Fujifilm X half – A few frames taken with a Camera From a World I Don’t Understand

By David Hume

This little thing is fun.

That’s the main takeaway — the key word that came up over and over again on a recent photo walk in my hometown of Adelaide, South Australia. The event was hosted by Ted’s Camera Stores and by Fujifilm, and five punters were given a Fuji X half for an hour to stroll the streets and take some photos, followed by an hour in a café over pizza and hot chocolate to warm up and talk cameras.

So – a bit of context about my images. Because it was a night walk and this little thing purported to have film sims I thought I’d see if I could bring a bit of a “Velvia at night” vibe, and hark back to a five frames I posted here in 2019. That was real Velvia 100 in a Nikon F4 and you can see those here.

I didn’t plan to write about the X half at the time, so I didn’t ask anyone’s permission to use identifiable photos — and I didn’t ask their ages or genders either — but my best guess is we were a fairly mixed group: three women in their late 20s to mid-30s, two guys (one 30ish, one around 60). There were also a couple of Ted’s staffers, a Fuji educator, and a social media person floating about. No one, I think, would be surprised that I’m writing this, or misrepresented by it. The tone of the walk was clear: this camera is about fun.

That’s really why I’m writing. I’d followed the launch of the Fuji X half, read the reviews, seen the hot takes. I’d watched the YouTube videos. And the internet has spoken. People are hammering the camera for its lack of features and high price — many of them, predictably, without ever having touched it.

But this is a camera that doesn’t make sense until you touch it. Until you shoot it. Until you’re in a social setting, passing it around, pointing it at something, or someone, and seeing what you get.

If you’re not into this camera — that’s fine. Walk away. But don’t form an opinion from the spec sheet. Use it. Or if you can’t, imagine for a moment that you’re not the intended audience. That’s what I had to do — and it’s what prompted me to write this.

Because even after using the camera, I don’t understand it. In fact, I think it comes from a place I can’t  understand. And I say that not as criticism but with genuine curiosity and humility. The Fuji X half, in my view, wasn’t made to impress the familiar demographic of camera enthusiasts — the Western, mostly middle-aged men who think their opinions are perhaps a little more valid than those with whom they disagree (of which, full disclosure, I am one). It feels like it’s from another cultural context entirely. Japan, obviously — and maybe South Korea. A place where visual culture is being created in ways that the old guard of photo culture doesn’t dictate anymore. Maybe it’s for the K-Pop generation. Maybe it’s for TikTok. Maybe it’s for a mode of visual communication that doesn’t care what aperture it’s shot at — or what that even means.

There are things about the camera that didn’t make sense to me. And that’s okay. Maybe that’s part of the point.

I could actually do a likes and dislikes about this camera, as I have some of each, but I figure as soon as I do that I’m negating my thesis that it’s not about the specs. No one talks about the handling of an Instamatic — they just use it to record moments, places, friends. And yes, you might ask, “But David, have you not heard of this newfangled thing called the smartphone?”

To which I reply: you weren’t paying attention. I said you need to use it before forming an opinion.

And that’s the most interesting thing I found about the Fuji X half camera — it was not any one feature or quirk, but the fact that it exists at all. That someone at Fujifilm — or some group of someones — greenlit the idea, shepherded it through the design and manufacturing process, and got it into the hands of people who are going to use it.

Whether it succeeds or fails in the market? I have no idea. But we’ll find out. And we’ll find out not by reading the comments section or arguing specs, but by seeing whether or not people are  carrying it around a year or so from now, pointing it at something that matters to them.

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
If you think £2.99 a month is too little, then please subscribe and I can manually edit the subscription value for you – thank you very much in advance if this is what you would like to do!

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

About The Author

By David Hume
David Hume is an Australian visual artist and photographer, best known for work depicting the Australian landscape. He also worked as a commercial editorial photographer for over 25 years, and has held a number of photographic exhibitions. He currently exhibits both painting and photography.
View Profile

Comments

Gary on Fujifilm X half – A few frames taken with a Camera From a World I Don’t Understand

Comment posted: 22/06/2025

"It ain't me, babe." But I'm too old, too Western, and too unhip to be among the target audience. Same with the Ricoh half-frame film camera.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

thorsten on Fujifilm X half – A few frames taken with a Camera From a World I Don’t Understand

Comment posted: 22/06/2025

And fun is the selling point, isn't it dear David.
Your image up there reminded me a bit of Trent Parke, in the dark.
After testing the GFX100RF I skipped the Xhalb, but look forward to the X-E5 with the neat emulsionsimulationdial…
;))
/t
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Hume replied:

Comment posted: 22/06/2025

Trent Parke is a big compliment Thorsten! Cheers. (I don't think I'm going for the X-E5, but ironically I have a D Lux 8 that cost me almost as much!)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thorsten Wulff replied:

Comment posted: 22/06/2025

so turned out Fuji will send me an X-Half anyway... I'll take it to Cannes next week and get back to you, David!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Hume replied:

Comment posted: 22/06/2025

Brilliant Thorsten! I would love to see how you go.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

john on Fujifilm X half – A few frames taken with a Camera From a World I Don’t Understand

Comment posted: 22/06/2025

I just can't believe how bad the photos look from this camera, no shade to the author or any photographers using this camera, but on a basic technical level they just look TERRIBLE. Which is shocking coming from Fujifilm who's been spitting out some of the best OOC jpegs for more than a decade. I don't agree with their decision to not allow RAW recording but I sort of understand it, but I cannot understand just how objectively bad the jpegs this camera produces are. No matter the film simulation used they reek of bargain basement webcam sensor jammed in a plastic housing grocery checkout aisle level camera. Toy'r'us level camera. Baffling.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Hume replied:

Comment posted: 22/06/2025

No offence taken John but I think the shots are great. In any case they are just what I wanted, which is the main thing hey.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

John Bennett on Fujifilm X half – A few frames taken with a Camera From a World I Don’t Understand

Comment posted: 22/06/2025

Fun is the whole point for most of us. Or it should be. Speaking for myself, of course. Never going to be famous. Never going to change the world (even the world of photography). Time is fleeting. Better have fun.

I bought a Pentax 17 (half frame film camera) almost a year ago.. I use it all the time. More often than some of my serious cameras. It’s so much fun. The new Fujifilm X Half is tempting for the same reason.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/johnandrewbennett/albums/72177720321723362/
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Hume replied:

Comment posted: 22/06/2025

Checked out your flicker and those shots indeed look like fun, John! Good on you.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ryan Gardiner Johnson on Fujifilm X half – A few frames taken with a Camera From a World I Don’t Understand

Comment posted: 22/06/2025

This is the first Fuji (Digital) camera I’ve been interested in! The interface seems interesting as well as film simulations, kinda dig the idea of vertical frames ala 645 series. Also like the idea you can hide the pics until ‘the roll‘ is finished…
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Hume replied:

Comment posted: 22/06/2025

Yeah there's a lot I like about this camera and quite a bit I don't - I might collate some thoughts into a long comment.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Erik Brammer on Fujifilm X half – A few frames taken with a Camera From a World I Don’t Understand

Comment posted: 22/06/2025

Hi David,
Was it your deliberate ideas to only take pictures in landscape orientation?
I have my X-Pro2 which I still very much enjoy for the rare event that I prefer digital over film these days. No intentions to upgrade as long as it’s going strong.
Cheers,
Erik
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Hume replied:

Comment posted: 22/06/2025

Hi Erik - yes I was just taking photos for myself, and those are the kind I wanted to take. For what it's worth it's really easy to hold this thing vertically because it's so small. One side is flat and it sits in your hand really nicely. I had a Fuji 645 role film camera and I could never get the horizon straight in landscape mode! My X-Pro3 is going strong too. Does feel a bit bigger after using this thing though!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Roger on Fujifilm X half – A few frames taken with a Camera From a World I Don’t Understand

Comment posted: 22/06/2025

Like Erik, I am surprised that all the photos are landscape orientation when one of the camera’s main selling points is its portrait mode. Were they all cropped or was the camera turned round?
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith on Fujifilm X half – A few frames taken with a Camera From a World I Don’t Understand

Comment posted: 22/06/2025

The fact that it exists at all is indeed baffling.

Fuji had the camera buying world by the gnads some time ago with the release of the X100VI and as far as I know, they're still hard to get new. Why introduce new product when you can't supply demand for existing releases?
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scott Ferguson on Fujifilm X half – A few frames taken with a Camera From a World I Don’t Understand

Comment posted: 22/06/2025

Hey David,
Thanks for sharing. Until I got to the comments and revisited the photos a little more carefully, I thought this was a post about a half-frame 35mm camera! (My very first camera was a half frame 35mm Mercury from the 50's that was a hand me down from my dad.) I was going to quiz you about film stock and exposure on your night shots. I don't currently have a digital camera that I use other than my iphone, and am kind of holding off until I can afford something that will use my Leica glass (I know that sounds kind of stupid, but I'm in a freelance profession that can be a bit boom/bust.). While this is eliciting some strong reactions from the readership, to me it does look like it would be fun to run about snapping away.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Hume replied:

Comment posted: 22/06/2025

Hi - yeah this camera has really got me thinking about what I want in a little snaps camera. I deliberately didn't put any of those thoughts into the article but I might collect them all into one long comment. It's pretty good fun. I bought a like D Lux eight recently and I'm toying with whether I should just sell it and take the heavy loss. It's a great camera, but I think it's highlighted that I'm not a zoom guy. I haven't zooms since I had to do commercial stuff. Anyway, it's all good fun!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Harry Weide on Fujifilm X half – A few frames taken with a Camera From a World I Don’t Understand

Comment posted: 22/06/2025

Wait a minute. Isn't this camera by default portrait orientation? All the example photos are landscape. FWIW, I think this camera is ridiculous and would never buy one, but if you're testing it, shouldn't you use it in the spirit in which it is intended?
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Hume replied:

Comment posted: 22/06/2025

Hi Harry - I wasn't testing, I was just out for a hands-on photo walk for my own amusement so I used the camera like I wanted to. It's easy to hold it vertically. And I don't think "spirit it was intended" really holds water if you think about it. 35mm is only that orientation because of the way the film moves; we just inherited that and it became a default. Journos had to hold their SLRs vertically to shoot Nat Geo covers after all. (I don't think it's a coincidence that this camera is the same orientation as a phone screen BTW.) Cheers

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Hume on Fujifilm X half – A few frames taken with a Camera From a World I Don’t Understand

Comment posted: 23/06/2025

My Extended Thoughts Comment:

When I wrote this piece, I didn’t put in any of my thoughts about the camera itself or specs. The point - if you hadn’t guessed already - is that people were bashing it without having using it and to me the whole point of this thing is you really do need to use it.

So my conversation with Hamish along those lines led to me putting those thoughts down in the piece above. I didn’t know if I would respond to comments, but I usually do, and people had genuine questions so I thought I’d answer those. In the spirit of that I then decided that what I would do is write down my takeaways from using this camera.

It really has got me thinking. It’s got me thinking about what I would love in a small camera of about this size. Disclaimer: I kind of get annoyed when I see things on forums “Oh, I would buy it if only it had...” but if – as the rep told me – this is a new sensor, then surely it will be used in more than one camera. One thing this camera showed me was that this sensor is great, and I’ll certainly be keeping an eye open to see if it comes out somewhere else.

I’ll start by saying a lot of this camera is pretty silly in my opinion and I’m not thinking of buying one.

However, it’s got me looking for a camera with many of its features, and I’ll just go through those. I really think it’s very interesting in a lot of ways and if it points to something in the future, I’ll be super happy.

Another thing that happened is that I’ve recently bought a Leica D Lux 8 and the image quality of that is fantastic. What’s not fantastic the fact that it’s got zoom. And I really just don’t get on with that power zoom. I’ve got the option of selling it and losing maybe a third of the money I put into it or keeping it and seeing what happens. I still really don’t know what I’m going to do. Anyway, here’s what I took out of the experience of using the Fuji and I will really only deal with my takeaway important things. I’m not going to try and be in anyway complete.

The Sensor.
The Fuji rep told me that this was a new sensor. I’m hoping that we see it in a camera a bit like this sometime. It’s a great sensor. 17 megapixels and 1 inch is great. I found it clean up ISO 800 which is good enough for me.

No Raw no Problem.
Raw is nice but not mission-critical in a little camera. I found the JPEGs were very nice, very easy to work with. I think almost that a flat JPEG is the new Raw in a sensor like this. Let the camera do the heavy lifting in JPEG processing and give you something that you can tweak in Lightroom if you want to. If it were me, I’d shoot a flattish JPEG, then be crushing the blacks and throwing in an S curve in LR - basically a little Dave preset, and the convenience and small size of JPEG would well and truly compensate for any lost highlights and shadows that I’m pretty sure in camera software would sort out anyway.

A Lens that doesn’t Buzz.
Okay, this lens will not give you narrow DOF. That really doesn’t matter. I think a tiny camera is a little point-and-shoot NOT a portrait machine. F2 .8 is fine in terms of light gathering and the main thing is that when you switch the camera on it’s ready to go. You don’t have to switch it on and listen to it go buzz while the lens extends. The aperture clicks are nice and this thing is about the right size.

Optical Viewfinder
Yes,, this is not a great optical view finder but I would love an OVF with a dioptre and focus confirm overlay.

Xenon Flash.
This is a must have. I know this camera with its LED is versatile because you can use that for video as well as photos, but to me a good real Xenon flash is just what will differentiate from an iPhone and make it something fun.

Size and Ergonomics.
Yeah, it’s nice to hold in the hand. You can shoot it one handed and I can’t shoot my iPhone one handed even though young people can. This one is a bit plasticy and more metal would be nice.

That sort of wraps it up.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

James Evidon on Fujifilm X half – A few frames taken with a Camera From a World I Don’t Understand

Comment posted: 23/06/2025

I didn't jump on the 1/2 frame bandwagon when they were popular. I was impressed by the Olympus Pen F, but I bought the Olympus XA instead.
For the same size, I had a FF camera in the days when grain mattered. I'd still do the same today. There are 1/2 frame jewels out there that offer a lot more than this new one and can be rebuilt like new, like the Pen F. Good review by the way.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Hume replied:

Comment posted: 23/06/2025

Cheers James. Yes, I did once borrow a nice little Olympus half frame camera with a 30mm f1.7 lens. But I used that to shoot a stop motion movie, a bit like 35mm cine film was shot.. I never really wanted one for stills. I have an XA2, and used to use a Minox 35GT. I agree re grain.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

MarcusGunaratnam on Fujifilm X half – A few frames taken with a Camera From a World I Don’t Understand

Comment posted: 24/06/2025

I would rather buy an Olympus MFT (new)camera than this model as discribed . There are a selection of lenses for evey occassion, is waterproof and fully featured
Am I missing some thing here?
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Hume replied:

Comment posted: 24/06/2025

Hi Marcus. No, I don't think you're missing anything at all. I don't think this camera is for everyone, and it's not for me. Personally, I'm really interested in it because of the size and how that lens and the sensor can work together. If they made one that was less gimicky and had a couple more features I'd be all over it like a cheap suit. But that's just me - it's great that we have so many cameras to choose from. And like I said above, I get annoyed by people who go oh "I would buy it if only blah blah blah" which is just what I've done!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Andrew L on Fujifilm X half – A few frames taken with a Camera From a World I Don’t Understand

Comment posted: 24/06/2025

My only critique is the price - that's because I think Fujifilm sets a precedent on price whenever they release an innovative product without direct comparisons. This is just really expensive for what it is. It offers pretty close to higher-end smartphone quality for pretty close to a higher-end smartphone price. It means that, if any other manufacturers want to follow suit with a similar product, they'll use the price of this one as an excuse to price theirs as high, or higher. Same thing goes for the fixed-lens GFX100RF.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Hume replied:

Comment posted: 24/06/2025

Good point Andrew. And I'm interested to see how the market reacts to this price point. I think the GFX 100 RF is pretty cheap when you compare it to a Leica Q3 and the X-E5 is pretty competitive as well in my view, especially with the kit lens. I just bought a Leica D Lux 8 and the price of that hurt a bit, but having used the clean interface I'm thinking well the money doesn't matter. There's nothing else like this in terms of the ergonomics and so that's what I have to do if I want one. It's actually got me looking at secondhand Leica CLs even though they are watering compared to the XE line.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Hume on Fujifilm X half – A few frames taken with a Camera From a World I Don’t Understand

Comment posted: 24/06/2025

Good point Andrew. And I'm interested to see how the market reacts to this price point. I think the GFX 100 RF is pretty cheap when you compare it to a Leica Q3 and the X-E5 is pretty competitive as well in my view, especially with the kit lens. I just bought a Leica D Lux 8 and the price of that hurt a bit, but having used the clean interface I'm thinking well the money doesn't matter. There's nothing else like this in terms of the ergonomics and so that's what I have to do if I want one. It's actually got me looking at secondhand Leica CLs even though they are watering compared to the XE line.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *