Sasquatch 617 – Why We Built Our Own 6×17 Panoramic Film Camera

By Ellie Kim

There’s something quietly addictive about panoramic film photography. The way it stretches time and space across a single frame feels very different from shooting standard formats.

We’re Derek and Ellie, two industrial designers based in California, and we genuinely love shooting film. We had long been interested in the X-Pan, but realistically, it was far beyond what we could afford. Instead of letting that idea go, we started asking a different question: what if we tried to build our own 6×17 camera?

From a Personal Project to a Real Camera

The Sasquatch 617 began as a very personal project. At the time, we already had a 3D printer at home, design backgrounds, and a lot of curiosity. We weren’t trying to start a camera company. We simply wanted a tool that would let us shoot panoramic film in a way that felt honest, mechanical, and hands-on.

Early prototypes were rough and purely functional. We focused on light-tightness, film flatness, and basic usability. Once we started shooting real rolls through those early versions, we realized that the camera wasn’t just working, it was genuinely fun to use. The format encouraged slower shooting, careful composition, and a deeper connection to each frame.

That was the moment we decided to refine the design properly and see how far we could take it.

Why 6×17?

We chose the 6×17 format because it feels unapologetically panoramic. It’s wide enough to demand intention, but still grounded in the tactile rhythm of medium format film. Each roll gives you only four frames, which naturally slows everything down.

For us, that limitation is part of the appeal. Shooting with the Sasquatch 617 feels closer to large format thinking, but without the complexity of sheet film.

Materials and Making

From the beginning, we wanted the camera to feel solid, honest, and durable. The core structure of the Sasquatch 617 is built around a 304 stainless steel frame. It provides rigidity, alignment accuracy, and a reassuring weight in the hands.

The body itself is made from 3D-printed PC and PETG components. Using 3D printing wasn’t just a convenience. It allowed us to iterate quickly, test tolerances, and refine ergonomics over time. Every design decision was tested through actual shooting, not just CAD models.

All finishing and assembly are done by hand. Because of this, each camera has small variations: subtle brushed textures on the stainless steel, or minor cosmetic marks on the printed parts. We see these not as flaws, but as evidence that the camera is made, not mass-produced.

Lens Compatibility

The Sasquatch 617 was designed and tested specifically around two lenses:

Schneider Kreuznach Super Angulon 90mm f/8
Nikon Nikkor SW 90mm f/8

We verified compatibility with Copal #0 and Synchro-Compur shutters so far. Rather than trying to support every possible option, we chose to fully optimize the camera for these lenses to ensure consistent results, reliable focusing, and proper coverage.

Shooting Experience

Using the Sasquatch 617 is intentionally simple. There’s no meter, no automation, and no shortcuts. You slow down, set your focus, think carefully about framing, and commit to the shot. When you finally see the negatives, the reward feels earned.

The panoramic frame changes how you approach scenes. Horizontal movement, negative space, and environmental context become just as important as the subject itself. It encourages you to look longer and wait more.

Sharing the Sasquatch

What started as a personal solution eventually felt worth sharing. After refining the design and spending a lot of time shooting with the camera, we successfully funded the Sasquatch 617 on Kickstarter last year. This year, the Sasquatch 617 made the transition into retail, allowing more film shooters to experience it.

Nikon Nikkor 90mm f8 | Fujifilm Velvia 50 | Yosemite Valley Bridge
Nikon Nikkor 90mm f8 | Fujifilm Velvia 50 | Alishan, Taiwan
Schneider Kreuznach 90mm f8 | Kodak Gold | The Huntington Library
Schneider Kreuznach 90mm f8 | Kodak Portra 400 | In-N-Out Near LAX
Schneider Kreuznach 90mm f8 | Kodak Portra 400 | Marina Del Rey

Photographing with a camera we designed ourselves brings a very different feeling to the process. The Sasquatch 617 wasn’t something we had to adapt to, it was built around how we wanted to shoot from the beginning. Because of that, using it carries a deeper sense of meaning for us.

In many ways, the experience of creating and shooting with this camera has been more valuable than simply owning a camera we once admired from afar.

Now that the Sasquatch 617 is being used by photographers around the world, the project continues to grow. Seeing how others approach the format and sharing the camera with the community has become one of the most rewarding parts of the journey.

Share this post:

About The Author

By Ellie Kim
We're two industrial designers with a passion for film photography, making the kind of camera that we've always wanted. We designed, prototyped, and fabricated everything ourselves and are proud of the products that we build.
Read More Articles From Ellie Kim

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £3.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Ibraar Hussain on Sasquatch 617 – Why We Built Our Own 6×17 Panoramic Film Camera

Comment posted: 29/03/2026

Very good! Excellent work and you guys should be fully commended for this
Nice to see panoramic trend continuing here!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Mike Brooks on Sasquatch 617 – Why We Built Our Own 6×17 Panoramic Film Camera

Comment posted: 29/03/2026

That's pretty awesome. Nice job. I have a Fuji GX617 that sees occasional use, but the cost of the camera also brings occasional thoughts of selling it. Cool to see something new and affordable! Congratulations on getting it to market
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Greg Hammond on Sasquatch 617 – Why We Built Our Own 6×17 Panoramic Film Camera

Comment posted: 29/03/2026

Nicely done! I’m struggling between resisting the GAS and succumbing to it! I’ve already got my Shen-Hao and two pinhole 6x17 cameras that don’t see nearly enough use. Still . . ..
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Gary Paudler on Sasquatch 617 – Why We Built Our Own 6×17 Panoramic Film Camera

Comment posted: 29/03/2026

Beautiful work! What a great accomplishment!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Gary Smith on Sasquatch 617 – Why We Built Our Own 6×17 Panoramic Film Camera

Comment posted: 29/03/2026

The camera is gorgeous! The example shots here and on your website are also gorgeous! I was surprised that the price is so reasonable. I'm not sure that I'm ready to make the jump to such a format. I've shot 4 x 5 sheets and I can see how the Sasquatch would be a LOT easier! Congratulations on launching a new film camera!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Jeffery Luhn on Sasquatch 617 – Why We Built Our Own 6×17 Panoramic Film Camera

Comment posted: 30/03/2026

This is a VERY NICE LOOKING CAMERA! I have a WillTravel 4x5 camera with a 65mm lens. I like it a lot, but it is a project to take a bag of holders into the field. A roll film pano-view camera is such a temptation! Three questions::
1- The width of the image is approximately 6.8 inches. Am I right that the user must buy a 90mm super angulon, not just an angulon?
2- I like to print my images. The Omega enlarger I have accommodates 4x5. Do you have experience printing film from your camera?
3- If you have a solution for printing, please share it with me.
Thanks for a cool product!!
Jeffery
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Omar Tibi on Sasquatch 617 – Why We Built Our Own 6×17 Panoramic Film Camera

Comment posted: 30/03/2026

Hey, I remember seeing you guys' camera in the Kickstarter last year! Glad to see that it's made it to retail. More new cameras, especially ones for such interesting/niche applications like panoramic shots, is only a great thing for the film community. Wishing you all much success in the Sasquatch and I'd love to try it someday too!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Alexander Seidler on Sasquatch 617 – Why We Built Our Own 6×17 Panoramic Film Camera

Comment posted: 30/03/2026

Great camera and results, Ellie !
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Tony Warren on Sasquatch 617 – Why We Built Our Own 6×17 Panoramic Film Camera

Comment posted: 30/03/2026

Congratulations on such an accomplished product Ellie. I completely agree that there is great satisfaction to be had from making something yourself. And your photography is up there with your product. The SS chassis is a definite plus and the aesthetics have been very professionally handled as well as the practicalities, the details are superbly handled.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


@nathanspics486 on Sasquatch 617 – Why We Built Our Own 6×17 Panoramic Film Camera

Comment posted: 31/03/2026

I like these panoramic designs, but why was 6x17 selected by older designers - is it effectively two 6x7 frames plus the space in between? I figure that 6x12, 6x14, or 6x18 would be easier to design if the space between frames were negligible, but 3cm seems like a pretty big gap.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *