5 Frames with a Voigtlander 40mm f/2 in Nikon F Mount

By Mrigank Shekhar

I’ve always been a bit of a black sheep when it comes to my personal preferences. Hence my likeness is for a 40mm lens rather than a 35 or a 50. It gives me just enough wide perspective to show the composition, and at the same time, it allows me to be able to get up close to someone and yet, not let it feel like a portrait.

Don’t get me wrong, I love my M6 but I do wish I had a 40mm frame lines on it. Now I do have plenty of cameras but none of them really have a 40mm option, so when I saw the Voigtlander 40mm f/2 option for my Nikon F2, I knew this would be a favorite setup right after my Leica M6 combined with a 35mm lens.

To check the sharpness and the color of this lens I quickly loaded up a Provia 100F in the F2. In the picture below, we just finished summer and I was out on a beach one fine weekend quite excited to take some pictures. Here are the results from that outing.

The kid was trying to look over the fence and it just felt like a perfect picture. Wide enough but still up close and personal.
This next picture made me chuckle, the person is soaking up the sun but the face is imposed from the magazine instead.
The pastel colors of this picture were appealing and full of the summer vibe. How could I not take a film picture? Ha!
A somber picture? Maybe?
The standard giant wheel picture with all the red I wanted.

I was blown away with the results. The lens is tack sharp and it has that character where it represents all the colors as they are supposed to be. Not at any point did I feel that I had to fiddle with the lens, everything is where it’s supposed to be. To me the composition was easy because of that 40mm length. It just felt an extension of myself. I mostly took pictures with aperture ranging from F5.6 to F11 and the results speak for themselves. I’d be interested to hear from anyone else who has shot one of these lenses, or perhaps finds 40mm to work for them so well too!

Share this post:

About The Author

By Mrigank Shekhar
Full time corporate slave, taking pictures at any other given moment. Started my photography journey with film in 2015 when I was a youngster and never gave up. After all the years I still feel I'm a humble student of film, i experiment and I'm not afraid to make mistakes, which by the way I've made many!
Read More Articles From Mrigank Shekhar

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £3.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Ralph Turner on 5 Frames with a Voigtlander 40mm f/2 in Nikon F Mount

Comment posted: 16/08/2026

Excellent results, Mrigank. For me, 40-45mm always feels a little more natural or instinctive to how I see a scene. My little Canon 40mm f2.8 pancake is one of my faves.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Art Meripol replied:

Comment posted: 16/08/2026

Ralph, I’ve used that same little sweet lens on my GFX as well as my Canon.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ralph Turner replied:

Comment posted: 16/08/2026

That's interesting, Art. I never realised that EOS lenses are fully adaptable to GFX (in ignorance, I had to look this up) - presumably without any sensor coverage issues. It certainly a lens seems to punch above it's weight and appears to work well whether on digital or film.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Erik Brammer replied:

Comment posted: 16/08/2026

I am using full frame 85 mm and 135 mm Zeisses on my GFX, and depending on focal length you need to stop down quite a bit (and still get vignetting) or you use the built-in 35mm mode. I like that setup very much. Otherwise, I also like the 40 mm focal length (or equivalent in medium format) very much as it feels very natural to me. Great photographs, Mrigank!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Art Meripol replied:

Comment posted: 16/08/2026

It may be the best overall from Canon for that sensor, with an adaptor of course. I was using the Canon 24 Tilt/Shift on the GFX and it was ok if you didn’t shift too far but just never seemed as sharp as the sensor would need. I ended up going with the GFX 20-35 for architectural work since the 30mm GF lens was unavailable for several years.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Argentix on 5 Frames with a Voigtlander 40mm f/2 in Nikon F Mount

Comment posted: 16/08/2026

I mostly use my 40mm Nokton 1,4 and my Heliar 2,8 on my Minolta CLE, which has a 40mm frame in its viewfinder. Great lenses both, i love also 40mm , as a good compromise between 35 and 50mm. Thanks for your beautiful pictures.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Shalini on 5 Frames with a Voigtlander 40mm f/2 in Nikon F Mount

Comment posted: 16/08/2026

I don't understand any of the photography jargon you use, but I absolutely love the photographs! They have such life in them!!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Markus Larjomaa on 5 Frames with a Voigtlander 40mm f/2 in Nikon F Mount

Comment posted: 16/08/2026

I started this hobby with a Canonet so I first learned with a 40mm and that’s what I keep coming back to. I’ve loved that focal length or thereabouts on fixed lens rangefinders, Olympus OM system and now Leicas. I wouldn’t worry too much about not having 40mm frame lines. The 35mm frame on your M6 is most probably on the conservative side anyway, might well be closer to 40 than 35. I’ve found that the whole viewfinder area on my M3 is practically perfect for 40mm (with 40/2 M-Rokkor) and with Barnacks and the 40/2.8 Heliar I use an old Altissa Altix 35mm viewfinder that is probably also on the conservative side or with my Leica Standard just its own viewfinder that feels somewhat a bit wider than 50mm. Never felt handicapped for not having a ”proper” viewfinder nor felt that I’d must invest a small fortune on the metal Voigtländer 40mm finder.

Still haven’t replaced my 50s and 35 with the 40mm Ultron on my Nikons, but I think the day will come… :)
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

BG replied:

Comment posted: 16/08/2026

Some people claim using the whole viewfinder area on a M3 is about the coverage of a 35mm lens. I found it clumsy and variable depending on how far left and right that I squinted through the finder. So I bought a 35mm finder for the flash shoe. Leirz made a 36mm finder for their X1 camera. That finder should be good enough for a 40mm lens.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Markus Larjomaa replied:

Comment posted: 16/08/2026

The whole M3 finder window might not be wide enough for 35mm focal length, but it might well be really close to other M Leicas’ 35mm framelines ;)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Richard Arbib on 5 Frames with a Voigtlander 40mm f/2 in Nikon F Mount

Comment posted: 16/08/2026

I agree that the 40mm is a happy medium between the 35 and 50mm lenses. I've owned my Minolta CLE since 1981 and most of my photos are taken with the 40mm f2 M-Rokkor lens.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith on 5 Frames with a Voigtlander 40mm f/2 in Nikon F Mount

Comment posted: 16/08/2026

I don't own a single 40mm. I have 35's and 50's out the wazoo. Also (TBH) I don't really understand the whole thing with frame lines. I don't generally agonize over the width of my shots in the finder as I'm comfortable with cropping in post. Different strokes...

Thanks for sharing, Mrigank!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Steve Macfarlane on 5 Frames with a Voigtlander 40mm f/2 in Nikon F Mount

Comment posted: 16/08/2026

Lovely photos and thanks for posting!! I’ve had this lens for 7 or 8 years and it’s a favorite of mine for all the reasons you state. It practically lives on my Nikon FM2n, and I’ve also used it extensively on my F2. My Flickr page, www.flickr.com/photos/bingley0522, has an album devoted to photos made w/ this lens. An interesting note is that it also focuses as closely as the Micro-Nikkor 55 lenses. I’m also a huge fan of 40mm lenses, and own quite a few. I use the 40mm focal length as a tighter 35mm lens rather than as a stand-in for 50mm. Along the way, I picked up a Voightlander brightline finder in 40mm, which I use when shooting the amazing and tiny Heliar 40mm f2.8 ASPH on my barnack Leicas. One of my favorite kits for travel is a 40mm lens and a 75mm lens. A couple of other thoughts:
(1) 40mm lenses work well on Leica M6 cameras, bc the 35mm framelines on the M6 are “tighter” than on, say, the M2 or M4 cameras; Leica shrank them slightly in order to accommodate 28mm framelines in the M6 finders. Thus, from about 10 ft. on, the 35mm framelines on the M6 will give you effectively a 40mm field of view. I’ve filed down the flanges on a couple of my favorite 40s (the M-Rokkor 40/2.0 and the Nokton 40mm/1.4) so those lenses will bring up the 35mm framelines on my M6 classic. (2) The viewfinder on the M3 most certainly can be used to frame with 40mm lenses. I often shoot my 40 lenses on an M3 this way and have little difficulty framing.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jeffery Luhn on 5 Frames with a Voigtlander 40mm f/2 in Nikon F Mount

Comment posted: 17/08/2026

Nice shots! I have a Canonet with a fixed 40mm and it gets as much use as any of my high priced cameras. The 40mm is very Goldilocks. (sp?)
Your shots make buying that lens tempting...if I didn't already have a couple 35mm.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Hume on 5 Frames with a Voigtlander 40mm f/2 in Nikon F Mount

Comment posted: 17/08/2026

Hi Mrgirank


I like these shots, and like that you've cropped them 5:4 - nice compositions! I use 40mm (equivalent) on my fuji crop cameras - I have a Voigtlander 27mm in X mount on my XP3.

I've never bothered with looking for a 40mm on my Nikons, and usually leave a 50 on them (but oddly I find the 50 equivalent 35mm a bit tight on a Fuji, which I know does not make sense)

I did think it was sensible that Nikon released a 40mm f2 with the Zf though...

Cheers
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Walter Reumkens on 5 Frames with a Voigtlander 40mm f/2 in Nikon F Mount

Comment posted: 17/08/2026

The first lens I bought with my Nikon FE2 in the late 1970s was the Nikkor-Ai 35mm/F2. It’s one of the best Nikkor lenses and I still use it today. So why a 40mm? Either I’ll move a little closer to the subject or crop the image afterwards. It would be different if I were starting out with a new camera system and needed a lightweight wide-angle lens. In that case, I’d simply buy the ‘better’ lens. That’s why, when I switched to the Nikon Z system, I opted for the Nikkor Z 40mm f/2 SE, which I’m very happy with and which is a perfect match for the Nikon Zf. It all depends on your own shooting habits. For 35/40/50mm, one lens is enough, plus a 28mm to cover the wider end, or better still, a 24mm straight away. Thanks for the photos and your article.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 17/08/2026

Of course, it should say ‘Nikon FE’ at the top. Its successor wasn’t launched until 1983. Sorry!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *