Kodak Duaflex Camera with Flic Film Roll

Kodak Duaflex – Toronto-made – Fun or Fad?

By Sneakerzoom

Close to my birthday near the end of 2024, a friend of mine gave me box full of “old photography stuff” he had lying around, asking me if I would have use for it. Never saying ‘no’ to anything free, especially if it relates to photography, I happily accepted and took the box home. In there, amongst an old projector, some flash modules, a bunch of cables and other trinkets, were two old Kodak box cameras – and one appeared to be made right here in Toronto. My interest peaked.

Kodak Duaflex Camera Front View

Taking a good look at the two it appeared they were in cosmetically good condition, but the design of the Toronto Duaflex was just a bit more striking than the other one (a Duaflex II). I love this kind of styling – sleek and timeless (to a point). The glass looked good, the viewfinder looked…interesting and the innards were near mint. Score! Look at how bright that viewfinder is – it’s really a joy to shoot with. The camera looks like a toy camera but feels like something a bit more upscale, not flimsy at all and most likely due to the sturdy aluminum used in its construction. This particular Duaflex appeared to have been made in Toronto, somewhere between 1947 and 1950, and according to this website only 882 were made. I was elated holding a piece of local history in my hands.

The camera sports a 75mm, f/15 single-element, fixed-focus Kodet lens set in a leaf shutter that probably operates somewhere between 1/30 and 1/60 seconds. There’s also a Bulb mode but I have not use that (yet). And did I mention the huge viewfinder?

Kodak Duaflex Camera Top View

But now what to do. On the top it clearly states “USE KODAK FILM 620” – what the heck is that? Afraid I just got myself a dud requiring some ancient out-of-production film format I started up the googol machine I quickly found that 620 is he same as 120 film but spooled onto a different pin. Okay, this is getting better now. Then I found that the people over at Flic Film were kind enough to re-spool some B/W film onto this ‘620’ pin and sell it in a nifty little box. We’re in business.

The business-end of things had to wait until the early summer of 2025, when I found an opportunity to use this little box in some lieu time during a Dragon Boat Race on the Toronto Islands. I didn’t shoot any dragons nor sank any boats but used the opportunity to walk around the sizeable main island in search of some snapshots. I quickly found that cameras like these should really be able to hold extra long film rolls so one isn’t limited to 12 shots; 38 or 46 would be much preferable. It’s so easy and quick to use (for lack of focussing and that easy ‘glance and click’ viewfinder). An hour or two later I was out of film and on my way back to the races. Fun fact: there were around 5,000 participants that day, not counting spectators – yet at times I felt almost alone on the island. It’s a great place to be in summer.

A lifeguard boat on a beach on the Toronto Islands

Wiki-interject: the Toronto Islands are 15 man-made structures which originated as sand-bars from the deposition of sand from the Scarborough Bluffs by Lake Ontario currents, and were since the 1790s build up to accommodate a lighthouse, summer retreats for the wealthy and a water treatment facility for the mainland. Nowadays, you can find ferry and water taxi services, an international airport, a nude beach, a marina, an entertainment park, disc-golf courses, leisure parks and other beaches there, as well as residents living on-island year-round with a church, restaurants and bars. And notably: no cars, but plenty of kayaks and bicycles and depending on where you are, the stunning backdrop of the Toronto skyline. And yes, that part of the lake freezes over during a -20C winter weather spell so good luck to you if you forgot your BBQ sauce.

Bicyclists on the Toronto Islands

Then there’s the film. The box simply states 100ASA film, but I have no idea which it is. Could it be Fomapan Classic 100? Who knows. What I do know is that I don’t like it, not one bit. Granted, the camera didn’t help: there are flares, mega-soft corners, and an overall glaring lack of contrast. Not that I was expecting miracles from this tiny box, but I had higher hopes. Perhaps, if I could get my hands on some colour 620 film…

A single big tree A church on the Toronto Islands Tree canopy providing some shade in summer Marina on the Toronto Islands with the CN Tower in the backgrond

And there you have it. I am grateful for this gift and all in all I’d recommend grabbing this camera or one just like it if you can. It’s a lot of fun to use. But if you’re crafty -unlike me- and you are able to re-spool film yourself, why not use some Vision3 or Ektachrome (and give me a call).

Thanks for reading!

…just get closer on sneakerzoom.ca

Share this post:

About The Author

By Sneakerzoom
Very casual (read: lazy) picture taker from Scarborough, Ontario. Particularly fond of expired film and cheap cameras.
Read More Articles From Sneakerzoom

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £3.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Jeff on Kodak Duaflex – Toronto-made – Fun or Fad?

Comment posted: 27/03/2026

This was my mother's main camera. She even had the Sports Finder Accessory : )
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Sneakerzoom replied:

Comment posted: 27/03/2026

Hi Jeff...(bewildered face) there is a sports finder accessory??!!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Charles Young on Kodak Duaflex – Toronto-made – Fun or Fad?

Comment posted: 27/03/2026

HI Sneakerzoom:.


I have a similar TLR. I used box cameras as a kid. Bummer that I couldn't get close to my subject.

You might try this:
1. Shoot with ASA 400 film and hold a red filter over the lens, and shoot in sunny conditons. Should be good for bringing out the clouds.
Then without the red filter it is good for lower light situations.
2. For closer work, informal portraits, etc get cheap "reading glasses" from a Dollar Store to use as a close up lens. The "power" of the reading glasses is the inverse of the focal length in meters. e.g. "power 1" is 1 meter focal length, "power 2" is a half meter focal length.
Chuck
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Sneakerzoom replied:

Comment posted: 27/03/2026

Hi Charles, thank you for your response! Those are some crafty tips...I may put some into practise, especially for portraits as I think this camera could be a cool alternative for a casual portrait box. I have a few 'close-up' bayonet lenses lying around I may be able to McGyver onto the front...

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Bob Janes on Kodak Duaflex – Toronto-made – Fun or Fad?

Comment posted: 27/03/2026

One thing I have seen people do is to take digital shots through the viewfinders of similar cameras.
https://www.dyxum.com/dforum/autumn-ttv_topic68132_post769759.html?KW=flex#769759
here my friend Manfred in Sweden called them TTV (through the viewfinder) shots.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Sneakerzoom replied:

Comment posted: 27/03/2026

Hi Bob! Thank you for reading. Hmm you see I get the idea of that - but it feels to me like a hack to get the lens characteristics in-camera (phone) without using a filter...whereas the lens+film combination gets lost and one would end up with an analog-digital hybrid photo of sorts. The digital part in that negates the whole exercise for me.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Gary Smith on Kodak Duaflex – Toronto-made – Fun or Fad?

Comment posted: 27/03/2026

Nobody ever gives me anything. :-(
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Eric Rose replied:

Comment posted: 27/03/2026

We give lots of love Gary! Eric

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Sneakerzoom replied:

Comment posted: 27/03/2026

Hey Gary, when is your birthday? I have another one... :)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Gary Smith replied:

Comment posted: 27/03/2026

Thanks Eric! :-)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Tony Warren on Kodak Duaflex – Toronto-made – Fun or Fad?

Comment posted: 27/03/2026

A rewarding exercise for sure. There were two lens options for these models I understand so if your Duaflex II has the focusing version you could give it a try. The shot of the trees looking up is quite sharp because the subject is all at the hyperfocal distance of the lens, the church shot shows the same sharpness in some of the weatherboarding.

I have shot a few older box cameras and have been surprised at what they could produce but I have always had to work on contrast and sharpness in post to get the best result.

The suggestion fron Charles is work exploring. Filters can make a big difference.

Like you I admire the styling of the camera.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Sneakerzoom replied:

Comment posted: 27/03/2026

Hi Tony, thanks for reading! I'm afraid mine is the poor man's version without any focusing except for one's feet. During this walk I wasn't too bothered about what the sweet spot of this lens is as it was the first time I handled it and merely wanted to have an idea of what it could do. But you're right - these simple cameras can surprise you. I've had (unfortunately no longer do) an Agfa Clack which I used for a number of years, and it yielded surprisingly sharp images - possible due to the curved film back. I have to admit that sometimes I let the styling of the machine sway my decision to purchase one, which isn't the best of purchasing advice I could give someone. Usability should be first, but mannn...some of these things are just so beautifully designed.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Jeffery Luhn on Kodak Duaflex – Toronto-made – Fun or Fad?

Comment posted: 28/03/2026

Dear Sneakerzoom,
That camera is, indeed, a beautiful piece of history. So many Kodak cameras were dressed up versions of the super successful Box Brownie. I can imagine men in suits at a conference table ignoring the advice of a designer to make a model that focused and had several shutter speeds . "That's not our core business." Was what I imagine the response to be. Attractive, yes. A good performer? No. It is a good shelf piece. I have the II version, by the way. But I have Rollei and Mamiya TLRs too. The Kodak is a good conversation piece!!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Sneakerzoom replied:

Comment posted: 28/03/2026

Hi Jeffery, thanks for responding! You're of course absolutely right, this is by no means a camera one should take seriously - aside from its historical impact and, in my opinion, aesthetics. A while ago I found an absolutely mint Ricohflex in an antique shop. Of course, it suffered the dreaded fused lens element, so a friend of mine is helping tearing the camera apart and getting it back to working condition. Would that be worth having done 'professionally'? Probably not. Will it -if successful- make for a good looking camera that can take surprisingly nice pictures? Hopefully yes. Especially with the 35mm converter that came with it.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Christopher Pye on Kodak Duaflex – Toronto-made – Fun or Fad?

Comment posted: 30/03/2026

Hi Sneakerzoom,
Fellow Canadian here! I believe Sylvain meant this was the 882nd camera on his website's inventory, not that only 882 of them were made. It was made for four years and I find it quite hard to believe that only such an amount was made for the Canadian market! I'm also a fellow Ricoh Color Back owner, and quite excited to find the time to shoot some 35mm in it!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Sneakerzoom replied:

Comment posted: 30/03/2026

Hey Christopher, thanks for your comment! Thank you for the correction and your assumption is plausible; 882 sounds like a low production number for the Canadian market. That's what I get for not researching the information I find on the interweb! Regarding the Ricoh, I hope we can put it back together -in working condition- sometime soon so I can take it somewhere interesting down here in the GTA. I've never shot 35mm in a medium format camera before. Could be fun, eh?

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *