Medium Format

A Yashica MAT 124G (and its auxiliary lenses) Review – By Aivaras

Yashica MAT 124G

I got my first medium format camera, a Mamiya 645 1000s, in 2017. It was a leap in quality and big change of workflow compared to 35mm; my process became slower, more contemplative, framing and composition became more thorough and the resulting photos became better.

I began with one lens: the 80mm f/1.9, and after some time I acquired my “usual set”, the 45mm f/2.8 for landscapes and 150mm f3.5 for tight headshots. However, not everything was flowers and candies. I had my own struggles that peaked during one portrait session, where I realized that I lose concentration and workflow of shooting because I fiddle too much with changing lenses – I was spending too much time thinking which one will suit the frame better. I also struggled too much the landscape orientation of camera. Finally, I felt that I wasn’t getting a true medium format “look” – to me 645 is great, but it just looks like slightly higher quality 35mm. I wanted the real medium format look – the look that I start to see from 6×6, 6×7, 6×8…

I began to grasp the idea that “less is more” and started to wonder what TLR with 6×6 and one fixed lens would give to me – I was expecting better MF look, and more concentration on scene, not on equipment. During the time of this contemplation, I got an unexpected message from a fellow photographer asking if I would be interested in selling Mamiya. Oh yes, I did! That was the trigger to depart from 645, and I started to dig deeper into the idea of a TLR.

The Yashica MAT 124G

The Yashica MAT 124G looked to me to be a good option. It has a lot of good reviews, good lens, a legend of it being a strong “rival to the Rolleiflex” and a reasonable price on market. So I gave it a go. And by the way, it’s beautiful machine itself too!

The Gains and Pains

Some things went as expected. To be limited in equipment – in most cases – is a very good thing. I had better concentration on the scene due to fact that I had no need, or even possibility to change the lenses. There is no necessity to pick vertical or horizontal composition – all you have is square. Though I did have to train the eye to see composition in square.

The biggest gain is that I left the entire “what lenses to take with me, what lens should I use for this shot” headache behind me.  That, again, means one important thing – I can look at the scene, analyze it, change the angle or position of the camera, integrate model or subject into the scene, think about light, shoot, analyze results, improve, move forward. This left me with a real feeling of liberation!

And then there is that real good medium format look in the pictures…

Of course, there are drawbacks and limitations that I can hardly overcome. Limited spaces where I struggle to get everything into frame, limited close focus abilities, the slower f/3.5 lens demanding more light, blurring backgrounds into nonexistence is more difficult due to the close focus ability and smaller maximum aperture.

But none of those limiting factors makes me feel that I lost something with the Yashica MAT 124G – I gained more!

But me being me, still thinking about obstacles, started to dig a bit deeper and deeper and found a way, a way that changed an attitude to TLR as a “fixed lens camera” to “system camera”. Of course, it means back to old habits!

Yashica MAT 124G, standard lens, Kodak Portra 400

Back to old habits

I discovered that the Yashica had a lot of accessories for its line of 6×6 TLR’s. The good thing is that those accessories are compatible with almost all Yashica TLR models. Some of them are even quite affordable. The ones that I was interested in and got are:

  • Lens hood. There are a lot of stories about Yashica MAT 124G lens flare. The short story is – use the hood. It helps.
  • Circular polarizer filter. Simple add on, but helps to deal with reflections – and what is more important – sometimes helps to handle harsh daylight.
  • Close Up lens. It helps to focus closer.
  • Yashica auxiliary TELEPHOTO lens. Makes standard lens longer.
  • Yashica auxiliary WIDE lens. Makes standard lens wider.

I will get back to the later three accessories in more detail after some talk about the standard camera and my story of getting it work for me. But I mention them now as it was the discovery of those add-ons that became the main motivator to write this article. At the point of gathering information – especially about the AUXILIARY WIDE and TELE lenses – I found information and sample photos very limited, so I got the idea that somebody could benefit from me writing up my wider experiences with this camera and all the extra kit I have bought for it.

Yashica MAT 124G, standard lens @f3.5, Ilford Delta 3200

Body and controls

So, first of all,  let’s return to basics and dig a bit deeper into standard camera, without all the add-ons.

The Yashica MAT 124G is built very sturdily and to what seems to me to be a high standards. All the controls are logical, easily accessible, and placed pretty much in the same places where one would look for them on almost any TLR.

The front of the Yashica MAT 124G contains both viewing and taking lenses. The shutter speed dial on right hand side, and aperture wheel on left. There is a threaded and lockable shutter button on bottom right side. There is a window on top of the viewing lens that shows selected aperture and shutter speed combination. The self-timer is located at left bottom part, below the taking lens.

Between taking and viewing lenses there is a flash sync lever – as I don’t use flash at all, I have only vague understanding what this thing does, but there is one important thing that every MAT owner should know: if you use the self timer, the flash sync lever has to be on the “X” position, otherwise the shutter will jam and camera will have to go to be serviced.

The integrated light meter is on top on both lenses – you can see the round window next to camera brand name and model designation.

The left hand side of the Yashica MAT 124G contains the focusing knob, battery chamber, film spool locking knobs, and flash mount. There is a simple film reminder function integrated into film knob.

The right hand side of the Yashica MAT 124G is simple. It has the film rewind/shutter cooking handle and exposure number window and ISO control dial. The selected ISO is shown through a window on the top.

All of these camera controls operate with assurance and precision. It’s perhaps not up to Rolleiflex level of control smoothness, but handling is a real pleasure!

The Viewfinder

Well I’ll start the Yashica MAT 124G viewfinder usability, as it seems it is a very subjective issue. Before buying the camera I had read that it has very bright finder, but coming from my Mamiya 645 1000s with f/1.9 lens, I can say that the viewfinder is definitely dimmer. On the other hand, it is as bright as my other TLR the Rolleiflex 2.8GX and my friend’s standard focusing screen in a Rolleiflex 2.8C.

As such, I have zero reservations about the viewfinder’s usability. It’s big, and under the right conditions (have to shield screen from stray light) I can see all the scene. Work with this TLR is a dream – I’m able to pre-visualize the shot, compose with high accuracy, and have time to contemplate. Not having to peek into a small SLR viewfinder is something you have to experience to understand.

Yashica MAT 124G, standard lens @f3.5, Kodak Tri-X 400

Focusing

Of course, it’s one thing is to be able to see the scene, and another to be able to focus accurately. The Yashica MAT 124G has several focusing screen options. Mine is the one with red one-third lines etched into it and with a bright fresnel in the center for accurate focusing. I like to shoot with the lens wide-open, so accurate focusing is critical to me. First thing is that it’s relatively easy to focus with high precision, even without a split screen option, focus “snap” in the center is evident. Other remarks:

  • I have to shield a screen from stray light to see everything accurately.
  • The use of inbuilt magnifier is a must.
  • I can’t focus on areas outside center bright zone. Focus on any other part of screen for me is a guessing game, the “bite” of focus is not that noticeable.

This all means that if you want to shoot wide open, you have to use a focus and recompose technique. Such methods of shooting is usual for me, so I give Yashica MAT 124G high praise for focusing comfort and accuracy.

A few more notes on other aspects that relate to focusing:

  • Movement of the focus knob is comfortable and predictable – this adds to pleasure of shooting.
  • Minimal focusing distance is 1 meter – this is a usual thing for TLRs.
  • My camera has a hard stop when focusing to infinity.

Inbuilt metering

Let’s start with a confession – I don’t use the meter in my Yashica MAT 124G. My means of metering is the excellent Lumu application on my iPhone. With app I can meter an average of the scene with the spot meter and do the rest I do in my head. But, if you want to know a bit more about Yashica MAT 124G metering – you’re welcome:

  • The minimum ASA/ISO is 25, maximum 400
  • It features match needle system – there are two needles that move according to the preset sensitivity of film and shutter speed/aperture combination. When those needles match in the window, exposure is correct.
  • Metering is not coupled with camera exposure control.
  • Exposure control is totally manual and dependant on user decision.
  • The meter turns itself on when finder hood is up. Close the hood and it will switch off.
  • It’s not “through-the-lens” metering. As mentioned, the meter sensor is on the top front of camera.
  • It uses obsolete 1,3 V mercury battery, and there it’s said on internet that if you use standard closest-to-the-original recommended battery lithium ones, the meter reading will be off.
  • Meters on these cameras are prone to stop working.

The meter wasn’t working at all, when I bought my Yashica MAT 124G. I then had the camera completely refurbished, and when I got it back it was working. I didn’t ask if it had been adjusted to work with 1.5v batteries or not, in fact when I sent camera to service, I didn’t say anything about the meter, because I didn’t care if it would work or not. As such, I don’t track how well it reads all the time, but I have noted that in low contrast scenes it shows correct exposures.

The Lens

Well… It’s awesome. From wide open to stopped down it performs incredibly well providing good resolution. It draws in a “vintage” style that I started to love from my first exposure. I would say that the Yashica MAT 124G compares to the Rolleiflex 2.8GX lens in terms of resolution, only the Flex has way better flare resistance and contrast in backlit scenarios, probably due to newer coatings. The overall character of Rollei and Yashica lenses is therefore very, very different.

The taking lens of my camera is a Yashinon Tessar type lens. What I learned from the internet is that in some Yashica MAT’s 124G’s there was another type of lens used called the Lumaxar Tessar. Versions with this lens are rarer – but whether the picture characteristics are different or not, I don’t know.

Lens hood, filters and other accessories are mounted by bayonet.

Yashica MAT 124G, standard lens @f3.5, Kodak Portra 400

Yashica MAT 124G, standard lens, Kodak Tri-X 400

Yashica MAT 124G, standard lens, Kodak Portra 400 

Yashica MAT 124G, standard lens @f3.5, Kodak Tri-X 400

Parallax error

After talking about the lens, it’s worth noting a specific TLR issue: parallax. Due to the fact that you look through one lens, and take pictures through another there is difference to what you see and what camera records on film. The point of view of the taking lens is always a bit lower, and closer you are, the more pronounced this effect is.

The Yashica MAT 124G doesn’t have any means to compensate this effect. Some other TLR manufacturers do include options to compensate or partly compensate this effect. But in real world usually it’s not significant. From further away, I don’t worry about parallax error. When closer up, now I have gained experience with it I have started to make compensation automatically. Sometimes, if parallax error is really worrying me, I will leave some place for cropping.

Troubles…

Buying used old film cameras like the Yashica MAT 124G is risky thing. I found my Yashica on ebay and it looked as new. The description also stated that camera is in excellent shape. And I can say that it was, but it appeared that some things needed to be sorted out. The first thing that I noticed, but didn’t care about, was the non-functioning light meter. Then I noted that the focusing knob had a bit of an uneven movement, I also had a feeling that on one part of its travel it was “grinding” a bit – not a problem, but more of an annoying issue. Third, when I got Yashica my viewfinder was rather dim. I read half of the internet and had a theory that the mirror behind focusing screen had got a bit dim due to its age. Then I got some results back and discovered the biggest issue: an excess of haze in the lens.

…and solutions

I’m perfectionist and so the biggest issue that this camera faced was my attitude. I researched where I can have my camera serviced and found out about Mark Hama in US. His story is very fascinating one. Here is short version:

He lived in Japan and worked in Yashica factory, where he was assembling new Yashica MAT 124G’s. At some point he moved to live in US and opened camera repair service. After they stopped producing the camera and stopped servicing them themselves, Yashica sent all the remaining spare parts of MAT 124G to him. Now, and for some time, he has been the god of all Yashica TLR’s. He has a MAT’s rebuild service. You send your camera to him, he disassembles it into final pieces and assembles it back changing necessary parts. Basically what you get back is your same old camera… but it’s like a new one.

So I did it. The rice was still reasonable, though the process took about half a year. If you do it, keep in mind, while Mark’s work is outstanding, communication is not the best, if you want an update, you have to be the one who enquires about what’s going on, and if it’s going on. Maybe others have different experience, but that’s mine. I’m not whining at all though – Mark is god send for Yashica MAT 124G owners, and in the I’m a very happy customer!

All the pictures I have shared so far were made prior to when I had my Yashica MAT 124G refurbished. All pictures after this point were made with camera after the service. Here are a few taken with the standard lens:

Yashica MAT 124G, standard lens @f3.5, Kodak Portra 400

Yashica MAT 124G, standard lens, Kodak Ektar 100

Yashica MAT 124G, standard lens @f3.5, Kodak Portra 400

Yashica MAT 124G, standard lens @f8, Kodak Portra 800

And now let’s get to the part where the Yashica MAT 124G starts to be system camera with its different add-ons:

Close-up lens

The standard Yashica MAT 124G lens focuses down to 1 meter. There are two original close-up lenses available: no. 1 (the one that I have) that enables focus in 44-66cm range, and no. 2 that enables focus in the 36-45cm range.

It’s worth noting that both lenses have a Parallax correction feature. This means that the viewing lens has a lens that is mounted with an angle that creates a change of direction of the viewpoint, the my experience is that parallax is not totally corrected. It’s worth noting that due to inbuilt parallax correction feature, you have to mount the viewing lens in correct way, otherwise the exposure will be way different to what you saw in viewfinder.

Regarding image quality I didn’t notice any degradation compared to the standard lens, but depth of field is extremely thin.

Yashica MAT 124G, close up lens no. 1 @f3.5, Kodak Portra 400

Yashica MAT 124G, close up lens no. 1 @f3.5, Kodak Tri-X 400

Yashica MAT 124G, close up lens no. 1 @f8, Kodak Gold 200 expired in 1992

Yashica MAT 124G, close up lens no. 1 @f16, Kodak Portra 800

Yashica MAT 124G, close up lens no. 1 @f3.5, Kodak Gold 200 expired in 1989 desaturated

Yashica MAT 124G, close up lens no. 1 @f16, Kodak Portra 800

The Yashica telephoto lens

It’s the Frankenstein mode for Yashica Mat 124G. Cool looking isn’t it?

The telephoto and wide-angle lenses comes as a pair. The bigger goes to taking lens, smaller to viewing lens. The purpose of smaller lens on viewing lens is to provide same viewing area as taking lens record on film and at the same time to enable proper focusing.

The Yashica Telephoto lens increases the focal range of standard 80mm lens by approx. 50% and therefore makes it equivalent to a 112.8mm lens without sacrificing maximum f/3.5 aperture. At the same time it increases minimal focus range by 50cm, making it 1.5 meter. The distance scale on focusing knob become useless due to the change of minimal focusing distance.

My initial idea to get this lens, besides feeling like I just needed to try it was that I could get even shallower depth of field from the widest f/3.5 aperture and maybe get some interesting even more vintage bokeh.

Rendering and image quality

Sharpness is ok. Color rendition is a bit different comparing to standard lens. There is increased “vintage” lens feel to picture.

Yashica MAT 124G, Yashica telephoto lens @f5.6, Kodak Portra 400

Bokeh

Different. I cant say that DOF is shallower, but bokeh is less smooth and there is a swirl effect.

Yashica MAT 124G, Yashica auxiliary telephoto lens @f3.5, Kodak Gold 200 expired in 1992

Usage flaws

Here comes the elephant in the room. It’s difficult, in fact, near-impossible to critically focus my camera with this lens. Focus snap is fine, but when the viewfinder shows that lens is focused properly, the taking lens front-focused. In short – viewfinder lies to me. For example in picture above you can see it focused on laundry pegs, but I was trying to focus on the scull…

So for my intended use – portraits with critical focus and wide open aperture – this lens is not suitable.

Of course, there could be possibility that something is wrong with the viewing lens. I can’t confirm, or deny this. Stopping down the lens does decreases the amount of problem, but there seems little point with what I am trying to achieve with this camera.

The Yashica wide-angle lens

The Yashica WIDE lens reduces the focal range of standard 80mm lens by 25% and makes it 58.4mm lens. It decreases minimal focus range by 50 cm, making it 50 cm. Again, the distance scale on focusing knob becomes useless due to change of minimal focusing distance.

Whilst in with the tele-lens I didn’t get anything that was that useful to me, I did with the wide-angle. Simply, I can get more into frame where the space is limited. It also enables me to get more dynamic compositions because transformation of angles and ability to manipulate with leading lines differently than with standard lens. Though it’s not without its quirks!

Rendering and image quality

This lens is like Jekyll & Hyde, like two lenses in one. I can use it as a lo-fi, special effect lens when shooting wide open or I can use it as a wide lens with some allowances when stopped down or shooting close-ups.

A vignette is often more present – sometimes I notice more, sometimes less at the same aperture. I will have to shoot more with it to understand. Distortion, especially at the edge of the frame is huge.

Sharpness is acceptable in the center of the image, even with wide open apertures.

Yashica MAT 124G, Yashica auxiliary wide-angle lens @f3.5, Kodak Gold 200 expired in 1992

Yashica MAT 124G, Yashica auxiliary wide-angle lens @f3.5, Kodak Portra 160

It’s sharper across image when stopped down with good contrast.

Yashica MAT 124G, Yashica auxiliary wide-angle lens @f8, Kodak Portra 160

Wide open at distance, is where things are different – it renders surreal photos that looks like they have some sort of underwater effect applied. I like it, under the right conditions it can make dull picture an interesting one.

Yashica MAT 124G, Yashica auxiliary wide-angle lens @f3.5, Kodak Portra 160

Yashica MAT 124G, Yashica auxiliary wide-angle lens @f3.5, Kodak Portra 160

Bokeh

Surreal would be good way to describe the Bokeh from the wide lens. Just take a look at this picture below. I love it!

Yashica MAT 124G, Yashica auxiliary wide-angle lens @f3.5, Kodak Portra 160

Usage flaws

This lens has very interesting look – this could be a feature or a flaw if you are looking for “perfect” picture characteristic. Basically, it’s usable, but it depends on preferences!

Lens Comparisons

For the end of the post, I will share some comparison shots. I made some test pictures when I got both auxiliary lenses just in order to understand the difference in focal range and to test focusing. The camera was fixed on tripod. Two pictures with each lens, one with an open aperture and one stopped down to f8.

I managed to miss the focus on few of them, therefore the f/8 shots are better comparison – I’ll provide some remarks with pictures.

f/3.5 test shots

Yashica MAT 124G, Yashica standard lens @f3.5, Kodak Portra 160Think I managed to miss the focus on this one…

Yashica MAT 124G, Yashica auxiliary telephoto lens @f3.5, Kodak Portra 160

Yashica MAT 124G, Yashica auxiliary wide-angle lens @f3.5, Kodak Portra 160Think I managed to miss the focus on this one…

f/8 test shots

Yashica MAT 124G, Yashica standard lens @f8, Kodak Portra 160

Yashica MAT 124G, Yashica auxiliary telephoto lens @f8, Kodak Portra 160

Yashica MAT 124G, Yashica auxiliary wide-angle lens @f8, Kodak Portra 160 – Note distortion on both sides of picture.

Final thoughts

A short summary of the Yashica MAT 124G: this camera is awesome! The standard lens is outstanding with specific “vintage lens” look into images though the lens hood is a must!

In terms of the other accessories I have bought, my experience is that the close focus lens is very useful addition. I’ve not had much luck with the telephoto lens which is practically useless to me due to an inability to focus it properly – I just zoom in with my feet instead. The wide lens helps in special situations with some allowances for image quality. It also lets me creates some fairly surreal, artsy images if used in a way that plays on its flaws.

As for my personal story going from a complicated camera setup, to a simple one-camera-one-lens setup – in the end I didn’t ruin my tranquility and concentration by getting involved with the accessories. Everything still falls into place with the Yashica MAT 124G. I know what tool to use for each occasion and don’t get bogged down fussing and playing with gear instead of getting the job (fun) done.

Thanks for bearing with me and this long story! As usual more shots could be found here: http://www.beautifulgrain.com

Do you enjoy reading 35mmc?

For as little as $1 a month, you can help support the upkeep of this website. The more people chuck me a small amount of cash each month, the more time I can spend building and improving upon it - simple as that!
Or, for $2 a month you can get access to my behind the scenes micro-blog over on Patreon!

Either way, want to help out, become a patron of 35mmc here:

Become a Patron!

Alternatively, if you just enjoyed this post, or like the odd post here and there, please feel free to chuck a few pennies in the tip jar via Ko fi here:


Write for 35mmc: read more here, about how you can help build upon this ever growing resource
Subscribe/Follow: click here, to discover all the ways you can follow 35mmc

Advertisement

You Might Also Like

14 Comments

  • Avatar
    Reply
    eric
    June 28, 2019 at 10:21 am

    Agree with you and according to the price and image quality : awesome best deal for films cameras

  • Avatar
    Reply
    Zvonimir
    June 28, 2019 at 10:28 am

    Excellent review, sir. Easily the most thorough that I have seen in this site. There are several other 6×6 cameras that are worthy of your attention. One is the Minolta Autocord: build quality, lens quality are as fine as the 124. One important advantage: it has a film pressure plate, something that Yashica should not have overlooked. The other camera is the Super Ikonta 111 folder. Its lens is the ancient Cooke triplet, which must be stopped down to at least f8 for decent resolution, but it can produce very fine negatives in bright weather. Major advantage: Folded, it fits in my hip pocket, perfect for camping trips in the former Ottoman empire.

    P.S. Square format doesn’t matter in the darkroom. You can crop any way you want. Z

    • Avatar
      Reply
      Aivaras
      June 28, 2019 at 4:55 pm

      Thank you. I was thinking about Autocord, but what pushed me into MAT was 80mm lens instead of 75 and… well frankly speaking MAT is the most handsome TLR for me 🙂

      • Avatar
        Reply
        Scott
        June 30, 2019 at 1:04 am

        Yes; Plus 1 for the Autocord.

  • Avatar
    Reply
    Phil Harrison
    June 28, 2019 at 11:54 am

    Excellent review, well done! I especially agree with your comments: “I realized that I lose concentration and workflow of shooting because I fiddle too much with changing lenses” and “I began to grasp the idea that “less is more”. My experience exactly. I had a Yashicamat in the early 70’s and did many weddings with lovely results, mind you my camera was nearly new, they were still making them then!

    • Avatar
      Reply
      Aivaras
      June 28, 2019 at 4:53 pm

      Thanks. Well these days I’m all about not acquiring, but reducing gear and simplifying. “Less is more” is very liberating…

  • Avatar
    Reply
    Graham Orbell
    June 28, 2019 at 8:55 pm

    Aivaras thanks for your comprehensive review. Back in the mid ‘60s I started my career in photography by managing a busy photography store. We had just received an order of the latest Rolleiflexes and had a showcase full of them. Then soon afterwards the store owners arrived and told the sales manager to send them all back to the agents. Our parent company had just obtained the national agency for Yashica. Not long after that our showcase was filled with Yashicamats which sold very well. I can’t remember the price difference but it may have been around 50% less.
    In my opinion, the Rolleiflex has a bit better quality of build but the difference is not great and the results are pretty well indistinguishable.
    I currently own a Rolleiflex and a Rolleicord both from about 1955 and both in as new condition. I also had a Yashicamat that I gave to my grandson when he briefly became interested in photography. I could hardly have a use for 3 TLRs in the digital age.
    A couple of days ago I bought a roll of Portra 400 for the Rolleiflex and will soon be enjoying using film once more. Hopefully my grandson might be inspired to use the Yashicamat.

    • Avatar
      Reply
      Terry B
      June 30, 2019 at 1:03 pm

      Graham, the price difference you quote is around the mark, but if one says a Rollei was somewhere around double the price of a Yashicamat, this will give a better idea of the price differential. Double the price is more emotive than 50% less. In real money, here are the prices in Wallace Heaton’s Blue Books, just to give proper comparisons. At this time in the mid-1960 period, the direct Rollei camera would be the basic Rolleiflex T. In reality, the Rollei is closer to 2 1/4 times the price, rising to nearly 2 1/2 times by 1968/69. Given the general quality of the Yashica lens one can see why they were popular.

      1964/65 Yashicamat £39/14/7 Rolleiflex T £91/2/10
      1968/69 Yashicamat £54/6/6 Rolleiflex T £135/3/0

  • Avatar
    Reply
    Terry B
    June 28, 2019 at 10:06 pm

    A nice overview of the last in the wonderful line of Yashica TLR’s.

    I got my first ‘Mat in 1963 and that one had a particularly fine lens. The lens in my second ‘Mat wasn’t as good. I purchased both cameras new, so there could only be batch variation to blame. So buying today, what should we expect from used/abused samples? This is probably why getting a 124G. the last of the line, should be a safer, but not necessarily so, option. As I did my own B/W d&p this experience prompted my move to a Mamiya C330f (and much later to a 330S and Rolleiflex 3.5f and which I still have) and whose lenses were superior to even my first ‘Mat. The comparisons using analogue photographic enlargements i.e. wet process prints, and not digital scans, were noticeable, although I wouldn’t say that the differences bore any resemblance to price differences, and how good the negs were from my first ‘Mat, which attests to the high standard, generally, of the Yashinon, and the overall good value of the Yashica camera.

    For those interested in the range of Yashica TLR cameras, probably the best site is Paul Sokk’s. He’s devoted a lot of time to the history of Yashica TLR’s and is a mine of information. Find it here: http://www.yashicatlr.com/index.html

  • Avatar
    Reply
    jon campo
    June 29, 2019 at 2:05 am

    This was an excellent review and all the more interesting with the accessories that you very patiently tested. Your pictures are very good and I actually really like the the examples taken with the wide angle accessory lens. I had similar issues with a Hasselblad kit that I decided to replace with a TLR. I do agree that the 124’s are handsome beasts, unfortunately my camera which i’ve had for many years and bought from the original owner is a real piece of junk that has had to go for service multiple times. The lens is OK but nothing special and I was happy to replace it with a Rolleicord which is what I should have bought in the first place. I haven’t sold it because I would feel bad inflicting it on anyone else. Mark Hama is a gentleman and a consummate professional but he is not young. He also does great work on Rolleis by the way. Keep making those great pictures.

  • Avatar
    Reply
    Huss
    June 29, 2019 at 3:23 am

    Excellent review and pics! I have, umm, three Rolleiflexes but still picked up a Yash 124G because the price seemed too good to pass up on. And I was curious. Really bright focusing screen, very easy to focus. Nice size. Super sharp images. But… there was something wrong with the film transport and so the images were overlapping. I’m sure fixable but I wasn’t in the mood as I already have the other TLRs to use, and was tired of going down that CLA rabbit hole! It was returned to the seller.
    So yeah, if you get a good one they are wonderful cameras.

  • Avatar
    Reply
    Kodachromeguy
    June 29, 2019 at 3:52 am

    Very nice overview of the Yashica-Mat! I like all your pictures but am especially drawn to the first one, the stream (or sewer?) outfall with frosty branches. This is the type of scene where the square composition really shines. A few thoughts:
    1. I think the wide adapter at f/8 is totally useable.
    2. Mark Hama repaired a RolleifleX 3.5E for me that had been fouled up by another Rolleiflex repairman. Mark did a great job and within a couple of weeks, as I recall. (The other repairman was once regarded as one of the experts in the USA, but he was clearly past his prime and had become sloppy.)
    Now you have inspired me to put a roll of Panatomic-X in my Rolleiflex and head out.

  • Avatar
    Reply
    Charles Morgan
    June 29, 2019 at 2:56 pm

    A delight to read a review by someone who so clearly understands the camera and what it can offer. Exceptionally thorough too. I love TLRs, especially ones like this that have the whole of the Bayonet 30 systems at their fingertips (like my Rolleicord) for a very reasonable price. I doubt I’ll ever get a Yashica as I love my Rolleiflex 3.5f to death, but it’s a super camera!

  • Avatar
    Reply
    Aivaras
    June 29, 2019 at 8:18 pm

    Thank You all for positive feedback in comments and Your personal stories too!

  • Leave a Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Pin It on Pinterest

    Share This

    Thank you for commenting

    ...now share the post with your friends?