just yesterday. Well done.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 26/10/2025

Thank you so much, Ron! I'm so happy you liked the photos.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Alexander Seidler on Coney Island with A Tele-Rolleiflex

Comment posted: 27/10/2025

Very atmospheric and friendly shots, David !
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 27/10/2025

Thank you, Alexander!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Michael Jardine on Coney Island with A Tele-Rolleiflex

Comment posted: 27/10/2025

These are amazing- I've only ever fiddled with a Tele-Rollei in an expensive camera shop, under the watchful eye of the proprietor... I'm lucky to have a 2.8F in my paws and you've made a compelling case for the immersive Rollei finder experience married to a longer lens. Coney alas only exists for me in my imagination and in my reception of images such as these, but so vividly! Also, bonus for using the word "schmaltzy"!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 27/10/2025

Thank you, Michael. The tele-Rolleis are quite amazing and are also one of my favorite cameras for portraits under the right circumstances. Unlike the wide Rolleis which command insane prices due to rarity they can be found for prices on the same level as a 3.5F. But as another poster here reminds us, lens delamination is something to watch out for. Apparently the glues they used to cement the lens elements in place can fail — a situation I hope to never have to deal with!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Charles Young on Coney Island with A Tele-Rolleiflex

Comment posted: 27/10/2025

Good job capturing the flavor of Coney Island!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 27/10/2025

Thank you so much, Charles!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain on Coney Island with A Tele-Rolleiflex

Comment posted: 27/10/2025

Wonderfully written - the writing really carried me there! Then the photos - wow! Wonderful life captured in lush tones
Great stuff as always
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 27/10/2025

Thank you Ibraar. I'm so glad you liked the writing and as always appreciate your feedback.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Scott Ferguson on Coney Island with A Tele-Rolleiflex

Comment posted: 27/10/2025

Hey David,
I am not at all surprised, but this is a remarkable post with amazing photos! I love the way you find really interesting frames with great graphic compositions whether the subject is people or a line of trash bins. And the quality of the Tri-X is terrific! I really like the look of the Tele-Rolleiflex -- very interesting piece of gear that I was not aware of. I also love your reflections on Coney Island, especially as contrasted with the corporate takeover of Times Square. I like finding those pockets of New York that have real personality, and Coney Island is a great one! Really great shooting and writing. Inspirational!
Best,
s
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 27/10/2025

Thank you so much, Scott! The Tele-Rolleiflex is an amazing piece of gear for sure, especially outdoors with some breathing room. The minimum focus distance is something like nine feet unless one uses close-up filters. I've never used that camera indoors in studio conditions (I don't do much of that anyway) but maybe as winter comes on I'll be tempted. With the f4 max aperture a flash would likely be essential. As for Coney Island maybe we can head out together there one of these days. As a photographer friend of mine, Lloyd Wolf, told me, it's a "target rich environment." Take care and thanks my friend.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Dean Lawrence on Coney Island with A Tele-Rolleiflex

Comment posted: 27/10/2025

Wonderful images David, and to reiterate what many before me have said, they do have a timeless atmosphere within them. Not just because of the mono, but maybe the format as well. I think my two favourite images here are, "Hey Mr. Photographer, and Lifeguard trainee. The first one of these with the ladies is excellent, a group of mixed ages escaping from normal for a while. Enjoying the sun, the atmosphere, the freedom to be happy, and they all look happy. The Lifeguard trainee on the other hand is serious, aware and ready to pounce. What I like most is the framing. He looks like a hero, and who knows, to someone he may well be.

A excellent set and I loved reading about your times taking images there. To quote Ben E King, " you can almost taste the hot dogs and French fries they sell". Of course slightly younger people may remember Bruce Willis saying the same, just not as well.

Really good post thank you for sharing.

Dean.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 27/10/2025

Dean, thanks so much for your encouraging words and for bringing the wonderful Ben E. King into your response -- a sure sign of success for any post about beaches and summertime! I hadn't thought of the square format contributing to the old-fashioned look of this set, but I'm sure you're right. I read somewhere that the natural aspect ratio of our field of vision is rectangular, and that the square format creates a bit of tension and perhaps distance. Not sure if that's true across the board but it may apply here. It's also interesting that the 2 photos you chose both show faces, albeit one in profile (the trainee). With children in particular I hesitate to make photos that show faces without asking for parental permission. The kids' photos here are meant mainly to evoke the atmosphere and suggest relationships to adults not as portraits per se. Once again thanks so much for your response.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Jeffery Luhn on Coney Island with A Tele-Rolleiflex

Comment posted: 28/10/2025

David,
I really enjoyed the collection of photos. You captured a lot of interesting moments. I'm guessing that folks weren't objecting to you shooting because you had an old style camera. The telephoto also helps, I'm sure. I'm a California boy, but I went to NYC for several years in a row for Toy Fair in February from 1983-1988. I told some local workmates I wanted to visit Coney Island and they all asked, "Why?" One of them took me there on a very cold Sunday. Freezing! The place was vacant except for...The Polar Bear Club swimmers! It's a group of adventurist folks that swim in the ocean in winter. New Years day is their big gathering, but they do their thing every winter all over the world. SO SAD I DIDN'T HAVE A CAMERA! It goes to prove that Coney Island is full of surprises.
I want to mention that Rolleicord TLR cameras are much less expensive, but deliver the same quality as the standard Rolleiflex models. Same lens, but a knob winder instead of a crank. Some other feature differences too. It's a good entry point for people wanting to buy what I feel is one of the best cameras ever made. Keep shooting and posting, David. I always enjoy your text and photos!
Jeffery
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 28/10/2025

Hi Jeffrey, Thanks so much for your comment and for the fantastic memory of Coney Island in Polar Bear season! I'll bet they still do that ... and if so I may have to borrow inspiration from you, don my warmest parka and head out for a look (with a camera!). We are often in upstate NY over New Years but I think this year may be the exception. Thank you also as always for the lovely words and generous encouragement. -DP

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Jeffery Luhn replied:

Comment posted: 28/10/2025

They are still at it! https://coneyislandpolarbearclub.com/ It's a big deal in San Francisco. My grandfather was a member. Started in 1903. I'm sure New Years Day will be huge at Coney Island. Good photo op!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Pauley replied:

Comment posted: 28/10/2025

Thanks for the link! I will have to go and have a look! (But NOT a dip!).

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *