Kodak DX6340 – A Day With a 2003 Digicam for Jankuary

By Michael Zwicky-Ross

I mentioned in my last post that I am a compulsive collector of Kodak cameras and have a number that I have never used. The current Jankuary January strand prompted me to look for something suitable to use and perhaps review. To the top of the list came an EasyShare DX6340 from 2003. Original list price $329. With a maximum resolution of 2032 x 1536, effectively 3.1 megapixels, perhaps I should not expect too much. On the other hand, it has everything I look for in a camera: viewfinder with diopter adjustment; playback screen; a 36mm – 144mm equivalent zoom; dry-cell battery capability and it takes SD cards. What’s not to like?

There’s a full write-up on DPREVIEW here

The first thing I notice is that the Kodak DX6340 is quite a chunky thing not dissimilar in feel to a compact 35mm camera. The viewfinder is tiny but I can see to the edge of the frame even with spectacles on. Ok, time for some batteries. Having downloaded the 122-page instruction manual I note that for acceptable battery life alkaline cells are not recommended but as that’s all I have they will have to do. It seems to fire up anyway, the lens shutter slides away and the lens extends by a few centimetres. I press the review button and discover that I took two pictures in 2016, presumably when I first bought it. That’s interesting, it must have some internal memory. Page 10, Internal Memory: 16MB. Let’s put an SD card in anyway as I don’t think I have a suitable cable for image transfer. The first card I tried was 32GB which was rejected. Of course, in 2003 cards would max out at less than 1GB I think. A deep dive in the accessories box produces a 512MB card good for over 300 pictures. At this point, having set the time and date, checked that we are on the highest quality and delved through the menus I’ve nearly killed the first set of cells. They weren’t kidding about the battery life, this thing must take some current.

Kodak EasyShare DX6340 front view
Front view with lens closed
Kodak EasyShare DX6340 rear view
Rear view showing Mode Dial, Preview Screen and Menu buttons

The weather is not great today, gloves necessary but it’s not actually raining so let’s go for a walk and see what we can shoot.

Pennington Church - wide angle
Pennington Church – wide angle
Pennington Church - full telephoto
Pennington Church – full telephoto
Union Jack Flag
A patriotic neighbour
cows eating silage
The next door dairy farm
blue sky with heliecopter
Blue sky with helicopter
abstract art
Our granddaughter’s latest creation! (date set wrongly)
still life with flowers

I have to say I’m quite impressed with the Kodak DX6340. Everything was taken on full automatic apart from the indoor picture of some flowers when I used the flowers setting. Everything is in focus, there’s texture in the sky so it seems to have handled exposure well. Obviously there’s not a fabulous amount of detail but plenty for a 7” x 5” print and the colour rendering is excellent. I’ve always liked the look of CCD sensors.

Would I use it again? Probably not. It’s neither small enough for a jeans pocket nor capable enough for a main camera but I certainly enjoyed using it until I dropped it. The down side of gloves. I’m off to eBay now to look for another one for the collection.

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Michael Zwicky-Ross
Enthusiastic amateur and collector of all things Kodak
View Profile

Comments

Ibraar Hussain on Kodak DX6340 – A Day With a 2003 Digicam for Jankuary

Comment posted: 26/01/2024

Great write up and lovely photos
The colours are so so nice - especially the reds which pop! Those Kodak colours are the best
You’ve inspired me - I used to have a few Kodak Easyshare cameras - my favourites were the V705 dual lens and the Z990 Easyshare max.
I’m on the lookout for another V705 - mine broke while trekking in 2009. Also the P880 is one I always wanted.
Thanks again
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Michael Zwicky-Ross replied:

Comment posted: 26/01/2024

Thank you very much for your kind comments Ibraar. I was really surprised how bright and vibrant (and also accurate) the colours turned out. I have several other Easyshare models but none of the numbers you reference so it's back to the search I think!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Steven G on Kodak DX6340 – A Day With a 2003 Digicam for Jankuary

Comment posted: 26/01/2024

Nice. I'm impressed with the colour reproduction of some of these early digicams.
On thing that I realised is that at least in my case, one often didn't get the full benefit of those colours back in the day. My family had a Windows XP laptop, which served very well for years, but in hindsight the colour gamut coverage of that old LCD panel was horrendous, and I think shifted towards blue as well.
Now, however, a large proportion of newer devices have very decent screens and we see the 'true colours shining through" as it were. ;-)
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Michael Zwicky-Ross replied:

Comment posted: 26/01/2024

Thank you for your kind comments. I have only recently replaced my compact-fluorescent back-lit monitors with LED ones and it's amazing how much brighter and more true to life they are.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scott Gitlin on Kodak DX6340 – A Day With a 2003 Digicam for Jankuary

Comment posted: 01/02/2024

Very much enjoyed your article. I believe this camera has a CCD sensor rather than CMOS . . . and vintage CCD cameras are becoming an "item."
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Michael Zwicky-Ross replied:

Comment posted: 01/02/2024

Thank you for your comments. You are of course correct about it having a CCD sensor and I'm sure that abbreviation was in my mind when I typed CMOS That's definitely a failure of proof-reading!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *